Up-to-date CO2 Capture in Thermal Power Plants
An up-to-date review of CO2 capture technologies for coal-fired power plants is presented. This study is based on EDF experience on CO2 capture build through collaborative projects and pilot plants operation follow up. This review focuses mostly on most mature technologies and provides insight on th...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Energy procedia 2017-07, Vol.114, p.95-103 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 103 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 95 |
| container_title | Energy procedia |
| container_volume | 114 |
| creator | Kanniche, Mohamed Le Moullec, Yann Authier, Olivier Hagi, Hayato Bontemps, Domitille Neveux, Thibaut Louis-Louisy, Myriam |
| description | An up-to-date review of CO2 capture technologies for coal-fired power plants is presented. This study is based on EDF experience on CO2 capture build through collaborative projects and pilot plants operation follow up. This review focuses mostly on most mature technologies and provides insight on the interest of least developed technology with high potential. Technologies are compared and assessed based on energy performance, maturity and economic criteria. A specific method for assessing uncertainties in this process is proposed.
Amine based post-combustion technology remains the best reference for short and medium terms with a tight competition with cryogenic oxy-combustion. Both share the highest maturity and similar energy performance in their most advanced embodiments. At the moment IGGC based capture looks less promising for power generation due to the high cost of the plant even without CO2 capture. Regarding more innovative technology, promising candidates, such as inertial extraction, chemical looping combustion or oxy-fired CO2 cycle, are highlighted but their effective development up to industrial ground is not guaranteed due to the constant improvement of reference technology and their difficulty to be retrofitted. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1152 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>hal_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01930415v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1876610217313231</els_id><sourcerecordid>oai_HAL_hal_01930415v1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-1a5046b4ca89cf25135859a7bf2b5f95cec74bcc4a54f3e45363c6c337cb85fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRsH78BCFXD4k7-5GPk5SgVii0h_a8bKYTuyVtwm6s9N_bEBFvnmYY3ueFeRh7AJ4Ah_Rpl9DHqfNtIjhkCZcJgBYXbAJ5lsYpcHH5Z79mNyHsOM84z9WEJesu7tt4Y3uKyoWIStv1n54id4hWW_J720TL9ot8tGzsoQ937Kq2TaD7n3nL1q8vq3IWzxdv7-V0HqMSRR-D1VyllUKbF1gLDVLnurBZVYtK14VGwkxViMpqVUtSWqYSU5QywyrXNcpb9jj2bm1jOu_21p9Ma52ZTedmuHEoJFegj3DO6jGLvg3BU_0LADeDILMzoyAzCDJcmkHQmXseOTo_cnTkTUBHB6SN84S92bTun4Zvro9uyw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Up-to-date CO2 Capture in Thermal Power Plants</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Kanniche, Mohamed ; Le Moullec, Yann ; Authier, Olivier ; Hagi, Hayato ; Bontemps, Domitille ; Neveux, Thibaut ; Louis-Louisy, Myriam</creator><creatorcontrib>Kanniche, Mohamed ; Le Moullec, Yann ; Authier, Olivier ; Hagi, Hayato ; Bontemps, Domitille ; Neveux, Thibaut ; Louis-Louisy, Myriam</creatorcontrib><description>An up-to-date review of CO2 capture technologies for coal-fired power plants is presented. This study is based on EDF experience on CO2 capture build through collaborative projects and pilot plants operation follow up. This review focuses mostly on most mature technologies and provides insight on the interest of least developed technology with high potential. Technologies are compared and assessed based on energy performance, maturity and economic criteria. A specific method for assessing uncertainties in this process is proposed.
Amine based post-combustion technology remains the best reference for short and medium terms with a tight competition with cryogenic oxy-combustion. Both share the highest maturity and similar energy performance in their most advanced embodiments. At the moment IGGC based capture looks less promising for power generation due to the high cost of the plant even without CO2 capture. Regarding more innovative technology, promising candidates, such as inertial extraction, chemical looping combustion or oxy-fired CO2 cycle, are highlighted but their effective development up to industrial ground is not guaranteed due to the constant improvement of reference technology and their difficulty to be retrofitted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1876-6102</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1876-6102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1152</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Chemical engineering ; chemical looping combustion ; Chemical Sciences ; cost uncertainties propagation ; oxy-combustion ; post-combustion ; pre-combustion ; technico-economic analysis</subject><ispartof>Energy procedia, 2017-07, Vol.114, p.95-103</ispartof><rights>2017 The Authors</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-1a5046b4ca89cf25135859a7bf2b5f95cec74bcc4a54f3e45363c6c337cb85fc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-1a5046b4ca89cf25135859a7bf2b5f95cec74bcc4a54f3e45363c6c337cb85fc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0662-0000 ; 0000-0002-7460-702X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1152$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://edf.hal.science/hal-01930415$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kanniche, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Moullec, Yann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Authier, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagi, Hayato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bontemps, Domitille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neveux, Thibaut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Louis-Louisy, Myriam</creatorcontrib><title>Up-to-date CO2 Capture in Thermal Power Plants</title><title>Energy procedia</title><description>An up-to-date review of CO2 capture technologies for coal-fired power plants is presented. This study is based on EDF experience on CO2 capture build through collaborative projects and pilot plants operation follow up. This review focuses mostly on most mature technologies and provides insight on the interest of least developed technology with high potential. Technologies are compared and assessed based on energy performance, maturity and economic criteria. A specific method for assessing uncertainties in this process is proposed.
Amine based post-combustion technology remains the best reference for short and medium terms with a tight competition with cryogenic oxy-combustion. Both share the highest maturity and similar energy performance in their most advanced embodiments. At the moment IGGC based capture looks less promising for power generation due to the high cost of the plant even without CO2 capture. Regarding more innovative technology, promising candidates, such as inertial extraction, chemical looping combustion or oxy-fired CO2 cycle, are highlighted but their effective development up to industrial ground is not guaranteed due to the constant improvement of reference technology and their difficulty to be retrofitted.</description><subject>Chemical engineering</subject><subject>chemical looping combustion</subject><subject>Chemical Sciences</subject><subject>cost uncertainties propagation</subject><subject>oxy-combustion</subject><subject>post-combustion</subject><subject>pre-combustion</subject><subject>technico-economic analysis</subject><issn>1876-6102</issn><issn>1876-6102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRsH78BCFXD4k7-5GPk5SgVii0h_a8bKYTuyVtwm6s9N_bEBFvnmYY3ueFeRh7AJ4Ah_Rpl9DHqfNtIjhkCZcJgBYXbAJ5lsYpcHH5Z79mNyHsOM84z9WEJesu7tt4Y3uKyoWIStv1n54id4hWW_J720TL9ot8tGzsoQ937Kq2TaD7n3nL1q8vq3IWzxdv7-V0HqMSRR-D1VyllUKbF1gLDVLnurBZVYtK14VGwkxViMpqVUtSWqYSU5QywyrXNcpb9jj2bm1jOu_21p9Ma52ZTedmuHEoJFegj3DO6jGLvg3BU_0LADeDILMzoyAzCDJcmkHQmXseOTo_cnTkTUBHB6SN84S92bTun4Zvro9uyw</recordid><startdate>201707</startdate><enddate>201707</enddate><creator>Kanniche, Mohamed</creator><creator>Le Moullec, Yann</creator><creator>Authier, Olivier</creator><creator>Hagi, Hayato</creator><creator>Bontemps, Domitille</creator><creator>Neveux, Thibaut</creator><creator>Louis-Louisy, Myriam</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0662-0000</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7460-702X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201707</creationdate><title>Up-to-date CO2 Capture in Thermal Power Plants</title><author>Kanniche, Mohamed ; Le Moullec, Yann ; Authier, Olivier ; Hagi, Hayato ; Bontemps, Domitille ; Neveux, Thibaut ; Louis-Louisy, Myriam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-1a5046b4ca89cf25135859a7bf2b5f95cec74bcc4a54f3e45363c6c337cb85fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Chemical engineering</topic><topic>chemical looping combustion</topic><topic>Chemical Sciences</topic><topic>cost uncertainties propagation</topic><topic>oxy-combustion</topic><topic>post-combustion</topic><topic>pre-combustion</topic><topic>technico-economic analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kanniche, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Moullec, Yann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Authier, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagi, Hayato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bontemps, Domitille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neveux, Thibaut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Louis-Louisy, Myriam</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Energy procedia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kanniche, Mohamed</au><au>Le Moullec, Yann</au><au>Authier, Olivier</au><au>Hagi, Hayato</au><au>Bontemps, Domitille</au><au>Neveux, Thibaut</au><au>Louis-Louisy, Myriam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Up-to-date CO2 Capture in Thermal Power Plants</atitle><jtitle>Energy procedia</jtitle><date>2017-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>114</volume><spage>95</spage><epage>103</epage><pages>95-103</pages><issn>1876-6102</issn><eissn>1876-6102</eissn><abstract>An up-to-date review of CO2 capture technologies for coal-fired power plants is presented. This study is based on EDF experience on CO2 capture build through collaborative projects and pilot plants operation follow up. This review focuses mostly on most mature technologies and provides insight on the interest of least developed technology with high potential. Technologies are compared and assessed based on energy performance, maturity and economic criteria. A specific method for assessing uncertainties in this process is proposed.
Amine based post-combustion technology remains the best reference for short and medium terms with a tight competition with cryogenic oxy-combustion. Both share the highest maturity and similar energy performance in their most advanced embodiments. At the moment IGGC based capture looks less promising for power generation due to the high cost of the plant even without CO2 capture. Regarding more innovative technology, promising candidates, such as inertial extraction, chemical looping combustion or oxy-fired CO2 cycle, are highlighted but their effective development up to industrial ground is not guaranteed due to the constant improvement of reference technology and their difficulty to be retrofitted.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1152</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0662-0000</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7460-702X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1876-6102 |
| ispartof | Energy procedia, 2017-07, Vol.114, p.95-103 |
| issn | 1876-6102 1876-6102 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01930415v1 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
| subjects | Chemical engineering chemical looping combustion Chemical Sciences cost uncertainties propagation oxy-combustion post-combustion pre-combustion technico-economic analysis |
| title | Up-to-date CO2 Capture in Thermal Power Plants |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T14%3A18%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hal_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Up-to-date%20CO2%20Capture%20in%20Thermal%20Power%20Plants&rft.jtitle=Energy%20procedia&rft.au=Kanniche,%20Mohamed&rft.date=2017-07&rft.volume=114&rft.spage=95&rft.epage=103&rft.pages=95-103&rft.issn=1876-6102&rft.eissn=1876-6102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1152&rft_dat=%3Chal_cross%3Eoai_HAL_hal_01930415v1%3C/hal_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1876610217313231&rfr_iscdi=true |