Surgery of the hallux valgus in an ambulatory setting: a liability risk?
Introduction The primary objective of the study is to make an inventory of malpractice in hallux valgus surgery in an ambulatory setting and to identify the patient characteristics for a higher risk of malpractice. The secondary objective is creating a methodology for analyzing the medicolegal aspec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 2017-05, Vol.27 (4), p.545-548 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 548 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 545 |
container_title | European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Galois, L. Serwier, J.-M. Arashvand, A. D. |
description | Introduction
The primary objective of the study is to make an inventory of malpractice in hallux valgus surgery in an ambulatory setting and to identify the patient characteristics for a higher risk of malpractice. The secondary objective is creating a methodology for analyzing the medicolegal aspects of a surgery in day case comparing with hospitalization.
Materials and methods
The database of the Branchet insurance company was used. A total of 11,000 claims for a period of 11 years (2002–2013) have been investigated. The files of the patients with hallux valgus surgery were isolated from the insurer’s database using CCAM codes. The medical director, a medical officer, the legal expert and finally the judge had already analyzed all these cases. The authors reviewed the various documents with a specific questionnaire.
Results
We identified 14 cases of claims in relation with hallux valgus 1-day surgery among a total of 138 claims for hallux valgus including all techniques (10%). All patients were female. The mean age was 42.6 years (19–64) in ambulatory patients (AG group) in comparison with 49.5 years (19–73) in hospitalized patients (HG group). Percutaneous techniques were significantly more represented in the AG group (
p
= 0.002) and scarfs osteotomies in the HG group (
p
= 0.004). The use of tourniquet seemed to be lower in the AG group, but it was a not significant trend (
p
= 0.085). In term of anesthesia procedures, no significant differences were seen between the two groups. The comparison of the complications common to both groups showed no significant difference except for insufficient results which were more frequent in the AG group (
p
= 0.026). The rate of insufficient informed consent seemed to be higher in the AG group, but it was a not significant trend (
p
= 0.084).
Discussion and conclusion
No specific data regarding claims in relation with hallux valgus 1-day surgery are available to our knowledge in the literature. We did not identify in our study specific complications related to ambulatory procedures except for insufficient results. Hallux valgus 1-day surgery does not seem to expose surgeons to higher medicolegal problems than classical hospitalization. Nevertheless, a specific consent form for ambulatory patients is required to limit claims regarding information. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00590-017-1901-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01714584v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2837229913</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3214-156b361fa345d8b60293ecbe48236ea1fb3a035d9104ac06c01e2b25f8693bce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1rFDEUhoMo9kN_QG9KwBt7MXpOvjbxRkqxXWHBC_U6JLOZbdrsTJvMFPffm2X6AYIQSMh5zpv35CXkBOETAiw-FwBpoAFcNGgAG_GKHKLgrEFQ-nU9K84bDUoekKNSbgBQGpRvyQHTsNBC6UOy_DnlTcg7OnR0vA702qU0_aEPLm2mQmNPXV1bPyU3DpUqYRxjv_lCHU3R-ZjiuKM5ltuv78ibzqUS3j_ux-T35bdfF8tm9ePq-8X5qmk5Q9GgVJ4r7BwXcq29AmZ4aH0QmnEVHHaeO-BybRCEa0G1gIF5JjutDPdt4MfkbNatTu1djluXd3Zw0S7PV3Z_V38DhdTiASv7cWbv8nA_hTLabSxtSMn1YZiKRS01AkcwFf3wD3ozTLmvk1im-YIxY5BXCmeqzUMpOXTPDhDsPhI7R7I3YfeRWFF7Th-VJ78N6-eOpwwqwGag1FJfw3h5-v-qfwEc6pOA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2837229913</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surgery of the hallux valgus in an ambulatory setting: a liability risk?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Galois, L. ; Serwier, J.-M. ; Arashvand, A. D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Galois, L. ; Serwier, J.-M. ; Arashvand, A. D.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
The primary objective of the study is to make an inventory of malpractice in hallux valgus surgery in an ambulatory setting and to identify the patient characteristics for a higher risk of malpractice. The secondary objective is creating a methodology for analyzing the medicolegal aspects of a surgery in day case comparing with hospitalization.
Materials and methods
The database of the Branchet insurance company was used. A total of 11,000 claims for a period of 11 years (2002–2013) have been investigated. The files of the patients with hallux valgus surgery were isolated from the insurer’s database using CCAM codes. The medical director, a medical officer, the legal expert and finally the judge had already analyzed all these cases. The authors reviewed the various documents with a specific questionnaire.
Results
We identified 14 cases of claims in relation with hallux valgus 1-day surgery among a total of 138 claims for hallux valgus including all techniques (10%). All patients were female. The mean age was 42.6 years (19–64) in ambulatory patients (AG group) in comparison with 49.5 years (19–73) in hospitalized patients (HG group). Percutaneous techniques were significantly more represented in the AG group (
p
= 0.002) and scarfs osteotomies in the HG group (
p
= 0.004). The use of tourniquet seemed to be lower in the AG group, but it was a not significant trend (
p
= 0.085). In term of anesthesia procedures, no significant differences were seen between the two groups. The comparison of the complications common to both groups showed no significant difference except for insufficient results which were more frequent in the AG group (
p
= 0.026). The rate of insufficient informed consent seemed to be higher in the AG group, but it was a not significant trend (
p
= 0.084).
