French People’s Views on the Appropriateness of Disclosing an Unsolicited Finding in Medical Genetics: A Preliminary Study
With progress in medical genetics, genome-sequencing techniques are becoming more and more efficient. However, these genetic tests may lead to the detection of unsolicited genetic findings, i.e. findings that are not the primary purpose of the screening. New ethical issues have emerged, in particula...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Universitas psychologica 2018-01, Vol.17 (4), p.1-11 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 11 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Universitas psychologica |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Rosier, Marion Guedj, Myriam Calvas, Patrick Julia, Sophie Garnier, Christelle Cambon-Thomsen, Anne Muñoz Sastre, Maria Teresa |
description | With progress in medical genetics, genome-sequencing techniques are becoming more and more efficient. However, these genetic tests may lead to the detection of unsolicited genetic findings, i.e. findings that are not the primary purpose of the screening. New ethical issues have emerged, in particular the question of whether to disclose these unsolicited findings to the patient or not. Forty-seven patients under supervision in a Medical Genetics service, 15 health professionals and 107 members of the French general population expressed their opinion regarding the appropriateness of disclosing an unsolicited high penetrance genetic finding in 36 scenarios containing three pieces of information on: a) patient information and consent;b) possibility of prevention and treatment of the detected genetic disease; and c) disclosure of the results by the physician (e.g., no disclosure of the unsolicited results). Four positions were found that were called Respect for patient’s autonomy, Beneficence to patient, Non-maleficence, and Always appropriate. |
doi_str_mv | 10.11144/Javeriana.upsy17-4.fpva |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>hal_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01952989v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_HAL_hal_01952989v1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-71c4dccba744c6808c8f9e534ba530ed10c9ddd8e07bd39e0c0d3a3b564103e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kNFKwzAYhYMoOKfvkFsvOpMmbRrvynSbMnGg8zakyV8X6dLSdJOBF76Gr-eT2Dnx6ofDOYfzfwhhSkaUUs6v7vUWWqe9Hm2asKMi4qOy2eojNIgJpVEshDhGA5omIpJxKk7RWQhvhCSCSTFAH5MWvFnhBdRNBd-fXwG_OHgPuPa4WwHOm6atm76_Aw-hl0t844Kp6uD8K9YeL32oK2dcBxZPnLd72Xn8ANYZXeFpH-ucCdc4x4sWKrd2Xrc7_NRt7O4cnZS6CnDxd4doObl9Hs-i-eP0bpzPIxNL1kWCGm6NKbTg3KQZyUxWSkgYL3TCCFhKjLTWZkBEYZkEYohlmhVJyilhINgQXR56V7pS_TPrfoGqtVOzfK72GqEyiWUmt7T3ZgevaesQWij_A5SoX-Lqn7g6EFdc7YmzH3X9fXA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>French People’s Views on the Appropriateness of Disclosing an Unsolicited Finding in Medical Genetics: A Preliminary Study</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Rosier, Marion ; Guedj, Myriam ; Calvas, Patrick ; Julia, Sophie ; Garnier, Christelle ; Cambon-Thomsen, Anne ; Muñoz Sastre, Maria Teresa</creator><creatorcontrib>Rosier, Marion ; Guedj, Myriam ; Calvas, Patrick ; Julia, Sophie ; Garnier, Christelle ; Cambon-Thomsen, Anne ; Muñoz Sastre, Maria Teresa</creatorcontrib><description>With progress in medical genetics, genome-sequencing techniques are becoming more and more efficient. However, these genetic tests may lead to the detection of unsolicited genetic findings, i.e. findings that are not the primary purpose of the screening. New ethical issues have emerged, in particular the question of whether to disclose these unsolicited findings to the patient or not. Forty-seven patients under supervision in a Medical Genetics service, 15 health professionals and 107 members of the French general population expressed their opinion regarding the appropriateness of disclosing an unsolicited high penetrance genetic finding in 36 scenarios containing three pieces of information on: a) patient information and consent;b) possibility of prevention and treatment of the detected genetic disease; and c) disclosure of the results by the physician (e.g., no disclosure of the unsolicited results). Four positions were found that were called Respect for patient’s autonomy, Beneficence to patient, Non-maleficence, and Always appropriate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1657-9267</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2011-2777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.11144/Javeriana.upsy17-4.fpva</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Pontifica Universidad Javeriana, Faculty of Science</publisher><subject>Cognitive science ; Ethics ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Life Sciences ; Psychology</subject><ispartof>Universitas psychologica, 2018-01, Vol.17 (4), p.1-11</ispartof><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-71c4dccba744c6808c8f9e534ba530ed10c9ddd8e07bd39e0c0d3a3b564103e73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-71c4dccba744c6808c8f9e534ba530ed10c9ddd8e07bd39e0c0d3a3b564103e73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8855-1266 ; 0000-0002-7293-3382 ; 0000-0003-1272-528X ; 0000-0001-8793-3644 ; 0000-0002-3080-2974 ; 0000-0002-6522-8650 ; 0000-0002-1811-7309</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://univ-tlse2.hal.science/hal-01952989$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rosier, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guedj, Myriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvas, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Julia, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garnier, Christelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cambon-Thomsen, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz Sastre, Maria Teresa</creatorcontrib><title>French People’s Views on the Appropriateness of Disclosing an Unsolicited Finding in Medical Genetics: A Preliminary Study</title><title>Universitas psychologica</title><description>With progress in medical genetics, genome-sequencing techniques are becoming more and more efficient. However, these genetic tests may lead to the detection of unsolicited genetic findings, i.e. findings that are not the primary purpose of the screening. New ethical issues have emerged, in particular the question of whether to disclose these unsolicited findings to the patient or not. Forty-seven patients under supervision in a Medical Genetics service, 15 health professionals and 107 members of the French general population expressed their opinion regarding the appropriateness of disclosing an unsolicited high penetrance genetic finding in 36 scenarios containing three pieces of information on: a) patient information and consent;b) possibility of prevention and treatment of the detected genetic disease; and c) disclosure of the results by the physician (e.g., no disclosure of the unsolicited results). Four positions were found that were called Respect for patient’s autonomy, Beneficence to patient, Non-maleficence, and Always appropriate.