Shared Decision-Making: a Systematic Review Focusing on Mood Disorders
Purpose of Review This study aims to provide a review of the randomized controlled studies evaluating the effects of shared decision-making (SDM) intervention in comparison to care as usual in patients with mood disorders. Recent Findings Of the 14 randomized controlled studies identified, only thre...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Current psychiatry reports 2018-04, Vol.20 (4), p.23-23, Article 23 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 23 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 23 |
| container_title | Current psychiatry reports |
| container_volume | 20 |
| creator | Samalin, Ludovic Genty, Jean-Baptiste Boyer, Laurent Lopez-Castroman, Jorge Abbar, Mocrane Llorca, Pierre-Michel |
| description | Purpose of Review
This study aims to provide a review of the randomized controlled studies evaluating the effects of shared decision-making (SDM) intervention in comparison to care as usual in patients with mood disorders.
Recent Findings
Of the 14 randomized controlled studies identified, only three 6-month studies evaluated the interest of SDM interventions using decision aids in depressed patients. All of them showed that the intervention effectively improved patient satisfaction and engagement in the decision-making process. Only one study in patients with bipolar disorder (BD) showed improvement of depressive symptoms, functioning, and quality of life. Other included studies were collaborative care interventions using a SDM approach in patients with depression in specific populations depending on age, gender, income, and physical comorbidities. All of them showed significant improvement in depression outcomes or medication adherence.
Summary
SDM interventions using decision aids and collaborative care showed evidence of improvements in the management of depression. Stronger evidence of SDM interest in BD is needed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11920-018-0892-0 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01758360v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2422903126</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-884ba9cdb1f3dc8e8aff90754f4bb4599243db4141fd92f500b7f213742e45593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFv1DAQhS0EoqXwA7igSFzgYJgZ24nNrSosRdoKicLZchK7ddmNW3tT1H-PVylFQuLkked7b2b0GHuJ8A4BuvcF0RBwQM1BG-LwiB2iEopjK9XjfU2CC410wJ6VcgVAAJqesgMyShskc8hW55cu-7H56IdYYpr4mfsZp4sPjWvO78rOb90uDs03fxv9r2aVhrnUbpOm5iylqool5dHn8pw9CW5T_Iv794j9WH36fnLK118_fzk5XvNBQrvjWsvemWHsMYhx0F67EAx0SgbZ91IZQ1KMvUSJYTQUFEDfBULRSfJSKSOO2NvF99Jt7HWOW5fvbHLRnh6v7f4PsFNatHCLlX2zsNc53cy-7Ow2lsFvNm7yaS6WAI1sNaquoq__Qa_SnKd6iSVJZEAgtZXChRpyKiX78LABgt0HYpdA6hLa7gOxUDWv7p3nfuvHB8WfBCpAC1Bqa7rw-e_o_7v-BnM5kpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2422903126</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Shared Decision-Making: a Systematic Review Focusing on Mood Disorders</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Samalin, Ludovic ; Genty, Jean-Baptiste ; Boyer, Laurent ; Lopez-Castroman, Jorge ; Abbar, Mocrane ; Llorca, Pierre-Michel</creator><creatorcontrib>Samalin, Ludovic ; Genty, Jean-Baptiste ; Boyer, Laurent ; Lopez-Castroman, Jorge ; Abbar, Mocrane ; Llorca, Pierre-Michel</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose of Review
This study aims to provide a review of the randomized controlled studies evaluating the effects of shared decision-making (SDM) intervention in comparison to care as usual in patients with mood disorders.
Recent Findings
Of the 14 randomized controlled studies identified, only three 6-month studies evaluated the interest of SDM interventions using decision aids in depressed patients. All of them showed that the intervention effectively improved patient satisfaction and engagement in the decision-making process. Only one study in patients with bipolar disorder (BD) showed improvement of depressive symptoms, functioning, and quality of life. Other included studies were collaborative care interventions using a SDM approach in patients with depression in specific populations depending on age, gender, income, and physical comorbidities. All of them showed significant improvement in depression outcomes or medication adherence.
Summary
SDM interventions using decision aids and collaborative care showed evidence of improvements in the management of depression. Stronger evidence of SDM interest in BD is needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1523-3812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11920-018-0892-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29589129</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Clinical decision making ; Cognitive science ; Cognitive Sciences ; Collaboration ; Decision Making ; Emotional disorders ; Humans ; Life Sciences ; Medication Adherence - statistics & numerical data ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Mental depression ; Mood disorders ; Mood Disorders (E Baca-Garcia ; Mood Disorders - therapy ; Neurobiology ; Neurons and Cognition ; Neuroscience ; Patient Participation ; Patient Satisfaction ; Psychiatry ; Psychology and behavior ; Quality of Life ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Section Editor ; Systematic review ; Topical Collection on Mood Disorders</subject><ispartof>Current psychiatry reports, 2018-04, Vol.20 (4), p.23-23, Article 23</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-884ba9cdb1f3dc8e8aff90754f4bb4599243db4141fd92f500b7f213742e45593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-884ba9cdb1f3dc8e8aff90754f4bb4599243db4141fd92f500b7f213742e45593</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0618-0690 ; 0000-0001-7438-8990</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11920-018-0892-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11920-018-0892-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29589129$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://uca.hal.science/hal-01758360$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Samalin, Ludovic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Genty, Jean-Baptiste</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyer, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez-Castroman, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbar, Mocrane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Llorca, Pierre-Michel</creatorcontrib><title>Shared Decision-Making: a Systematic Review Focusing on Mood Disorders</title><title>Current psychiatry reports</title><addtitle>Curr Psychiatry Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Curr Psychiatry Rep</addtitle><description>Purpose of Review
This study aims to provide a review of the randomized controlled studies evaluating the effects of shared decision-making (SDM) intervention in comparison to care as usual in patients with mood disorders.
Recent Findings
Of the 14 randomized controlled studies identified, only three 6-month studies evaluated the interest of SDM interventions using decision aids in depressed patients. All of them showed that the intervention effectively improved patient satisfaction and engagement in the decision-making process. Only one study in patients with bipolar disorder (BD) showed improvement of depressive symptoms, functioning, and quality of life. Other included studies were collaborative care interventions using a SDM approach in patients with depression in specific populations depending on age, gender, income, and physical comorbidities. All of them showed significant improvement in depression outcomes or medication adherence.
Summary
SDM interventions using decision aids and collaborative care showed evidence of improvements in the management of depression. Stronger evidence of SDM interest in BD is needed.</description><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Cognitive science</subject><subject>Cognitive Sciences</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Emotional disorders</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Medication Adherence - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Mood disorders</subject><subject>Mood Disorders (E Baca-Garcia</subject><subject>Mood Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Neurobiology</subject><subject>Neurons and Cognition</subject><subject>Neuroscience</subject><subject>Patient Participation</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology and behavior</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Section Editor</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Topical Collection on Mood Disorders</subject><issn>1523-3812</issn><issn>1535-1645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUFv1DAQhS0EoqXwA7igSFzgYJgZ24nNrSosRdoKicLZchK7ddmNW3tT1H-PVylFQuLkked7b2b0GHuJ8A4BuvcF0RBwQM1BG-LwiB2iEopjK9XjfU2CC410wJ6VcgVAAJqesgMyShskc8hW55cu-7H56IdYYpr4mfsZp4sPjWvO78rOb90uDs03fxv9r2aVhrnUbpOm5iylqool5dHn8pw9CW5T_Iv794j9WH36fnLK118_fzk5XvNBQrvjWsvemWHsMYhx0F67EAx0SgbZ91IZQ1KMvUSJYTQUFEDfBULRSfJSKSOO2NvF99Jt7HWOW5fvbHLRnh6v7f4PsFNatHCLlX2zsNc53cy-7Ow2lsFvNm7yaS6WAI1sNaquoq__Qa_SnKd6iSVJZEAgtZXChRpyKiX78LABgt0HYpdA6hLa7gOxUDWv7p3nfuvHB8WfBCpAC1Bqa7rw-e_o_7v-BnM5kpA</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Samalin, Ludovic</creator><creator>Genty, Jean-Baptiste</creator><creator>Boyer, Laurent</creator><creator>Lopez-Castroman, Jorge</creator><creator>Abbar, Mocrane</creator><creator>Llorca, Pierre-Michel</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Current Medicine Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0618-0690</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7438-8990</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Shared Decision-Making: a Systematic Review Focusing on Mood Disorders</title><author>Samalin, Ludovic ; Genty, Jean-Baptiste ; Boyer, Laurent ; Lopez-Castroman, Jorge ; Abbar, Mocrane ; Llorca, Pierre-Michel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-884ba9cdb1f3dc8e8aff90754f4bb4599243db4141fd92f500b7f213742e45593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Cognitive science</topic><topic>Cognitive Sciences</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Emotional disorders</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Medication Adherence - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Mood disorders</topic><topic>Mood Disorders (E Baca-Garcia</topic><topic>Mood Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Neurobiology</topic><topic>Neurons and Cognition</topic><topic>Neuroscience</topic><topic>Patient Participation</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology and behavior</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Section Editor</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Topical Collection on Mood Disorders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Samalin, Ludovic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Genty, Jean-Baptiste</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyer, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez-Castroman, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbar, Mocrane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Llorca, Pierre-Michel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Current psychiatry reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Samalin, Ludovic</au><au>Genty, Jean-Baptiste</au><au>Boyer, Laurent</au><au>Lopez-Castroman, Jorge</au><au>Abbar, Mocrane</au><au>Llorca, Pierre-Michel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shared Decision-Making: a Systematic Review Focusing on Mood Disorders</atitle><jtitle>Current psychiatry reports</jtitle><stitle>Curr Psychiatry Rep</stitle><addtitle>Curr Psychiatry Rep</addtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>23-23</pages><artnum>23</artnum><issn>1523-3812</issn><eissn>1535-1645</eissn><abstract>Purpose of Review
This study aims to provide a review of the randomized controlled studies evaluating the effects of shared decision-making (SDM) intervention in comparison to care as usual in patients with mood disorders.
Recent Findings
Of the 14 randomized controlled studies identified, only three 6-month studies evaluated the interest of SDM interventions using decision aids in depressed patients. All of them showed that the intervention effectively improved patient satisfaction and engagement in the decision-making process. Only one study in patients with bipolar disorder (BD) showed improvement of depressive symptoms, functioning, and quality of life. Other included studies were collaborative care interventions using a SDM approach in patients with depression in specific populations depending on age, gender, income, and physical comorbidities. All of them showed significant improvement in depression outcomes or medication adherence.
Summary
SDM interventions using decision aids and collaborative care showed evidence of improvements in the management of depression. Stronger evidence of SDM interest in BD is needed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>29589129</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11920-018-0892-0</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0618-0690</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7438-8990</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1523-3812 |
| ispartof | Current psychiatry reports, 2018-04, Vol.20 (4), p.23-23, Article 23 |
| issn | 1523-3812 1535-1645 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01758360v1 |
| source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Clinical decision making Cognitive science Cognitive Sciences Collaboration Decision Making Emotional disorders Humans Life Sciences Medication Adherence - statistics & numerical data Medicine Medicine & Public Health Mental depression Mood disorders Mood Disorders (E Baca-Garcia Mood Disorders - therapy Neurobiology Neurons and Cognition Neuroscience Patient Participation Patient Satisfaction Psychiatry Psychology and behavior Quality of Life Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Section Editor Systematic review Topical Collection on Mood Disorders |
| title | Shared Decision-Making: a Systematic Review Focusing on Mood Disorders |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T18%3A34%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shared%20Decision-Making:%20a%20Systematic%20Review%20Focusing%20on%20Mood%20Disorders&rft.jtitle=Current%20psychiatry%20reports&rft.au=Samalin,%20Ludovic&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=23-23&rft.artnum=23&rft.issn=1523-3812&rft.eissn=1535-1645&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11920-018-0892-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2422903126%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2422903126&rft_id=info:pmid/29589129&rfr_iscdi=true |