Soundscapes reveal disturbance impacts: biophonic response to wildfire in the Sonoran Desert Sky Islands
Context While remote sensing imagery is effective for quantifying land cover changes across large areas, its utility for directly assessing the response of animals to disturbance is limited. Soundscapes approaches—the recording and analysis of sounds in a landscape—could address this shortcoming. Ob...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Landscape ecology 2018-08, Vol.33 (8), p.1399-1415 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1415 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1399 |
container_title | Landscape ecology |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Gasc, Amandine Gottesman, Benjamin L. Francomano, Dante Jung, Jinha Durham, Mark Mateljak, Jason Pijanowski, Bryan C. |
description | Context
While remote sensing imagery is effective for quantifying land cover changes across large areas, its utility for directly assessing the response of animals to disturbance is limited. Soundscapes approaches—the recording and analysis of sounds in a landscape—could address this shortcoming.
Objectives
In 2011, a massive wildfire named “the Horseshoe 2 Burn” occurred in the Chiricahua National Monument, Arizona, USA. We evaluated the impact of this wildfire on acoustic activity of animal communities.
Methods
In 2013, soundscape recordings were collected over 9 months in 12 burned and 12 non-burned sites in four ecological systems. The seasonal and diel biological acoustic activity were described using the “Bioacoustic Index”, a detailed aural analysis of sound sources, and a new tool called “Sonic Timelapse Builder” (STLB).
Results
Seasonal biophony phenology showed a diurnal peak in June and a nocturnal peak in October in all ecological systems. On June mornings, acoustic activity was lower at burned than at non-burned sites in three of four ecological systems, due to a decreased abundance of cicadas directly impacted by the death of trees. Aural analyses revealed that 55% of recordings from non-burned sites contained insect sounds compared to 18% from burned sites. On October nights, orthopteran activity was more prevalent at some burned sites, possibly due to post-fire emergence of herbaceous.
Conclusions
Soundscape approaches can help address long-term conservation issues involving the responses of animal communities to wildfire. Acoustic methods can serve as a valuable complement to remote sensing for disturbance-based landscape management. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10980-018-0675-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01837168v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2067506678</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-4ebd9c313eb13f10da1a6e6d40e89d9dc0878aa74ce43300b34a2e087ce660a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANwsceIQWMepnXCr-GulShwKZ8txtjQltYOdFvXtcRQEJ04rjb6Z3R1CLhncMAB5GxgUOSTA8gSEnCT8iIzYRKZJIQU7JiMoUpakheSn5CyEDQBwDjAi66Xb2SoY3WKgHveoG1rVodv5UluDtN622nThjpa1a9fO1iZSoXU2IO0c_aqbalX7yFnarZEunXVeW_qAAX1Hlx8HOg-NjhvOyclKNwEvfuaYvD09vt7PksXL8_x-ukgML3iXZFhWheGMY8n4ikGlmRYoqgwwL6qiMpDLXGuZGcz6D0qe6RSjaFAI0IyPyfWQu9aNan291f6gnK7VbLpQvRYr4pKJfN-zVwPbeve5w9Cpjdt5G89Tad8iCCHzSLGBMt6F4HH1G8tA9eWrofw-WfU2xaMnHTwhsvYd_V_y_6ZvIwGHjw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2067506678</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Soundscapes reveal disturbance impacts: biophonic response to wildfire in the Sonoran Desert Sky Islands</title><source>SpringerLink (Online service)</source><creator>Gasc, Amandine ; Gottesman, Benjamin L. ; Francomano, Dante ; Jung, Jinha ; Durham, Mark ; Mateljak, Jason ; Pijanowski, Bryan C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gasc, Amandine ; Gottesman, Benjamin L. ; Francomano, Dante ; Jung, Jinha ; Durham, Mark ; Mateljak, Jason ; Pijanowski, Bryan C.</creatorcontrib><description>Context
While remote sensing imagery is effective for quantifying land cover changes across large areas, its utility for directly assessing the response of animals to disturbance is limited. Soundscapes approaches—the recording and analysis of sounds in a landscape—could address this shortcoming.
Objectives
In 2011, a massive wildfire named “the Horseshoe 2 Burn” occurred in the Chiricahua National Monument, Arizona, USA. We evaluated the impact of this wildfire on acoustic activity of animal communities.
Methods
In 2013, soundscape recordings were collected over 9 months in 12 burned and 12 non-burned sites in four ecological systems. The seasonal and diel biological acoustic activity were described using the “Bioacoustic Index”, a detailed aural analysis of sound sources, and a new tool called “Sonic Timelapse Builder” (STLB).
Results
Seasonal biophony phenology showed a diurnal peak in June and a nocturnal peak in October in all ecological systems. On June mornings, acoustic activity was lower at burned than at non-burned sites in three of four ecological systems, due to a decreased abundance of cicadas directly impacted by the death of trees. Aural analyses revealed that 55% of recordings from non-burned sites contained insect sounds compared to 18% from burned sites. On October nights, orthopteran activity was more prevalent at some burned sites, possibly due to post-fire emergence of herbaceous.
Conclusions
Soundscape approaches can help address long-term conservation issues involving the responses of animal communities to wildfire. Acoustic methods can serve as a valuable complement to remote sensing for disturbance-based landscape management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-2973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9761</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10980-018-0675-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Acoustics ; Biodiversity and Ecology ; Biological activity ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Desert environments ; Diurnal ; Ecology ; Ecosystems ; Environmental Management ; Environmental Sciences ; Imagery ; Land cover ; Landscape ; Landscape Ecology ; Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning ; Life Sciences ; Nature Conservation ; Nocturnal ; Remote sensing ; Research Article ; Sound sources ; Sustainable Development ; Wildfires ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Landscape ecology, 2018-08, Vol.33 (8), p.1399-1415</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2018</rights><rights>Landscape Ecology is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-4ebd9c313eb13f10da1a6e6d40e89d9dc0878aa74ce43300b34a2e087ce660a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-4ebd9c313eb13f10da1a6e6d40e89d9dc0878aa74ce43300b34a2e087ce660a13</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8369-4930</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10980-018-0675-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10980-018-0675-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01837168$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gasc, Amandine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gottesman, Benjamin L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francomano, Dante</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Jinha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durham, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mateljak, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pijanowski, Bryan C.</creatorcontrib><title>Soundscapes reveal disturbance impacts: biophonic response to wildfire in the Sonoran Desert Sky Islands</title><title>Landscape ecology</title><addtitle>Landscape Ecol</addtitle><description>Context
While remote sensing imagery is effective for quantifying land cover changes across large areas, its utility for directly assessing the response of animals to disturbance is limited. Soundscapes approaches—the recording and analysis of sounds in a landscape—could address this shortcoming.
Objectives
In 2011, a massive wildfire named “the Horseshoe 2 Burn” occurred in the Chiricahua National Monument, Arizona, USA. We evaluated the impact of this wildfire on acoustic activity of animal communities.
Methods
In 2013, soundscape recordings were collected over 9 months in 12 burned and 12 non-burned sites in four ecological systems. The seasonal and diel biological acoustic activity were described using the “Bioacoustic Index”, a detailed aural analysis of sound sources, and a new tool called “Sonic Timelapse Builder” (STLB).
Results
Seasonal biophony phenology showed a diurnal peak in June and a nocturnal peak in October in all ecological systems. On June mornings, acoustic activity was lower at burned than at non-burned sites in three of four ecological systems, due to a decreased abundance of cicadas directly impacted by the death of trees. Aural analyses revealed that 55% of recordings from non-burned sites contained insect sounds compared to 18% from burned sites. On October nights, orthopteran activity was more prevalent at some burned sites, possibly due to post-fire emergence of herbaceous.
Conclusions
Soundscape approaches can help address long-term conservation issues involving the responses of animal communities to wildfire. Acoustic methods can serve as a valuable complement to remote sensing for disturbance-based landscape management.</description><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Biodiversity and Ecology</subject><subject>Biological activity</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Desert environments</subject><subject>Diurnal</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Imagery</subject><subject>Land cover</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Landscape Ecology</subject><subject>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Nature Conservation</subject><subject>Nocturnal</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Sound sources</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Wildfires</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>0921-2973</issn><issn>1572-9761</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANwsceIQWMepnXCr-GulShwKZ8txtjQltYOdFvXtcRQEJ04rjb6Z3R1CLhncMAB5GxgUOSTA8gSEnCT8iIzYRKZJIQU7JiMoUpakheSn5CyEDQBwDjAi66Xb2SoY3WKgHveoG1rVodv5UluDtN622nThjpa1a9fO1iZSoXU2IO0c_aqbalX7yFnarZEunXVeW_qAAX1Hlx8HOg-NjhvOyclKNwEvfuaYvD09vt7PksXL8_x-ukgML3iXZFhWheGMY8n4ikGlmRYoqgwwL6qiMpDLXGuZGcz6D0qe6RSjaFAI0IyPyfWQu9aNan291f6gnK7VbLpQvRYr4pKJfN-zVwPbeve5w9Cpjdt5G89Tad8iCCHzSLGBMt6F4HH1G8tA9eWrofw-WfU2xaMnHTwhsvYd_V_y_6ZvIwGHjw</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>Gasc, Amandine</creator><creator>Gottesman, Benjamin L.</creator><creator>Francomano, Dante</creator><creator>Jung, Jinha</creator><creator>Durham, Mark</creator><creator>Mateljak, Jason</creator><creator>Pijanowski, Bryan C.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8369-4930</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>Soundscapes reveal disturbance impacts: biophonic response to wildfire in the Sonoran Desert Sky Islands</title><author>Gasc, Amandine ; Gottesman, Benjamin L. ; Francomano, Dante ; Jung, Jinha ; Durham, Mark ; Mateljak, Jason ; Pijanowski, Bryan C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-4ebd9c313eb13f10da1a6e6d40e89d9dc0878aa74ce43300b34a2e087ce660a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Biodiversity and Ecology</topic><topic>Biological activity</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Desert environments</topic><topic>Diurnal</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Imagery</topic><topic>Land cover</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Landscape Ecology</topic><topic>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Nature Conservation</topic><topic>Nocturnal</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Sound sources</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Wildfires</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gasc, Amandine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gottesman, Benjamin L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francomano, Dante</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Jinha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durham, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mateljak, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pijanowski, Bryan C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Landscape ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gasc, Amandine</au><au>Gottesman, Benjamin L.</au><au>Francomano, Dante</au><au>Jung, Jinha</au><au>Durham, Mark</au><au>Mateljak, Jason</au><au>Pijanowski, Bryan C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Soundscapes reveal disturbance impacts: biophonic response to wildfire in the Sonoran Desert Sky Islands</atitle><jtitle>Landscape ecology</jtitle><stitle>Landscape Ecol</stitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1399</spage><epage>1415</epage><pages>1399-1415</pages><issn>0921-2973</issn><eissn>1572-9761</eissn><abstract>Context
While remote sensing imagery is effective for quantifying land cover changes across large areas, its utility for directly assessing the response of animals to disturbance is limited. Soundscapes approaches—the recording and analysis of sounds in a landscape—could address this shortcoming.
Objectives
In 2011, a massive wildfire named “the Horseshoe 2 Burn” occurred in the Chiricahua National Monument, Arizona, USA. We evaluated the impact of this wildfire on acoustic activity of animal communities.
Methods
In 2013, soundscape recordings were collected over 9 months in 12 burned and 12 non-burned sites in four ecological systems. The seasonal and diel biological acoustic activity were described using the “Bioacoustic Index”, a detailed aural analysis of sound sources, and a new tool called “Sonic Timelapse Builder” (STLB).
Results
Seasonal biophony phenology showed a diurnal peak in June and a nocturnal peak in October in all ecological systems. On June mornings, acoustic activity was lower at burned than at non-burned sites in three of four ecological systems, due to a decreased abundance of cicadas directly impacted by the death of trees. Aural analyses revealed that 55% of recordings from non-burned sites contained insect sounds compared to 18% from burned sites. On October nights, orthopteran activity was more prevalent at some burned sites, possibly due to post-fire emergence of herbaceous.
Conclusions
Soundscape approaches can help address long-term conservation issues involving the responses of animal communities to wildfire. Acoustic methods can serve as a valuable complement to remote sensing for disturbance-based landscape management.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10980-018-0675-3</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8369-4930</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0921-2973 |
ispartof | Landscape ecology, 2018-08, Vol.33 (8), p.1399-1415 |
issn | 0921-2973 1572-9761 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01837168v1 |
source | SpringerLink (Online service) |
subjects | Acoustics Biodiversity and Ecology Biological activity Biomedical and Life Sciences Desert environments Diurnal Ecology Ecosystems Environmental Management Environmental Sciences Imagery Land cover Landscape Landscape Ecology Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning Life Sciences Nature Conservation Nocturnal Remote sensing Research Article Sound sources Sustainable Development Wildfires Wildlife conservation |
title | Soundscapes reveal disturbance impacts: biophonic response to wildfire in the Sonoran Desert Sky Islands |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T09%3A11%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Soundscapes%20reveal%20disturbance%20impacts:%20biophonic%20response%20to%20wildfire%20in%20the%20Sonoran%20Desert%20Sky%20Islands&rft.jtitle=Landscape%20ecology&rft.au=Gasc,%20Amandine&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1399&rft.epage=1415&rft.pages=1399-1415&rft.issn=0921-2973&rft.eissn=1572-9761&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10980-018-0675-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2067506678%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2067506678&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |