Surgery of the hallux valgus in an ambulatory setting: a liability risk?

Introduction The primary objective of the study is to make an inventory of malpractice in hallux valgus surgery in an ambulatory setting and to identify the patient characteristics for a higher risk of malpractice. The secondary objective is creating a methodology for analyzing the medicolegal aspec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 2017-05, Vol.27 (4), p.545-548
Hauptverfasser: Galois, L., Serwier, J.-M., Arashvand, A. D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 548
container_issue 4
container_start_page 545
container_title European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
container_volume 27
creator Galois, L.
Serwier, J.-M.
Arashvand, A. D.
description Introduction The primary objective of the study is to make an inventory of malpractice in hallux valgus surgery in an ambulatory setting and to identify the patient characteristics for a higher risk of malpractice. The secondary objective is creating a methodology for analyzing the medicolegal aspects of a surgery in day case comparing with hospitalization. Materials and methods The database of the Branchet insurance company was used. A total of 11,000 claims for a period of 11 years (2002–2013) have been investigated. The files of the patients with hallux valgus surgery were isolated from the insurer’s database using CCAM codes. The medical director, a medical officer, the legal expert and finally the judge had already analyzed all these cases. The authors reviewed the various documents with a specific questionnaire. Results We identified 14 cases of claims in relation with hallux valgus 1-day surgery among a total of 138 claims for hallux valgus including all techniques (10%). All patients were female. The mean age was 42.6 years (19–64) in ambulatory patients (AG group) in comparison with 49.5 years (19–73) in hospitalized patients (HG group). Percutaneous techniques were significantly more represented in the AG group ( p  = 0.002) and scarfs osteotomies in the HG group ( p  = 0.004). The use of tourniquet seemed to be lower in the AG group, but it was a not significant trend ( p  = 0.085). In term of anesthesia procedures, no significant differences were seen between the two groups. The comparison of the complications common to both groups showed no significant difference except for insufficient results which were more frequent in the AG group ( p  = 0.026). The rate of insufficient informed consent seemed to be higher in the AG group, but it was a not significant trend ( p  = 0.084). Discussion and conclusion No specific data regarding claims in relation with hallux valgus 1-day surgery are available to our knowledge in the literature. We did not identify in our study specific complications related to ambulatory procedures except for insufficient results. Hallux valgus 1-day surgery does not seem to expose surgeons to higher medicolegal problems than classical hospitalization. Nevertheless, a specific consent form for ambulatory patients is required to limit claims regarding information.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00590-017-1901-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01714584v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2837229913</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3214-156b361fa345d8b60293ecbe48236ea1fb3a035d9104ac06c01e2b25f8693bce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1rFDEUhoMo9kN_QG9KwBt7MXpOvjbxRkqxXWHBC_U6JLOZbdrsTJvMFPffm2X6AYIQSMh5zpv35CXkBOETAiw-FwBpoAFcNGgAG_GKHKLgrEFQ-nU9K84bDUoekKNSbgBQGpRvyQHTsNBC6UOy_DnlTcg7OnR0vA702qU0_aEPLm2mQmNPXV1bPyU3DpUqYRxjv_lCHU3R-ZjiuKM5ltuv78ibzqUS3j_ux-T35bdfF8tm9ePq-8X5qmk5Q9GgVJ4r7BwXcq29AmZ4aH0QmnEVHHaeO-BybRCEa0G1gIF5JjutDPdt4MfkbNatTu1djluXd3Zw0S7PV3Z_V38DhdTiASv7cWbv8nA_hTLabSxtSMn1YZiKRS01AkcwFf3wD3ozTLmvk1im-YIxY5BXCmeqzUMpOXTPDhDsPhI7R7I3YfeRWFF7Th-VJ78N6-eOpwwqwGag1FJfw3h5-v-qfwEc6pOA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2837229913</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surgery of the hallux valgus in an ambulatory setting: a liability risk?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Galois, L. ; Serwier, J.-M. ; Arashvand, A. D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Galois, L. ; Serwier, J.-M. ; Arashvand, A. D.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction The primary objective of the study is to make an inventory of malpractice in hallux valgus surgery in an ambulatory setting and to identify the patient characteristics for a higher risk of malpractice. The secondary objective is creating a methodology for analyzing the medicolegal aspects of a surgery in day case comparing with hospitalization. Materials and methods The database of the Branchet insurance company was used. A total of 11,000 claims for a period of 11 years (2002–2013) have been investigated. The files of the patients with hallux valgus surgery were isolated from the insurer’s database using CCAM codes. The medical director, a medical officer, the legal expert and finally the judge had already analyzed all these cases. The authors reviewed the various documents with a specific questionnaire. Results We identified 14 cases of claims in relation with hallux valgus 1-day surgery among a total of 138 claims for hallux valgus including all techniques (10%). All patients were female. The mean age was 42.6 years (19–64) in ambulatory patients (AG group) in comparison with 49.5 years (19–73) in hospitalized patients (HG group). Percutaneous techniques were significantly more represented in the AG group ( p  = 0.002) and scarfs osteotomies in the HG group ( p  = 0.004). The use of tourniquet seemed to be lower in the AG group, but it was a not significant trend ( p  = 0.085). In term of anesthesia procedures, no significant differences were seen between the two groups. The comparison of the complications common to both groups showed no significant difference except for insufficient results which were more frequent in the AG group ( p  = 0.026). The rate of insufficient informed consent seemed to be higher in the AG group, but it was a not significant trend ( p  = 0.084). Discussion and conclusion No specific data regarding claims in relation with hallux valgus 1-day surgery are available to our knowledge in the literature. We did not identify in our study specific complications related to ambulatory procedures except for insufficient results. Hallux valgus 1-day surgery does not seem to expose surgeons to higher medicolegal problems than classical hospitalization. Nevertheless, a specific consent form for ambulatory patients is required to limit claims regarding information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1633-8065</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0948-4817</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1068</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00590-017-1901-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28078468</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Paris: Springer Paris</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - methods ; Cohort Studies ; Databases, Factual ; Female ; France ; Hallux Valgus - diagnostic imaging ; Hallux Valgus - surgery ; Hospitalization - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Human health and pathology ; Humans ; Incidence ; Insurance Claim Reporting ; Liability, Legal ; Life Sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Original Article • FOOT - HALLUX VALGUS ; Osteotomy - adverse effects ; Osteotomy - methods ; Pain management ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - physiopathology ; Prognosis ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Surgery ; Surgical Orthopedics ; Traumatic Surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery &amp; Traumatology, 2017-05, Vol.27 (4), p.545-548</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag France 2017</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag France 2017.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3214-156b361fa345d8b60293ecbe48236ea1fb3a035d9104ac06c01e2b25f8693bce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3214-156b361fa345d8b60293ecbe48236ea1fb3a035d9104ac06c01e2b25f8693bce3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0457-4189</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00590-017-1901-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00590-017-1901-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28078468$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01714584$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Galois, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serwier, J.-M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arashvand, A. D.</creatorcontrib><title>Surgery of the hallux valgus in an ambulatory setting: a liability risk?</title><title>European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery &amp; Traumatology</title><addtitle>Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol</addtitle><description>Introduction The primary objective of the study is to make an inventory of malpractice in hallux valgus surgery in an ambulatory setting and to identify the patient characteristics for a higher risk of malpractice. The secondary objective is creating a methodology for analyzing the medicolegal aspects of a surgery in day case comparing with hospitalization. Materials and methods The database of the Branchet insurance company was used. A total of 11,000 claims for a period of 11 years (2002–2013) have been investigated. The files of the patients with hallux valgus surgery were isolated from the insurer’s database using CCAM codes. The medical director, a medical officer, the legal expert and finally the judge had already analyzed all these cases. The authors reviewed the various documents with a specific questionnaire. Results We identified 14 cases of claims in relation with hallux valgus 1-day surgery among a total of 138 claims for hallux valgus including all techniques (10%). All patients were female. The mean age was 42.6 years (19–64) in ambulatory patients (AG group) in comparison with 49.5 years (19–73) in hospitalized patients (HG group). Percutaneous techniques were significantly more represented in the AG group ( p  = 0.002) and scarfs osteotomies in the HG group ( p  = 0.004). The use of tourniquet seemed to be lower in the AG group, but it was a not significant trend ( p  = 0.085). In term of anesthesia procedures, no significant differences were seen between the two groups. The comparison of the complications common to both groups showed no significant difference except for insufficient results which were more frequent in the AG group ( p  = 0.026). The rate of insufficient informed consent seemed to be higher in the AG group, but it was a not significant trend ( p  = 0.084). Discussion and conclusion No specific data regarding claims in relation with hallux valgus 1-day surgery are available to our knowledge in the literature. We did not identify in our study specific complications related to ambulatory procedures except for insufficient results. Hallux valgus 1-day surgery does not seem to expose surgeons to higher medicolegal problems than classical hospitalization. Nevertheless, a specific consent form for ambulatory patients is required to limit claims regarding information.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>Hallux Valgus - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Hallux Valgus - surgery</subject><subject>Hospitalization - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Human health and pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Insurance Claim Reporting</subject><subject>Liability, Legal</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Article • FOOT - HALLUX VALGUS</subject><subject>Osteotomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Osteotomy - methods</subject><subject>Pain management</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - physiopathology</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><subject>Traumatic Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1633-8065</issn><issn>0948-4817</issn><issn>1432-1068</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1rFDEUhoMo9kN_QG9KwBt7MXpOvjbxRkqxXWHBC_U6JLOZbdrsTJvMFPffm2X6AYIQSMh5zpv35CXkBOETAiw-FwBpoAFcNGgAG_GKHKLgrEFQ-nU9K84bDUoekKNSbgBQGpRvyQHTsNBC6UOy_DnlTcg7OnR0vA702qU0_aEPLm2mQmNPXV1bPyU3DpUqYRxjv_lCHU3R-ZjiuKM5ltuv78ibzqUS3j_ux-T35bdfF8tm9ePq-8X5qmk5Q9GgVJ4r7BwXcq29AmZ4aH0QmnEVHHaeO-BybRCEa0G1gIF5JjutDPdt4MfkbNatTu1djluXd3Zw0S7PV3Z_V38DhdTiASv7cWbv8nA_hTLabSxtSMn1YZiKRS01AkcwFf3wD3ozTLmvk1im-YIxY5BXCmeqzUMpOXTPDhDsPhI7R7I3YfeRWFF7Th-VJ78N6-eOpwwqwGag1FJfw3h5-v-qfwEc6pOA</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Galois, L.</creator><creator>Serwier, J.-M.</creator><creator>Arashvand, A. D.</creator><general>Springer Paris</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0457-4189</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>Surgery of the hallux valgus in an ambulatory setting: a liability risk?</title><author>Galois, L. ; Serwier, J.-M. ; Arashvand, A. D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3214-156b361fa345d8b60293ecbe48236ea1fb3a035d9104ac06c01e2b25f8693bce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Hallux Valgus - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Hallux Valgus - surgery</topic><topic>Hospitalization - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Human health and pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Insurance Claim Reporting</topic><topic>Liability, Legal</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Article • FOOT - HALLUX VALGUS</topic><topic>Osteotomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Osteotomy - methods</topic><topic>Pain management</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - physiopathology</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><topic>Traumatic Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Galois, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serwier, J.-M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arashvand, A. D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery &amp; Traumatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Galois, L.</au><au>Serwier, J.-M.</au><au>Arashvand, A. D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surgery of the hallux valgus in an ambulatory setting: a liability risk?</atitle><jtitle>European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery &amp; Traumatology</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol</addtitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>545</spage><epage>548</epage><pages>545-548</pages><issn>1633-8065</issn><issn>0948-4817</issn><eissn>1432-1068</eissn><abstract>Introduction The primary objective of the study is to make an inventory of malpractice in hallux valgus surgery in an ambulatory setting and to identify the patient characteristics for a higher risk of malpractice. The secondary objective is creating a methodology for analyzing the medicolegal aspects of a surgery in day case comparing with hospitalization. Materials and methods The database of the Branchet insurance company was used. A total of 11,000 claims for a period of 11 years (2002–2013) have been investigated. The files of the patients with hallux valgus surgery were isolated from the insurer’s database using CCAM codes. The medical director, a medical officer, the legal expert and finally the judge had already analyzed all these cases. The authors reviewed the various documents with a specific questionnaire. Results We identified 14 cases of claims in relation with hallux valgus 1-day surgery among a total of 138 claims for hallux valgus including all techniques (10%). All patients were female. The mean age was 42.6 years (19–64) in ambulatory patients (AG group) in comparison with 49.5 years (19–73) in hospitalized patients (HG group). Percutaneous techniques were significantly more represented in the AG group ( p  = 0.002) and scarfs osteotomies in the HG group ( p  = 0.004). The use of tourniquet seemed to be lower in the AG group, but it was a not significant trend ( p  = 0.085). In term of anesthesia procedures, no significant differences were seen between the two groups. The comparison of the complications common to both groups showed no significant difference except for insufficient results which were more frequent in the AG group ( p  = 0.026). The rate of insufficient informed consent seemed to be higher in the AG group, but it was a not significant trend ( p  = 0.084). Discussion and conclusion No specific data regarding claims in relation with hallux valgus 1-day surgery are available to our knowledge in the literature. We did not identify in our study specific complications related to ambulatory procedures except for insufficient results. Hallux valgus 1-day surgery does not seem to expose surgeons to higher medicolegal problems than classical hospitalization. Nevertheless, a specific consent form for ambulatory patients is required to limit claims regarding information.</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>Springer Paris</pub><pmid>28078468</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00590-017-1901-4</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0457-4189</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1633-8065
ispartof European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2017-05, Vol.27 (4), p.545-548
issn 1633-8065
0948-4817
1432-1068
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01714584v1
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adult
Aged
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - methods
Cohort Studies
Databases, Factual
Female
France
Hallux Valgus - diagnostic imaging
Hallux Valgus - surgery
Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data
Human health and pathology
Humans
Incidence
Insurance Claim Reporting
Liability, Legal
Life Sciences
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Original Article • FOOT - HALLUX VALGUS
Osteotomy - adverse effects
Osteotomy - methods
Pain management
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Postoperative Complications - physiopathology
Prognosis
Recurrence
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Surgery
Surgical Orthopedics
Traumatic Surgery
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
title Surgery of the hallux valgus in an ambulatory setting: a liability risk?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T08%3A45%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surgery%20of%20the%20hallux%20valgus%20in%20an%20ambulatory%20setting:%20a%20liability%20risk?&rft.jtitle=European%20Journal%20of%20Orthopaedic%20Surgery%20&%20Traumatology&rft.au=Galois,%20L.&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=545&rft.epage=548&rft.pages=545-548&rft.issn=1633-8065&rft.eissn=1432-1068&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00590-017-1901-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2837229913%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2837229913&rft_id=info:pmid/28078468&rfr_iscdi=true