Managing generalized interferon-induced eruptions and the effectiveness of desensitization
Summary Background We evaluated the value of skin tests and the efficacy of a 12‐step desensitization protocol to pegylated interferon (IFN) in patients with generalized drug eruptions due to IFNs. Methods A retrospective study (1998–2009) was followed by a cross‐sectional clinical study conducted p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical and experimental allergy 2014-05, Vol.44 (5), p.756-764 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 764 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 756 |
container_title | Clinical and experimental allergy |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Poreaux, C. Bronowicki, J.-P. Debouverie, M. Schmutz, J.-L. Waton, J. Barbaud, A. |
description | Summary
Background
We evaluated the value of skin tests and the efficacy of a 12‐step desensitization protocol to pegylated interferon (IFN) in patients with generalized drug eruptions due to IFNs.
Methods
A retrospective study (1998–2009) was followed by a cross‐sectional clinical study conducted prospectively (2009–2011). All patients received a dermatological clinical examination and skin tests. Twelve‐step IFN desensitization was proposed for patient with active hepatitis C and no alternative therapy.
Results
Twenty‐six patients (13 males, mean age, 53.5 years) had generalized reactions to IFNs; 21 were treated with IFN‐α and 5 with IFN‐β. Moreover, 21 patients had skin tests. Intradermal tests (IDTs) were positive after an average of 72 h. Cross‐reactivity between peg‐IFN‐α2a and peg‐IFN‐α2b was observed in 5/10 cases in the prospective study. In 16 of 26 cases, IFN treatment was stopped. In 8 of 16 cases of diffuse eczematous drug eruption, treatment was continued. The corticosteroid and antihistamine were sufficient in 4/8 cases. In three other cases, topical tacrolimus was highly effective. In 3 of 16 cases in which treatment were stopped, patients underwent the early resumption of peg‐IFN‐α. These three patients had positive tests with peg‐IFN‐α2a and peg‐IFN‐α2b and successfully completed the tolerance induction protocol for peg‐IFN‐α2b. Tolerance induction involved a weekly dose of peg‐IFN and a gradual increase in the recovery of an antiviral C. Clinical tolerance was excellent, and the patients' viral load C became negative.
Conclusions
Our study demonstrates the benefit of allergy testing in cases of generalized drug reactions to IFN, cross‐reactivities in a single class of IFNs and the importance of delayed IDT reading. We report for the first time the effectiveness of 12‐step desensitization with peg‐IFN. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/cea.12217 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01687409v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3309980841</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2657-37fa41e6cef50001cd01c07192fac71ecabb3ac93a1a4a34d39ba86e9fda831a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kFtLAzEQhYMoWC8P_oMFn3xYzWw2m93HUrSKVV-8gC9hmp3UaM3WZOvt15tacWCYYfjOYTiMHQA_hlQnhvAYigLUBhuAqGRepNpkA97IMld1U26znRifOedCNvWAPV6hx5nzs2xGngLO3Te1mfM9BUuh87nz7dKkE4Xlonedjxn6NuufKCNryfTuPelizDqbtRTJR9e7b1yRe2zL4jzS_t_cZXdnp7ej83xyM74YDSe5KSqpcqEslkCVISvTW2Da1FxBU1g0CsjgdCrQNAIBSxRlK5op1hU1tsVaAIpddrT2fcK5XgT3iuFLd-j0-XCiVzcOVa1K3rxDYg_X7CJ0b0uKvX7ulsGn9zTIoioUQCESdbKmPtycvv49getVxjplrH8z1qPT4e-SFPla4WJPn_8KDC-6UkJJ_XA91vx6LC-5lPpe_AD33YC6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1526271123</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Managing generalized interferon-induced eruptions and the effectiveness of desensitization</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Poreaux, C. ; Bronowicki, J.-P. ; Debouverie, M. ; Schmutz, J.-L. ; Waton, J. ; Barbaud, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Poreaux, C. ; Bronowicki, J.-P. ; Debouverie, M. ; Schmutz, J.-L. ; Waton, J. ; Barbaud, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Background
We evaluated the value of skin tests and the efficacy of a 12‐step desensitization protocol to pegylated interferon (IFN) in patients with generalized drug eruptions due to IFNs.
Methods
A retrospective study (1998–2009) was followed by a cross‐sectional clinical study conducted prospectively (2009–2011). All patients received a dermatological clinical examination and skin tests. Twelve‐step IFN desensitization was proposed for patient with active hepatitis C and no alternative therapy.
Results
Twenty‐six patients (13 males, mean age, 53.5 years) had generalized reactions to IFNs; 21 were treated with IFN‐α and 5 with IFN‐β. Moreover, 21 patients had skin tests. Intradermal tests (IDTs) were positive after an average of 72 h. Cross‐reactivity between peg‐IFN‐α2a and peg‐IFN‐α2b was observed in 5/10 cases in the prospective study. In 16 of 26 cases, IFN treatment was stopped. In 8 of 16 cases of diffuse eczematous drug eruption, treatment was continued. The corticosteroid and antihistamine were sufficient in 4/8 cases. In three other cases, topical tacrolimus was highly effective. In 3 of 16 cases in which treatment were stopped, patients underwent the early resumption of peg‐IFN‐α. These three patients had positive tests with peg‐IFN‐α2a and peg‐IFN‐α2b and successfully completed the tolerance induction protocol for peg‐IFN‐α2b. Tolerance induction involved a weekly dose of peg‐IFN and a gradual increase in the recovery of an antiviral C. Clinical tolerance was excellent, and the patients' viral load C became negative.
Conclusions
Our study demonstrates the benefit of allergy testing in cases of generalized drug reactions to IFN, cross‐reactivities in a single class of IFNs and the importance of delayed IDT reading. We report for the first time the effectiveness of 12‐step desensitization with peg‐IFN.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0954-7894</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2222</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cea.12217</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>cutaneous adverse drug reaction ; drug allergy ; interferon ; Life Sciences ; skin tests ; tolerance induction</subject><ispartof>Clinical and experimental allergy, 2014-05, Vol.44 (5), p.756-764</ispartof><rights>2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2657-37fa41e6cef50001cd01c07192fac71ecabb3ac93a1a4a34d39ba86e9fda831a3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-6659-6148</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcea.12217$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcea.12217$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-01687409$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Poreaux, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bronowicki, J.-P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Debouverie, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmutz, J.-L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waton, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbaud, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Managing generalized interferon-induced eruptions and the effectiveness of desensitization</title><title>Clinical and experimental allergy</title><addtitle>Clin Exp Allergy</addtitle><description>Summary
Background
We evaluated the value of skin tests and the efficacy of a 12‐step desensitization protocol to pegylated interferon (IFN) in patients with generalized drug eruptions due to IFNs.
Methods
A retrospective study (1998–2009) was followed by a cross‐sectional clinical study conducted prospectively (2009–2011). All patients received a dermatological clinical examination and skin tests. Twelve‐step IFN desensitization was proposed for patient with active hepatitis C and no alternative therapy.
Results
Twenty‐six patients (13 males, mean age, 53.5 years) had generalized reactions to IFNs; 21 were treated with IFN‐α and 5 with IFN‐β. Moreover, 21 patients had skin tests. Intradermal tests (IDTs) were positive after an average of 72 h. Cross‐reactivity between peg‐IFN‐α2a and peg‐IFN‐α2b was observed in 5/10 cases in the prospective study. In 16 of 26 cases, IFN treatment was stopped. In 8 of 16 cases of diffuse eczematous drug eruption, treatment was continued. The corticosteroid and antihistamine were sufficient in 4/8 cases. In three other cases, topical tacrolimus was highly effective. In 3 of 16 cases in which treatment were stopped, patients underwent the early resumption of peg‐IFN‐α. These three patients had positive tests with peg‐IFN‐α2a and peg‐IFN‐α2b and successfully completed the tolerance induction protocol for peg‐IFN‐α2b. Tolerance induction involved a weekly dose of peg‐IFN and a gradual increase in the recovery of an antiviral C. Clinical tolerance was excellent, and the patients' viral load C became negative.
