Comparative analysis of two hybrid energy storage systems used in a two front wheel driven electric vehicle during extreme start-up and regenerative braking operations
•Comparison of HESS Ultracapacitor and Flywheel for maximizing EV energy recovery.•Energy recovery performed for extreme two front-wheel driven EV brake conditions.•Regenerative EV braking control strategies and constraints for HESS.•Comparative cost effectiveness for two HESS solutions Ultracapacit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energy conversion and management 2017-07, Vol.144, p.69-87 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 87 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 69 |
container_title | Energy conversion and management |
container_volume | 144 |
creator | Itani, Khaled De Bernardinis, Alexandre Khatir, Zoubir Jammal, Ahmad |
description | •Comparison of HESS Ultracapacitor and Flywheel for maximizing EV energy recovery.•Energy recovery performed for extreme two front-wheel driven EV brake conditions.•Regenerative EV braking control strategies and constraints for HESS.•Comparative cost effectiveness for two HESS solutions Ultracapacitors and Flywheel.
This paper presents the comparative study of two hybrid energy storage systems (HESS) of a two front wheel driven electric vehicle. The primary energy source of the HESS is a Li-Ion battery, whereas the secondary energy source is either an ultracapacitor (UC) or a flywheel energy system (FES). The main role of the secondary source is to deliver/recover energy during high peak power demand, but also to increase battery lifetime, considered among the most expensive items in the electric vehicle. As a first step, a techno-economic comparative study, supported by strong literature research, is performed between the UC and the FES. The design and sizing of each element will be presented. The comparison criteria and specifications are also described. The adopted approach in this paper is based on an academic non-oriented point of view. In a second step, each of the HESS will be integrated in a more global Simulink model which includes the vehicle model, the traction control system (TCS), the regenerative braking system and the vehicle actuators. Simulation tests are performed for an extreme braking and vehicle starting-up operations. Tests are realized on two different surface road types and conditions (high and low friction roads) and for different initial system states. In order to show the most appropriate storage system regarding compactness, weight and battery constraints minimization, deep comparative analysis is provided. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.04.036 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01671565v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0196890417303461</els_id><sourcerecordid>2024800980</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-ff27170038de16b91af9df99f79b6d2cb556949a706974a425ba384008961fb33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2O1DAQhSMEEs3AFZAlViwS7PzY8Y5RCxikltjA2nKScrebxA5lp4eciGviTDNsZ1VS6atXVe9l2VtGC0YZ_3AuwPXeTdoVJWWioHVBK_4s27FWyLwsS_E821Emed5KWr_MXoVwppRWDeW77M_eT7NGHe0FiHZ6XIMNxBsS7z05rR3agYADPK4kRI_6CCSsIcIUyBJgINYR_cAa9C6S-xPASAZMao7ACH1E25MLnGw_AhkWtO5I4HdEmJJQ1BjzZU57B4Jw3PZcD-lQ_9xIPz90vAuvsxdGjwHe_Ks32Y_Pn77v7_LDty9f97eHvK9EHXNjSsFEeq4dgPFOMm3kYKQ0QnZ8KPuuabispRaUS1Hrumw6XbU1pa3kzHRVdZO9v-qe9KhmtJPGVXlt1d3tQW295LhgDW8uLLHvruyM_tcCIaqzXzB5GFRJy7qlVLY0UfxK9ehDQDD_ZRlVW4DqrB4DVFuAitYqBZgGP14HIf17sYAq9DaRMFhMxqrB26ck_gIkgKrM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2024800980</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative analysis of two hybrid energy storage systems used in a two front wheel driven electric vehicle during extreme start-up and regenerative braking operations</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Itani, Khaled ; De Bernardinis, Alexandre ; Khatir, Zoubir ; Jammal, Ahmad</creator><creatorcontrib>Itani, Khaled ; De Bernardinis, Alexandre ; Khatir, Zoubir ; Jammal, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><description>•Comparison of HESS Ultracapacitor and Flywheel for maximizing EV energy recovery.•Energy recovery performed for extreme two front-wheel driven EV brake conditions.•Regenerative EV braking control strategies and constraints for HESS.•Comparative cost effectiveness for two HESS solutions Ultracapacitors and Flywheel.
This paper presents the comparative study of two hybrid energy storage systems (HESS) of a two front wheel driven electric vehicle. The primary energy source of the HESS is a Li-Ion battery, whereas the secondary energy source is either an ultracapacitor (UC) or a flywheel energy system (FES). The main role of the secondary source is to deliver/recover energy during high peak power demand, but also to increase battery lifetime, considered among the most expensive items in the electric vehicle. As a first step, a techno-economic comparative study, supported by strong literature research, is performed between the UC and the FES. The design and sizing of each element will be presented. The comparison criteria and specifications are also described. The adopted approach in this paper is based on an academic non-oriented point of view. In a second step, each of the HESS will be integrated in a more global Simulink model which includes the vehicle model, the traction control system (TCS), the regenerative braking system and the vehicle actuators. Simulation tests are performed for an extreme braking and vehicle starting-up operations. Tests are realized on two different surface road types and conditions (high and low friction roads) and for different initial system states. In order to show the most appropriate storage system regarding compactness, weight and battery constraints minimization, deep comparative analysis is provided.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-8904</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2227</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.04.036</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Braking systems ; Comparative analysis ; Comparative studies ; Computer simulation ; Economic conditions ; Electric power ; Electric power demand ; Electric vehicle ; Electric vehicles ; Energy sources ; Energy storage ; Engineering Sciences ; Flywheel energy system ; Flywheels ; Fuel consumption ; Hybrid energy storage ; Hybrid systems ; Lithium-ion batteries ; Peak load ; Regenerative braking ; Regenerative braking system ; Storage systems ; Traction control system ; Traction control systems ; Ultracapacitor</subject><ispartof>Energy conversion and management, 2017-07, Vol.144, p.69-87</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jul 15, 2017</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-ff27170038de16b91af9df99f79b6d2cb556949a706974a425ba384008961fb33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-ff27170038de16b91af9df99f79b6d2cb556949a706974a425ba384008961fb33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9297-4811 ; 0000-0003-0767-596X ; 0000-0002-3026-1346</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.04.036$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01671565$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Itani, Khaled</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Bernardinis, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khatir, Zoubir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jammal, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative analysis of two hybrid energy storage systems used in a two front wheel driven electric vehicle during extreme start-up and regenerative braking operations</title><title>Energy conversion and management</title><description>•Comparison of HESS Ultracapacitor and Flywheel for maximizing EV energy recovery.•Energy recovery performed for extreme two front-wheel driven EV brake conditions.•Regenerative EV braking control strategies and constraints for HESS.•Comparative cost effectiveness for two HESS solutions Ultracapacitors and Flywheel.
This paper presents the comparative study of two hybrid energy storage systems (HESS) of a two front wheel driven electric vehicle. The primary energy source of the HESS is a Li-Ion battery, whereas the secondary energy source is either an ultracapacitor (UC) or a flywheel energy system (FES). The main role of the secondary source is to deliver/recover energy during high peak power demand, but also to increase battery lifetime, considered among the most expensive items in the electric vehicle. As a first step, a techno-economic comparative study, supported by strong literature research, is performed between the UC and the FES. The design and sizing of each element will be presented. The comparison criteria and specifications are also described. The adopted approach in this paper is based on an academic non-oriented point of view. In a second step, each of the HESS will be integrated in a more global Simulink model which includes the vehicle model, the traction control system (TCS), the regenerative braking system and the vehicle actuators. Simulation tests are performed for an extreme braking and vehicle starting-up operations. Tests are realized on two different surface road types and conditions (high and low friction roads) and for different initial system states. In order to show the most appropriate storage system regarding compactness, weight and battery constraints minimization, deep comparative analysis is provided.</description><subject>Braking systems</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Electric power</subject><subject>Electric power demand</subject><subject>Electric vehicle</subject><subject>Electric vehicles</subject><subject>Energy sources</subject><subject>Energy storage</subject><subject>Engineering Sciences</subject><subject>Flywheel energy system</subject><subject>Flywheels</subject><subject>Fuel consumption</subject><subject>Hybrid energy storage</subject><subject>Hybrid systems</subject><subject>Lithium-ion batteries</subject><subject>Peak load</subject><subject>Regenerative braking</subject><subject>Regenerative braking system</subject><subject>Storage systems</subject><subject>Traction control system</subject><subject>Traction control systems</subject><subject>Ultracapacitor</subject><issn>0196-8904</issn><issn>1879-2227</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU2O1DAQhSMEEs3AFZAlViwS7PzY8Y5RCxikltjA2nKScrebxA5lp4eciGviTDNsZ1VS6atXVe9l2VtGC0YZ_3AuwPXeTdoVJWWioHVBK_4s27FWyLwsS_E821Emed5KWr_MXoVwppRWDeW77M_eT7NGHe0FiHZ6XIMNxBsS7z05rR3agYADPK4kRI_6CCSsIcIUyBJgINYR_cAa9C6S-xPASAZMao7ACH1E25MLnGw_AhkWtO5I4HdEmJJQ1BjzZU57B4Jw3PZcD-lQ_9xIPz90vAuvsxdGjwHe_Ks32Y_Pn77v7_LDty9f97eHvK9EHXNjSsFEeq4dgPFOMm3kYKQ0QnZ8KPuuabispRaUS1Hrumw6XbU1pa3kzHRVdZO9v-qe9KhmtJPGVXlt1d3tQW295LhgDW8uLLHvruyM_tcCIaqzXzB5GFRJy7qlVLY0UfxK9ehDQDD_ZRlVW4DqrB4DVFuAitYqBZgGP14HIf17sYAq9DaRMFhMxqrB26ck_gIkgKrM</recordid><startdate>20170715</startdate><enddate>20170715</enddate><creator>Itani, Khaled</creator><creator>De Bernardinis, Alexandre</creator><creator>Khatir, Zoubir</creator><creator>Jammal, Ahmad</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9297-4811</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0767-596X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3026-1346</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170715</creationdate><title>Comparative analysis of two hybrid energy storage systems used in a two front wheel driven electric vehicle during extreme start-up and regenerative braking operations</title><author>Itani, Khaled ; De Bernardinis, Alexandre ; Khatir, Zoubir ; Jammal, Ahmad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-ff27170038de16b91af9df99f79b6d2cb556949a706974a425ba384008961fb33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Braking systems</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Electric power</topic><topic>Electric power demand</topic><topic>Electric vehicle</topic><topic>Electric vehicles</topic><topic>Energy sources</topic><topic>Energy storage</topic><topic>Engineering Sciences</topic><topic>Flywheel energy system</topic><topic>Flywheels</topic><topic>Fuel consumption</topic><topic>Hybrid energy storage</topic><topic>Hybrid systems</topic><topic>Lithium-ion batteries</topic><topic>Peak load</topic><topic>Regenerative braking</topic><topic>Regenerative braking system</topic><topic>Storage systems</topic><topic>Traction control system</topic><topic>Traction control systems</topic><topic>Ultracapacitor</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Itani, Khaled</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Bernardinis, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khatir, Zoubir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jammal, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Energy conversion and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Itani, Khaled</au><au>De Bernardinis, Alexandre</au><au>Khatir, Zoubir</au><au>Jammal, Ahmad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative analysis of two hybrid energy storage systems used in a two front wheel driven electric vehicle during extreme start-up and regenerative braking operations</atitle><jtitle>Energy conversion and management</jtitle><date>2017-07-15</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>144</volume><spage>69</spage><epage>87</epage><pages>69-87</pages><issn>0196-8904</issn><eissn>1879-2227</eissn><abstract>•Comparison of HESS Ultracapacitor and Flywheel for maximizing EV energy recovery.•Energy recovery performed for extreme two front-wheel driven EV brake conditions.•Regenerative EV braking control strategies and constraints for HESS.•Comparative cost effectiveness for two HESS solutions Ultracapacitors and Flywheel.
This paper presents the comparative study of two hybrid energy storage systems (HESS) of a two front wheel driven electric vehicle. The primary energy source of the HESS is a Li-Ion battery, whereas the secondary energy source is either an ultracapacitor (UC) or a flywheel energy system (FES). The main role of the secondary source is to deliver/recover energy during high peak power demand, but also to increase battery lifetime, considered among the most expensive items in the electric vehicle. As a first step, a techno-economic comparative study, supported by strong literature research, is performed between the UC and the FES. The design and sizing of each element will be presented. The comparison criteria and specifications are also described. The adopted approach in this paper is based on an academic non-oriented point of view. In a second step, each of the HESS will be integrated in a more global Simulink model which includes the vehicle model, the traction control system (TCS), the regenerative braking system and the vehicle actuators. Simulation tests are performed for an extreme braking and vehicle starting-up operations. Tests are realized on two different surface road types and conditions (high and low friction roads) and for different initial system states. In order to show the most appropriate storage system regarding compactness, weight and battery constraints minimization, deep comparative analysis is provided.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enconman.2017.04.036</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9297-4811</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0767-596X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3026-1346</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0196-8904 |
ispartof | Energy conversion and management, 2017-07, Vol.144, p.69-87 |
issn | 0196-8904 1879-2227 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01671565v1 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Braking systems Comparative analysis Comparative studies Computer simulation Economic conditions Electric power Electric power demand Electric vehicle Electric vehicles Energy sources Energy storage Engineering Sciences Flywheel energy system Flywheels Fuel consumption Hybrid energy storage Hybrid systems Lithium-ion batteries Peak load Regenerative braking Regenerative braking system Storage systems Traction control system Traction control systems Ultracapacitor |
title | Comparative analysis of two hybrid energy storage systems used in a two front wheel driven electric vehicle during extreme start-up and regenerative braking operations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T01%3A05%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20analysis%20of%20two%20hybrid%20energy%20storage%20systems%20used%20in%20a%20two%20front%20wheel%20driven%20electric%20vehicle%20during%20extreme%20start-up%20and%20regenerative%20braking%20operations&rft.jtitle=Energy%20conversion%20and%20management&rft.au=Itani,%20Khaled&rft.date=2017-07-15&rft.volume=144&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=87&rft.pages=69-87&rft.issn=0196-8904&rft.eissn=1879-2227&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.04.036&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2024800980%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2024800980&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0196890417303461&rfr_iscdi=true |