The red-vented bulbul (Pycnonotus cafer): serious pest or understudied invader?

Recently, debate has flourished about inadequacies in the simplistic “worst invasive species” approach and its global scale. Here we investigate the status of the red-vented bulbul ( Pycnonotus cafer ), an Asian passerine bird. This species has been introduced widely across Pacific islands and is co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biological invasions 2018, Vol.20 (1), p.121-136
Hauptverfasser: Thibault, Martin, Vidal, Eric, Potter, Murray A., Dyer, Ellie, Brescia, Fabrice
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 136
container_issue 1
container_start_page 121
container_title Biological invasions
container_volume 20
creator Thibault, Martin
Vidal, Eric
Potter, Murray A.
Dyer, Ellie
Brescia, Fabrice
description Recently, debate has flourished about inadequacies in the simplistic “worst invasive species” approach and its global scale. Here we investigate the status of the red-vented bulbul ( Pycnonotus cafer ), an Asian passerine bird. This species has been introduced widely across Pacific islands and is commonly blamed for its impacts on agriculture and biodiversity via dispersal of invasive plant seeds and competition with native fauna. This case study evaluates all available data on the impacts and management of this invasive species and identifies priorities for future research. We reviewed the scientific literature and information from three databases (ABBA, GAVIA, eBird) and highlight that the attention paid to this species by scientists and managers varied considerably between islands and contexts and was globally lower than the attention paid to other species on the IUCN-ISSG list. The red-vented bulbul has now established on 37 islands and in seven continental locations outside its native range. We show that three categories of effects are associated with this species: plant damage, seed dispersal and disturbance of fauna. We compiled lists of 110 plant species consumed, 33 plant species dispersed, and 15 species of bird that this bulbul interacts with. However, these lists were mainly made of opportunistic observations rather than specific assessments. Research outputs that focus on better ways to prevent or quantify the impacts of the red-vented bulbul remain scarce. We found very few references exploring potential positive impacts of this species, and only two examples of management actions undertaken against it. The latter are required to inform management actions, especially on sensitive tropical islands where invasions and dispersal of the red-vented bulbul are ongoing. Our analysis of the literature found no clear support for considering this species to be one of the “world’s worst” invasive alien species.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10530-017-1521-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01789436v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1993444426</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-a0e22f1153b2c5d2c46b4d335bcbbb7b99303142030b784859a3d20f533938e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFLwzAUxoMoOKd_gLeCF3eIJnlJ03gRGeqEwTzMc0ja1HXMZibtYP-9GRXxoiGQvPD73vvIh9AlJTeUEHkbKRFAMKESU8EoZkdoRIUETHnOj9MdColBcHmKzmJcE0KUJGKEFsuVy4Kr8M61nasy22_Szq5f92XrW9_1MStN7cLkLosuND7VWxe7zIesbysXYtdXTdI17c6k8v4cndRmE93F9zlGb0-Py-kMzxfPL9OHOS45ox02xDFWUyrAslJUrOS55RWAsKW1VlqlgADljACxsuCFUAYqRmoBoKBwCsZoMvRdmY3ehubDhL32ptGzh7k-vKWfKBSHfEcTezWw2-A_--Rer30f2mRPs5wqlXOVjPxDJQZ4WixPFB2oMvgYg6t_hlOiD0noIYnDfH1IQrOkYYMmJrZ9d-FX5z9FX5luiBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1993444426</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The red-vented bulbul (Pycnonotus cafer): serious pest or understudied invader?</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Thibault, Martin ; Vidal, Eric ; Potter, Murray A. ; Dyer, Ellie ; Brescia, Fabrice</creator><creatorcontrib>Thibault, Martin ; Vidal, Eric ; Potter, Murray A. ; Dyer, Ellie ; Brescia, Fabrice</creatorcontrib><description>Recently, debate has flourished about inadequacies in the simplistic “worst invasive species” approach and its global scale. Here we investigate the status of the red-vented bulbul ( Pycnonotus cafer ), an Asian passerine bird. This species has been introduced widely across Pacific islands and is commonly blamed for its impacts on agriculture and biodiversity via dispersal of invasive plant seeds and competition with native fauna. This case study evaluates all available data on the impacts and management of this invasive species and identifies priorities for future research. We reviewed the scientific literature and information from three databases (ABBA, GAVIA, eBird) and highlight that the attention paid to this species by scientists and managers varied considerably between islands and contexts and was globally lower than the attention paid to other species on the IUCN-ISSG list. The red-vented bulbul has now established on 37 islands and in seven continental locations outside its native range. We show that three categories of effects are associated with this species: plant damage, seed dispersal and disturbance of fauna. We compiled lists of 110 plant species consumed, 33 plant species dispersed, and 15 species of bird that this bulbul interacts with. However, these lists were mainly made of opportunistic observations rather than specific assessments. Research outputs that focus on better ways to prevent or quantify the impacts of the red-vented bulbul remain scarce. We found very few references exploring potential positive impacts of this species, and only two examples of management actions undertaken against it. The latter are required to inform management actions, especially on sensitive tropical islands where invasions and dispersal of the red-vented bulbul are ongoing. Our analysis of the literature found no clear support for considering this species to be one of the “world’s worst” invasive alien species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-3547</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10530-017-1521-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Agricultural management ; Animal biology ; Biodiversity ; Biodiversity and Ecology ; Birds ; Developmental Biology ; Dispersion ; Ecology ; Ecology, environment ; Ecosystems ; Environmental Sciences ; Fauna ; Flowers &amp; plants ; Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology ; Introduced species ; Invasive plants ; Invasive species ; Islands ; Life Sciences ; Nonnative species ; Original Paper ; Plant Sciences ; Plant species ; Pycnonotus cafer ; Seed dispersal ; Seeds ; Studies ; Symbiosis ; Vertebrate Zoology</subject><ispartof>Biological invasions, 2018, Vol.20 (1), p.121-136</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing AG 2017</rights><rights>Biological Invasions is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Springer International Publishing AG 2017.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-a0e22f1153b2c5d2c46b4d335bcbbb7b99303142030b784859a3d20f533938e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-a0e22f1153b2c5d2c46b4d335bcbbb7b99303142030b784859a3d20f533938e93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2386-4501 ; 0000-0001-8114-2219</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10530-017-1521-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10530-017-1521-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,27907,27908,41471,42540,51302</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01789436$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thibault, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidal, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potter, Murray A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dyer, Ellie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brescia, Fabrice</creatorcontrib><title>The red-vented bulbul (Pycnonotus cafer): serious pest or understudied invader?</title><title>Biological invasions</title><addtitle>Biol Invasions</addtitle><description>Recently, debate has flourished about inadequacies in the simplistic “worst invasive species” approach and its global scale. Here we investigate the status of the red-vented bulbul ( Pycnonotus cafer ), an Asian passerine bird. This species has been introduced widely across Pacific islands and is commonly blamed for its impacts on agriculture and biodiversity via dispersal of invasive plant seeds and competition with native fauna. This case study evaluates all available data on the impacts and management of this invasive species and identifies priorities for future research. We reviewed the scientific literature and information from three databases (ABBA, GAVIA, eBird) and highlight that the attention paid to this species by scientists and managers varied considerably between islands and contexts and was globally lower than the attention paid to other species on the IUCN-ISSG list. The red-vented bulbul has now established on 37 islands and in seven continental locations outside its native range. We show that three categories of effects are associated with this species: plant damage, seed dispersal and disturbance of fauna. We compiled lists of 110 plant species consumed, 33 plant species dispersed, and 15 species of bird that this bulbul interacts with. However, these lists were mainly made of opportunistic observations rather than specific assessments. Research outputs that focus on better ways to prevent or quantify the impacts of the red-vented bulbul remain scarce. We found very few references exploring potential positive impacts of this species, and only two examples of management actions undertaken against it. The latter are required to inform management actions, especially on sensitive tropical islands where invasions and dispersal of the red-vented bulbul are ongoing. Our analysis of the literature found no clear support for considering this species to be one of the “world’s worst” invasive alien species.</description><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>Animal biology</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biodiversity and Ecology</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Developmental Biology</subject><subject>Dispersion</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecology, environment</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Fauna</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Invasive plants</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Islands</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Pycnonotus cafer</subject><subject>Seed dispersal</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Symbiosis</subject><subject>Vertebrate Zoology</subject><issn>1387-3547</issn><issn>1573-1464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFLwzAUxoMoOKd_gLeCF3eIJnlJ03gRGeqEwTzMc0ja1HXMZibtYP-9GRXxoiGQvPD73vvIh9AlJTeUEHkbKRFAMKESU8EoZkdoRIUETHnOj9MdColBcHmKzmJcE0KUJGKEFsuVy4Kr8M61nasy22_Szq5f92XrW9_1MStN7cLkLosuND7VWxe7zIesbysXYtdXTdI17c6k8v4cndRmE93F9zlGb0-Py-kMzxfPL9OHOS45ox02xDFWUyrAslJUrOS55RWAsKW1VlqlgADljACxsuCFUAYqRmoBoKBwCsZoMvRdmY3ehubDhL32ptGzh7k-vKWfKBSHfEcTezWw2-A_--Rer30f2mRPs5wqlXOVjPxDJQZ4WixPFB2oMvgYg6t_hlOiD0noIYnDfH1IQrOkYYMmJrZ9d-FX5z9FX5luiBQ</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Thibault, Martin</creator><creator>Vidal, Eric</creator><creator>Potter, Murray A.</creator><creator>Dyer, Ellie</creator><creator>Brescia, Fabrice</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2386-4501</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8114-2219</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>The red-vented bulbul (Pycnonotus cafer): serious pest or understudied invader?</title><author>Thibault, Martin ; Vidal, Eric ; Potter, Murray A. ; Dyer, Ellie ; Brescia, Fabrice</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-a0e22f1153b2c5d2c46b4d335bcbbb7b99303142030b784859a3d20f533938e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>Animal biology</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biodiversity and Ecology</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Developmental Biology</topic><topic>Dispersion</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecology, environment</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Fauna</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Invasive plants</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Islands</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Pycnonotus cafer</topic><topic>Seed dispersal</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Symbiosis</topic><topic>Vertebrate Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thibault, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidal, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potter, Murray A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dyer, Ellie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brescia, Fabrice</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Biological invasions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thibault, Martin</au><au>Vidal, Eric</au><au>Potter, Murray A.</au><au>Dyer, Ellie</au><au>Brescia, Fabrice</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The red-vented bulbul (Pycnonotus cafer): serious pest or understudied invader?</atitle><jtitle>Biological invasions</jtitle><stitle>Biol Invasions</stitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>121</spage><epage>136</epage><pages>121-136</pages><issn>1387-3547</issn><eissn>1573-1464</eissn><abstract>Recently, debate has flourished about inadequacies in the simplistic “worst invasive species” approach and its global scale. Here we investigate the status of the red-vented bulbul ( Pycnonotus cafer ), an Asian passerine bird. This species has been introduced widely across Pacific islands and is commonly blamed for its impacts on agriculture and biodiversity via dispersal of invasive plant seeds and competition with native fauna. This case study evaluates all available data on the impacts and management of this invasive species and identifies priorities for future research. We reviewed the scientific literature and information from three databases (ABBA, GAVIA, eBird) and highlight that the attention paid to this species by scientists and managers varied considerably between islands and contexts and was globally lower than the attention paid to other species on the IUCN-ISSG list. The red-vented bulbul has now established on 37 islands and in seven continental locations outside its native range. We show that three categories of effects are associated with this species: plant damage, seed dispersal and disturbance of fauna. We compiled lists of 110 plant species consumed, 33 plant species dispersed, and 15 species of bird that this bulbul interacts with. However, these lists were mainly made of opportunistic observations rather than specific assessments. Research outputs that focus on better ways to prevent or quantify the impacts of the red-vented bulbul remain scarce. We found very few references exploring potential positive impacts of this species, and only two examples of management actions undertaken against it. The latter are required to inform management actions, especially on sensitive tropical islands where invasions and dispersal of the red-vented bulbul are ongoing. Our analysis of the literature found no clear support for considering this species to be one of the “world’s worst” invasive alien species.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10530-017-1521-2</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2386-4501</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8114-2219</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1387-3547
ispartof Biological invasions, 2018, Vol.20 (1), p.121-136
issn 1387-3547
1573-1464
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01789436v1
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Agricultural management
Animal biology
Biodiversity
Biodiversity and Ecology
Birds
Developmental Biology
Dispersion
Ecology
Ecology, environment
Ecosystems
Environmental Sciences
Fauna
Flowers & plants
Freshwater & Marine Ecology
Introduced species
Invasive plants
Invasive species
Islands
Life Sciences
Nonnative species
Original Paper
Plant Sciences
Plant species
Pycnonotus cafer
Seed dispersal
Seeds
Studies
Symbiosis
Vertebrate Zoology
title The red-vented bulbul (Pycnonotus cafer): serious pest or understudied invader?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T15%3A28%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20red-vented%20bulbul%20(Pycnonotus%20cafer):%20serious%20pest%20or%20understudied%20invader?&rft.jtitle=Biological%20invasions&rft.au=Thibault,%20Martin&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=121&rft.epage=136&rft.pages=121-136&rft.issn=1387-3547&rft.eissn=1573-1464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10530-017-1521-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1993444426%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1993444426&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true