Conclusions
Our study demonstrates the benefit of allergy testing in cases of generalized drug reactions to IFN, cross‐reactivities in a single class of IFNs and the importance of delayed IDT reading. We report for the first time the effectiveness of 12‐step desensitization with peg‐IFN.</description><subject>cutaneous adverse drug reaction</subject><subject>drug allergy</subject><subject>interferon</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>skin tests</subject><subject>tolerance induction</subject><issn>0954-7894</issn><issn>1365-2222</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kFtLAzEQhYMoWC8P_oMFn3xYzWw2m93HUrSKVV-8gC9hmp3UaM3WZOvt15tacWCYYfjOYTiMHQA_hlQnhvAYigLUBhuAqGRepNpkA97IMld1U26znRifOedCNvWAPV6hx5nzs2xGngLO3Te1mfM9BUuh87nz7dKkE4Xlonedjxn6NuufKCNryfTuPelizDqbtRTJR9e7b1yRe2zL4jzS_t_cZXdnp7ej83xyM74YDSe5KSqpcqEslkCVISvTW2Da1FxBU1g0CsjgdCrQNAIBSxRlK5op1hU1tsVaAIpddrT2fcK5XgT3iuFLd-j0-XCiVzcOVa1K3rxDYg_X7CJ0b0uKvX7ulsGn9zTIoioUQCESdbKmPtycvv49getVxjplrH8z1qPT4e-SFPla4WJPn_8KDC-6UkJJ_XA91vx6LC-5lPpe_AD33YC6</recordid><startdate>201405</startdate><enddate>201405</enddate><creator>Poreaux, C.</creator><creator>Bronowicki, J.-P.</creator><creator>Debouverie, M.</creator><creator>Schmutz, J.-L.</creator><creator>Waton, J.</creator><creator>Barbaud, A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6659-6148</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201405</creationdate><title>Managing generalized interferon-induced eruptions and the effectiveness of desensitization</title><author>Poreaux, C. ; Bronowicki, J.-P. ; Debouverie, M. ; Schmutz, J.-L. ; Waton, J. ; Barbaud, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2657-37fa41e6cef50001cd01c07192fac71ecabb3ac93a1a4a34d39ba86e9fda831a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>cutaneous adverse drug reaction</topic><topic>drug allergy</topic><topic>interferon</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>skin tests</topic><topic>tolerance induction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Poreaux, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bronowicki, J.-P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Debouverie, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmutz, J.-L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waton, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbaud, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Clinical and experimental allergy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Poreaux, C.</au><au>Bronowicki, J.-P.</au><au>Debouverie, M.</au><au>Schmutz, J.-L.</au><au>Waton, J.</au><au>Barbaud, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Managing generalized interferon-induced eruptions and the effectiveness of desensitization</atitle><jtitle>Clinical and experimental allergy</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Exp Allergy</addtitle><date>2014-05</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>756</spage><epage>764</epage><pages>756-764</pages><issn>0954-7894</issn><eissn>1365-2222</eissn><abstract>Summary
Background
We evaluated the value of skin tests and the efficacy of a 12‐step desensitization protocol to pegylated interferon (IFN) in patients with generalized drug eruptions due to IFNs.
Methods
A retrospective study (1998–2009) was followed by a cross‐sectional clinical study conducted prospectively (2009–2011). All patients received a dermatological clinical examination and skin tests. Twelve‐step IFN desensitization was proposed for patient with active hepatitis C and no alternative therapy.
Results
Twenty‐six patients (13 males, mean age, 53.5 years) had generalized reactions to IFNs; 21 were treated with IFN‐α and 5 with IFN‐β. Moreover, 21 patients had skin tests. Intradermal tests (IDTs) were positive after an average of 72 h. Cross‐reactivity between peg‐IFN‐α2a and peg‐IFN‐α2b was observed in 5/10 cases in the prospective study. In 16 of 26 cases, IFN treatment was stopped. In 8 of 16 cases of diffuse eczematous drug eruption, treatment was continued. The corticosteroid and antihistamine were sufficient in 4/8 cases. In three other cases, topical tacrolimus was highly effective. In 3 of 16 cases in which treatment were stopped, patients underwent the early resumption of peg‐IFN‐α. These three patients had positive tests with peg‐IFN‐α2a and peg‐IFN‐α2b and successfully completed the tolerance induction protocol for peg‐IFN‐α2b. Tolerance induction involved a weekly dose of peg‐IFN and a gradual increase in the recovery of an antiviral C. Clinical tolerance was excellent, and the patients' viral load C became negative.
Conclusions
Our study demonstrates the benefit of allergy testing in cases of generalized drug reactions to IFN, cross‐reactivities in a single class of IFNs and the importance of delayed IDT reading. We report for the first time the effectiveness of 12‐step desensitization with peg‐IFN.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/cea.12217</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6659-6148</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0954-7894 |
ispartof | Clinical and experimental allergy, 2014-05, Vol.44 (5), p.756-764 |
issn | 0954-7894 1365-2222 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01687409v1 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | cutaneous adverse drug reaction drug allergy interferon Life Sciences skin tests tolerance induction |
title | Managing generalized interferon-induced eruptions and the effectiveness of desensitization |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T21%3A02%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Managing%20generalized%20interferon-induced%20eruptions%20and%20the%20effectiveness%20of%20desensitization&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20and%20experimental%20allergy&rft.au=Poreaux,%20C.&rft.date=2014-05&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=756&rft.epage=764&rft.pages=756-764&rft.issn=0954-7894&rft.eissn=1365-2222&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cea.12217&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E3309980841%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1526271123&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |