Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS): clinicopathological study of 45 cases

Background Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a rare and severe adverse drug reaction. Large detailed studies of histopathological features of DRESS are sparse and suggest an association between keratinocyte damage and the severity of visceral involvement. Objectives To...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2015-11, Vol.29 (11), p.2199-2205
Hauptverfasser: Skowron, F., Bensaid, B., Balme, B., Depaepe, L., Kanitakis, J., Nosbaum, A., Maucort-Boulch, D., Bérard, F., D'Incan, M., Kardaun, S.H., Nicolas, J.F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2205
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2199
container_title Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
container_volume 29
creator Skowron, F.
Bensaid, B.
Balme, B.
Depaepe, L.
Kanitakis, J.
Nosbaum, A.
Maucort-Boulch, D.
Bérard, F.
D'Incan, M.
Kardaun, S.H.
Nicolas, J.F.
description Background Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a rare and severe adverse drug reaction. Large detailed studies of histopathological features of DRESS are sparse and suggest an association between keratinocyte damage and the severity of visceral involvement. Objectives To describe the dermatopathological features in a large series of DRESS and their possible association with clinical features and the severity of the disease. Methods A retrospective analysis of the clinicobiological and dermatopathological features in a monocentric cohort of patients with DRESS. Results From January 2005 to January 2013, 45 patients were validated as probable or definite cases of DRESS. The median age was 64 years (range 3–87). The most frequent clinical and biological features included: fever ≥38.5°C (95%), facial oedema (72%), enlarged lymph nodes (51%), visceral involvement (75%), blood eosinophilia (97%) and atypical lymphocytes (82%). Severe DRESS occurred in 24% and a fatal outcome in 6% of patients. Histopathological analysis showed that no specific histopathological pattern was characteristic for DRESS. However, several changes in different cutaneous compartments were observed in 2 of 3 of cases. Spongiosis (55%) and keratinocyte damage (53%) were the most common epidermal changes. Spongiosis was associated with non‐severe DRESS (P = 0.041) whereas confluent keratinocyte necrosis correlated with severe DRESS (P = 0.011). Vascular changes were frequent (88%). A moderate dermal perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate was invariably present, containing eosinophils, neutrophils and/or atypical lymphocytes in 57% of cases. Conclusions Epidermal changes are indicative for the severity of DRESS.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jdv.13212
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01953678v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1727987887</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4672-75f9b4e1ece5459843cb35642b202e57632936601cbb6413764456ca15b9ef693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1P3DAQhq2KqizQA38A-QiHgL8d94ZYuttqBRUfbW-W4ziswYnTOAH23zewsD11LjMaPfMc5gVgH6NjPNbJffl4jCnB5AOYYCbyjKKcboEJUkRkSnG1DXZSukcIYczzT2CbCMqZpGwCymk33MHOGdv72MAn3y-hi8k3sV364A00TQnTKvWu9nYc6raPdYKH06vz6-ujL9AG33gbW9MvY4h33poAUz-UKxgryDi0Jrm0Bz5WJiT3-a3vgtuv5zdn82xxOft2drrILBOSZJJXqmAOO-s44ypn1BaUC0YKgojjUlCiqBAI26IQDFMpGOPCGswL5Sqh6C44WnuXJui287XpVjoar-enC_2yQ1hxKmT-iEf2cM22XfwzuNTr2ifrQjCNi0PSWBKpcpnn8p_WdjGlzlUbN0b6JQA9BqBfAxjZgzftUNSu3JDvHx-BkzXw5INb_d-kv09_viuz9YUfU3jeXJjuQQtJJde_Lmaa_OBCXFCmf9O_2n6cMA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1727987887</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS): clinicopathological study of 45 cases</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Skowron, F. ; Bensaid, B. ; Balme, B. ; Depaepe, L. ; Kanitakis, J. ; Nosbaum, A. ; Maucort-Boulch, D. ; Bérard, F. ; D'Incan, M. ; Kardaun, S.H. ; Nicolas, J.F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Skowron, F. ; Bensaid, B. ; Balme, B. ; Depaepe, L. ; Kanitakis, J. ; Nosbaum, A. ; Maucort-Boulch, D. ; Bérard, F. ; D'Incan, M. ; Kardaun, S.H. ; Nicolas, J.F.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a rare and severe adverse drug reaction. Large detailed studies of histopathological features of DRESS are sparse and suggest an association between keratinocyte damage and the severity of visceral involvement. Objectives To describe the dermatopathological features in a large series of DRESS and their possible association with clinical features and the severity of the disease. Methods A retrospective analysis of the clinicobiological and dermatopathological features in a monocentric cohort of patients with DRESS. Results From January 2005 to January 2013, 45 patients were validated as probable or definite cases of DRESS. The median age was 64 years (range 3–87). The most frequent clinical and biological features included: fever ≥38.5°C (95%), facial oedema (72%), enlarged lymph nodes (51%), visceral involvement (75%), blood eosinophilia (97%) and atypical lymphocytes (82%). Severe DRESS occurred in 24% and a fatal outcome in 6% of patients. Histopathological analysis showed that no specific histopathological pattern was characteristic for DRESS. However, several changes in different cutaneous compartments were observed in 2 of 3 of cases. Spongiosis (55%) and keratinocyte damage (53%) were the most common epidermal changes. Spongiosis was associated with non‐severe DRESS (P = 0.041) whereas confluent keratinocyte necrosis correlated with severe DRESS (P = 0.011). Vascular changes were frequent (88%). A moderate dermal perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate was invariably present, containing eosinophils, neutrophils and/or atypical lymphocytes in 57% of cases. Conclusions Epidermal changes are indicative for the severity of DRESS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0926-9959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3083</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jdv.13212</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26354734</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bacteriology ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome - complications ; Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome - pathology ; Edema - etiology ; Epidermis - pathology ; Face ; Female ; Fever - etiology ; Humans ; Immunology ; Keratinocytes - pathology ; Life Sciences ; Lymphatic Diseases - etiology ; Lymphocytes - pathology ; Male ; Microbiology and Parasitology ; Middle Aged ; Necrosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Severity of Illness Index ; Virology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 2015-11, Vol.29 (11), p.2199-2205</ispartof><rights>2015 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology</rights><rights>2015 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4672-75f9b4e1ece5459843cb35642b202e57632936601cbb6413764456ca15b9ef693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4672-75f9b4e1ece5459843cb35642b202e57632936601cbb6413764456ca15b9ef693</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2281-9052 ; 0000-0003-0042-7787 ; 0000-0003-4204-803X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjdv.13212$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjdv.13212$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,1413,27906,27907,45556,45557</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26354734$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01953678$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Skowron, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bensaid, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balme, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Depaepe, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanitakis, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nosbaum, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maucort-Boulch, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bérard, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Incan, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kardaun, S.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolas, J.F.</creatorcontrib><title>Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS): clinicopathological study of 45 cases</title><title>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology</title><addtitle>J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol</addtitle><description>Background Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a rare and severe adverse drug reaction. Large detailed studies of histopathological features of DRESS are sparse and suggest an association between keratinocyte damage and the severity of visceral involvement. Objectives To describe the dermatopathological features in a large series of DRESS and their possible association with clinical features and the severity of the disease. Methods A retrospective analysis of the clinicobiological and dermatopathological features in a monocentric cohort of patients with DRESS. Results From January 2005 to January 2013, 45 patients were validated as probable or definite cases of DRESS. The median age was 64 years (range 3–87). The most frequent clinical and biological features included: fever ≥38.5°C (95%), facial oedema (72%), enlarged lymph nodes (51%), visceral involvement (75%), blood eosinophilia (97%) and atypical lymphocytes (82%). Severe DRESS occurred in 24% and a fatal outcome in 6% of patients. Histopathological analysis showed that no specific histopathological pattern was characteristic for DRESS. However, several changes in different cutaneous compartments were observed in 2 of 3 of cases. Spongiosis (55%) and keratinocyte damage (53%) were the most common epidermal changes. Spongiosis was associated with non‐severe DRESS (P = 0.041) whereas confluent keratinocyte necrosis correlated with severe DRESS (P = 0.011). Vascular changes were frequent (88%). A moderate dermal perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate was invariably present, containing eosinophils, neutrophils and/or atypical lymphocytes in 57% of cases. Conclusions Epidermal changes are indicative for the severity of DRESS.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bacteriology</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome - complications</subject><subject>Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome - pathology</subject><subject>Edema - etiology</subject><subject>Epidermis - pathology</subject><subject>Face</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fever - etiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunology</subject><subject>Keratinocytes - pathology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Lymphatic Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Lymphocytes - pathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Microbiology and Parasitology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Necrosis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Virology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0926-9959</issn><issn>1468-3083</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1P3DAQhq2KqizQA38A-QiHgL8d94ZYuttqBRUfbW-W4ziswYnTOAH23zewsD11LjMaPfMc5gVgH6NjPNbJffl4jCnB5AOYYCbyjKKcboEJUkRkSnG1DXZSukcIYczzT2CbCMqZpGwCymk33MHOGdv72MAn3y-hi8k3sV364A00TQnTKvWu9nYc6raPdYKH06vz6-ujL9AG33gbW9MvY4h33poAUz-UKxgryDi0Jrm0Bz5WJiT3-a3vgtuv5zdn82xxOft2drrILBOSZJJXqmAOO-s44ypn1BaUC0YKgojjUlCiqBAI26IQDFMpGOPCGswL5Sqh6C44WnuXJui287XpVjoar-enC_2yQ1hxKmT-iEf2cM22XfwzuNTr2ifrQjCNi0PSWBKpcpnn8p_WdjGlzlUbN0b6JQA9BqBfAxjZgzftUNSu3JDvHx-BkzXw5INb_d-kv09_viuz9YUfU3jeXJjuQQtJJde_Lmaa_OBCXFCmf9O_2n6cMA</recordid><startdate>201511</startdate><enddate>201511</enddate><creator>Skowron, F.</creator><creator>Bensaid, B.</creator><creator>Balme, B.</creator><creator>Depaepe, L.</creator><creator>Kanitakis, J.</creator><creator>Nosbaum, A.</creator><creator>Maucort-Boulch, D.</creator><creator>Bérard, F.</creator><creator>D'Incan, M.</creator><creator>Kardaun, S.H.</creator><creator>Nicolas, J.F.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2281-9052</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0042-7787</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4204-803X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201511</creationdate><title>Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS): clinicopathological study of 45 cases</title><author>Skowron, F. ; Bensaid, B. ; Balme, B. ; Depaepe, L. ; Kanitakis, J. ; Nosbaum, A. ; Maucort-Boulch, D. ; Bérard, F. ; D'Incan, M. ; Kardaun, S.H. ; Nicolas, J.F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4672-75f9b4e1ece5459843cb35642b202e57632936601cbb6413764456ca15b9ef693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bacteriology</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome - complications</topic><topic>Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome - pathology</topic><topic>Edema - etiology</topic><topic>Epidermis - pathology</topic><topic>Face</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fever - etiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunology</topic><topic>Keratinocytes - pathology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Lymphatic Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Lymphocytes - pathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Microbiology and Parasitology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Necrosis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Virology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Skowron, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bensaid, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balme, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Depaepe, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanitakis, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nosbaum, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maucort-Boulch, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bérard, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Incan, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kardaun, S.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolas, J.F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Skowron, F.</au><au>Bensaid, B.</au><au>Balme, B.</au><au>Depaepe, L.</au><au>Kanitakis, J.</au><au>Nosbaum, A.</au><au>Maucort-Boulch, D.</au><au>Bérard, F.</au><au>D'Incan, M.</au><au>Kardaun, S.H.</au><au>Nicolas, J.F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS): clinicopathological study of 45 cases</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology</jtitle><addtitle>J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol</addtitle><date>2015-11</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2199</spage><epage>2205</epage><pages>2199-2205</pages><issn>0926-9959</issn><eissn>1468-3083</eissn><abstract>Background Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a rare and severe adverse drug reaction. Large detailed studies of histopathological features of DRESS are sparse and suggest an association between keratinocyte damage and the severity of visceral involvement. Objectives To describe the dermatopathological features in a large series of DRESS and their possible association with clinical features and the severity of the disease. Methods A retrospective analysis of the clinicobiological and dermatopathological features in a monocentric cohort of patients with DRESS. Results From January 2005 to January 2013, 45 patients were validated as probable or definite cases of DRESS. The median age was 64 years (range 3–87). The most frequent clinical and biological features included: fever ≥38.5°C (95%), facial oedema (72%), enlarged lymph nodes (51%), visceral involvement (75%), blood eosinophilia (97%) and atypical lymphocytes (82%). Severe DRESS occurred in 24% and a fatal outcome in 6% of patients. Histopathological analysis showed that no specific histopathological pattern was characteristic for DRESS. However, several changes in different cutaneous compartments were observed in 2 of 3 of cases. Spongiosis (55%) and keratinocyte damage (53%) were the most common epidermal changes. Spongiosis was associated with non‐severe DRESS (P = 0.041) whereas confluent keratinocyte necrosis correlated with severe DRESS (P = 0.011). Vascular changes were frequent (88%). A moderate dermal perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate was invariably present, containing eosinophils, neutrophils and/or atypical lymphocytes in 57% of cases. Conclusions Epidermal changes are indicative for the severity of DRESS.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26354734</pmid><doi>10.1111/jdv.13212</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2281-9052</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0042-7787</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4204-803X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0926-9959
ispartof Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 2015-11, Vol.29 (11), p.2199-2205
issn 0926-9959
1468-3083
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01953678v1
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bacteriology
Child
Child, Preschool
Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome - complications
Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome - pathology
Edema - etiology
Epidermis - pathology
Face
Female
Fever - etiology
Humans
Immunology
Keratinocytes - pathology
Life Sciences
Lymphatic Diseases - etiology
Lymphocytes - pathology
Male
Microbiology and Parasitology
Middle Aged
Necrosis
Retrospective Studies
Severity of Illness Index
Virology
Young Adult
title Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS): clinicopathological study of 45 cases
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T10%3A59%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Drug%20reaction%20with%20eosinophilia%20and%20systemic%20symptoms%20(DRESS):%20clinicopathological%20study%20of%2045%20cases&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20European%20Academy%20of%20Dermatology%20and%20Venereology&rft.au=Skowron,%20F.&rft.date=2015-11&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2199&rft.epage=2205&rft.pages=2199-2205&rft.issn=0926-9959&rft.eissn=1468-3083&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jdv.13212&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1727987887%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1727987887&rft_id=info:pmid/26354734&rfr_iscdi=true