</description><subject>Cognitive science</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><issn>1657-9267</issn><issn>2011-2777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kNFKwzAYhYMoOKfvkFsvOpMmbRrvynSbMnGg8zakyV8X6dLSdJOBF76Gr-eT2Dnx6ofDOYfzfwhhSkaUUs6v7vUWWqe9Hm2asKMi4qOy2eojNIgJpVEshDhGA5omIpJxKk7RWQhvhCSCSTFAH5MWvFnhBdRNBd-fXwG_OHgPuPa4WwHOm6atm76_Aw-hl0t844Kp6uD8K9YeL32oK2dcBxZPnLd72Xn8ANYZXeFpH-ucCdc4x4sWKrd2Xrc7_NRt7O4cnZS6CnDxd4doObl9Hs-i-eP0bpzPIxNL1kWCGm6NKbTg3KQZyUxWSkgYL3TCCFhKjLTWZkBEYZkEYohlmhVJyilhINgQXR56V7pS_TPrfoGqtVOzfK72GqEyiWUmt7T3ZgevaesQWij_A5SoX-Lqn7g6EFdc7YmzH3X9fXA</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Rosier, Marion</creator><creator>Guedj, Myriam</creator><creator>Calvas, Patrick</creator><creator>Julia, Sophie</creator><creator>Garnier, Christelle</creator><creator>Cambon-Thomsen, Anne</creator><creator>Muñoz Sastre, Maria Teresa</creator><general>Pontifica Universidad Javeriana, Faculty of Science</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><scope>IHQJB</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8855-1266</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7293-3382</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1272-528X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8793-3644</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3080-2974</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6522-8650</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1811-7309</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>French People’s Views on the Appropriateness of Disclosing an Unsolicited Finding in Medical Genetics: A Preliminary Study</title><author>Rosier, Marion ; Guedj, Myriam ; Calvas, Patrick ; Julia, Sophie ; Garnier, Christelle ; Cambon-Thomsen, Anne ; Muñoz Sastre, Maria Teresa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-71c4dccba744c6808c8f9e534ba530ed10c9ddd8e07bd39e0c0d3a3b564103e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Cognitive science</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rosier, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guedj, Myriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvas, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Julia, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garnier, Christelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cambon-Thomsen, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz Sastre, Maria Teresa</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société (Open Access)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Universitas psychologica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rosier, Marion</au><au>Guedj, Myriam</au><au>Calvas, Patrick</au><au>Julia, Sophie</au><au>Garnier, Christelle</au><au>Cambon-Thomsen, Anne</au><au>Muñoz Sastre, Maria Teresa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>French People’s Views on the Appropriateness of Disclosing an Unsolicited Finding in Medical Genetics: A Preliminary Study</atitle><jtitle>Universitas psychologica</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>1-11</pages><issn>1657-9267</issn><eissn>2011-2777</eissn><abstract>With progress in medical genetics, genome-sequencing techniques are becoming more and more efficient. However, these genetic tests may lead to the detection of unsolicited genetic findings, i.e. findings that are not the primary purpose of the screening. New ethical issues have emerged, in particular the question of whether to disclose these unsolicited findings to the patient or not. Forty-seven patients under supervision in a Medical Genetics service, 15 health professionals and 107 members of the French general population expressed their opinion regarding the appropriateness of disclosing an unsolicited high penetrance genetic finding in 36 scenarios containing three pieces of information on: a) patient information and consent;b) possibility of prevention and treatment of the detected genetic disease; and c) disclosure of the results by the physician (e.g., no disclosure of the unsolicited results). Four positions were found that were called Respect for patient’s autonomy, Beneficence to patient, Non-maleficence, and Always appropriate.</abstract><pub>Pontifica Universidad Javeriana, Faculty of Science</pub><doi>10.11144/Javeriana.upsy17-4.fpva</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8855-1266</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7293-3382</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1272-528X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8793-3644</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3080-2974</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6522-8650</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1811-7309</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1657-9267 |
ispartof | Universitas psychologica, 2018-01, Vol.17 (4), p.1-11 |
issn | 1657-9267 2011-2777 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01952989v1 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Cognitive science Ethics Humanities and Social Sciences Life Sciences Psychology |
title | French People’s Views on the Appropriateness of Disclosing an Unsolicited Finding in Medical Genetics: A Preliminary Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T02%3A13%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hal_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=French%20People%E2%80%99s%20Views%20on%20the%20Appropriateness%20of%20Disclosing%20an%20Unsolicited%20Finding%20in%20Medical%20Genetics:%20A%20Preliminary%20Study&rft.jtitle=Universitas%20psychologica&rft.au=Rosier,%20Marion&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=1-11&rft.issn=1657-9267&rft.eissn=2011-2777&rft_id=info:doi/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy17-4.fpva&rft_dat=%3Chal_cross%3Eoai_HAL_hal_01952989v1%3C/hal_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |