Comparative analysis of two hybrid energy storage systems used in a two front wheel driven electric vehicle during extreme start-up and regenerative braking operations

•Comparison of HESS Ultracapacitor and Flywheel for maximizing EV energy recovery.•Energy recovery performed for extreme two front-wheel driven EV brake conditions.•Regenerative EV braking control strategies and constraints for HESS.•Comparative cost effectiveness for two HESS solutions Ultracapacit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy conversion and management 2017-07, Vol.144, p.69-87
Hauptverfasser: Itani, Khaled, De Bernardinis, Alexandre, Khatir, Zoubir, Jammal, Ahmad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 87
container_issue
container_start_page 69
container_title Energy conversion and management
container_volume 144
creator Itani, Khaled
De Bernardinis, Alexandre
Khatir, Zoubir
Jammal, Ahmad
description •Comparison of HESS Ultracapacitor and Flywheel for maximizing EV energy recovery.•Energy recovery performed for extreme two front-wheel driven EV brake conditions.•Regenerative EV braking control strategies and constraints for HESS.•Comparative cost effectiveness for two HESS solutions Ultracapacitors and Flywheel. This paper presents the comparative study of two hybrid energy storage systems (HESS) of a two front wheel driven electric vehicle. The primary energy source of the HESS is a Li-Ion battery, whereas the secondary energy source is either an ultracapacitor (UC) or a flywheel energy system (FES). The main role of the secondary source is to deliver/recover energy during high peak power demand, but also to increase battery lifetime, considered among the most expensive items in the electric vehicle. As a first step, a techno-economic comparative study, supported by strong literature research, is performed between the UC and the FES. The design and sizing of each element will be presented. The comparison criteria and specifications are also described. The adopted approach in this paper is based on an academic non-oriented point of view. In a second step, each of the HESS will be integrated in a more global Simulink model which includes the vehicle model, the traction control system (TCS), the regenerative braking system and the vehicle actuators. Simulation tests are performed for an extreme braking and vehicle starting-up operations. Tests are realized on two different surface road types and conditions (high and low friction roads) and for different initial system states. In order to show the most appropriate storage system regarding compactness, weight and battery constraints minimization, deep comparative analysis is provided.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.04.036
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01671565v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0196890417303461</els_id><sourcerecordid>2024800980</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-ff27170038de16b91af9df99f79b6d2cb556949a706974a425ba384008961fb33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2O1DAQhSMEEs3AFZAlViwS7PzY8Y5RCxikltjA2nKScrebxA5lp4eciGviTDNsZ1VS6atXVe9l2VtGC0YZ_3AuwPXeTdoVJWWioHVBK_4s27FWyLwsS_E821Emed5KWr_MXoVwppRWDeW77M_eT7NGHe0FiHZ6XIMNxBsS7z05rR3agYADPK4kRI_6CCSsIcIUyBJgINYR_cAa9C6S-xPASAZMao7ACH1E25MLnGw_AhkWtO5I4HdEmJJQ1BjzZU57B4Jw3PZcD-lQ_9xIPz90vAuvsxdGjwHe_Ks32Y_Pn77v7_LDty9f97eHvK9EHXNjSsFEeq4dgPFOMm3kYKQ0QnZ8KPuuabispRaUS1Hrumw6XbU1pa3kzHRVdZO9v-qe9KhmtJPGVXlt1d3tQW295LhgDW8uLLHvruyM_tcCIaqzXzB5GFRJy7qlVLY0UfxK9ehDQDD_ZRlVW4DqrB4DVFuAitYqBZgGP14HIf17sYAq9DaRMFhMxqrB26ck_gIkgKrM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2024800980</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative analysis of two hybrid energy storage systems used in a two front wheel driven electric vehicle during extreme start-up and regenerative braking operations</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Itani, Khaled ; De Bernardinis, Alexandre ; Khatir, Zoubir ; Jammal, Ahmad</creator><creatorcontrib>Itani, Khaled ; De Bernardinis, Alexandre ; Khatir, Zoubir ; Jammal, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><description>•Comparison of HESS Ultracapacitor and Flywheel for maximizing EV energy recovery.•Energy recovery performed for extreme two front-wheel driven EV brake conditions.•Regenerative EV braking control strategies and constraints for HESS.•Comparative cost effectiveness for two HESS solutions Ultracapacitors and Flywheel. This paper presents the comparative study of two hybrid energy storage systems (HESS) of a two front wheel driven electric vehicle. The primary energy source of the HESS is a Li-Ion battery, whereas the secondary energy source is either an ultracapacitor (UC) or a flywheel energy system (FES). The main role of the secondary source is to deliver/recover energy during high peak power demand, but also to increase battery lifetime, considered among the most expensive items in the electric vehicle. As a first step, a techno-economic comparative study, supported by strong literature research, is performed between the UC and the FES. The design and sizing of each element will be presented. The comparison criteria and specifications are also described. The adopted approach in this paper is based on an academic non-oriented point of view. In a second step, each of the HESS will be integrated in a more global Simulink model which includes the vehicle model, the traction control system (TCS), the regenerative braking system and the vehicle actuators. Simulation tests are performed for an extreme braking and vehicle starting-up operations. Tests are realized on two different surface road types and conditions (high and low friction roads) and for different initial system states. In order to show the most appropriate storage system regarding compactness, weight and battery constraints minimization, deep comparative analysis is provided.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-8904</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2227</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.04.036</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Braking systems ; Comparative analysis ; Comparative studies ; Computer simulation ; Economic conditions ; Electric power ; Electric power demand ; Electric vehicle ; Electric vehicles ; Energy sources ; Energy storage ; Engineering Sciences ; Flywheel energy system ; Flywheels ; Fuel consumption ; Hybrid energy storage ; Hybrid systems ; Lithium-ion batteries ; Peak load ; Regenerative braking ; Regenerative braking system ; Storage systems ; Traction control system ; Traction control systems ; Ultracapacitor</subject><ispartof>Energy conversion and management, 2017-07, Vol.144, p.69-87</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jul 15, 2017</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-ff27170038de16b91af9df99f79b6d2cb556949a706974a425ba384008961fb33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-ff27170038de16b91af9df99f79b6d2cb556949a706974a425ba384008961fb33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9297-4811 ; 0000-0003-0767-596X ; 0000-0002-3026-1346</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.04.036$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01671565$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Itani, Khaled</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Bernardinis, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khatir, Zoubir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jammal, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative analysis of two hybrid energy storage systems used in a two front wheel driven electric vehicle during extreme start-up and regenerative braking operations</title><title>Energy conversion and management</title><description>•Comparison of HESS Ultracapacitor and Flywheel for maximizing EV energy recovery.•Energy recovery performed for extreme two front-wheel driven EV brake conditions.•Regenerative EV braking control strategies and constraints for HESS.•Comparative cost effectiveness for two HESS solutions Ultracapacitors and Flywheel. This paper presents the comparative study of two hybrid energy storage systems (HESS) of a two front wheel driven electric vehicle. The primary energy source of the HESS is a Li-Ion battery, whereas the secondary energy source is either an ultracapacitor (UC) or a flywheel energy system (FES). The main role of the secondary source is to deliver/recover energy during high peak power demand, but also to increase battery lifetime, considered among the most expensive items in the electric vehicle. As a first step, a techno-economic comparative study, supported by strong literature research, is performed between the UC and the FES. The design and sizing of each element will be presented. The comparison criteria and specifications are also described. The adopted approach in this paper is based on an academic non-oriented point of view. In a second step, each of the HESS will be integrated in a more global Simulink model which includes the vehicle model, the traction control system (TCS), the regenerative braking system and the vehicle actuators. Simulation tests are performed for an extreme braking and vehicle starting-up operations. Tests are realized on two different surface road types and conditions (high and low friction roads) and for different initial system states. In order to show the most appropriate storage system regarding compactness, weight and battery constraints minimization, deep comparative analysis is provided.</description><subject>Braking systems</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Electric power</subject><subject>Electric power demand</subject><subject>Electric vehicle</subject><subject>Electric vehicles</subject><subject>Energy sources</subject><subject>Energy storage</subject><subject>Engineering Sciences</subject><subject>Flywheel energy system</subject><subject>Flywheels</subject><subject>Fuel consumption</subject><subject>Hybrid energy storage</subject><subject>Hybrid systems</subject><subject>Lithium-ion batteries</subject><subject>Peak load</subject><subject>Regenerative braking</subject><subject>Regenerative braking system</subject><subject>Storage systems</subject><subject>Traction control system</subject><subject>Traction control systems</subject><subject>Ultracapacitor</subject><issn>0196-8904</issn><issn>1879-2227</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU2O1DAQhSMEEs3AFZAlViwS7PzY8Y5RCxikltjA2nKScrebxA5lp4eciGviTDNsZ1VS6atXVe9l2VtGC0YZ_3AuwPXeTdoVJWWioHVBK_4s27FWyLwsS_E821Emed5KWr_MXoVwppRWDeW77M_eT7NGHe0FiHZ6XIMNxBsS7z05rR3agYADPK4kRI_6CCSsIcIUyBJgINYR_cAa9C6S-xPASAZMao7ACH1E25MLnGw_AhkWtO5I4HdEmJJQ1BjzZU57B4Jw3PZcD-lQ_9xIPz90vAuvsxdGjwHe_Ks32Y_Pn77v7_LDty9f97eHvK9EHXNjSsFEeq4dgPFOMm3kYKQ0QnZ8KPuuabispRaUS1Hrumw6XbU1pa3kzHRVdZO9v-qe9KhmtJPGVXlt1d3tQW295LhgDW8uLLHvruyM_tcCIaqzXzB5GFRJy7qlVLY0UfxK9ehDQDD_ZRlVW4DqrB4DVFuAitYqBZgGP14HIf17sYAq9DaRMFhMxqrB26ck_gIkgKrM</recordid><startdate>20170715</startdate><enddate>20170715</enddate><creator>Itani, Khaled</creator><creator>De Bernardinis, Alexandre</creator><creator>Khatir, Zoubir</creator><creator>Jammal, Ahmad</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9297-4811</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0767-596X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3026-1346</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170715</creationdate><title>Comparative analysis of two hybrid energy storage systems used in a two front wheel driven electric vehicle during extreme start-up and regenerative braking operations</title><author>Itani, Khaled ; De Bernardinis, Alexandre ; Khatir, Zoubir ; Jammal, Ahmad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-ff27170038de16b91af9df99f79b6d2cb556949a706974a425ba384008961fb33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Braking systems</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Electric power</topic><topic>Electric power demand</topic><topic>Electric vehicle</topic><topic>Electric vehicles</topic><topic>Energy sources</topic><topic>Energy storage</topic><topic>Engineering Sciences</topic><topic>Flywheel energy system</topic><topic>Flywheels</topic><topic>Fuel consumption</topic><topic>Hybrid energy storage</topic><topic>Hybrid systems</topic><topic>Lithium-ion batteries</topic><topic>Peak load</topic><topic>Regenerative braking</topic><topic>Regenerative braking system</topic><topic>Storage systems</topic><topic>Traction control system</topic><topic>Traction control systems</topic><topic>Ultracapacitor</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Itani, Khaled</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Bernardinis, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khatir, Zoubir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jammal, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Energy conversion and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Itani, Khaled</au><au>De Bernardinis, Alexandre</au><au>Khatir, Zoubir</au><au>Jammal, Ahmad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative analysis of two hybrid energy storage systems used in a two front wheel driven electric vehicle during extreme start-up and regenerative braking operations</atitle><jtitle>Energy conversion and management</jtitle><date>2017-07-15</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>144</volume><spage>69</spage><epage>87</epage><pages>69-87</pages><issn>0196-8904</issn><eissn>1879-2227</eissn><abstract>•Comparison of HESS Ultracapacitor and Flywheel for maximizing EV energy recovery.•Energy recovery performed for extreme two front-wheel driven EV brake conditions.•Regenerative EV braking control strategies and constraints for HESS.•Comparative cost effectiveness for two HESS solutions Ultracapacitors and Flywheel. This paper presents the comparative study of two hybrid energy storage systems (HESS) of a two front wheel driven electric vehicle. The primary energy source of the HESS is a Li-Ion battery, whereas the secondary energy source is either an ultracapacitor (UC) or a flywheel energy system (FES). The main role of the secondary source is to deliver/recover energy during high peak power demand, but also to increase battery lifetime, considered among the most expensive items in the electric vehicle. As a first step, a techno-economic comparative study, supported by strong literature research, is performed between the UC and the FES. The design and sizing of each element will be presented. The comparison criteria and specifications are also described. The adopted approach in this paper is based on an academic non-oriented point of view. In a second step, each of the HESS will be integrated in a more global Simulink model which includes the vehicle model, the traction control system (TCS), the regenerative braking system and the vehicle actuators. Simulation tests are performed for an extreme braking and vehicle starting-up operations. Tests are realized on two different surface road types and conditions (high and low friction roads) and for different initial system states. In order to show the most appropriate storage system regarding compactness, weight and battery constraints minimization, deep comparative analysis is provided.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enconman.2017.04.036</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9297-4811</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0767-596X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3026-1346</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-8904
ispartof Energy conversion and management, 2017-07, Vol.144, p.69-87
issn 0196-8904
1879-2227
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01671565v1
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Braking systems
Comparative analysis
Comparative studies
Computer simulation
Economic conditions
Electric power
Electric power demand
Electric vehicle
Electric vehicles
Energy sources
Energy storage
Engineering Sciences
Flywheel energy system
Flywheels
Fuel consumption
Hybrid energy storage
Hybrid systems
Lithium-ion batteries
Peak load
Regenerative braking
Regenerative braking system
Storage systems
Traction control system
Traction control systems
Ultracapacitor
title Comparative analysis of two hybrid energy storage systems used in a two front wheel driven electric vehicle during extreme start-up and regenerative braking operations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T01%3A05%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20analysis%20of%20two%20hybrid%20energy%20storage%20systems%20used%20in%20a%20two%20front%20wheel%20driven%20electric%20vehicle%20during%20extreme%20start-up%20and%20regenerative%20braking%20operations&rft.jtitle=Energy%20conversion%20and%20management&rft.au=Itani,%20Khaled&rft.date=2017-07-15&rft.volume=144&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=87&rft.pages=69-87&rft.issn=0196-8904&rft.eissn=1879-2227&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.04.036&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2024800980%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2024800980&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0196890417303461&rfr_iscdi=true