How to capture fish in a school? Effect of successive predator attacks on seabird feeding success

1. Prey aggregations, such as fish schools, attract numerous predators. This typically leads to the formation of multispecific groups of predators. These aggregations can be seen both as a place of increased competition and as a place of possible facilitation between predators. Consequently, the fun...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of animal ecology 2016-01, Vol.85 (1), p.157-167
Hauptverfasser: Thiebault, Andréa, Semeria, Magali, Lett, Christophe, Tremblay, Yann
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 167
container_issue 1
container_start_page 157
container_title The Journal of animal ecology
container_volume 85
creator Thiebault, Andréa
Semeria, Magali
Lett, Christophe
Tremblay, Yann
description 1. Prey aggregations, such as fish schools, attract numerous predators. This typically leads to the formation of multispecific groups of predators. These aggregations can be seen both as a place of increased competition and as a place of possible facilitation between predators. Consequently, the functional role of such predator–prey aggregation is uncertain, and its effect on individual feeding success is virtually unknown. 2. Using underwater film footage of different predators feeding on fish schools during the sardine run in South Africa, we directly measured the in situ feeding success of individual Cape gannets Morus capensis in different foraging situations. 3. We determined the types of Cape gannet attacks (direct plunge dive or plunge dive followed by underwater pursuit) and we measured the occurrences and timing of attacks from the different species (mostly Cape gannets and long-beaked common dolphins Delphinus capensis). We also estimated the size of the targeted fish schools. These observations were complemented with a simulation model to evaluate the cumulative effect of successive predator attacks on the prey aggregation structure. 4. The probability to capture a fish in one feeding attempt by Cape gannets averaged 0·28. It was lower when gannets engaged in underwater prey pursuit after the plunge compared to direct plunge (0·13 vs. 0·36). We found no effect of the number of prey on gannets' feeding success. However, the timing and frequency of attacks influenced strongly and positively the feeding success of individuals. The probability to capture a fish was the lowest (0·16) when no attack occurred in the few seconds (1–15 s) prior to a dive and the highest (∼0·4, i.e. more than twice) when one or two attacks occurred during this time window. The simulation model showed that a prey aggregation disorganized just after an attack and that the maximum of disturbance was obtained a few seconds after the initiation of the successive attacks. 5. Our study suggests that, in multispecies predator assemblages, the cumulative effect (through disorganization of school cohesiveness) of the multiple species attacking a prey aggregation may increase the feeding success of each individual. Therefore, facilitation between predators is likely to overcome competition in these multispecific assemblages.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2656.12455
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01922067v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24701616</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24701616</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5685-21323a89242e3a8960f08b1fe1f61e818e54b598c6f84402c84557d72bce20373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1vEzEQhi0EoqFw5gSyxAUOaf2x_sipiqq0AUVwgbPl9Y6Jw2Yd7N1W_fd42SZIXMCSNdLomVczehB6TckFLe-ScinmTAp5QVklxBM0O3WeohkhjM61WpAz9CLnHSFEMcKfozMmldScixmy63iP-4idPfRDAuxD3uLQYYuz28bYXuGV9-B6HD3Og3OQc7gDfEjQ2D4mbPveuh8Zxw5nsHVIDfYATei-H_GX6Jm3bYZXj_UcfbtZfb1ezzdfbj9eLzdzJ6QuK1POuNULVjEYqySe6Jp6oF5S0FSDqGqx0E56XVWEOV3uVY1itYNylOLn6MOUu7WtOaSwt-nBRBvMerkxY4_QBWNEqjta2PcTe0jx5wC5N_uQHbSt7SAO2VClpJRCE_kfqCS6fMEL-u4vdBeH1JWjCyWUoFzLkbqcKJdizgn8aVlKzCjVjArNqND8llom3j7mDvUemhN_tFgAOQH3oYWHf-WZT8vPq2Pym2lwl4vMP8GVIlRSyX8Bu3mxlw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1757513863</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How to capture fish in a school? Effect of successive predator attacks on seabird feeding success</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Full Collection</source><source>JSTOR</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Thiebault, Andréa ; Semeria, Magali ; Lett, Christophe ; Tremblay, Yann</creator><contributor>Quinn, John</contributor><creatorcontrib>Thiebault, Andréa ; Semeria, Magali ; Lett, Christophe ; Tremblay, Yann ; Quinn, John</creatorcontrib><description>1. Prey aggregations, such as fish schools, attract numerous predators. This typically leads to the formation of multispecific groups of predators. These aggregations can be seen both as a place of increased competition and as a place of possible facilitation between predators. Consequently, the functional role of such predator–prey aggregation is uncertain, and its effect on individual feeding success is virtually unknown. 