Torque resistance of impression copings after direct implant impression: An in vitro evaluation of impression materials with and without adhesive

Abstract Statement of problem No data are available on the ability of an impression coping to resist the manual placement of an abutment replica (implant analog) during prosthodontic laboratory procedures after a direct (pick-up) impression. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2017-01, Vol.117 (1), p.73-80
Hauptverfasser: Auroy, Pascal, DDS, PhD, Nicolas, Emanuel, DDS, PhD, Bedouin, Yvan, DDS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 80
container_issue 1
container_start_page 73
container_title The Journal of prosthetic dentistry
container_volume 117
creator Auroy, Pascal, DDS, PhD
Nicolas, Emanuel, DDS, PhD
Bedouin, Yvan, DDS
description Abstract Statement of problem No data are available on the ability of an impression coping to resist the manual placement of an abutment replica (implant analog) during prosthodontic laboratory procedures after a direct (pick-up) impression. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the torque resistance of impression copings after a direct impression, that is, the amount of rotational torque sufficient to induce irreversible displacement of impression copings in the impression material bulk once the impression has been made. Material and methods A reference model with 5 abutment replicas was constructed. Five impression copings were screwed onto the abutment replicas, and standardized impressions were made. A controlled twisting force was applied to each impression coping. A torque tester recorded the torque variation. Three elastomeric impression materials were tested. ANOVA and the Tukey test (α=.05) were performed using an average of 30 measurements per impression material, with and without adhesive. Results ANOVA and the Tukey test results showed that the adhesive, cohesive, and mechanical bonds between the impression coping and the impression material depended greatly on the type of material and that the average rupture threshold of these bonds was statistically significantly different in pairwise comparisons ( P
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.05.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01670500v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0022391316301408</els_id><sourcerecordid>1826738367</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-b3c8beec4c8e3c1863aa147191d377e868c83a34bb3e27d3ca1b9881cbe0f9d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks1u1DAUhS0EosPAK1RewiLBjpPYYYEYVUCRRmJBWVuOc8N4SOzBdlL1NXgCnoUnwyFtBWzY-Of63GPrfEbonJKcElq_POYn70IHNuZF2uekygkpHqANJQ3PalHSh2iTKkXGGsrO0JMQjoQQUXH6GJ0VvORVQ_kGfb9y_tsE2EMwISqrAbsem_GUCsE4i7U7GfslYNVH8LgzHnRczgdl4x-6V3hnsbE_f8wmeodhVsOk4mLwt92oko1RQ8DXJh6wst3vhZsiVt0hPWKGp-hRnwTw7Hbeos_v3l5dXGb7j-8_XOz2mS5JGbOWadEC6FILYJqKmilFS04b2jHOQdRCC6ZY2bYMCt4xrWjbCEF1C6RvOsq26MXqe1CDPHkzKn8jnTLycreXSy3lyklFyLxon6_alHqKK0Q5mqBhSCmAm4Kkoqg5EywNW1SvUp0ABQ_9vTclcmEnj_KOnVzYSVLJRCo1nt_eMbUjdPdtd7CS4M0qgJTKbMDLoA0kZCsV2Tnz_zte_2OhB2ONVsNXuIFwdJO3KXNJZSgkkZ-WH7R8IFozQksi2C__SMeb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826738367</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Torque resistance of impression copings after direct implant impression: An in vitro evaluation of impression materials with and without adhesive</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Auroy, Pascal, DDS, PhD ; Nicolas, Emanuel, DDS, PhD ; Bedouin, Yvan, DDS</creator><creatorcontrib>Auroy, Pascal, DDS, PhD ; Nicolas, Emanuel, DDS, PhD ; Bedouin, Yvan, DDS</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Statement of problem No data are available on the ability of an impression coping to resist the manual placement of an abutment replica (implant analog) during prosthodontic laboratory procedures after a direct (pick-up) impression. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the torque resistance of impression copings after a direct impression, that is, the amount of rotational torque sufficient to induce irreversible displacement of impression copings in the impression material bulk once the impression has been made. Material and methods A reference model with 5 abutment replicas was constructed. Five impression copings were screwed onto the abutment replicas, and standardized impressions were made. A controlled twisting force was applied to each impression coping. A torque tester recorded the torque variation. Three elastomeric impression materials were tested. ANOVA and the Tukey test (α=.05) were performed using an average of 30 measurements per impression material, with and without adhesive. Results ANOVA and the Tukey test results showed that the adhesive, cohesive, and mechanical bonds between the impression coping and the impression material depended greatly on the type of material and that the average rupture threshold of these bonds was statistically significantly different in pairwise comparisons ( P &lt;.05). The curve analysis showed that when the impression materials are used with adhesives, the deformation of the interface is irreversible beyond 5 Ncm of torque. Conclusions The polyether impression material is the direct impression material that showed the highest breakdown threshold for adhesive bonding when used without an adhesive. The use of an adhesive on impression copings leads to irreversible deformation of the interface at torque stresses well below the adhesive bond threshold of the same materials used without an adhesive.