Economic diplomacy: The “one–China policy” effect on trade

Chinese foreign policy is mainly characterized by the Beijing consensus and the one-China principle in international relations. More precisely, the situation faced by Taiwan is a “core interest” in China's economic diplomacy strategy. We investigate whether the “one-China policy” (OCP) has had...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:China economic review 2018-04, Vol.48, p.223-243
1. Verfasser: Didier, Laurent
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 243
container_issue
container_start_page 223
container_title China economic review
container_volume 48
creator Didier, Laurent
description Chinese foreign policy is mainly characterized by the Beijing consensus and the one-China principle in international relations. More precisely, the situation faced by Taiwan is a “core interest” in China's economic diplomacy strategy. We investigate whether the “one-China policy” (OCP) has had visible effects on bilateral trade flows. In other words, does the compliance of diplomatic commitments with China undermine Taiwanese trade and enhance China's trade position? Using a structural gravity model based on worldwide panel data for the period 1948–2012, we approximate the OCP through two dummy variables: the vote by countries of the UN resolution about China's recognition in 1971 and the existence of diplomatic ties with China. The first component of the OCP drastically increased on average in trade flows with China regardless of the vote of trading partners concerning this UN resolution as well as that for Taiwan. On average, results suggest that diplomatic relations with China improve bilateral trade flows for China, but a trade-deteriorating effect appears for Taiwan with certain ex-colonies. We also find that the effects of these economic diplomacy components confirm previous results reported for the period studied. •Economic diplomacy matters in Chinese and Taiwanese trade relations through the “one-Chinapolicy”.•China's recognition by the UN has improved on average the Chinese and Taiwanese trade flows regardless the vote.•Diplomatic ties with China lead to a trade-promoting effect for China regardless the nature of trading partners.•Diplomatic agreements with China lead to a trade-deteriorating effect for Taiwan with someex-colonies.•Chinese authorities use retaliation measures to compel its trading partners to respect its foreign policy doctrine.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.chieco.2016.11.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01575965v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1043951X16301419</els_id><sourcerecordid>S1043951X16301419</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-9150b0fae8dba96e4800fbe3c64a1c185c6b98f2213b8251575b3a8b384715c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AUhQdRsFbfwEW2LhLvzWSSiQtRSrVCwU0X7obJ5A6ZkmZKUgrd9R3c6sv1SUyIuHR1fzjnwPkYu0WIEDC9X0emcmR8FPdXhBgB8DM2QZnxMMsknvc7JDzMBX5csquuWwNACpBM2NPc-MZvnAlKt639RpvDQ7CqKDgdv3xDp-PnrHKNDra-duZwOn4HZC2ZXeCbYNfqkq7ZhdV1Rze_c8pWL_PVbBEu31_fZs_L0PCM78IcBRRgNcmy0HlKiQSwBXGTJhoNSmHSIpc2jpEXMhYoMlFwLQsukwyF4VN2N8ZWulbb1m10e1BeO7V4XqrhB4MlT8Uee20yak3ru64l-2dAUAMwtVYjMDUAU4iqB9bbHkcb9TX2jlrVGUeNodK1fWNVevd_wA_16Xbs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic diplomacy: The “one–China policy” effect on trade</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Didier, Laurent</creator><creatorcontrib>Didier, Laurent</creatorcontrib><description>Chinese foreign policy is mainly characterized by the Beijing consensus and the one-China principle in international relations. More precisely, the situation faced by Taiwan is a “core interest” in China's economic diplomacy strategy. We investigate whether the “one-China policy” (OCP) has had visible effects on bilateral trade flows. In other words, does the compliance of diplomatic commitments with China undermine Taiwanese trade and enhance China's trade position? Using a structural gravity model based on worldwide panel data for the period 1948–2012, we approximate the OCP through two dummy variables: the vote by countries of the UN resolution about China's recognition in 1971 and the existence of diplomatic ties with China. The first component of the OCP drastically increased on average in trade flows with China regardless of the vote of trading partners concerning this UN resolution as well as that for Taiwan. On average, results suggest that diplomatic relations with China improve bilateral trade flows for China, but a trade-deteriorating effect appears for Taiwan with certain ex-colonies. We also find that the effects of these economic diplomacy components confirm previous results reported for the period studied. •Economic diplomacy matters in Chinese and Taiwanese trade relations through the “one-Chinapolicy”.•China's recognition by the UN has improved on average the Chinese and Taiwanese trade flows regardless the vote.•Diplomatic ties with China lead to a trade-promoting effect for China regardless the nature of trading partners.•Diplomatic agreements with China lead to a trade-deteriorating effect for Taiwan with someex-colonies.•Chinese authorities use retaliation measures to compel its trading partners to respect its foreign policy doctrine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1043-951X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7781</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2016.11.003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>China ; Economic diplomacy ; Economics and Finance ; Gravity ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Taiwan ; Trade</subject><ispartof>China economic review, 2018-04, Vol.48, p.223-243</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-9150b0fae8dba96e4800fbe3c64a1c185c6b98f2213b8251575b3a8b384715c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-9150b0fae8dba96e4800fbe3c64a1c185c6b98f2213b8251575b3a8b384715c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4088-064X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2016.11.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.univ-reunion.fr/hal-01575965$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Didier, Laurent</creatorcontrib><title>Economic diplomacy: The “one–China policy” effect on trade</title><title>China economic review</title><description>Chinese foreign policy is mainly characterized by the Beijing consensus and the one-China principle in international relations. More precisely, the situation faced by Taiwan is a “core interest” in China's economic diplomacy strategy. We investigate whether the “one-China policy” (OCP) has had visible effects on bilateral trade flows. In other words, does the compliance of diplomatic commitments with China undermine Taiwanese trade and enhance China's trade position? Using a structural gravity model based on worldwide panel data for the period 1948–2012, we approximate the OCP through two dummy variables: the vote by countries of the UN resolution about China's recognition in 1971 and the existence of diplomatic ties with China. The first component of the OCP drastically increased on average in trade flows with China regardless of the vote of trading partners concerning this UN resolution as well as that for Taiwan. On average, results suggest that diplomatic relations with China improve bilateral trade flows for China, but a trade-deteriorating effect appears for Taiwan with certain ex-colonies. We also find that the effects of these economic diplomacy components confirm previous results reported for the period studied. •Economic diplomacy matters in Chinese and Taiwanese trade relations through the “one-Chinapolicy”.•China's recognition by the UN has improved on average the Chinese and Taiwanese trade flows regardless the vote.•Diplomatic ties with China lead to a trade-promoting effect for China regardless the nature of trading partners.•Diplomatic agreements with China lead to a trade-deteriorating effect for Taiwan with someex-colonies.•Chinese authorities use retaliation measures to compel its trading partners to respect its foreign policy doctrine.</description><subject>China</subject><subject>Economic diplomacy</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Gravity</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Taiwan</subject><subject>Trade</subject><issn>1043-951X</issn><issn>1873-7781</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AUhQdRsFbfwEW2LhLvzWSSiQtRSrVCwU0X7obJ5A6ZkmZKUgrd9R3c6sv1SUyIuHR1fzjnwPkYu0WIEDC9X0emcmR8FPdXhBgB8DM2QZnxMMsknvc7JDzMBX5csquuWwNACpBM2NPc-MZvnAlKt639RpvDQ7CqKDgdv3xDp-PnrHKNDra-duZwOn4HZC2ZXeCbYNfqkq7ZhdV1Rze_c8pWL_PVbBEu31_fZs_L0PCM78IcBRRgNcmy0HlKiQSwBXGTJhoNSmHSIpc2jpEXMhYoMlFwLQsukwyF4VN2N8ZWulbb1m10e1BeO7V4XqrhB4MlT8Uee20yak3ru64l-2dAUAMwtVYjMDUAU4iqB9bbHkcb9TX2jlrVGUeNodK1fWNVevd_wA_16Xbs</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Didier, Laurent</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4088-064X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Economic diplomacy: The “one–China policy” effect on trade</title><author>Didier, Laurent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-9150b0fae8dba96e4800fbe3c64a1c185c6b98f2213b8251575b3a8b384715c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>China</topic><topic>Economic diplomacy</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Gravity</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Taiwan</topic><topic>Trade</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Didier, Laurent</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>China economic review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Didier, Laurent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic diplomacy: The “one–China policy” effect on trade</atitle><jtitle>China economic review</jtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>48</volume><spage>223</spage><epage>243</epage><pages>223-243</pages><issn>1043-951X</issn><eissn>1873-7781</eissn><abstract>Chinese foreign policy is mainly characterized by the Beijing consensus and the one-China principle in international relations. More precisely, the situation faced by Taiwan is a “core interest” in China's economic diplomacy strategy. We investigate whether the “one-China policy” (OCP) has had visible effects on bilateral trade flows. In other words, does the compliance of diplomatic commitments with China undermine Taiwanese trade and enhance China's trade position? Using a structural gravity model based on worldwide panel data for the period 1948–2012, we approximate the OCP through two dummy variables: the vote by countries of the UN resolution about China's recognition in 1971 and the existence of diplomatic ties with China. The first component of the OCP drastically increased on average in trade flows with China regardless of the vote of trading partners concerning this UN resolution as well as that for Taiwan. On average, results suggest that diplomatic relations with China improve bilateral trade flows for China, but a trade-deteriorating effect appears for Taiwan with certain ex-colonies. We also find that the effects of these economic diplomacy components confirm previous results reported for the period studied. •Economic diplomacy matters in Chinese and Taiwanese trade relations through the “one-Chinapolicy”.•China's recognition by the UN has improved on average the Chinese and Taiwanese trade flows regardless the vote.•Diplomatic ties with China lead to a trade-promoting effect for China regardless the nature of trading partners.•Diplomatic agreements with China lead to a trade-deteriorating effect for Taiwan with someex-colonies.•Chinese authorities use retaliation measures to compel its trading partners to respect its foreign policy doctrine.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.chieco.2016.11.003</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4088-064X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1043-951X
ispartof China economic review, 2018-04, Vol.48, p.223-243
issn 1043-951X
1873-7781
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01575965v1
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects China
Economic diplomacy
Economics and Finance
Gravity
Humanities and Social Sciences
Taiwan
Trade
title Economic diplomacy: The “one–China policy” effect on trade
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T02%3A03%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20diplomacy:%20The%20%E2%80%9Cone%E2%80%93China%20policy%E2%80%9D%20effect%20on%20trade&rft.jtitle=China%20economic%20review&rft.au=Didier,%20Laurent&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=48&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=243&rft.pages=223-243&rft.issn=1043-951X&rft.eissn=1873-7781&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chieco.2016.11.003&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_hal_p%3ES1043951X16301419%3C/elsevier_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1043951X16301419&rfr_iscdi=true