Discussion and conclusion
No specific data regarding claims in relation with hallux valgus 1-day surgery are available to our knowledge in the literature. We did not identify in our study specific complications related to ambulatory procedures except for insufficient results. Hallux valgus 1-day surgery does not seem to expose surgeons to higher medicolegal problems than classical hospitalization. Nevertheless, a specific consent form for ambulatory patients is required to limit claims regarding information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1633-8065</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0948-4817</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1068</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00590-017-1901-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28078468</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Paris: Springer Paris</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - methods ; Cohort Studies ; Databases, Factual ; Female ; France ; Hallux Valgus - diagnostic imaging ; Hallux Valgus - surgery ; Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data ; Human health and pathology ; Humans ; Incidence ; Insurance Claim Reporting ; Liability, Legal ; Life Sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Original Article • FOOT - HALLUX VALGUS ; Osteotomy - adverse effects ; Osteotomy - methods ; Pain management ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - physiopathology ; Prognosis ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Surgery ; Surgical Orthopedics ; Traumatic Surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2017-05, Vol.27 (4), p.545-548</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag France 2017</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag France 2017.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3214-156b361fa345d8b60293ecbe48236ea1fb3a035d9104ac06c01e2b25f8693bce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3214-156b361fa345d8b60293ecbe48236ea1fb3a035d9104ac06c01e2b25f8693bce3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0457-4189</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00590-017-1901-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00590-017-1901-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28078468$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01714584$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Galois, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serwier, J.-M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arashvand, A. D.</creatorcontrib><title>Surgery of the hallux valgus in an ambulatory setting: a liability risk?</title><title>European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology</title><addtitle>Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol</addtitle><description>Introduction
The primary objective of the study is to make an inventory of malpractice in hallux valgus surgery in an ambulatory setting and to identify the patient characteristics for a higher risk of malpractice. The secondary objective is creating a methodology for analyzing the medicolegal aspects of a surgery in day case comparing with hospitalization.
Materials and methods
The database of the Branchet insurance company was used. A total of 11,000 claims for a period of 11 years (2002–2013) have been investigated. The files of the patients with hallux valgus surgery were isolated from the insurer’s database using CCAM codes. The medical director, a medical officer, the legal expert and finally the judge had already analyzed all these cases. The authors reviewed the various documents with a specific questionnaire.
Results
We identified 14 cases of claims in relation with hallux valgus 1-day surgery among a total of 138 claims for hallux valgus including all techniques (10%). All patients were female. The mean age was 42.6 years (19–64) in ambulatory patients (AG group) in comparison with 49.5 years (19–73) in hospitalized patients (HG group). Percutaneous techniques were significantly more represented in the AG group (
p
= 0.002) and scarfs osteotomies in the HG group (
p
= 0.004). The use of tourniquet seemed to be lower in the AG group, but it was a not significant trend (
p
= 0.085). In term of anesthesia procedures, no significant differences were seen between the two groups. The comparison of the complications common to both groups showed no significant difference except for insufficient results which were more frequent in the AG group (
p
= 0.026). The rate of insufficient informed consent seemed to be higher in the AG group, but it was a not significant trend (
p
= 0.084).
Discussion and conclusion
No specific data regarding claims in relation with hallux valgus 1-day surgery are available to our knowledge in the literature. We did not identify in our study specific complications related to ambulatory procedures except for insufficient results. Hallux valgus 1-day surgery does not seem to expose surgeons to higher medicolegal problems than classical hospitalization. Nevertheless, a specific consent form for ambulatory patients is required to limit claims regarding information.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>Hallux Valgus - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Hallux Valgus - surgery</subject><subject>Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Human health and pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Insurance Claim Reporting</subject><subject>Liability, Legal</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Article • FOOT - HALLUX VALGUS</subject><subject>Osteotomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Osteotomy - methods</subject><subject>Pain management</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - physiopathology</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><subject>Traumatic Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1633-8065</issn><issn>0948-4817</issn><issn>1432-1068</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1rFDEUhoMo9kN_QG9KwBt7MXpOvjbxRkqxXWHBC_U6JLOZbdrsTJvMFPffm2X6AYIQSMh5zpv35CXkBOETAiw-FwBpoAFcNGgAG_GKHKLgrEFQ-nU9K84bDUoekKNSbgBQGpRvyQHTsNBC6UOy_DnlTcg7OnR0vA702qU0_aEPLm2mQmNPXV1bPyU3DpUqYRxjv_lCHU3R-ZjiuKM5ltuv78ibzqUS3j_ux-T35bdfF8tm9ePq-8X5qmk5Q9GgVJ4r7BwXcq29AmZ4aH0QmnEVHHaeO-BybRCEa0G1gIF5JjutDPdt4MfkbNatTu1djluXd3Zw0S7PV3Z_V38DhdTiASv7cWbv8nA_hTLabSxtSMn1YZiKRS01AkcwFf3wD3ozTLmvk1im-YIxY5BXCmeqzUMpOXTPDhDsPhI7R7I3YfeRWFF7Th-VJ78N6-eOpwwqwGag1FJfw3h5-v-qfwEc6pOA</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Galois, L.</creator><creator>Serwier, J.-M.</creator><creator>Arashvand, A. D.</creator><general>Springer Paris</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0457-4189</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>Surgery of the hallux valgus in an ambulatory setting: a liability risk?</title><author>Galois, L. ; Serwier, J.-M. ; Arashvand, A. D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3214-156b361fa345d8b60293ecbe48236ea1fb3a035d9104ac06c01e2b25f8693bce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Hallux Valgus - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Hallux Valgus - surgery</topic><topic>Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Human health and pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Insurance Claim Reporting</topic><topic>Liability, Legal</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Article • FOOT - HALLUX VALGUS</topic><topic>Osteotomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Osteotomy - methods</topic><topic>Pain management</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - physiopathology</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><topic>Traumatic Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Galois, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serwier, J.-M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arashvand, A. D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Galois, L.</au><au>Serwier, J.-M.</au><au>Arashvand, A. D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surgery of the hallux valgus in an ambulatory setting: a liability risk?</atitle><jtitle>European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol</addtitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>545</spage><epage>548</epage><pages>545-548</pages><issn>1633-8065</issn><issn>0948-4817</issn><eissn>1432-1068</eissn><abstract>Introduction
The primary objective of the study is to make an inventory of malpractice in hallux valgus surgery in an ambulatory setting and to identify the patient characteristics for a higher risk of malpractice. The secondary objective is creating a methodology for analyzing the medicolegal aspects of a surgery in day case comparing with hospitalization.
Materials and methods
The database of the Branchet insurance company was used. A total of 11,000 claims for a period of 11 years (2002–2013) have been investigated. The files of the patients with hallux valgus surgery were isolated from the insurer’s database using CCAM codes. The medical director, a medical officer, the legal expert and finally the judge had already analyzed all these cases. The authors reviewed the various documents with a specific questionnaire.
Results
We identified 14 cases of claims in relation with hallux valgus 1-day surgery among a total of 138 claims for hallux valgus including all techniques (10%). All patients were female. The mean age was 42.6 years (19–64) in ambulatory patients (AG group) in comparison with 49.5 years (19–73) in hospitalized patients (HG group). Percutaneous techniques were significantly more represented in the AG group (
p
= 0.002) and scarfs osteotomies in the HG group (
p
= 0.004). The use of tourniquet seemed to be lower in the AG group, but it was a not significant trend (
p
= 0.085). In term of anesthesia procedures, no significant differences were seen between the two groups. The comparison of the complications common to both groups showed no significant difference except for insufficient results which were more frequent in the AG group (
p
= 0.026). The rate of insufficient informed consent seemed to be higher in the AG group, but it was a not significant trend (
p
= 0.084).
Discussion and conclusion
No specific data regarding claims in relation with hallux valgus 1-day surgery are available to our knowledge in the literature. We did not identify in our study specific complications related to ambulatory procedures except for insufficient results. Hallux valgus 1-day surgery does not seem to expose surgeons to higher medicolegal problems than classical hospitalization. Nevertheless, a specific consent form for ambulatory patients is required to limit claims regarding information.</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>Springer Paris</pub><pmid>28078468</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00590-017-1901-4</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0457-4189</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1633-8065 |
ispartof | European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2017-05, Vol.27 (4), p.545-548 |
issn | 1633-8065 0948-4817 1432-1068 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01714584v1 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adult Aged Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - methods Cohort Studies Databases, Factual Female France Hallux Valgus - diagnostic imaging Hallux Valgus - surgery Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data Human health and pathology Humans Incidence Insurance Claim Reporting Liability, Legal Life Sciences Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Original Article • FOOT - HALLUX VALGUS Osteotomy - adverse effects Osteotomy - methods Pain management Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Postoperative Complications - physiopathology Prognosis Recurrence Retrospective Studies Risk Assessment Surgery Surgical Orthopedics Traumatic Surgery Treatment Outcome Young Adult |
title | Surgery of the hallux valgus in an ambulatory setting: a liability risk? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T08%3A45%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surgery%20of%20the%20hallux%20valgus%20in%20an%20ambulatory%20setting:%20a%20liability%20risk?&rft.jtitle=European%20Journal%20of%20Orthopaedic%20Surgery%20&%20Traumatology&rft.au=Galois,%20L.&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=545&rft.epage=548&rft.pages=545-548&rft.issn=1633-8065&rft.eissn=1432-1068&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00590-017-1901-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2837229913%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2837229913&rft_id=info:pmid/28078468&rfr_iscdi=true |