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3913</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6841</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.05.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27475917</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Dental Cements - therapeutic use ; Dental Impression Materials ; Dental Impression Technique ; Dentistry ; Food and Nutrition ; Humans ; In Vitro Techniques ; Life Sciences ; Prosthodontics ; Santé publique et épidémiologie ; Torque</subject><ispartof>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2017-01, Vol.117 (1), p.73-80</ispartof><rights>2016 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-b3c8beec4c8e3c1863aa147191d377e868c83a34bb3e27d3ca1b9881cbe0f9d13</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0557-9341</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391316301408$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27475917$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://uca.hal.science/hal-01670500$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Auroy, Pascal, DDS, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolas, Emanuel, DDS, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bedouin, Yvan, DDS</creatorcontrib><title>Torque resistance of impression copings after direct implant impression: An in vitro evaluation of impression materials with and without adhesive</title><title>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</title><addtitle>J Prosthet Dent</addtitle><description>Abstract Statement of problem No data are available on the ability of an impression coping to resist the manual placement of an abutment replica (implant analog) during prosthodontic laboratory procedures after a direct (pick-up) impression. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the torque resistance of impression copings after a direct impression, that is, the amount of rotational torque sufficient to induce irreversible displacement of impression copings in the impression material bulk once the impression has been made. Material and methods A reference model with 5 abutment replicas was constructed. Five impression copings were screwed onto the abutment replicas, and standardized impressions were made. A controlled twisting force was applied to each impression coping. A torque tester recorded the torque variation. Three elastomeric impression materials were tested. ANOVA and the Tukey test (α=.05) were performed using an average of 30 measurements per impression material, with and without adhesive. Results ANOVA and the Tukey test results showed that the adhesive, cohesive, and mechanical bonds between the impression coping and the impression material depended greatly on the type of material and that the average rupture threshold of these bonds was statistically significantly different in pairwise comparisons ( P &lt;.05). The curve analysis showed that when the impression materials are used with adhesives, the deformation of the interface is irreversible beyond 5 Ncm of torque. Conclusions The polyether impression material is the direct impression material that showed the highest breakdown threshold for adhesive bonding when used without an adhesive. The use of an adhesive on impression copings leads to irreversible deformation of the interface at torque stresses well below the adhesive bond threshold of the same materials used without an adhesive.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Dental Cements - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Dental Impression Materials</subject><subject>Dental Impression Technique</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Food and Nutrition</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Prosthodontics</subject><subject>Santé publique et épidémiologie</subject><subject>Torque</subject><issn>0022-3913</issn><issn>1097-6841</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks1u1DAUhS0EosPAK1RewiLBjpPYYYEYVUCRRmJBWVuOc8N4SOzBdlL1NXgCnoUnwyFtBWzY-Of63GPrfEbonJKcElq_POYn70IHNuZF2uekygkpHqANJQ3PalHSh2iTKkXGGsrO0JMQjoQQUXH6GJ0VvORVQ_kGfb9y_tsE2EMwISqrAbsem_GUCsE4i7U7GfslYNVH8LgzHnRczgdl4x-6V3hnsbE_f8wmeodhVsOk4mLwt92oko1RQ8DXJh6wst3vhZsiVt0hPWKGp-hRnwTw7Hbeos_v3l5dXGb7j-8_XOz2mS5JGbOWadEC6FILYJqKmilFS04b2jHOQdRCC6ZY2bYMCt4xrWjbCEF1C6RvOsq26MXqe1CDPHkzKn8jnTLycreXSy3lyklFyLxon6_alHqKK0Q5mqBhSCmAm4Kkoqg5EywNW1SvUp0ABQ_9vTclcmEnj_KOnVzYSVLJRCo1nt_eMbUjdPdtd7CS4M0qgJTKbMDLoA0kZCsV2Tnz_zte_2OhB2ONVsNXuIFwdJO3KXNJZSgkkZ-WH7R8IFozQksi2C__SMeb</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Auroy, Pascal, DDS, PhD</creator><creator>Nicolas, Emanuel, DDS, PhD</creator><creator>Bedouin, Yvan, DDS</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0557-9341</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Torque