Assessment of derelict soil quality: Abiotic, biotic and functional approaches
The intensification and subsequent closing down of industrial activities during the last century has left behind large surfaces of derelict lands. Derelict soils have low fertility, can be contaminated, and many of them remain unused. However, with the increasing demand of soil surfaces, they might...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Science of the total environment 2018-02, Vol.613-614, p.990-1002 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1002 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 990 |
container_title | The Science of the total environment |
container_volume | 613-614 |
creator | Vincent, Quentin Auclerc, Apolline Beguiristain, Thierry Leyval, Corinne |
description | The intensification and subsequent closing down of industrial activities during the last century has left behind large surfaces of derelict lands. Derelict soils have low fertility, can be contaminated, and many of them remain unused. However, with the increasing demand of soil surfaces, they might be considered as a resource, for example for non-food biomass production. The study of their physico-chemical properties and of their biodiversity and biological activity may provide indications for their potential re-use. The objective of our study was to investigate the quality of six derelict soils, considering abiotic, biotic, and functional parameters. We studied (i) the soil bacteria, fungi, meso- and macro-fauna and plant communities of six different derelict soils (two from coking plants, one from a settling pond, two constructed ones made from different substrates and remediated soil, and an inert waste storage one), and (ii) their decomposition function based on the decomposer trophic network, enzyme activities, mineralization activity, and organic pollutant degradation.
Biodiversity levels in these soils were high, but all biotic parameters, except the mycorrhizal colonization level, discriminated them. Multivariate analysis showed that biotic parameters co-varied more with fertility proxies than with soil contamination parameters. Similarly, functional parameters significantly co-varied with abiotic parameters. Among functional parameters, macro-decomposer proportion, enzyme activity, average mineralization capacity, and microbial polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degraders were useful to discriminate the soils. We assessed their quality by combining abiotic, biotic, and functional parameters: the compost-amended constructed soil displayed the highest quality, while the settling pond soil and the contaminated constructed soil displayed the lowest. Although differences among the soils were highlighted, this study shows that derelict soils may provide a biodiversity ecosystem service and are functional for decomposition.
[Display omitted]
•Abiotic, biotic, and functional parameters of six derelict soils were compared.•Microbial, faunal (meso- and macrofauna) and plant components were studied.•A high biodiversity level and decomposition functions were observed in the derelict soils.•A strong co-variation between abiotic-biotic and abiotic-functional parameters was found.•Derelict soils may provide biodiversity ecosystem service and be a resource for bioma |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.118 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01691365v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048969717324580</els_id><sourcerecordid>1943283178</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-8155d451b102c6dbeda2da715bd6967ecf4a3dd6c17f03e38aea75279525922e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1r3DAQhkVoSTYff6HVsYXalWTrqzcT2qawtJf2LGRpTLR4rY0lL-TfR4vTvWYuA8Mz7wwPQh8pqSmh4uuuTi7kmGE61oxQWRNdU6ou0IYqqStKmHiHNoS0qtJCyyt0ndKOlJKKXqIrpnQrGiU26HeXEqS0hynjOGAPM4zBZZxiGPHTYseQn7_hrg8xB_cFrx3byeNhmVwOcbIjtofDHK17hHSL3g92THD32m_Qvx_f_94_VNs_P3_dd9vKtbzNlaKc-5bTvjzqhO_BW-atpLz3QgsJbmht471wVA6kgUZZsJIzqTnjmjFobtDnNffRjuYwh72dn020wTx0W3OaFUmaNoIfaWE_rWx58mmBlM0-JAfjaCeISzJUtw1TDZWqoHJF3RxTmmE4Z1NiTuLNzpzFm5N4Q7Qp4svmh9cjS78Hf977b7oA3QpA0XIMMJ-CYHLgwwwuGx_Dm0deAB3kmLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1943283178</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of derelict soil quality: Abiotic, biotic and functional approaches</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Vincent, Quentin ; Auclerc, Apolline ; Beguiristain, Thierry ; Leyval, Corinne</creator><creatorcontrib>Vincent, Quentin ; Auclerc, Apolline ; Beguiristain, Thierry ; Leyval, Corinne</creatorcontrib><description>The intensification and subsequent closing down of industrial activities during the last century has left behind large surfaces of derelict lands. Derelict soils have low fertility, can be contaminated, and many of them remain unused. However, with the increasing demand of soil surfaces, they might be considered as a resource, for example for non-food biomass production. The study of their physico-chemical properties and of their biodiversity and biological activity may provide indications for their potential re-use. The objective of our study was to investigate the quality of six derelict soils, considering abiotic, biotic, and functional parameters. We studied (i) the soil bacteria, fungi, meso- and macro-fauna and plant communities of six different derelict soils (two from coking plants, one from a settling pond, two constructed ones made from different substrates and remediated soil, and an inert waste storage one), and (ii) their decomposition function based on the decomposer trophic network, enzyme activities, mineralization activity, and organic pollutant degradation.
Biodiversity levels in these soils were high, but all biotic parameters, except the mycorrhizal colonization level, discriminated them. Multivariate analysis showed that biotic parameters co-varied more with fertility proxies than with soil contamination parameters. Similarly, functional parameters significantly co-varied with abiotic parameters. Among functional parameters, macro-decomposer proportion, enzyme activity, average mineralization capacity, and microbial polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degraders were useful to discriminate the soils. We assessed their quality by combining abiotic, biotic, and functional parameters: the compost-amended constructed soil displayed the highest quality, while the settling pond soil and the contaminated constructed soil displayed the lowest. Although differences among the soils were highlighted, this study shows that derelict soils may provide a biodiversity ecosystem service and are functional for decomposition.
[Display omitted]
•Abiotic, biotic, and functional parameters of six derelict soils were compared.•Microbial, faunal (meso- and macrofauna) and plant components were studied.•A high biodiversity level and decomposition functions were observed in the derelict soils.•A strong co-variation between abiotic-biotic and abiotic-functional parameters was found.•Derelict soils may provide biodiversity ecosystem service and be a resource for biomass production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.118</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28946386</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Derelict soil ; Earth Sciences ; Sciences of the Universe ; Soil biota ; Soil functioning ; Soil quality ; Technosol</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2018-02, Vol.613-614, p.990-1002</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-8155d451b102c6dbeda2da715bd6967ecf4a3dd6c17f03e38aea75279525922e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-8155d451b102c6dbeda2da715bd6967ecf4a3dd6c17f03e38aea75279525922e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2172-2750 ; 0000-0002-5339-1178 ; 0000-0002-6988-1382</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.118$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,3539,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28946386$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01691365$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vincent, Quentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auclerc, Apolline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beguiristain, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leyval, Corinne</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of derelict soil quality: Abiotic, biotic and functional approaches</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><description>The intensification and subsequent closing down of industrial activities during the last century has left behind large surfaces of derelict lands. Derelict soils have low fertility, can be contaminated, and many of them remain unused. However, with the increasing demand of soil surfaces, they might be considered as a resource, for example for non-food biomass production. The study of their physico-chemical properties and of their biodiversity and biological activity may provide indications for their potential re-use. The objective of our study was to investigate the quality of six derelict soils, considering abiotic, biotic, and functional parameters. We studied (i) the soil bacteria, fungi, meso- and macro-fauna and plant communities of six different derelict soils (two from coking plants, one from a settling pond, two constructed ones made from different substrates and remediated soil, and an inert waste storage one), and (ii) their decomposition function based on the decomposer trophic network, enzyme activities, mineralization activity, and organic pollutant degradation.
Biodiversity levels in these soils were high, but all biotic parameters, except the mycorrhizal colonization level, discriminated them. Multivariate analysis showed that biotic parameters co-varied more with fertility proxies than with soil contamination parameters. Similarly, functional parameters significantly co-varied with abiotic parameters. Among functional parameters, macro-decomposer proportion, enzyme activity, average mineralization capacity, and microbial polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degraders were useful to discriminate the soils. We assessed their quality by combining abiotic, biotic, and functional parameters: the compost-amended constructed soil displayed the highest quality, while the settling pond soil and the contaminated constructed soil displayed the lowest. Although differences among the soils were highlighted, this study shows that derelict soils may provide a biodiversity ecosystem service and are functional for decomposition.
