Valorization of carob waste: Definition of a second-generation bioethanol production process

•Bioethanol production from carob solid waste of the food industry was studied.•Sugar extraction efficiency was maximized at 60% on cut waste at room temperature.•Liquid fermentation on these extracts achieved 45.0% yield and 78g EtOH/kg waste.•Solid-state fermentation maintained yield and achieved...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bioresource technology 2017-07, Vol.235, p.25-34
Hauptverfasser: Bahry, Hajar, Pons, Agnès, Abdallah, Rawa, Pierre, Guillaume, Delattre, Cédric, Fayad, Nidal, Taha, Samir, Vial, Christophe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Bioethanol production from carob solid waste of the food industry was studied.•Sugar extraction efficiency was maximized at 60% on cut waste at room temperature.•Liquid fermentation on these extracts achieved 45.0% yield and 78g EtOH/kg waste.•Solid-state fermentation maintained yield and achieved up to 155g ethanol/(kg waste).•Carob waste is an attractive feedstock for second-generation bioethanol production. The aim of this work was to develop a strategy for second-generation ethanol production from carob solid waste issued from Lebanese food industry. The pros and cons of submerged (SF) and solid-state fermentations (SSF) using S. cerevisiae on ethanol yield and productivity were compared, including the respective roles of upstream and downstream processes, such as the size reduction, or sugar and ethanol recovery processes. The design of experiments methodology was applied. Experimental results demonstrated that SSF applied to cut carob waste from carob syrup preparation was simpler to operate and more cost-effective, maintained yield and productivity (0.458g ethanol/g consumed sugar and 4.3g/(kg waste)/h) in comparison to SF (0.450g ethanol/g consumed sugar and 5.7g/(kg waste)/h), and was able to achieve ethanol production up to 155g/(kg waste) at low water demand, while SF reached only 78g/(kg waste) due to the limitations of the sugar extraction pretreatment.
ISSN:0960-8524
1873-2976
DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.056