resistance of impression copings after direct implant impression: An in vitro evaluation of impression materials with and without adhesive</title><author>Auroy, Pascal, DDS, PhD ; Nicolas, Emanuel, DDS, PhD ; Bedouin, Yvan, DDS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-b3c8beec4c8e3c1863aa147191d377e868c83a34bb3e27d3ca1b9881cbe0f9d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Dental Cements - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Dental Impression Materials</topic><topic>Dental Impression Technique</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Food and Nutrition</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Prosthodontics</topic><topic>Santé publique et épidémiologie</topic><topic>Torque</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Auroy, Pascal, DDS, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolas, Emanuel, DDS, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bedouin, Yvan, DDS</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Auroy, Pascal, DDS, PhD</au><au>Nicolas, Emanuel, DDS, PhD</au><au>Bedouin, Yvan, DDS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Torque resistance of impression copings after direct implant impression: An in vitro evaluation of impression materials with and without adhesive</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Prosthet Dent</addtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>117</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>73</spage><epage>80</epage><pages>73-80</pages><issn>0022-3913</issn><eissn>1097-6841</eissn><abstract>Abstract Statement of problem No data are available on the ability of an impression coping to resist the manual placement of an abutment replica (implant analog) during prosthodontic laboratory procedures after a direct (pick-up) impression. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the torque resistance of impression copings after a direct impression, that is, the amount of rotational torque sufficient to induce irreversible displacement of impression copings in the impression material bulk once the impression has been made. Material and methods A reference model with 5 abutment replicas was constructed. Five impression copings were screwed onto the abutment replicas, and standardized impressions were made. A controlled twisting force was applied to each impression coping. A torque tester recorded the torque variation. Three elastomeric impression materials were tested. ANOVA and the Tukey test (α=.05) were performed using an average of 30 measurements per impression material, with and without adhesive. Results ANOVA and the Tukey test results showed that the adhesive, cohesive, and mechanical bonds between the impression coping and the impression material depended greatly on the type of material and that the average rupture threshold of these bonds was statistically significantly different in pairwise comparisons ( P &lt;.05). The curve analysis showed that when the impression materials are used with adhesives, the deformation of the interface is irreversible beyond 5 Ncm of torque. Conclusions The polyether impression material is the direct impression material that showed the highest breakdown threshold for adhesive bonding when used without an adhesive. The use of an adhesive on impression copings leads to irreversible deformation of the interface at torque stresses well below the adhesive bond threshold of the same materials used without an adhesive.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27475917</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.05.002</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0557-9341</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3913
ispartof The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2017-01, Vol.117 (1), p.73-80
issn 0022-3913
1097-6841
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01670500v1
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Cancer
Dental Cements - therapeutic use
Dental Impression Materials
Dental Impression Technique
Dentistry
Food and Nutrition
Humans
In Vitro Techniques
Life Sciences
Prosthodontics
Santé publique et épidémiologie
Torque
title Torque resistance of impression copings after direct implant impression: An in vitro evaluation of impression materials with and without adhesive
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T21%3A18%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Torque%20resistance%20of%20impression%20copings%20after%20direct%20implant%20impression:%20An%20in%C2%A0vitro%20evaluation%20of%20impression%20materials%20with%20and%20without%20adhesive&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20prosthetic%20dentistry&rft.au=Auroy,%20Pascal,%20DDS,%20PhD&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=73&rft.epage=80&rft.pages=73-80&rft.issn=0022-3913&rft.eissn=1097-6841&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.05.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1826738367%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826738367&rft_id=info:pmid/27475917&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0022391316301408&rfr_iscdi=true