2. Using underwater film footage of different predators feeding on fish schools during the sardine run in South Africa, we directly measured the in situ feeding success of individual Cape gannets Morus capensis in different foraging situations. 3. We determined the types of Cape gannet attacks (direct plunge dive or plunge dive followed by underwater pursuit) and we measured the occurrences and timing of attacks from the different species (mostly Cape gannets and long-beaked common dolphins Delphinus capensis). We also estimated the size of the targeted fish schools. These observations were complemented with a simulation model to evaluate the cumulative effect of successive predator attacks on the prey aggregation structure. 4. The probability to capture a fish in one feeding attempt by Cape gannets averaged 0·28. It was lower when gannets engaged in underwater prey pursuit after the plunge compared to direct plunge (0·13 vs. 0·36). We found no effect of the number of prey on gannets' feeding success. However, the timing and frequency of attacks influenced strongly and positively the feeding success of individuals. The probability to capture a fish was the lowest (0·16) when no attack occurred in the few seconds (1–15 s) prior to a dive and the highest (∼0·4, i.e. more than twice) when one or two attacks occurred during this time window. The simulation model showed that a prey aggregation disorganized just after an attack and that the maximum of disturbance was obtained a few seconds after the initiation of the successive attacks. 5. Our study suggests that, in multispecies predator assemblages, the cumulative effect (through disorganization of school cohesiveness) of the multiple species attacking a prey aggregation may increase the feeding success of each individual. Therefore, facilitation between predators is likely to overcome competition in these multispecific assemblages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2656</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12455</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26768335</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAECAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Behavioural ecology ; Biodiversity and Ecology ; Birds ; Birds - physiology ; boid ; Cetacea ; competition ; Delphinus capensis ; dolphins ; Dolphins - physiology ; Ecology, environment ; Ecosystems ; Environmental Sciences ; facilitation ; Fish ; Fishes - physiology ; Food Chain ; foraging ; gannets ; Global Changes ; group hunting ; Life Sciences ; Marine ; modelling ; Morus capensis ; Predation ; Predatory Behavior ; sardine run ; Sardinops ; Social Behavior ; South Africa ; video</subject><ispartof>The Journal of animal ecology, 2016-01, Vol.85 (1), p.157-167</ispartof><rights>2015 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2015 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2015 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2015 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2015 British Ecological Society.</rights><rights>Journal of Animal Ecology © 2016 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5685-21323a89242e3a8960f08b1fe1f61e818e54b598c6f84402c84557d72bce20373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5685-21323a89242e3a8960f08b1fe1f61e818e54b598c6f84402c84557d72bce20373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24701616$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24701616$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,799,881,1411,1427,27903,27904,45553,45554,46387,46811,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26768335$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.umontpellier.fr/hal-01922067$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Quinn, John</contributor><creatorcontrib>Thiebault, Andréa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semeria, Magali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lett, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tremblay, Yann</creatorcontrib><title>How to capture fish in a school? Effect of successive predator attacks on seabird feeding success</title><title>The Journal of animal ecology</title><addtitle>J Anim Ecol</addtitle><description>1. Prey aggregations, such as fish schools, attract numerous predators. This typically leads to the formation of multispecific groups of predators. These aggregations can be seen both as a place of increased competition and as a place of possible facilitation between predators. Consequently, the functional role of such predator–prey aggregation is uncertain, and its effect on individual feeding success is virtually unknown. 2. Using underwater film footage of different predators feeding on fish schools during the sardine run in South Africa, we directly measured the in situ feeding success of individual Cape gannets Morus capensis in different foraging situations. 3. We determined the types of Cape gannet attacks (direct plunge dive or plunge dive followed by underwater pursuit) and we measured the occurrences and timing of attacks from the different species (mostly Cape gannets and long-beaked common dolphins Delphinus capensis). We also estimated the size of the targeted fish schools. These observations were complemented with a simulation model to evaluate the cumulative effect of successive predator attacks on the prey aggregation structure. 4. The probability to capture a fish in one feeding attempt by Cape gannets averaged 0·28. It was lower when gannets engaged in underwater prey pursuit after the plunge compared to direct plunge (0·13 vs. 0·36). We found no effect of the number of prey on gannets' feeding success. However, the timing and frequency of attacks influenced strongly and positively the feeding success of individuals. The probability to capture a fish was the lowest (0·16) when no attack occurred in the few seconds (1–15 s) prior to a dive and the highest (∼0·4, i.e. more than twice) when one or two attacks occurred during this time window. The simulation model showed that a prey aggregation disorganized just after an attack and that the maximum of disturbance was obtained a few seconds after the initiation of the successive attacks. 5. Our study suggests that, in multispecies predator assemblages, the cumulative effect (through disorganization of school cohesiveness) of the multiple species attacking a prey aggregation may increase the feeding success of each individual. Therefore, facilitation between predators is likely to overcome competition in these multispecific assemblages.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavioural ecology</subject><subject>Biodiversity and Ecology</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Birds - physiology</subject><subject>boid</subject><subject>Cetacea</subject><subject>competition</subject><subject>Delphinus capensis</subject><subject>dolphins</subject><subject>Dolphins - physiology</subject><subject>Ecology, environment</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>facilitation</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fishes - physiology</subject><subject>Food Chain</subject><subject>foraging</subject><subject>gannets</subject><subject>Global Changes</subject><subject>group hunting</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>modelling</subject><subject>Morus capensis</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predatory Behavior</subject><subject>sardine run</subject><subject>Sardinops</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><subject>South Africa</subject><subject>video</subject><issn>0021-8790</issn><issn>1365-2656</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1vEzEQhi0EoqFw5gSyxAUOaf2x_sipiqq0AUVwgbPl9Y6Jw2Yd7N1W_fd42SZIXMCSNdLomVczehB6TckFLe-ScinmTAp5QVklxBM0O3WeohkhjM61WpAz9CLnHSFEMcKfozMmldScixmy63iP-4idPfRDAuxD3uLQYYuz28bYXuGV9-B6HD3Og3OQc7gDfEjQ2D4mbPveuh8Zxw5nsHVIDfYATei-H_GX6Jm3bYZXj_UcfbtZfb1ezzdfbj9eLzdzJ6QuK1POuNULVjEYqySe6Jp6oF5S0FSDqGqx0E56XVWEOV3uVY1itYNylOLn6MOUu7WtOaSwt-nBRBvMerkxY4_QBWNEqjta2PcTe0jx5wC5N_uQHbSt7SAO2VClpJRCE_kfqCS6fMEL-u4vdBeH1JWjCyWUoFzLkbqcKJdizgn8aVlKzCjVjArNqND8llom3j7mDvUemhN_tFgAOQH3oYWHf-WZT8vPq2Pym2lwl4vMP8GVIlRSyX8Bu3mxlw</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>Thiebault, Andréa</creator><creator>Semeria, Magali</creator><creator>Lett, Christophe</creator><creator>Tremblay, Yann</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>1XC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>How to capture fish in a school? Effect of successive predator attacks on seabird feeding success</title><author>Thiebault, Andréa ; Semeria, Magali ; Lett, Christophe ; Tremblay, Yann</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5685-21323a89242e3a8960f08b1fe1f61e818e54b598c6f84402c84557d72bce20373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavioural ecology</topic><topic>Biodiversity and Ecology</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Birds - physiology</topic><topic>boid</topic><topic>Cetacea</topic><topic>competition</topic><topic>Delphinus capensis</topic><topic>dolphins</topic><topic>Dolphins - physiology</topic><topic>Ecology, environment</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>facilitation</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fishes - physiology</topic><topic>Food Chain</topic><topic>foraging</topic><topic>gannets</topic><topic>Global Changes</topic><topic>group hunting</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>modelling</topic><topic>Morus capensis</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predatory Behavior</topic><topic>sardine run</topic><topic>Sardinops</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><topic>South Africa</topic><topic>video</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thiebault, Andréa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semeria, Magali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lett, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tremblay, Yann</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of animal ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thiebault, Andréa</au><au>Semeria, Magali</au><au>Lett, Christophe</au><au>Tremblay, Yann</au><au>Quinn, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How to capture fish in a school? Effect of successive predator attacks on seabird feeding success</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of animal ecology</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Ecol</addtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>157</spage><epage>167</epage><pages>157-167</pages><issn>0021-8790</issn><eissn>1365-2656</eissn><coden>JAECAP</coden><abstract>1. Prey aggregations, such as fish schools, attract numerous predators. This typically leads to the formation of multispecific groups of predators. These aggregations can be seen both as a place of increased competition and as a place of possible facilitation between predators. Consequently, the functional role of such predator–prey aggregation is uncertain, and its effect on individual feeding success is virtually unknown. 2. Using underwater film footage of different predators feeding on fish schools during the sardine run in South Africa, we directly measured the in situ feeding success of individual Cape gannets Morus capensis in different foraging situations. 3. We determined the types of Cape gannet attacks (direct plunge dive or plunge dive followed by underwater pursuit) and we measured the occurrences and timing of attacks from the different species (mostly Cape gannets and long-beaked common dolphins Delphinus capensis). We also estimated the size of the targeted fish schools. These observations were complemented with a simulation model to evaluate the cumulative effect of successive predator attacks on the prey aggregation structure. 4. The probability to capture a fish in one feeding attempt by Cape gannets averaged 0·28. It was lower when gannets engaged in underwater prey pursuit after the plunge compared to direct plunge (0·13 vs. 0·36). We found no effect of the number of prey on gannets' feeding success. However, the timing and frequency of attacks influenced strongly and positively the feeding success of individuals. The probability to capture a fish was the lowest (0·16) when no attack occurred in the few seconds (1–15 s) prior to a dive and the highest (∼0·4, i.e. more than twice) when one or two attacks occurred during this time window. The simulation model showed that a prey aggregation disorganized just after an attack and that the maximum of disturbance was obtained a few seconds after the initiation of the successive attacks. 5. Our study suggests that, in multispecies predator assemblages, the cumulative effect (through disorganization of school cohesiveness) of the multiple species attacking a prey aggregation may increase the feeding success of each individual. Therefore, facilitation between predators is likely to overcome competition in these multispecific assemblages.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</pub><pmid>26768335</pmid><doi>10.1111/1365-2656.12455</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8790
ispartof The Journal of animal ecology, 2016-01, Vol.85 (1), p.157-167
issn 0021-8790
1365-2656
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01922067v1
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Wiley-Blackwell Full Collection; JSTOR; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Animals
Behavioural ecology
Biodiversity and Ecology
Birds
Birds - physiology
boid
Cetacea
competition
Delphinus capensis
dolphins
Dolphins - physiology
Ecology, environment
Ecosystems
Environmental Sciences
facilitation
Fish
Fishes - physiology
Food Chain
foraging
gannets
Global Changes
group hunting
Life Sciences
Marine
modelling
Morus capensis
Predation
Predatory Behavior
sardine run
Sardinops
Social Behavior
South Africa
video
title How to capture fish in a school? Effect of successive predator attacks on seabird feeding success
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T20%3A14%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20to%20capture%20fish%20in%20a%20school?%20Effect%20of%20successive%20predator%20attacks%20on%20seabird%20feeding%20success&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20animal%20ecology&rft.au=Thiebault,%20Andr%C3%A9a&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=157&rft.epage=167&rft.pages=157-167&rft.issn=0021-8790&rft.eissn=1365-2656&rft.coden=JAECAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2656.12455&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_hal_p%3E24701616%3C/jstor_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1757513863&rft_id=info:pmid/26768335&rft_jstor_id=24701616&rfr_iscdi=true