Economic diplomacy: The “one–China policy” effect on trade
Chinese foreign policy is mainly characterized by the Beijing consensus and the one-China principle in international relations. More precisely, the situation faced by Taiwan is a “core interest” in China's economic diplomacy strategy. We investigate whether the “one-China policy” (OCP) has had...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | China economic review 2018-04, Vol.48, p.223-243 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 243 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 223 |
container_title | China economic review |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Didier, Laurent |
description | Chinese foreign policy is mainly characterized by the Beijing consensus and the one-China principle in international relations. More precisely, the situation faced by Taiwan is a “core interest” in China's economic diplomacy strategy. We investigate whether the “one-China policy” (OCP) has had visible effects on bilateral trade flows. In other words, does the compliance of diplomatic commitments with China undermine Taiwanese trade and enhance China's trade position? Using a structural gravity model based on worldwide panel data for the period 1948–2012, we approximate the OCP through two dummy variables: the vote by countries of the UN resolution about China's recognition in 1971 and the existence of diplomatic ties with China. The first component of the OCP drastically increased on average in trade flows with China regardless of the vote of trading partners concerning this UN resolution as well as that for Taiwan. On average, results suggest that diplomatic relations with China improve bilateral trade flows for China, but a trade-deteriorating effect appears for Taiwan with certain ex-colonies. We also find that the effects of these economic diplomacy components confirm previous results reported for the period studied.
•Economic diplomacy matters in Chinese and Taiwanese trade relations through the “one-Chinapolicy”.•China's recognition by the UN has improved on average the Chinese and Taiwanese trade flows regardless the vote.•Diplomatic ties with China lead to a trade-promoting effect for China regardless the nature of trading partners.•Diplomatic agreements with China lead to a trade-deteriorating effect for Taiwan with someex-colonies.•Chinese authorities use retaliation measures to compel its trading partners to respect its foreign policy doctrine. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.chieco.2016.11.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01575965v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1043951X16301419</els_id><sourcerecordid>S1043951X16301419</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-9150b0fae8dba96e4800fbe3c64a1c185c6b98f2213b8251575b3a8b384715c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AUhQdRsFbfwEW2LhLvzWSSiQtRSrVCwU0X7obJ5A6ZkmZKUgrd9R3c6sv1SUyIuHR1fzjnwPkYu0WIEDC9X0emcmR8FPdXhBgB8DM2QZnxMMsknvc7JDzMBX5csquuWwNACpBM2NPc-MZvnAlKt639RpvDQ7CqKDgdv3xDp-PnrHKNDra-duZwOn4HZC2ZXeCbYNfqkq7ZhdV1Rze_c8pWL_PVbBEu31_fZs_L0PCM78IcBRRgNcmy0HlKiQSwBXGTJhoNSmHSIpc2jpEXMhYoMlFwLQsukwyF4VN2N8ZWulbb1m10e1BeO7V4XqrhB4MlT8Uee20yak3ru64l-2dAUAMwtVYjMDUAU4iqB9bbHkcb9TX2jlrVGUeNodK1fWNVevd_wA_16Xbs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic diplomacy: The “one–China policy” effect on trade</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Didier, Laurent</creator><creatorcontrib>Didier, Laurent</creatorcontrib><description>Chinese foreign policy is mainly characterized by the Beijing consensus and the one-China principle in international relations. More precisely, the situation faced by Taiwan is a “core interest” in China's economic diplomacy strategy. We investigate whether the “one-China policy” (OCP) has had visible effects on bilateral trade flows. In other words, does the compliance of diplomatic commitments with China undermine Taiwanese trade and enhance China's trade position? Using a structural gravity model based on worldwide panel data for the period 1948–2012, we approximate the OCP through two dummy variables: the vote by countries of the UN resolution about China's recognition in 1971 and the existence of diplomatic ties with China. The first component of the OCP drastically increased on average in trade flows with China regardless of the vote of trading partners concerning this UN resolution as well as that for Taiwan. On average, results suggest that diplomatic relations with China improve bilateral trade flows for China, but a trade-deteriorating effect appears for Taiwan with certain ex-colonies. We also find that the effects of these economic diplomacy components confirm previous results reported for the period studied.
•Economic diplomacy matters in Chinese and Taiwanese trade relations through the “one-Chinapolicy”.•China's recognition by the UN has improved on average the Chinese and Taiwanese trade flows regardless the vote.•Diplomatic ties with China lead to a trade-promoting effect for China regardless the nature of trading partners.•Diplomatic agreements with China lead to a trade-deteriorating effect for Taiwan with someex-colonies.•Chinese authorities use retaliation measures to compel its trading partners to respect its foreign policy doctrine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1043-951X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7781</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2016.11.003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>China ; Economic diplomacy ; Economics and Finance ; Gravity ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Taiwan ; Trade</subject><ispartof>China economic review, 2018-04, Vol.48, p.223-243</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-9150b0fae8dba96e4800fbe3c64a1c185c6b98f2213b8251575b3a8b384715c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-9150b0fae8dba96e4800fbe3c64a1c185c6b98f2213b8251575b3a8b384715c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4088-064X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2016.11.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.univ-reunion.fr/hal-01575965$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Didier, Laurent</creatorcontrib><title>Economic diplomacy: The “one–China policy” effect on trade</title><title>China economic review</title><description>Chinese foreign policy is mainly characterized by the Beijing consensus and the one-China principle in international relations. More precisely, the situation faced by Taiwan is a “core interest” in China's economic diplomacy strategy. We investigate whether the “one-China policy” (OCP) has had visible effects on bilateral trade flows. In other words, does the compliance of diplomatic commitments with China undermine Taiwanese trade and enhance China's trade position? Using a structural gravity model based on worldwide panel data for the period 1948–2012, we approximate the OCP through two dummy variables: the vote by countries of the UN resolution about China's recognition in 1971 and the existence of diplomatic ties with China. The first component of the OCP drastically increased on average in trade flows with China regardless of the vote of trading partners concerning this UN resolution as well as that for Taiwan. On average, results suggest that diplomatic relations with China improve bilateral trade flows for China, but a trade-deteriorating effect appears for Taiwan with certain ex-colonies. We also find that the effects of these economic diplomacy components confirm previous results reported for the period studied.
•Economic diplomacy matters in Chinese and Taiwanese trade relations through the “one-Chinapolicy”.•China's recognition by the UN has improved on average the Chinese and Taiwanese trade flows regardless the vote.•Diplomatic ties with China lead to a trade-promoting effect for China regardless the nature of trading partners.•Diplomatic agreements with China lead to a trade-deteriorating effect for Taiwan with someex-colonies.•Chinese authorities use retaliation measures to compel its trading partners to respect its foreign policy doctrine.</description><subject>China</subject><subject>Economic diplomacy</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Gravity</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Taiwan</subject><subject>Trade</subject><issn>1043-951X</issn><issn>1873-7781</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AUhQdRsFbfwEW2LhLvzWSSiQtRSrVCwU0X7obJ5A6ZkmZKUgrd9R3c6sv1SUyIuHR1fzjnwPkYu0WIEDC9X0emcmR8FPdXhBgB8DM2QZnxMMsknvc7JDzMBX5csquuWwNACpBM2NPc-MZvnAlKt639RpvDQ7CqKDgdv3xDp-PnrHKNDra-duZwOn4HZC2ZXeCbYNfqkq7ZhdV1Rze_c8pWL_PVbBEu31_fZs_L0PCM78IcBRRgNcmy0HlKiQSwBXGTJhoNSmHSIpc2jpEXMhYoMlFwLQsukwyF4VN2N8ZWulbb1m10e1BeO7V4XqrhB4MlT8Uee20yak3ru64l-2dAUAMwtVYjMDUAU4iqB9bbHkcb9TX2jlrVGUeNodK1fWNVevd_wA_16Xbs</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Didier, Laurent</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4088-064X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Economic diplomacy: The “one–China policy” effect on trade</title><author>Didier, Laurent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-9150b0fae8dba96e4800fbe3c64a1c185c6b98f2213b8251575b3a8b384715c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>China</topic><topic>Economic diplomacy</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Gravity</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Taiwan</topic><topic>Trade</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Didier, Laurent</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>China economic review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Didier, Laurent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic diplomacy: The “one–China policy” effect on trade</atitle><jtitle>China economic review</jtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>48</volume><spage>223</spage><epage>243</epage><pages>223-243</pages><issn>1043-951X</issn><eissn>1873-7781</eissn><abstract>Chinese foreign policy is mainly characterized by the Beijing consensus and the one-China principle in international relations. More precisely, the situation faced by Taiwan is a “core interest” in China's economic diplomacy strategy. We investigate whether the “one-China policy” (OCP) has had visible effects on bilateral trade flows. In other words, does the compliance of diplomatic commitments with China undermine Taiwanese trade and enhance China's trade position? Using a structural gravity model based on worldwide panel data for the period 1948–2012, we approximate the OCP through two dummy variables: the vote by countries of the UN resolution about China's recognition in 1971 and the existence of diplomatic ties with China. The first component of the OCP drastically increased on average in trade flows with China regardless of the vote of trading partners concerning this UN resolution as well as that for Taiwan. On average, results suggest that diplomatic relations with China improve bilateral trade flows for China, but a trade-deteriorating effect appears for Taiwan with certain ex-colonies. We also find that the effects of these economic diplomacy components confirm previous results reported for the period studied.
•Economic diplomacy matters in Chinese and Taiwanese trade relations through the “one-Chinapolicy”.•China's recognition by the UN has improved on average the Chinese and Taiwanese trade flows regardless the vote.•Diplomatic ties with China lead to a trade-promoting effect for China regardless the nature of trading partners.•Diplomatic agreements with China lead to a trade-deteriorating effect for Taiwan with someex-colonies.•Chinese authorities use retaliation measures to compel its trading partners to respect its foreign policy doctrine.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.chieco.2016.11.003</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4088-064X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1043-951X |
ispartof | China economic review, 2018-04, Vol.48, p.223-243 |
issn | 1043-951X 1873-7781 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01575965v1 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | China Economic diplomacy Economics and Finance Gravity Humanities and Social Sciences Taiwan Trade |
title | Economic diplomacy: The “one–China policy” effect on trade |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T02%3A03%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20diplomacy:%20The%20%E2%80%9Cone%E2%80%93China%20policy%E2%80%9D%20effect%20on%20trade&rft.jtitle=China%20economic%20review&rft.au=Didier,%20Laurent&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=48&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=243&rft.pages=223-243&rft.issn=1043-951X&rft.eissn=1873-7781&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chieco.2016.11.003&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_hal_p%3ES1043951X16301419%3C/elsevier_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1043951X16301419&rfr_iscdi=true |