Management students' attitudes toward business ethics: A comparison between France and Romania
This study focuses on the differences in the perception of business ethics across two groups of management students from France and Romania (n = 220). Data was collected via the ATBEQ to measure preferences for three business philosophies: Machiavellianism, Social Darwinism, and Moral Objectivism. T...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of business ethics 2011-02, Vol.98 (3), p.391-406 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 406 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 391 |
| container_title | Journal of business ethics |
| container_volume | 98 |
| creator | Bageac, Daniel Furrer, Olivier Reynaud, Emmanuelle |
| description | This study focuses on the differences in the perception of business ethics across two groups of management students from France and Romania (n = 220). Data was collected via the ATBEQ to measure preferences for three business philosophies: Machiavellianism, Social Darwinism, and Moral Objectivism. The results show that Romanian students present more favorable attitudes toward Machiavellianism than French students; whereas, French students valued Social Darwinism and Moral Objectivism more highly. For Machiavellianism and Moral Objectivism the results are consistent with the literature and our hypotheses. However, contrary to our expectations, we find that Social Darwinism is more important in France than Romania. The results indicate that religious practice does not influence preferences for the three business philosophies. In terms of gender differences, women have less favorable attitudes toward Machiavellianism and more favorable attitudes toward Moral Objectivism than men. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10551-010-0555-5 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01796502v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41476140</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41476140</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-c97b1a5712854dfcea180be0b61939039d28709f9605ac131095e780b60615973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVFrFDEQx4MoeLZ-AAVh8aX4sO1Mkkk2j6VoK5z4Up9DbjfX7nG3e2ayLX57s6y04IMGwkwyv_lnwl-IdwjnCGAvGIEIa0CoS0I1vRArJKtqMM6-FCtAY2tNWr8Wb5h3UBahXgn6FoZwFw9xyBXnqSuRz6qQcz8fuMrjY0hdtZm4HyJzFfN93_KpeLUNe45v_8QT8ePL59urm3r9_frr1eW6bkk2uW6d3WAgi7Ih3W3bGLCBTYSNQaccKNfJxoLbOgMUWlQIjqItiAGD5Kw6EZ8W3fuw98fUH0L65cfQ-5vLtZ_vAK0zBPIBC3u2sMc0_pwiZ3_ouY37fRjiOLFvnMFGN1L-nyQlUaKlQn78i9yNUxrKl32jwVhQyhQIF6hNI3OK26dJEfxsjl_MKcOCn83xs7Bceriww11Mz8L_avqwNO04j-npFY3aGtRQ6u-Xetcfn4dwSkHZvwG8WJ_s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>840670336</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Management students' attitudes toward business ethics: A comparison between France and Romania</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source (EBSCOhost)</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Bageac, Daniel ; Furrer, Olivier ; Reynaud, Emmanuelle</creator><creatorcontrib>Bageac, Daniel ; Furrer, Olivier ; Reynaud, Emmanuelle</creatorcontrib><description>This study focuses on the differences in the perception of business ethics across two groups of management students from France and Romania (n = 220). Data was collected via the ATBEQ to measure preferences for three business philosophies: Machiavellianism, Social Darwinism, and Moral Objectivism. The results show that Romanian students present more favorable attitudes toward Machiavellianism than French students; whereas, French students valued Social Darwinism and Moral Objectivism more highly. For Machiavellianism and Moral Objectivism the results are consistent with the literature and our hypotheses. However, contrary to our expectations, we find that Social Darwinism is more important in France than Romania. The results indicate that religious practice does not influence preferences for the three business philosophies. In terms of gender differences, women have less favorable attitudes toward Machiavellianism and more favorable attitudes toward Moral Objectivism than men.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-4544</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1573-0697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0697</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10551-010-0555-5</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBUEDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Betriebswirtschaftslehre ; Business ; Business administration ; Business and Management ; Business Ethics ; Business structures ; Comparative analysis ; Corporate social responsibility ; Cultural heritage ; Economic value ; Education ; Ethical behavior ; Ethics ; Ethik ; France ; Frankreich ; Gender ; Globalization ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Hypotheses ; Judaism ; Machiavellianism ; Management ; Men ; Morality ; Morals ; Philosophy ; Quality of Life Research ; Questionnaires ; Religious practices ; Romania ; Rumänien ; Sex differences ; Social Darwinism ; Social ethics ; Social responsibility ; Student ; Student attitudes ; Students ; Studies ; Studium ; Unternehmen ; Vergleich ; Wahrnehmung ; Women</subject><ispartof>Journal of business ethics, 2011-02, Vol.98 (3), p.391-406</ispartof><rights>2011 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-c97b1a5712854dfcea180be0b61939039d28709f9605ac131095e780b60615973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-c97b1a5712854dfcea180be0b61939039d28709f9605ac131095e780b60615973</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41476140$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41476140$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,799,881,27842,27843,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/suche/fis_set.html?FId=933093$$DAccess content in the German Education Portal$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://amu.hal.science/hal-01796502$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bageac, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furrer, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynaud, Emmanuelle</creatorcontrib><title>Management students' attitudes toward business ethics: A comparison between France and Romania</title><title>Journal of business ethics</title><addtitle>J Bus Ethics</addtitle><description>This study focuses on the differences in the perception of business ethics across two groups of management students from France and Romania (n = 220). Data was collected via the ATBEQ to measure preferences for three business philosophies: Machiavellianism, Social Darwinism, and Moral Objectivism. The results show that Romanian students present more favorable attitudes toward Machiavellianism than French students; whereas, French students valued Social Darwinism and Moral Objectivism more highly. For Machiavellianism and Moral Objectivism the results are consistent with the literature and our hypotheses. However, contrary to our expectations, we find that Social Darwinism is more important in France than Romania. The results indicate that religious practice does not influence preferences for the three business philosophies. In terms of gender differences, women have less favorable attitudes toward Machiavellianism and more favorable attitudes toward Moral Objectivism than men.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Betriebswirtschaftslehre</subject><subject>Business</subject><subject>Business administration</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Business Ethics</subject><subject>Business structures</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Corporate social responsibility</subject><subject>Cultural heritage</subject><subject>Economic value</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Ethical behavior</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Ethik</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>Frankreich</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Judaism</subject><subject>Machiavellianism</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Morals</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Religious practices</subject><subject>Romania</subject><subject>Rumänien</subject><subject>Sex differences</subject><subject>Social Darwinism</subject><subject>Social ethics</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><subject>Student</subject><subject>Student attitudes</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Studium</subject><subject>Unternehmen</subject><subject>Vergleich</subject><subject>Wahrnehmung</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0167-4544</issn><issn>1573-0697</issn><issn>1573-0697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVFrFDEQx4MoeLZ-AAVh8aX4sO1Mkkk2j6VoK5z4Up9DbjfX7nG3e2ayLX57s6y04IMGwkwyv_lnwl-IdwjnCGAvGIEIa0CoS0I1vRArJKtqMM6-FCtAY2tNWr8Wb5h3UBahXgn6FoZwFw9xyBXnqSuRz6qQcz8fuMrjY0hdtZm4HyJzFfN93_KpeLUNe45v_8QT8ePL59urm3r9_frr1eW6bkk2uW6d3WAgi7Ih3W3bGLCBTYSNQaccKNfJxoLbOgMUWlQIjqItiAGD5Kw6EZ8W3fuw98fUH0L65cfQ-5vLtZ_vAK0zBPIBC3u2sMc0_pwiZ3_ouY37fRjiOLFvnMFGN1L-nyQlUaKlQn78i9yNUxrKl32jwVhQyhQIF6hNI3OK26dJEfxsjl_MKcOCn83xs7Bceriww11Mz8L_avqwNO04j-npFY3aGtRQ6u-Xetcfn4dwSkHZvwG8WJ_s</recordid><startdate>20110201</startdate><enddate>20110201</enddate><creator>Bageac, Daniel</creator><creator>Furrer, Olivier</creator><creator>Reynaud, Emmanuelle</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag</general><scope>9S6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><scope>IHQJB</scope><scope>VOOES</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110201</creationdate><title>Management students' attitudes toward business ethics</title><author>Bageac, Daniel ; Furrer, Olivier ; Reynaud, Emmanuelle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-c97b1a5712854dfcea180be0b61939039d28709f9605ac131095e780b60615973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Betriebswirtschaftslehre</topic><topic>Business</topic><topic>Business administration</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Business Ethics</topic><topic>Business structures</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Corporate social responsibility</topic><topic>Cultural heritage</topic><topic>Economic value</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Ethical behavior</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Ethik</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Frankreich</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Judaism</topic><topic>Machiavellianism</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Morals</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Religious practices</topic><topic>Romania</topic><topic>Rumänien</topic><topic>Sex differences</topic><topic>Social Darwinism</topic><topic>Social ethics</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><topic>Student</topic><topic>Student attitudes</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Studium</topic><topic>Unternehmen</topic><topic>Vergleich</topic><topic>Wahrnehmung</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bageac, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furrer, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynaud, Emmanuelle</creatorcontrib><collection>FIS Bildung Literaturdatenbank</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société (Open Access)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bageac, Daniel</au><au>Furrer, Olivier</au><au>Reynaud, Emmanuelle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Management students' attitudes toward business ethics: A comparison between France and Romania</atitle><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle><stitle>J Bus Ethics</stitle><date>2011-02-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>391</spage><epage>406</epage><pages>391-406</pages><issn>0167-4544</issn><issn>1573-0697</issn><eissn>1573-0697</eissn><coden>JBUEDJ</coden><abstract>This study focuses on the differences in the perception of business ethics across two groups of management students from France and Romania (n = 220). Data was collected via the ATBEQ to measure preferences for three business philosophies: Machiavellianism, Social Darwinism, and Moral Objectivism. The results show that Romanian students present more favorable attitudes toward Machiavellianism than French students; whereas, French students valued Social Darwinism and Moral Objectivism more highly. For Machiavellianism and Moral Objectivism the results are consistent with the literature and our hypotheses. However, contrary to our expectations, we find that Social Darwinism is more important in France than Romania. The results indicate that religious practice does not influence preferences for the three business philosophies. In terms of gender differences, women have less favorable attitudes toward Machiavellianism and more favorable attitudes toward Moral Objectivism than men.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10551-010-0555-5</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0167-4544 |
| ispartof | Journal of business ethics, 2011-02, Vol.98 (3), p.391-406 |
| issn | 0167-4544 1573-0697 1573-0697 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01796502v1 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source (EBSCOhost); Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; PAIS Index; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Attitudes Betriebswirtschaftslehre Business Business administration Business and Management Business Ethics Business structures Comparative analysis Corporate social responsibility Cultural heritage Economic value Education Ethical behavior Ethics Ethik France Frankreich Gender Globalization Humanities and Social Sciences Hypotheses Judaism Machiavellianism Management Men Morality Morals Philosophy Quality of Life Research Questionnaires Religious practices Romania Rumänien Sex differences Social Darwinism Social ethics Social responsibility Student Student attitudes Students Studies Studium Unternehmen Vergleich Wahrnehmung Women |
| title | Management students' attitudes toward business ethics: A comparison between France and Romania |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T12%3A12%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Management%20students'%20attitudes%20toward%20business%20ethics:%20A%20comparison%20between%20France%20and%20Romania&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20business%20ethics&rft.au=Bageac,%20Daniel&rft.date=2011-02-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=391&rft.epage=406&rft.pages=391-406&rft.issn=0167-4544&rft.eissn=1573-0697&rft.coden=JBUEDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10551-010-0555-5&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_hal_p%3E41476140%3C/jstor_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=840670336&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41476140&rfr_iscdi=true |