[Display omitted]
•Abiotic, biotic, and functional parameters of six derelict soils were compared.•Microbial, faunal (meso- and macrofauna) and plant components were studied.•A high biodiversity level and decomposition functions were observed in the derelict soils.•A strong co-variation between abiotic-biotic and abiotic-functional parameters was found.•Derelict soils may provide biodiversity ecosystem service and be a resource for biomass production.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Derelict soil</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Sciences of the Universe</subject><subject>Soil biota</subject><subject>Soil functioning</subject><subject>Soil quality</subject><subject>Technosol</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1r3DAQhkVoSTYff6HVsYXalWTrqzcT2qawtJf2LGRpTLR4rY0lL-TfR4vTvWYuA8Mz7wwPQh8pqSmh4uuuTi7kmGE61oxQWRNdU6ou0IYqqStKmHiHNoS0qtJCyyt0ndKOlJKKXqIrpnQrGiU26HeXEqS0hynjOGAPM4zBZZxiGPHTYseQn7_hrg8xB_cFrx3byeNhmVwOcbIjtofDHK17hHSL3g92THD32m_Qvx_f_94_VNs_P3_dd9vKtbzNlaKc-5bTvjzqhO_BW-atpLz3QgsJbmht471wVA6kgUZZsJIzqTnjmjFobtDnNffRjuYwh72dn020wTx0W3OaFUmaNoIfaWE_rWx58mmBlM0-JAfjaCeISzJUtw1TDZWqoHJF3RxTmmE4Z1NiTuLNzpzFm5N4Q7Qp4svmh9cjS78Hf977b7oA3QpA0XIMMJ-CYHLgwwwuGx_Dm0deAB3kmLg</recordid><startdate>20180201</startdate><enddate>20180201</enddate><creator>Vincent, Quentin</creator><creator>Auclerc, Apolline</creator><creator>Beguiristain, Thierry</creator><creator>Leyval, Corinne</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2172-2750</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5339-1178</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6988-1382</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180201</creationdate><title>Assessment of derelict soil quality: Abiotic, biotic and functional approaches</title><author>Vincent, Quentin ; Auclerc, Apolline ; Beguiristain, Thierry ; Leyval, Corinne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-8155d451b102c6dbeda2da715bd6967ecf4a3dd6c17f03e38aea75279525922e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Derelict soil</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Sciences of the Universe</topic><topic>Soil biota</topic><topic>Soil functioning</topic><topic>Soil quality</topic><topic>Technosol</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vincent, Quentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auclerc, Apolline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beguiristain, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leyval, Corinne</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vincent, Quentin</au><au>Auclerc, Apolline</au><au>Beguiristain, Thierry</au><au>Leyval, Corinne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of derelict soil quality: Abiotic, biotic and functional approaches</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><date>2018-02-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>613-614</volume><spage>990</spage><epage>1002</epage><pages>990-1002</pages><issn>0048-9697</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><abstract>The intensification and subsequent closing down of industrial activities during the last century has left behind large surfaces of derelict lands. Derelict soils have low fertility, can be contaminated, and many of them remain unused. However, with the increasing demand of soil surfaces, they might be considered as a resource, for example for non-food biomass production. The study of their physico-chemical properties and of their biodiversity and biological activity may provide indications for their potential re-use. The objective of our study was to investigate the quality of six derelict soils, considering abiotic, biotic, and functional parameters. We studied (i) the soil bacteria, fungi, meso- and macro-fauna and plant communities of six different derelict soils (two from coking plants, one from a settling pond, two constructed ones made from different substrates and remediated soil, and an inert waste storage one), and (ii) their decomposition function based on the decomposer trophic network, enzyme activities, mineralization activity, and organic pollutant degradation.
Biodiversity levels in these soils were high, but all biotic parameters, except the mycorrhizal colonization level, discriminated them. Multivariate analysis showed that biotic parameters co-varied more with fertility proxies than with soil contamination parameters. Similarly, functional parameters significantly co-varied with abiotic parameters. Among functional parameters, macro-decomposer proportion, enzyme activity, average mineralization capacity, and microbial polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degraders were useful to discriminate the soils. We assessed their quality by combining abiotic, biotic, and functional parameters: the compost-amended constructed soil displayed the highest quality, while the settling pond soil and the contaminated constructed soil displayed the lowest. Although differences among the soils were highlighted, this study shows that derelict soils may provide a biodiversity ecosystem service and are functional for decomposition.
[Display omitted]
•Abiotic, biotic, and functional parameters of six derelict soils were compared.•Microbial, faunal (meso- and macrofauna) and plant components were studied.•A high biodiversity level and decomposition functions were observed in the derelict soils.•A strong co-variation between abiotic-biotic and abiotic-functional parameters was found.•Derelict soils may provide biodiversity ecosystem service and be a resource for biomass production.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>28946386</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.118</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2172-2750</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5339-1178</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6988-1382</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0048-9697 |
ispartof | The Science of the total environment, 2018-02, Vol.613-614, p.990-1002 |
issn | 0048-9697 1879-1026 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01691365v1 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Biodiversity Derelict soil Earth Sciences Sciences of the Universe Soil biota Soil functioning Soil quality Technosol |
title | Assessment of derelict soil quality: Abiotic, biotic and functional approaches |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T14%3A13%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20derelict%20soil%20quality:%20Abiotic,%20biotic%20and%20functional%20approaches&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Vincent,%20Quentin&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.volume=613-614&rft.spage=990&rft.epage=1002&rft.pages=990-1002&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.118&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1943283178%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1943283178&rft_id=info:pmid/28946386&rft_els_id=S0048969717324580&rfr_iscdi=true |