Crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level: a review

Paradoxically, the number of crop–livestock farms is declining across Europe, despite the fact that crop-livestock farms are theoretically optimal to improve the sustainability of agriculture. To solve this issue, crop–livestock integration may be organized beyond the farm level. For instance, local...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agronomy for sustainable development 2016-09, Vol.36 (3), p.1-21, Article 53
Hauptverfasser: Martin, Guillaume, Moraine, Marc, Ryschawy, Julie, Magne, Marie-Angélina, Asai, Masayasu, Sarthou, Jean-Pierre, Duru, Michel, Therond, Olivier
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 21
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1
container_title Agronomy for sustainable development
container_volume 36
creator Martin, Guillaume
Moraine, Marc
Ryschawy, Julie
Magne, Marie-Angélina
Asai, Masayasu
Sarthou, Jean-Pierre
Duru, Michel
Therond, Olivier
description Paradoxically, the number of crop–livestock farms is declining across Europe, despite the fact that crop-livestock farms are theoretically optimal to improve the sustainability of agriculture. To solve this issue, crop–livestock integration may be organized beyond the farm level. For instance, local groups of farmers can negotiate land-use allocation patterns and exchange materials such as manure, grain, and straw. Development of such a collective agricultural system raises questions, rarely documented in the literature, about how to integrate crops and livestock among farms, and the consequences, impacts, and conditions of integrating them. Here, we review the different forms of crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level, their potential benefits, and the features of decision support systems (DSS) needed for the integration process. We identify three forms of crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level: local coexistence, complementarity, and synergy, each with increasingly stronger temporal, spatial, and organizational coordination among farms. We claim that the forms of integration implemented define the nature, area, and spatial configuration of crops, grasslands, and animals in farms and landscapes. In turn, these configurations influence the provision of ecosystem services. For instance, we show that the synergy form of integration promotes soil fertility, erosion control, and field-level biological regulation services through organizational coordination among farmers and spatiotemporal integration between crops, grasslands, and animals. We found that social benefits of the synergy form of integration include collective empowerment of farmers. We claim that design of the complementarity and synergy forms of crop–livestock integration can best be supported by collective participatory workshops involving farmers, agricultural consultants, and researchers. In these workshops, spatialized simulation modeling of crop–livestock integration among farms is the basis for achieving the upscaling process involved in integrating beyond the farm level. Facilitators of these workshops have to pay attention to the consequences on governance and equity issues within farmers groups.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13593-016-0390-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01584820v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1880866798</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-40cc1d4f55951687aede0d156a6c442836d96f3d50688d05c67a558888fdc0f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1OwzAUhS0EEqXwAGyRmBgC1_VPHMRSVUCRKrHAbBnbaVPSuNhpaDfegTfkSXAIQizcxVdH3znyPQidYrjAANllwITlJAXMUyA5pNs9NMBZ1imM7X_vNIWM8kN0FMISgHbKAF1PvFt_vn9UZWtD4_RLUtaNnXvVlK5Onu3O1SZpFjYplF8llW1tdZWoxNu2tG_H6KBQVbAnP-8QPd3ePE6m6ezh7n4ynqWa5KRJKWiNDS0YyxnmIlPWWDCYccU1pSNBuMl5QQwDLoQBpnmmGBNxCqOhIGSIzvvchark2pcr5XfSqVJOxzPZafFIQcUIWhzZs55de_e6iTfJpdv4On5PYiFAcJ7lIlK4p7R3IXhb_MZikF2hsi80JnPZFSq30TPqPSGy9dz6P8n_mr4ArKV33Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1880866798</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level: a review</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Martin, Guillaume ; Moraine, Marc ; Ryschawy, Julie ; Magne, Marie-Angélina ; Asai, Masayasu ; Sarthou, Jean-Pierre ; Duru, Michel ; Therond, Olivier</creator><creatorcontrib>Martin, Guillaume ; Moraine, Marc ; Ryschawy, Julie ; Magne, Marie-Angélina ; Asai, Masayasu ; Sarthou, Jean-Pierre ; Duru, Michel ; Therond, Olivier</creatorcontrib><description>Paradoxically, the number of crop–livestock farms is declining across Europe, despite the fact that crop-livestock farms are theoretically optimal to improve the sustainability of agriculture. To solve this issue, crop–livestock integration may be organized beyond the farm level. For instance, local groups of farmers can negotiate land-use allocation patterns and exchange materials such as manure, grain, and straw. Development of such a collective agricultural system raises questions, rarely documented in the literature, about how to integrate crops and livestock among farms, and the consequences, impacts, and conditions of integrating them. Here, we review the different forms of crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level, their potential benefits, and the features of decision support systems (DSS) needed for the integration process. We identify three forms of crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level: local coexistence, complementarity, and synergy, each with increasingly stronger temporal, spatial, and organizational coordination among farms. We claim that the forms of integration implemented define the nature, area, and spatial configuration of crops, grasslands, and animals in farms and landscapes. In turn, these configurations influence the provision of ecosystem services. For instance, we show that the synergy form of integration promotes soil fertility, erosion control, and field-level biological regulation services through organizational coordination among farmers and spatiotemporal integration between crops, grasslands, and animals. We found that social benefits of the synergy form of integration include collective empowerment of farmers. We claim that design of the complementarity and synergy forms of crop–livestock integration can best be supported by collective participatory workshops involving farmers, agricultural consultants, and researchers. In these workshops, spatialized simulation modeling of crop–livestock integration among farms is the basis for achieving the upscaling process involved in integrating beyond the farm level. Facilitators of these workshops have to pay attention to the consequences on governance and equity issues within farmers groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1774-0746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1773-0155</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13593-016-0390-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Paris: Springer Paris</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Agronomy ; Animals ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Computer simulation ; Configurations ; Coordination ; Crop production ; Crops ; Decision support systems ; Ecosystem services ; Erosion control ; Farms ; Grasslands ; Land use ; Life Sciences ; Livestock ; Review Article ; Soil erosion ; Soil fertility ; Soil management ; Soil Science &amp; Conservation ; Straw ; Sustainable agriculture ; Sustainable Development ; Workshops</subject><ispartof>Agronomy for sustainable development, 2016-09, Vol.36 (3), p.1-21, Article 53</ispartof><rights>INRA and Springer-Verlag France 2016</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science &amp; Business Media 2016</rights><rights>Copyright</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-40cc1d4f55951687aede0d156a6c442836d96f3d50688d05c67a558888fdc0f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-40cc1d4f55951687aede0d156a6c442836d96f3d50688d05c67a558888fdc0f33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4096-6291 ; 0000-0003-1875-0777 ; 0000-0003-0191-3509 ; 0000-0001-5443-4283 ; 0000-0003-0495-5886 ; 0000-0001-7407-4393 ; 0000-0002-9686-4684 ; 0000-0001-7190-7820</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-016-0390-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13593-016-0390-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01584820$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martin, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moraine, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryschawy, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magne, Marie-Angélina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asai, Masayasu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarthou, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duru, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Therond, Olivier</creatorcontrib><title>Crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level: a review</title><title>Agronomy for sustainable development</title><addtitle>Agron. Sustain. Dev</addtitle><description>Paradoxically, the number of crop–livestock farms is declining across Europe, despite the fact that crop-livestock farms are theoretically optimal to improve the sustainability of agriculture. To solve this issue, crop–livestock integration may be organized beyond the farm level. For instance, local groups of farmers can negotiate land-use allocation patterns and exchange materials such as manure, grain, and straw. Development of such a collective agricultural system raises questions, rarely documented in the literature, about how to integrate crops and livestock among farms, and the consequences, impacts, and conditions of integrating them. Here, we review the different forms of crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level, their potential benefits, and the features of decision support systems (DSS) needed for the integration process. We identify three forms of crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level: local coexistence, complementarity, and synergy, each with increasingly stronger temporal, spatial, and organizational coordination among farms. We claim that the forms of integration implemented define the nature, area, and spatial configuration of crops, grasslands, and animals in farms and landscapes. In turn, these configurations influence the provision of ecosystem services. For instance, we show that the synergy form of integration promotes soil fertility, erosion control, and field-level biological regulation services through organizational coordination among farmers and spatiotemporal integration between crops, grasslands, and animals. We found that social benefits of the synergy form of integration include collective empowerment of farmers. We claim that design of the complementarity and synergy forms of crop–livestock integration can best be supported by collective participatory workshops involving farmers, agricultural consultants, and researchers. In these workshops, spatialized simulation modeling of crop–livestock integration among farms is the basis for achieving the upscaling process involved in integrating beyond the farm level. Facilitators of these workshops have to pay attention to the consequences on governance and equity issues within farmers groups.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agronomy</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Configurations</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Crop production</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Decision support systems</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Erosion control</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Soil fertility</subject><subject>Soil management</subject><subject>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</subject><subject>Straw</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Workshops</subject><issn>1774-0746</issn><issn>1773-0155</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kL1OwzAUhS0EEqXwAGyRmBgC1_VPHMRSVUCRKrHAbBnbaVPSuNhpaDfegTfkSXAIQizcxVdH3znyPQidYrjAANllwITlJAXMUyA5pNs9NMBZ1imM7X_vNIWM8kN0FMISgHbKAF1PvFt_vn9UZWtD4_RLUtaNnXvVlK5Onu3O1SZpFjYplF8llW1tdZWoxNu2tG_H6KBQVbAnP-8QPd3ePE6m6ezh7n4ynqWa5KRJKWiNDS0YyxnmIlPWWDCYccU1pSNBuMl5QQwDLoQBpnmmGBNxCqOhIGSIzvvchark2pcr5XfSqVJOxzPZafFIQcUIWhzZs55de_e6iTfJpdv4On5PYiFAcJ7lIlK4p7R3IXhb_MZikF2hsi80JnPZFSq30TPqPSGy9dz6P8n_mr4ArKV33Q</recordid><startdate>20160901</startdate><enddate>20160901</enddate><creator>Martin, Guillaume</creator><creator>Moraine, Marc</creator><creator>Ryschawy, Julie</creator><creator>Magne, Marie-Angélina</creator><creator>Asai, Masayasu</creator><creator>Sarthou, Jean-Pierre</creator><creator>Duru, Michel</creator><creator>Therond, Olivier</creator><general>Springer Paris</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag/EDP Sciences/INRA</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4096-6291</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1875-0777</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0191-3509</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5443-4283</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0495-5886</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7407-4393</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9686-4684</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7190-7820</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160901</creationdate><title>Crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level: a review</title><author>Martin, Guillaume ; Moraine, Marc ; Ryschawy, Julie ; Magne, Marie-Angélina ; Asai, Masayasu ; Sarthou, Jean-Pierre ; Duru, Michel ; Therond, Olivier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-40cc1d4f55951687aede0d156a6c442836d96f3d50688d05c67a558888fdc0f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agronomy</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Configurations</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Crop production</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Decision support systems</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Erosion control</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Soil fertility</topic><topic>Soil management</topic><topic>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</topic><topic>Straw</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Workshops</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martin, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moraine, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryschawy, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magne, Marie-Angélina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asai, Masayasu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarthou, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duru, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Therond, Olivier</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Agronomy for sustainable development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martin, Guillaume</au><au>Moraine, Marc</au><au>Ryschawy, Julie</au><au>Magne, Marie-Angélina</au><au>Asai, Masayasu</au><au>Sarthou, Jean-Pierre</au><au>Duru, Michel</au><au>Therond, Olivier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level: a review</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy for sustainable development</jtitle><stitle>Agron. Sustain. Dev</stitle><date>2016-09-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>1-21</pages><artnum>53</artnum><issn>1774-0746</issn><eissn>1773-0155</eissn><abstract>Paradoxically, the number of crop–livestock farms is declining across Europe, despite the fact that crop-livestock farms are theoretically optimal to improve the sustainability of agriculture. To solve this issue, crop–livestock integration may be organized beyond the farm level. For instance, local groups of farmers can negotiate land-use allocation patterns and exchange materials such as manure, grain, and straw. Development of such a collective agricultural system raises questions, rarely documented in the literature, about how to integrate crops and livestock among farms, and the consequences, impacts, and conditions of integrating them. Here, we review the different forms of crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level, their potential benefits, and the features of decision support systems (DSS) needed for the integration process. We identify three forms of crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level: local coexistence, complementarity, and synergy, each with increasingly stronger temporal, spatial, and organizational coordination among farms. We claim that the forms of integration implemented define the nature, area, and spatial configuration of crops, grasslands, and animals in farms and landscapes. In turn, these configurations influence the provision of ecosystem services. For instance, we show that the synergy form of integration promotes soil fertility, erosion control, and field-level biological regulation services through organizational coordination among farmers and spatiotemporal integration between crops, grasslands, and animals. We found that social benefits of the synergy form of integration include collective empowerment of farmers. We claim that design of the complementarity and synergy forms of crop–livestock integration can best be supported by collective participatory workshops involving farmers, agricultural consultants, and researchers. In these workshops, spatialized simulation modeling of crop–livestock integration among farms is the basis for achieving the upscaling process involved in integrating beyond the farm level. Facilitators of these workshops have to pay attention to the consequences on governance and equity issues within farmers groups.</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>Springer Paris</pub><doi>10.1007/s13593-016-0390-x</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4096-6291</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1875-0777</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0191-3509</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5443-4283</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0495-5886</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7407-4393</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9686-4684</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7190-7820</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1774-0746
ispartof Agronomy for sustainable development, 2016-09, Vol.36 (3), p.1-21, Article 53
issn 1774-0746
1773-0155
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01584820v1
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Agriculture
Agronomy
Animals
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Computer simulation
Configurations
Coordination
Crop production
Crops
Decision support systems
Ecosystem services
Erosion control
Farms
Grasslands
Land use
Life Sciences
Livestock
Review Article
Soil erosion
Soil fertility
Soil management
Soil Science & Conservation
Straw
Sustainable agriculture
Sustainable Development
Workshops
title Crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level: a review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T05%3A46%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Crop%E2%80%93livestock%20integration%20beyond%20the%20farm%20level:%20a%20review&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20for%20sustainable%20development&rft.au=Martin,%20Guillaume&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=1-21&rft.artnum=53&rft.issn=1774-0746&rft.eissn=1773-0155&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13593-016-0390-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1880866798%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1880866798&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true