Rational model and justification model in 'outcome bias'
The authors of this study suggest that the harm‐punishment link (‘outcome bias’) can be explained by the activation of different judgment processes depending on the outcome severity of an offense: (1) a rational model for mild outcomes in which punishment is necessarily linked to responsibility of t...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of social psychology 2008-03, Vol.38 (2), p.272-279 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 279 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 272 |
| container_title | European journal of social psychology |
| container_volume | 38 |
| creator | Tostain, Manuel Lebreuilly, Joëlle |
| description | The authors of this study suggest that the harm‐punishment link (‘outcome bias’) can be explained by the activation of different judgment processes depending on the outcome severity of an offense: (1) a rational model for mild outcomes in which punishment is necessarily linked to responsibility of the perpetrator; (2) a justification model for severe outcomes in which punishment and responsibility are linked only when assessment order allows the latter to rationalize the former. Participants (126 university students) considered an unintentional road accident with mild or severe outcomes and made judgments of responsibility, punishment, and perceived seriousness of the offense. The results support the authors' hypothesis. In the discussion, the authors suggest different motives of punishment (preventive or compensative justice) which explain why responsibility and punishment are not necessarily linked. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ejsp.404 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01668281v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1437048301</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5214-741198adb560bd1c4acd43e4ed0b3157783c7ecc0e0a64da08d51b7d89d707373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0V1rFDEUBuBQFLq2Qn_CIGj1YurJd-aylNpaVlvaynoXMkkWs85O1smM2n_fTGfZC0F6EQLJw3s45yB0hOEEA5CPfpU2JwzYHpphqKoyH_ICzQCYKImUZB-9SmkFAJUQdIbUrelDbE1TrKPzTWFaV6yG1IdlsE8_2_fQFsdx6G1c-6IOJh0fopdL0yT_ensfoG-fzu_PLsv59cXns9N5aTnBrJQM40oZV3MBtcOWGesY9cw7qCnmUipqpbcWPBjBnAHlOK6lU5WTIKmkB-jDlPvDNHrThbXpHnQ0QV-ezvX4BlgIRRT-jbN9N9lNF38NPvV6HZL1TWNaH4ekBZaYCKyehVySXJqIZyEVilVMjKXf_ANXcejyXJPOY1CccDqmvZ-Q7WJKnV_uGsKgx-3pcXs6by_Tt9s8k6xplp1pbUg7T3LXhHKSXTm5P6HxD__N0-dXdzdT7taH1Pu_O2-6n1rkcXO9-Hqhvyyq7-R-caUr-gjqX7RN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214852536</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rational model and justification model in 'outcome bias'</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Tostain, Manuel ; Lebreuilly, Joëlle</creator><creatorcontrib>Tostain, Manuel ; Lebreuilly, Joëlle</creatorcontrib><description>The authors of this study suggest that the harm‐punishment link (‘outcome bias’) can be explained by the activation of different judgment processes depending on the outcome severity of an offense: (1) a rational model for mild outcomes in which punishment is necessarily linked to responsibility of the perpetrator; (2) a justification model for severe outcomes in which punishment and responsibility are linked only when assessment order allows the latter to rationalize the former. Participants (126 university students) considered an unintentional road accident with mild or severe outcomes and made judgments of responsibility, punishment, and perceived seriousness of the offense. The results support the authors' hypothesis. In the discussion, the authors suggest different motives of punishment (preventive or compensative justice) which explain why responsibility and punishment are not necessarily linked. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-2772</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0992</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.404</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EJSPA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Area studies ; Biological and medical sciences ; College Students ; European studies ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Judgment ; Judgments ; Justification ; Offenses ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Punishment ; Rationality ; Responsibility ; Social attribution, perception and cognition ; Social psychology ; Studies ; University students</subject><ispartof>European journal of social psychology, 2008-03, Vol.38 (2), p.272-279</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright John Wiley and Sons, Limited Mar/Apr 2008</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5214-741198adb560bd1c4acd43e4ed0b3157783c7ecc0e0a64da08d51b7d89d707373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5214-741198adb560bd1c4acd43e4ed0b3157783c7ecc0e0a64da08d51b7d89d707373</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2310-2491</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fejsp.404$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fejsp.404$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27903,27904,30978,30979,33753,33754,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20162352$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01668281$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tostain, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebreuilly, Joëlle</creatorcontrib><title>Rational model and justification model in 'outcome bias'</title><title>European journal of social psychology</title><addtitle>Eur. J. Soc. Psychol</addtitle><description>The authors of this study suggest that the harm‐punishment link (‘outcome bias’) can be explained by the activation of different judgment processes depending on the outcome severity of an offense: (1) a rational model for mild outcomes in which punishment is necessarily linked to responsibility of the perpetrator; (2) a justification model for severe outcomes in which punishment and responsibility are linked only when assessment order allows the latter to rationalize the former. Participants (126 university students) considered an unintentional road accident with mild or severe outcomes and made judgments of responsibility, punishment, and perceived seriousness of the offense. The results support the authors' hypothesis. In the discussion, the authors suggest different motives of punishment (preventive or compensative justice) which explain why responsibility and punishment are not necessarily linked. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Area studies</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>European studies</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Judgments</subject><subject>Justification</subject><subject>Offenses</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Punishment</subject><subject>Rationality</subject><subject>Responsibility</subject><subject>Social attribution, perception and cognition</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>University students</subject><issn>0046-2772</issn><issn>1099-0992</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0V1rFDEUBuBQFLq2Qn_CIGj1YurJd-aylNpaVlvaynoXMkkWs85O1smM2n_fTGfZC0F6EQLJw3s45yB0hOEEA5CPfpU2JwzYHpphqKoyH_ICzQCYKImUZB-9SmkFAJUQdIbUrelDbE1TrKPzTWFaV6yG1IdlsE8_2_fQFsdx6G1c-6IOJh0fopdL0yT_ensfoG-fzu_PLsv59cXns9N5aTnBrJQM40oZV3MBtcOWGesY9cw7qCnmUipqpbcWPBjBnAHlOK6lU5WTIKmkB-jDlPvDNHrThbXpHnQ0QV-ezvX4BlgIRRT-jbN9N9lNF38NPvV6HZL1TWNaH4ekBZaYCKyehVySXJqIZyEVilVMjKXf_ANXcejyXJPOY1CccDqmvZ-Q7WJKnV_uGsKgx-3pcXs6by_Tt9s8k6xplp1pbUg7T3LXhHKSXTm5P6HxD__N0-dXdzdT7taH1Pu_O2-6n1rkcXO9-Hqhvyyq7-R-caUr-gjqX7RN</recordid><startdate>200803</startdate><enddate>200803</enddate><creator>Tostain, Manuel</creator><creator>Lebreuilly, Joëlle</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><scope>IHQJB</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2310-2491</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>200803</creationdate><title>Rational model and justification model in 'outcome bias'</title><author>Tostain, Manuel ; Lebreuilly, Joëlle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5214-741198adb560bd1c4acd43e4ed0b3157783c7ecc0e0a64da08d51b7d89d707373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Area studies</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>European studies</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Judgments</topic><topic>Justification</topic><topic>Offenses</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Punishment</topic><topic>Rationality</topic><topic>Responsibility</topic><topic>Social attribution, perception and cognition</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>University students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tostain, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebreuilly, Joëlle</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société (Open Access)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>European journal of social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tostain, Manuel</au><au>Lebreuilly, Joëlle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rational model and justification model in 'outcome bias'</atitle><jtitle>European journal of social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur. J. Soc. Psychol</addtitle><date>2008-03</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>272</spage><epage>279</epage><pages>272-279</pages><issn>0046-2772</issn><eissn>1099-0992</eissn><coden>EJSPA6</coden><abstract>The authors of this study suggest that the harm‐punishment link (‘outcome bias’) can be explained by the activation of different judgment processes depending on the outcome severity of an offense: (1) a rational model for mild outcomes in which punishment is necessarily linked to responsibility of the perpetrator; (2) a justification model for severe outcomes in which punishment and responsibility are linked only when assessment order allows the latter to rationalize the former. Participants (126 university students) considered an unintentional road accident with mild or severe outcomes and made judgments of responsibility, punishment, and perceived seriousness of the offense. The results support the authors' hypothesis. In the discussion, the authors suggest different motives of punishment (preventive or compensative justice) which explain why responsibility and punishment are not necessarily linked. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/ejsp.404</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2310-2491</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0046-2772 |
| ispartof | European journal of social psychology, 2008-03, Vol.38 (2), p.272-279 |
| issn | 0046-2772 1099-0992 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01668281v1 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Area studies Biological and medical sciences College Students European studies Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humanities and Social Sciences Judgment Judgments Justification Offenses Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Punishment Rationality Responsibility Social attribution, perception and cognition Social psychology Studies University students |
| title | Rational model and justification model in 'outcome bias' |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T22%3A03%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rational%20model%20and%20justification%20model%20in%20'outcome%20bias'&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Tostain,%20Manuel&rft.date=2008-03&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=272&rft.epage=279&rft.pages=272-279&rft.issn=0046-2772&rft.eissn=1099-0992&rft.coden=EJSPA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ejsp.404&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1437048301%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214852536&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |