Managing generalized interferon-induced eruptions and the effectiveness of desensitization

Summary Background We evaluated the value of skin tests and the efficacy of a 12‐step desensitization protocol to pegylated interferon (IFN) in patients with generalized drug eruptions due to IFNs. Methods A retrospective study (1998–2009) was followed by a cross‐sectional clinical study conducted p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical and experimental allergy 2014-05, Vol.44 (5), p.756-764
Hauptverfasser: Poreaux, C., Bronowicki, J.-P., Debouverie, M., Schmutz, J.-L., Waton, J., Barbaud, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 764
container_issue 5
container_start_page 756
container_title Clinical and experimental allergy
container_volume 44
creator Poreaux, C.
Bronowicki, J.-P.
Debouverie, M.
Schmutz, J.-L.
Waton, J.
Barbaud, A.
description Summary Background We evaluated the value of skin tests and the efficacy of a 12‐step desensitization protocol to pegylated interferon (IFN) in patients with generalized drug eruptions due to IFNs. Methods A retrospective study (1998–2009) was followed by a cross‐sectional clinical study conducted prospectively (2009–2011). All patients received a dermatological clinical examination and skin tests. Twelve‐step IFN desensitization was proposed for patient with active hepatitis C and no alternative therapy. Results Twenty‐six patients (13 males, mean age, 53.5 years) had generalized reactions to IFNs; 21 were treated with IFN‐α and 5 with IFN‐β. Moreover, 21 patients had skin tests. Intradermal tests (IDTs) were positive after an average of 72 h. Cross‐reactivity between peg‐IFN‐α2a and peg‐IFN‐α2b was observed in 5/10 cases in the prospective study. In 16 of 26 cases, IFN treatment was stopped. In 8 of 16 cases of diffuse eczematous drug eruption, treatment was continued. The corticosteroid and antihistamine were sufficient in 4/8 cases. In three other cases, topical tacrolimus was highly effective. In 3 of 16 cases in which treatment were stopped, patients underwent the early resumption of peg‐IFN‐α. These three patients had positive tests with peg‐IFN‐α2a and peg‐IFN‐α2b and successfully completed the tolerance induction protocol for peg‐IFN‐α2b. Tolerance induction involved a weekly dose of peg‐IFN and a gradual increase in the recovery of an antiviral C. Clinical tolerance was excellent, and the patients' viral load C became negative. Conclusions Our study demonstrates the benefit of allergy testing in cases of generalized drug reactions to IFN, cross‐reactivities in a single class of IFNs and the importance of delayed IDT reading. We report for the first time the effectiveness of 12‐step desensitization with peg‐IFN.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cea.12217
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01687409v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3309980841</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2657-37fa41e6cef50001cd01c07192fac71ecabb3ac93a1a4a34d39ba86e9fda831a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kFtLAzEQhYMoWC8P_oMFn3xYzWw2m93HUrSKVV-8gC9hmp3UaM3WZOvt15tacWCYYfjOYTiMHQA_hlQnhvAYigLUBhuAqGRepNpkA97IMld1U26znRifOedCNvWAPV6hx5nzs2xGngLO3Te1mfM9BUuh87nz7dKkE4Xlonedjxn6NuufKCNryfTuPelizDqbtRTJR9e7b1yRe2zL4jzS_t_cZXdnp7ej83xyM74YDSe5KSqpcqEslkCVISvTW2Da1FxBU1g0CsjgdCrQNAIBSxRlK5op1hU1tsVaAIpddrT2fcK5XgT3iuFLd-j0-XCiVzcOVa1K3rxDYg_X7CJ0b0uKvX7ulsGn9zTIoioUQCESdbKmPtycvv49getVxjplrH8z1qPT4e-SFPla4WJPn_8KDC-6UkJJ_XA91vx6LC-5lPpe_AD33YC6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1526271123</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Managing generalized interferon-induced eruptions and the effectiveness of desensitization</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Poreaux, C. ; Bronowicki, J.-P. ; Debouverie, M. ; Schmutz, J.-L. ; Waton, J. ; Barbaud, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Poreaux, C. ; Bronowicki, J.-P. ; Debouverie, M. ; Schmutz, J.-L. ; Waton, J. ; Barbaud, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background We evaluated the value of skin tests and the efficacy of a 12‐step desensitization protocol to pegylated interferon (IFN) in patients with generalized drug eruptions due to IFNs. Methods A retrospective study (1998–2009) was followed by a cross‐sectional clinical study conducted prospectively (2009–2011). All patients received a dermatological clinical examination and skin tests. Twelve‐step IFN desensitization was proposed for patient with active hepatitis C and no alternative therapy. Results Twenty‐six patients (13 males, mean age, 53.5 years) had generalized reactions to IFNs; 21 were treated with IFN‐α and 5 with IFN‐β. Moreover, 21 patients had skin tests. Intradermal tests (IDTs) were positive after an average of 72 h. Cross‐reactivity between peg‐IFN‐α2a and peg‐IFN‐α2b was observed in 5/10 cases in the prospective study. In 16 of 26 cases, IFN treatment was stopped. In 8 of 16 cases of diffuse eczematous drug eruption, treatment was continued. The corticosteroid and antihistamine were sufficient in 4/8 cases. In three other cases, topical tacrolimus was highly effective. In 3 of 16 cases in which treatment were stopped, patients underwent the early resumption of peg‐IFN‐α. These three patients had positive tests with peg‐IFN‐α2a and peg‐IFN‐α2b and successfully completed the tolerance induction protocol for peg‐IFN‐α2b. Tolerance induction involved a weekly dose of peg‐IFN and a gradual increase in the recovery of an antiviral C. Clinical tolerance was excellent, and the patients' viral load C became negative. Conclusions Our study demonstrates the benefit of allergy testing in cases of generalized drug reactions to IFN, cross‐reactivities in a single class of IFNs and the importance of delayed IDT reading. We report for the first time the effectiveness of 12‐step desensitization with peg‐IFN.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0954-7894</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2222</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cea.12217</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>cutaneous adverse drug reaction ; drug allergy ; interferon ; Life Sciences ; skin tests ; tolerance induction</subject><ispartof>Clinical and experimental allergy, 2014-05, Vol.44 (5), p.756-764</ispartof><rights>2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2657-37fa41e6cef50001cd01c07192fac71ecabb3ac93a1a4a34d39ba86e9fda831a3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-6659-6148</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcea.12217$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcea.12217$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-01687409$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Poreaux, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bronowicki, J.-P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Debouverie, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmutz, J.-L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waton, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbaud, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Managing generalized interferon-induced eruptions and the effectiveness of desensitization</title><title>Clinical and experimental allergy</title><addtitle>Clin Exp Allergy</addtitle><description>Summary Background We evaluated the value of skin tests and the efficacy of a 12‐step desensitization protocol to pegylated interferon (IFN) in patients with generalized drug eruptions due to IFNs. Methods A retrospective study (1998–2009) was followed by a cross‐sectional clinical study conducted prospectively (2009–2011). All patients received a dermatological clinical examination and skin tests. Twelve‐step IFN desensitization was proposed for patient with active hepatitis C and no alternative therapy. Results Twenty‐six patients (13 males, mean age, 53.5 years) had generalized reactions to IFNs; 21 were treated with IFN‐α and 5 with IFN‐β. Moreover, 21 patients had skin tests. Intradermal tests (IDTs) were positive after an average of 72 h. Cross‐reactivity between peg‐IFN‐α2a and peg‐IFN‐α2b was observed in 5/10 cases in the prospective study. In 16 of 26 cases, IFN treatment was stopped. In 8 of 16 cases of diffuse eczematous drug eruption, treatment was continued. The corticosteroid and antihistamine were sufficient in 4/8 cases. In three other cases, topical tacrolimus was highly effective. In 3 of 16 cases in which treatment were stopped, patients underwent the early resumption of peg‐IFN‐α. These three patients had positive tests with peg‐IFN‐α2a and peg‐IFN‐α2b and successfully completed the tolerance induction protocol for peg‐IFN‐α2b. Tolerance induction involved a weekly dose of peg‐IFN and a gradual increase in the recovery of an antiviral C. Clinical tolerance was excellent, and the patients' viral load C became negative. Conclusions Our study demonstrates the benefit of allergy testing in cases of generalized drug reactions to IFN, cross‐reactivities in a single class of IFNs and the importance of delayed IDT reading. We report for the first time the effectiveness of 12‐step desensitization with peg‐IFN.</description><subject>cutaneous adverse drug reaction</subject><subject>drug allergy</subject><subject>interferon</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>skin tests</subject><subject>tolerance induction</subject><issn>0954-7894</issn><issn>1365-2222</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kFtLAzEQhYMoWC8P_oMFn3xYzWw2m93HUrSKVV-8gC9hmp3UaM3WZOvt15tacWCYYfjOYTiMHQA_hlQnhvAYigLUBhuAqGRepNpkA97IMld1U26znRifOedCNvWAPV6hx5nzs2xGngLO3Te1mfM9BUuh87nz7dKkE4Xlonedjxn6NuufKCNryfTuPelizDqbtRTJR9e7b1yRe2zL4jzS_t_cZXdnp7ej83xyM74YDSe5KSqpcqEslkCVISvTW2Da1FxBU1g0CsjgdCrQNAIBSxRlK5op1hU1tsVaAIpddrT2fcK5XgT3iuFLd-j0-XCiVzcOVa1K3rxDYg_X7CJ0b0uKvX7ulsGn9zTIoioUQCESdbKmPtycvv49getVxjplrH8z1qPT4e-SFPla4WJPn_8KDC-6UkJJ_XA91vx6LC-5lPpe_AD33YC6</recordid><startdate>201405</startdate><enddate>201405</enddate><creator>Poreaux, C.</creator><creator>Bronowicki, J.-P.</creator><creator>Debouverie, M.</creator><creator>Schmutz, J.-L.</creator><creator>Waton, J.</creator><creator>Barbaud, A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6659-6148</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201405</creationdate><title>Managing generalized interferon-induced eruptions and the effectiveness of desensitization</title><author>Poreaux, C. ; Bronowicki, J.-P. ; Debouverie, M. ; Schmutz, J.-L. ; Waton, J. ; Barbaud, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2657-37fa41e6cef50001cd01c07192fac71ecabb3ac93a1a4a34d39ba86e9fda831a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>cutaneous adverse drug reaction</topic><topic>drug allergy</topic><topic>interferon</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>skin tests</topic><topic>tolerance induction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Poreaux, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bronowicki, J.-P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Debouverie, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmutz, J.-L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waton, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbaud, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Clinical and experimental allergy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Poreaux, C.</au><au>Bronowicki, J.-P.</au><au>Debouverie, M.</au><au>Schmutz, J.-L.</au><au>Waton, J.</au><au>Barbaud, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Managing generalized interferon-induced eruptions and the effectiveness of desensitization</atitle><jtitle>Clinical and experimental allergy</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Exp Allergy</addtitle><date>2014-05</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>756</spage><epage>764</epage><pages>756-764</pages><issn>0954-7894</issn><eissn>1365-2222</eissn><abstract>Summary Background We evaluated the value of skin tests and the efficacy of a 12‐step desensitization protocol to pegylated interferon (IFN) in patients with generalized drug eruptions due to IFNs. Methods A retrospective study (1998–2009) was followed by a cross‐sectional clinical study conducted prospectively (2009–2011). All patients received a dermatological clinical examination and skin tests. Twelve‐step IFN desensitization was proposed for patient with active hepatitis C and no alternative therapy. Results Twenty‐six patients (13 males, mean age, 53.5 years) had generalized reactions to IFNs; 21 were treated with IFN‐α and 5 with IFN‐β. Moreover, 21 patients had skin tests. Intradermal tests (IDTs) were positive after an average of 72 h. Cross‐reactivity between peg‐IFN‐α2a and peg‐IFN‐α2b was observed in 5/10 cases in the prospective study. In 16 of 26 cases, IFN treatment was stopped. In 8 of 16 cases of diffuse eczematous drug eruption, treatment was continued. The corticosteroid and antihistamine were sufficient in 4/8 cases. In three other cases, topical tacrolimus was highly effective. In 3 of 16 cases in which treatment were stopped, patients underwent the early resumption of peg‐IFN‐α. These three patients had positive tests with peg‐IFN‐α2a and peg‐IFN‐α2b and successfully completed the tolerance induction protocol for peg‐IFN‐α2b. Tolerance induction involved a weekly dose of peg‐IFN and a gradual increase in the recovery of an antiviral C. Clinical tolerance was excellent, and the patients' viral load C became negative. Conclusions Our study demonstrates the benefit of allergy testing in cases of generalized drug reactions to IFN, cross‐reactivities in a single class of IFNs and the importance of delayed IDT reading. We report for the first time the effectiveness of 12‐step desensitization with peg‐IFN.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/cea.12217</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6659-6148</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0954-7894
ispartof Clinical and experimental allergy, 2014-05, Vol.44 (5), p.756-764
issn 0954-7894
1365-2222
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01687409v1
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects cutaneous adverse drug reaction
drug allergy
interferon
Life Sciences
skin tests
tolerance induction
title Managing generalized interferon-induced eruptions and the effectiveness of desensitization
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T21%3A02%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Managing%20generalized%20interferon-induced%20eruptions%20and%20the%20effectiveness%20of%20desensitization&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20and%20experimental%20allergy&rft.au=Poreaux,%20C.&rft.date=2014-05&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=756&rft.epage=764&rft.pages=756-764&rft.issn=0954-7894&rft.eissn=1365-2222&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cea.12217&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E3309980841%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1526271123&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true