Crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level: a review
Paradoxically, the number of crop–livestock farms is declining across Europe, despite the fact that crop-livestock farms are theoretically optimal to improve the sustainability of agriculture. To solve this issue, crop–livestock integration may be organized beyond the farm level. For instance, local...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Agronomy for sustainable development 2016-09, Vol.36 (3), p.1-21, Article 53 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 21 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Agronomy for sustainable development |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Martin, Guillaume Moraine, Marc Ryschawy, Julie Magne, Marie-Angélina Asai, Masayasu Sarthou, Jean-Pierre Duru, Michel Therond, Olivier |
description | Paradoxically, the number of crop–livestock farms is declining across Europe, despite the fact that crop-livestock farms are theoretically optimal to improve the sustainability of agriculture. To solve this issue, crop–livestock integration may be organized beyond the farm level. For instance, local groups of farmers can negotiate land-use allocation patterns and exchange materials such as manure, grain, and straw. Development of such a collective agricultural system raises questions, rarely documented in the literature, about how to integrate crops and livestock among farms, and the consequences, impacts, and conditions of integrating them. Here, we review the different forms of crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level, their potential benefits, and the features of decision support systems (DSS) needed for the integration process. We identify three forms of crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level: local coexistence, complementarity, and synergy, each with increasingly stronger temporal, spatial, and organizational coordination among farms. We claim that the forms of integration implemented define the nature, area, and spatial configuration of crops, grasslands, and animals in farms and landscapes. In turn, these configurations influence the provision of ecosystem services. For instance, we show that the synergy form of integration promotes soil fertility, erosion control, and field-level biological regulation services through organizational coordination among farmers and spatiotemporal integration between crops, grasslands, and animals. We found that social benefits of the synergy form of integration include collective empowerment of farmers. We claim that design of the complementarity and synergy forms of crop–livestock integration can best be supported by collective participatory workshops involving farmers, agricultural consultants, and researchers. In these workshops, spatialized simulation modeling of crop–livestock integration among farms is the basis for achieving the upscaling process involved in integrating beyond the farm level. Facilitators of these workshops have to pay attention to the consequences on governance and equity issues within farmers groups. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13593-016-0390-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01584820v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1880866798</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-40cc1d4f55951687aede0d156a6c442836d96f3d50688d05c67a558888fdc0f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1OwzAUhS0EEqXwAGyRmBgC1_VPHMRSVUCRKrHAbBnbaVPSuNhpaDfegTfkSXAIQizcxVdH3znyPQidYrjAANllwITlJAXMUyA5pNs9NMBZ1imM7X_vNIWM8kN0FMISgHbKAF1PvFt_vn9UZWtD4_RLUtaNnXvVlK5Onu3O1SZpFjYplF8llW1tdZWoxNu2tG_H6KBQVbAnP-8QPd3ePE6m6ezh7n4ynqWa5KRJKWiNDS0YyxnmIlPWWDCYccU1pSNBuMl5QQwDLoQBpnmmGBNxCqOhIGSIzvvchark2pcr5XfSqVJOxzPZafFIQcUIWhzZs55de_e6iTfJpdv4On5PYiFAcJ7lIlK4p7R3IXhb_MZikF2hsi80JnPZFSq30TPqPSGy9dz6P8n_mr4ArKV33Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1880866798</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level: a review</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Martin, Guillaume ; Moraine, Marc ; Ryschawy, Julie ; Magne, Marie-Angélina ; Asai, Masayasu ; Sarthou, Jean-Pierre ; Duru, Michel ; Therond, Olivier</creator><creatorcontrib>Martin, Guillaume ; Moraine, Marc ; Ryschawy, Julie ; Magne, Marie-Angélina ; Asai, Masayasu ; Sarthou, Jean-Pierre ; Duru, Michel ; Therond, Olivier</creatorcontrib><description>Paradoxically, the number of crop–livestock farms is declining across Europe, despite the fact that crop-livestock farms are theoretically optimal to improve the sustainability of agriculture. To solve this issue, crop–livestock integration may be organized beyond the farm level. For instance, local groups of farmers can negotiate land-use allocation patterns and exchange materials such as manure, grain, and straw. Development of such a collective agricultural system raises questions, rarely documented in the literature, about how to integrate crops and livestock among farms, and the consequences, impacts, and conditions of integrating them. Here, we review the different forms of crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level, their potential benefits, and the features of decision support systems (DSS) needed for the integration process. We identify three forms of crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level: local coexistence, complementarity, and synergy, each with increasingly stronger temporal, spatial, and organizational coordination among farms. We claim that the forms of integration implemented define the nature, area, and spatial configuration of crops, grasslands, and animals in farms and landscapes. In turn, these configurations influence the provision of ecosystem services. For instance, we show that the synergy form of integration promotes soil fertility, erosion control, and field-level biological regulation services through organizational coordination among farmers and spatiotemporal integration between crops, grasslands, and animals. We found that social benefits of the synergy form of integration include collective empowerment of farmers. We claim that design of the complementarity and synergy forms of crop–livestock integration can best be supported by collective participatory workshops involving farmers, agricultural consultants, and researchers. In these workshops, spatialized simulation modeling of crop–livestock integration among farms is the basis for achieving the upscaling process involved in integrating beyond the farm level. Facilitators of these workshops have to pay attention to the consequences on governance and equity issues within farmers groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1774-0746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1773-0155</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13593-016-0390-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Paris: Springer Paris</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Agronomy ; Animals ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Computer simulation ; Configurations ; Coordination ; Crop production ; Crops ; Decision support systems ; Ecosystem services ; Erosion control ; Farms ; Grasslands ; Land use ; Life Sciences ; Livestock ; Review Article ; Soil erosion ; Soil fertility ; Soil management ; Soil Science & Conservation ; Straw ; Sustainable agriculture ; Sustainable Development ; Workshops</subject><ispartof>Agronomy for sustainable development, 2016-09, Vol.36 (3), p.1-21, Article 53</ispartof><rights>INRA and Springer-Verlag France 2016</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media 2016</rights><rights>Copyright</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-40cc1d4f55951687aede0d156a6c442836d96f3d50688d05c67a558888fdc0f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-40cc1d4f55951687aede0d156a6c442836d96f3d50688d05c67a558888fdc0f33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4096-6291 ; 0000-0003-1875-0777 ; 0000-0003-0191-3509 ; 0000-0001-5443-4283 ; 0000-0003-0495-5886 ; 0000-0001-7407-4393 ; 0000-0002-9686-4684 ; 0000-0001-7190-7820</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-016-0390-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13593-016-0390-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01584820$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martin, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moraine, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryschawy, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magne, Marie-Angélina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asai, Masayasu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarthou, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duru, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Therond, Olivier</creatorcontrib><title>Crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level: a review</title><title>Agronomy for sustainable development</title><addtitle>Agron. Sustain. Dev</addtitle><description>Paradoxically, the number of crop–livestock farms is declining across Europe, despite the fact that crop-livestock farms are theoretically optimal to improve the sustainability of agriculture. To solve this issue, crop–livestock integration may be organized beyond the farm level. For instance, local groups of farmers can negotiate land-use allocation patterns and exchange materials such as manure, grain, and straw. Development of such a collective agricultural system raises questions, rarely documented in the literature, about how to integrate crops and livestock among farms, and the consequences, impacts, and conditions of integrating them. Here, we review the different forms of crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level, their potential benefits, and the features of decision support systems (DSS) needed for the integration process. We identify three forms of crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level: local coexistence, complementarity, and synergy, each with increasingly stronger temporal, spatial, and organizational coordination among farms. We claim that the forms of integration implemented define the nature, area, and spatial configuration of crops, grasslands, and animals in farms and landscapes. In turn, these configurations influence the provision of ecosystem services. For instance, we show that the synergy form of integration promotes soil fertility, erosion control, and field-level biological regulation services through organizational coordination among farmers and spatiotemporal integration between crops, grasslands, and animals. We found that social benefits of the synergy form of integration include collective empowerment of farmers. We claim that design of the complementarity and synergy forms of crop–livestock integration can best be supported by collective participatory workshops involving farmers, agricultural consultants, and researchers. In these workshops, spatialized simulation modeling of crop–livestock integration among farms is the basis for achieving the upscaling process involved in integrating beyond the farm level. Facilitators of these workshops have to pay attention to the consequences on governance and equity issues within farmers groups.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agronomy</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Configurations</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Crop production</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Decision support systems</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Erosion control</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Soil fertility</subject><subject>Soil management</subject><subject>Soil Science & Conservation</subject><subject>Straw</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Workshops</subject><issn>1774-0746</issn><issn>1773-0155</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kL1OwzAUhS0EEqXwAGyRmBgC1_VPHMRSVUCRKrHAbBnbaVPSuNhpaDfegTfkSXAIQizcxVdH3znyPQidYrjAANllwITlJAXMUyA5pNs9NMBZ1imM7X_vNIWM8kN0FMISgHbKAF1PvFt_vn9UZWtD4_RLUtaNnXvVlK5Onu3O1SZpFjYplF8llW1tdZWoxNu2tG_H6KBQVbAnP-8QPd3ePE6m6ezh7n4ynqWa5KRJKWiNDS0YyxnmIlPWWDCYccU1pSNBuMl5QQwDLoQBpnmmGBNxCqOhIGSIzvvchark2pcr5XfSqVJOxzPZafFIQcUIWhzZs55de_e6iTfJpdv4On5PYiFAcJ7lIlK4p7R3IXhb_MZikF2hsi80JnPZFSq30TPqPSGy9dz6P8n_mr4ArKV33Q</recordid><startdate>20160901</startdate><enddate>20160901</enddate><creator>Martin, Guillaume</creator><creator>Moraine, Marc</creator><creator>Ryschawy, Julie</creator><creator>Magne, Marie-Angélina</creator><creator>Asai, Masayasu</creator><creator>Sarthou, Jean-Pierre</creator><creator>Duru, Michel</creator><creator>Therond, Olivier</creator><general>Springer Paris</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag/EDP Sciences/INRA</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4096-6291</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1875-0777</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0191-3509</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5443-4283</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0495-5886</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7407-4393</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9686-4684</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7190-7820</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160901</creationdate><title>Crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level: a review</title><author>Martin, Guillaume ; Moraine, Marc ; Ryschawy, Julie ; Magne, Marie-Angélina ; Asai, Masayasu ; Sarthou, Jean-Pierre ; Duru, Michel ; Therond, Olivier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-40cc1d4f55951687aede0d156a6c442836d96f3d50688d05c67a558888fdc0f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agronomy</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Configurations</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Crop production</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Decision support systems</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Erosion control</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Soil fertility</topic><topic>Soil management</topic><topic>Soil Science & Conservation</topic><topic>Straw</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Workshops</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martin, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moraine, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryschawy, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magne, Marie-Angélina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asai, Masayasu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarthou, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duru, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Therond, Olivier</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Agronomy for sustainable development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martin, Guillaume</au><au>Moraine, Marc</au><au>Ryschawy, Julie</au><au>Magne, Marie-Angélina</au><au>Asai, Masayasu</au><au>Sarthou, Jean-Pierre</au><au>Duru, Michel</au><au>Therond, Olivier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level: a review</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy for sustainable development</jtitle><stitle>Agron. Sustain. Dev</stitle><date>2016-09-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>1-21</pages><artnum>53</artnum><issn>1774-0746</issn><eissn>1773-0155</eissn><abstract>Paradoxically, the number of crop–livestock farms is declining across Europe, despite the fact that crop-livestock farms are theoretically optimal to improve the sustainability of agriculture. To solve this issue, crop–livestock integration may be organized beyond the farm level. For instance, local groups of farmers can negotiate land-use allocation patterns and exchange materials such as manure, grain, and straw. Development of such a collective agricultural system raises questions, rarely documented in the literature, about how to integrate crops and livestock among farms, and the consequences, impacts, and conditions of integrating them. Here, we review the different forms of crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level, their potential benefits, and the features of decision support systems (DSS) needed for the integration process. We identify three forms of crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level: local coexistence, complementarity, and synergy, each with increasingly stronger temporal, spatial, and organizational coordination among farms. We claim that the forms of integration implemented define the nature, area, and spatial configuration of crops, grasslands, and animals in farms and landscapes. In turn, these configurations influence the provision of ecosystem services. For instance, we show that the synergy form of integration promotes soil fertility, erosion control, and field-level biological regulation services through organizational coordination among farmers and spatiotemporal integration between crops, grasslands, and animals. We found that social benefits of the synergy form of integration include collective empowerment of farmers. We claim that design of the complementarity and synergy forms of crop–livestock integration can best be supported by collective participatory workshops involving farmers, agricultural consultants, and researchers. In these workshops, spatialized simulation modeling of crop–livestock integration among farms is the basis for achieving the upscaling process involved in integrating beyond the farm level. Facilitators of these workshops have to pay attention to the consequences on governance and equity issues within farmers groups.</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>Springer Paris</pub><doi>10.1007/s13593-016-0390-x</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4096-6291</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1875-0777</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0191-3509</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5443-4283</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0495-5886</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7407-4393</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9686-4684</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7190-7820</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1774-0746 |
ispartof | Agronomy for sustainable development, 2016-09, Vol.36 (3), p.1-21, Article 53 |
issn | 1774-0746 1773-0155 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01584820v1 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Agriculture Agronomy Animals Biomedical and Life Sciences Computer simulation Configurations Coordination Crop production Crops Decision support systems Ecosystem services Erosion control Farms Grasslands Land use Life Sciences Livestock Review Article Soil erosion Soil fertility Soil management Soil Science & Conservation Straw Sustainable agriculture Sustainable Development Workshops |
title | Crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level: a review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T05%3A46%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Crop%E2%80%93livestock%20integration%20beyond%20the%20farm%20level:%20a%20review&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20for%20sustainable%20development&rft.au=Martin,%20Guillaume&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=1-21&rft.artnum=53&rft.issn=1774-0746&rft.eissn=1773-0155&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13593-016-0390-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1880866798%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1880866798&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |