Reproductive allocation in pulsed-resource environments: a comparative study in two populations of wild boar

Pulsed resources influence the demography and evolution of consumer populations and, by cascading effect, the dynamics of the entire community. Mast seeding provides a case study for exploring the evolution of life history traits of consumers in fluctuating environments. Wild boar (Sus scrofa) popul...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oecologia 2017-04, Vol.183 (4), p.1065-1076
Hauptverfasser: Gamelon, Marlène, Focardi, Stefano, Baubet, Eric, Brandt, Serge, Franzetti, Barbara, Ronchi, Francesca, Venner, Samuel, Sæther, Bernt-Erik, Gaillard, Jean-Michel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1076
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1065
container_title Oecologia
container_volume 183
creator Gamelon, Marlène
Focardi, Stefano
Baubet, Eric
Brandt, Serge
Franzetti, Barbara
Ronchi, Francesca
Venner, Samuel
Sæther, Bernt-Erik
Gaillard, Jean-Michel
description Pulsed resources influence the demography and evolution of consumer populations and, by cascading effect, the dynamics of the entire community. Mast seeding provides a case study for exploring the evolution of life history traits of consumers in fluctuating environments. Wild boar (Sus scrofa) population dynamics is related to seed availability (acorns/beechnuts). From a long-term monitoring of two populations subjected to markedly different environmental contexts (i.e., both low vs. high frequency of pulsed resources and low vs. high hunting pressure in Italy and in France, respectively), we assessed how pulsed resources shape the reproductive output of females. Using path analyses, we showed that in both populations, abundant seed availability increases body mass and both the absolute and the relative (to body mass) allocation to reproduction through higher fertility. In the Italian population, females equally relied on past and current resources for reproduction and ranked at an intermediate position along the capital-income continuum of breeding tactics. In contrast, in the French population, females relied on current more than past resources and ranked closer to the income end of the continuum. In the French population, one-year old females born in acorn-mast years were heavier and had larger litter size than females born in beechnut-mast years. In addition to the quantity, the type of resources (acorns/beechnuts) has to be accounted for to assess reliably how females allocate resources to reproduction. Our findings highlight a high plasticity in breeding tactics in wild boar females and provide new insight on allocation strategies in fluctuating environments.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00442-017-3821-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01887858v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A550949239</galeid><jstor_id>48718712</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A550949239</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c628t-b9e99193c60561ea1a6bfab608cb8401df8568f7547cb2821d71283301417c7e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk-LFDEQxYMo7rj6ATwoA17cQ6-pdOffcVh23YUBYdVzSKfTY4aezph0D_rtrabX0RERySFQ9XtFvUcR8hLoJVAq32VKq4oVFGRRKgaFekQWUJWsAF3qx2RBKdOF4pU-I89y3lIKFXD-lJwxBVgVYkHkvd-n2IxuCAe_tF0XnR1C7JehX-7HLvumSD7HMTm_9P0hpNjvfD_k5-RJa7H94uE_J59vrj9d3RbrD-_vrlbrwgmmhqLWXmvcxgnKBXgLVtStrQVVrlYVhaZVXKhW8kq6mqGHRgJTZTltKp305Tm5mOd-sZ3Zp7Cz6buJNpjb1dpMNQpKScXVAZB9O7Po6Ovo82B2ITvfdbb3ccwGSZCC4yL_gSLHGIgS0Td_oFuMo0fTSEkhkNT8F7WxnTehb-OQrJuGmhXnVFealRqpy79Q-Bq_Cy72vg1YPxFcnAiQGfy3YWPHnM3dx_tTFmbWpZhz8u0xL6Bmuhcz3wtGJs10L0ah5vWDubHe-eao-HkgCLAZyNjqNz795v4fU1_Nom0eYjoOrZTExICVPwAHcc6f</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1876686595</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reproductive allocation in pulsed-resource environments: a comparative study in two populations of wild boar</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Gamelon, Marlène ; Focardi, Stefano ; Baubet, Eric ; Brandt, Serge ; Franzetti, Barbara ; Ronchi, Francesca ; Venner, Samuel ; Sæther, Bernt-Erik ; Gaillard, Jean-Michel</creator><creatorcontrib>Gamelon, Marlène ; Focardi, Stefano ; Baubet, Eric ; Brandt, Serge ; Franzetti, Barbara ; Ronchi, Francesca ; Venner, Samuel ; Sæther, Bernt-Erik ; Gaillard, Jean-Michel</creatorcontrib><description>Pulsed resources influence the demography and evolution of consumer populations and, by cascading effect, the dynamics of the entire community. Mast seeding provides a case study for exploring the evolution of life history traits of consumers in fluctuating environments. Wild boar (Sus scrofa) population dynamics is related to seed availability (acorns/beechnuts). From a long-term monitoring of two populations subjected to markedly different environmental contexts (i.e., both low vs. high frequency of pulsed resources and low vs. high hunting pressure in Italy and in France, respectively), we assessed how pulsed resources shape the reproductive output of females. Using path analyses, we showed that in both populations, abundant seed availability increases body mass and both the absolute and the relative (to body mass) allocation to reproduction through higher fertility. In the Italian population, females equally relied on past and current resources for reproduction and ranked at an intermediate position along the capital-income continuum of breeding tactics. In contrast, in the French population, females relied on current more than past resources and ranked closer to the income end of the continuum. In the French population, one-year old females born in acorn-mast years were heavier and had larger litter size than females born in beechnut-mast years. In addition to the quantity, the type of resources (acorns/beechnuts) has to be accounted for to assess reliably how females allocate resources to reproduction. Our findings highlight a high plasticity in breeding tactics in wild boar females and provide new insight on allocation strategies in fluctuating environments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-8549</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00442-017-3821-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28154966</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Animals ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Case studies ; Comparative studies ; Demography ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Environment ; Females ; Fertility ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Life history ; Life Sciences ; Litter Size ; Plant Sciences ; Population biology ; POPULATION ECOLOGY – ORIGINAL RESEARCH ; Reproduction ; Sus scrofa</subject><ispartof>Oecologia, 2017-04, Vol.183 (4), p.1065-1076</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Springer</rights><rights>Oecologia is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c628t-b9e99193c60561ea1a6bfab608cb8401df8568f7547cb2821d71283301417c7e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c628t-b9e99193c60561ea1a6bfab608cb8401df8568f7547cb2821d71283301417c7e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9433-2369</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48718712$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48718712$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,799,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28154966$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01887858$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gamelon, Marlène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Focardi, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baubet, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandt, Serge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franzetti, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ronchi, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venner, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sæther, Bernt-Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaillard, Jean-Michel</creatorcontrib><title>Reproductive allocation in pulsed-resource environments: a comparative study in two populations of wild boar</title><title>Oecologia</title><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><description>Pulsed resources influence the demography and evolution of consumer populations and, by cascading effect, the dynamics of the entire community. Mast seeding provides a case study for exploring the evolution of life history traits of consumers in fluctuating environments. Wild boar (Sus scrofa) population dynamics is related to seed availability (acorns/beechnuts). From a long-term monitoring of two populations subjected to markedly different environmental contexts (i.e., both low vs. high frequency of pulsed resources and low vs. high hunting pressure in Italy and in France, respectively), we assessed how pulsed resources shape the reproductive output of females. Using path analyses, we showed that in both populations, abundant seed availability increases body mass and both the absolute and the relative (to body mass) allocation to reproduction through higher fertility. In the Italian population, females equally relied on past and current resources for reproduction and ranked at an intermediate position along the capital-income continuum of breeding tactics. In contrast, in the French population, females relied on current more than past resources and ranked closer to the income end of the continuum. In the French population, one-year old females born in acorn-mast years were heavier and had larger litter size than females born in beechnut-mast years. In addition to the quantity, the type of resources (acorns/beechnuts) has to be accounted for to assess reliably how females allocate resources to reproduction. Our findings highlight a high plasticity in breeding tactics in wild boar females and provide new insight on allocation strategies in fluctuating environments.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Life history</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Litter Size</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Population biology</subject><subject>POPULATION ECOLOGY – ORIGINAL RESEARCH</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Sus scrofa</subject><issn>0029-8549</issn><issn>1432-1939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk-LFDEQxYMo7rj6ATwoA17cQ6-pdOffcVh23YUBYdVzSKfTY4aezph0D_rtrabX0RERySFQ9XtFvUcR8hLoJVAq32VKq4oVFGRRKgaFekQWUJWsAF3qx2RBKdOF4pU-I89y3lIKFXD-lJwxBVgVYkHkvd-n2IxuCAe_tF0XnR1C7JehX-7HLvumSD7HMTm_9P0hpNjvfD_k5-RJa7H94uE_J59vrj9d3RbrD-_vrlbrwgmmhqLWXmvcxgnKBXgLVtStrQVVrlYVhaZVXKhW8kq6mqGHRgJTZTltKp305Tm5mOd-sZ3Zp7Cz6buJNpjb1dpMNQpKScXVAZB9O7Po6Ovo82B2ITvfdbb3ccwGSZCC4yL_gSLHGIgS0Td_oFuMo0fTSEkhkNT8F7WxnTehb-OQrJuGmhXnVFealRqpy79Q-Bq_Cy72vg1YPxFcnAiQGfy3YWPHnM3dx_tTFmbWpZhz8u0xL6Bmuhcz3wtGJs10L0ah5vWDubHe-eao-HkgCLAZyNjqNz795v4fU1_Nom0eYjoOrZTExICVPwAHcc6f</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Gamelon, Marlène</creator><creator>Focardi, Stefano</creator><creator>Baubet, Eric</creator><creator>Brandt, Serge</creator><creator>Franzetti, Barbara</creator><creator>Ronchi, Francesca</creator><creator>Venner, Samuel</creator><creator>Sæther, Bernt-Erik</creator><creator>Gaillard, Jean-Michel</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9433-2369</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Reproductive allocation in pulsed-resource environments</title><author>Gamelon, Marlène ; Focardi, Stefano ; Baubet, Eric ; Brandt, Serge ; Franzetti, Barbara ; Ronchi, Francesca ; Venner, Samuel ; Sæther, Bernt-Erik ; Gaillard, Jean-Michel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c628t-b9e99193c60561ea1a6bfab608cb8401df8568f7547cb2821d71283301417c7e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Life history</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Litter Size</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Population biology</topic><topic>POPULATION ECOLOGY – ORIGINAL RESEARCH</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Sus scrofa</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gamelon, Marlène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Focardi, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baubet, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandt, Serge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franzetti, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ronchi, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venner, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sæther, Bernt-Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaillard, Jean-Michel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gamelon, Marlène</au><au>Focardi, Stefano</au><au>Baubet, Eric</au><au>Brandt, Serge</au><au>Franzetti, Barbara</au><au>Ronchi, Francesca</au><au>Venner, Samuel</au><au>Sæther, Bernt-Erik</au><au>Gaillard, Jean-Michel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reproductive allocation in pulsed-resource environments: a comparative study in two populations of wild boar</atitle><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle><stitle>Oecologia</stitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>183</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1065</spage><epage>1076</epage><pages>1065-1076</pages><issn>0029-8549</issn><eissn>1432-1939</eissn><abstract>Pulsed resources influence the demography and evolution of consumer populations and, by cascading effect, the dynamics of the entire community. Mast seeding provides a case study for exploring the evolution of life history traits of consumers in fluctuating environments. Wild boar (Sus scrofa) population dynamics is related to seed availability (acorns/beechnuts). From a long-term monitoring of two populations subjected to markedly different environmental contexts (i.e., both low vs. high frequency of pulsed resources and low vs. high hunting pressure in Italy and in France, respectively), we assessed how pulsed resources shape the reproductive output of females. Using path analyses, we showed that in both populations, abundant seed availability increases body mass and both the absolute and the relative (to body mass) allocation to reproduction through higher fertility. In the Italian population, females equally relied on past and current resources for reproduction and ranked at an intermediate position along the capital-income continuum of breeding tactics. In contrast, in the French population, females relied on current more than past resources and ranked closer to the income end of the continuum. In the French population, one-year old females born in acorn-mast years were heavier and had larger litter size than females born in beechnut-mast years. In addition to the quantity, the type of resources (acorns/beechnuts) has to be accounted for to assess reliably how females allocate resources to reproduction. Our findings highlight a high plasticity in breeding tactics in wild boar females and provide new insight on allocation strategies in fluctuating environments.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><pmid>28154966</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00442-017-3821-8</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9433-2369</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0029-8549
ispartof Oecologia, 2017-04, Vol.183 (4), p.1065-1076
issn 0029-8549
1432-1939
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01887858v1
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Analysis
Animals
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Case studies
Comparative studies
Demography
Ecology
Ecosystem
Environment
Females
Fertility
Hydrology/Water Resources
Life history
Life Sciences
Litter Size
Plant Sciences
Population biology
POPULATION ECOLOGY – ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Reproduction
Sus scrofa
title Reproductive allocation in pulsed-resource environments: a comparative study in two populations of wild boar
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T21%3A28%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reproductive%20allocation%20in%20pulsed-resource%20environments:%20a%20comparative%20study%20in%20two%20populations%20of%20wild%20boar&rft.jtitle=Oecologia&rft.au=Gamelon,%20Marl%C3%A8ne&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=183&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1065&rft.epage=1076&rft.pages=1065-1076&rft.issn=0029-8549&rft.eissn=1432-1939&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00442-017-3821-8&rft_dat=%3Cgale_hal_p%3EA550949239%3C/gale_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1876686595&rft_id=info:pmid/28154966&rft_galeid=A550949239&rft_jstor_id=48718712&rfr_iscdi=true