Current developments and challenges in the assessment of negative symptoms

Abstract Reliable and valid assessment of negative symptoms is crucial to further develop etiological models and improve treatments. Our understanding of the concept of negative symptoms has undergone significant advances since the introduction of quantitative assessments of negative symptoms in the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Schizophrenia research 2017-08, Vol.186, p.8-18
Hauptverfasser: Lincoln, Tania M, Dollfus, Sonia, Lyne, John
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 18
container_issue
container_start_page 8
container_title Schizophrenia research
container_volume 186
creator Lincoln, Tania M
Dollfus, Sonia
Lyne, John
description Abstract Reliable and valid assessment of negative symptoms is crucial to further develop etiological models and improve treatments. Our understanding of the concept of negative symptoms has undergone significant advances since the introduction of quantitative assessments of negative symptoms in the 1980s. These include the conceptualization of cognitive dysfunction as separate from negative symptoms and the distinction of two main negative symptom factors (avolition and diminished expression). In this review we provide an overview of existing negative symptom scales, focusing on both observer-rated and self-rated measurement of negative symptoms. We also distinguish between measures that assess negative symptoms as part of a broader assessment of schizophrenia symptoms, those specifically developed for negative symptoms and those that assess specific domains of negative symptoms within and beyond the context of psychotic disorders. We critically discuss strengths and limitations of these measures in the light of some existing challenges, i.e. observed and subjective symptom experiences, the challenge of distinguishing between primary and secondary negative symptoms, and the overlap between negative symptoms and related factors (e.g. personality traits and premorbid functioning). This review is aimed to inform the ongoing development of negative symptom scales.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.schres.2016.02.035
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01543302v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S092099641630086X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1826656757</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-4280c9bbf4e238076d44600e2f44d3962b977863ce968d0c0a8d2ca8ed2b3e3e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhS0EosPAP0AoS1gkXD_ixBukalRo0UgsAImd5dg3HQ95DHYy0vx7HKXtgg3ywr7WOefa3yXkLYWCApUfj0W0h4CxYKkqgBXAy2dkQ8uK56wE9ZxsQDHIlZLiiryK8QgAtITqJbliUklQot6Qr7s5BBymzOEZu_HUp3PMzOAyezBdh8M9xswP2XTAzMSIMS6KbGyzAe_N5M-YxUt_msY-viYvWtNFfPOwb8nPzzc_drf5_tuXu931PreipFMuWA1WNU0rkPEaKumEkADIWiEcV5I1qqpqyS0qWTuwYGrHrKnRsYZjWlvyYc1ND9Sn4HsTLno0Xt9e7_Vyl34pOAd2pkn7ftWewvhnxjjp3keLXWcGHOeoac2kLGWVoG2JWKU2jDEGbJ-yKeiFuD7qlbheiGtgOhFPtncPHeamR_dkekScBJ9WASYmZ48hpXgcLDof0E7ajf5_Hf4NsJ0fvDXdb7xgPI5zGBJvTXVMBv19mfoydCo5QC1_8b-GNKgh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826656757</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Current developments and challenges in the assessment of negative symptoms</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Lincoln, Tania M ; Dollfus, Sonia ; Lyne, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Lincoln, Tania M ; Dollfus, Sonia ; Lyne, John</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Reliable and valid assessment of negative symptoms is crucial to further develop etiological models and improve treatments. Our understanding of the concept of negative symptoms has undergone significant advances since the introduction of quantitative assessments of negative symptoms in the 1980s. These include the conceptualization of cognitive dysfunction as separate from negative symptoms and the distinction of two main negative symptom factors (avolition and diminished expression). In this review we provide an overview of existing negative symptom scales, focusing on both observer-rated and self-rated measurement of negative symptoms. We also distinguish between measures that assess negative symptoms as part of a broader assessment of schizophrenia symptoms, those specifically developed for negative symptoms and those that assess specific domains of negative symptoms within and beyond the context of psychotic disorders. We critically discuss strengths and limitations of these measures in the light of some existing challenges, i.e. observed and subjective symptom experiences, the challenge of distinguishing between primary and secondary negative symptoms, and the overlap between negative symptoms and related factors (e.g. personality traits and premorbid functioning). This review is aimed to inform the ongoing development of negative symptom scales.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0920-9964</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2509</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.02.035</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26960948</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Affective Symptoms - diagnosis ; Affective Symptoms - etiology ; Assessment ; Diagnostic Self Evaluation ; Humans ; Life Sciences ; Measurement ; Negative symptoms ; Observer-rating ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Psychiatry ; Psychometric properties ; Psychometrics ; Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis ; Psychotic Disorders - etiology ; Schizophrenia - complications ; Schizophrenia - physiopathology ; Schizophrenic Psychology ; Self-rating</subject><ispartof>Schizophrenia research, 2017-08, Vol.186, p.8-18</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-4280c9bbf4e238076d44600e2f44d3962b977863ce968d0c0a8d2ca8ed2b3e3e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-4280c9bbf4e238076d44600e2f44d3962b977863ce968d0c0a8d2ca8ed2b3e3e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6674-2440</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092099641630086X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26960948$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01543302$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lincoln, Tania M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dollfus, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyne, John</creatorcontrib><title>Current developments and challenges in the assessment of negative symptoms</title><title>Schizophrenia research</title><addtitle>Schizophr Res</addtitle><description>Abstract Reliable and valid assessment of negative symptoms is crucial to further develop etiological models and improve treatments. Our understanding of the concept of negative symptoms has undergone significant advances since the introduction of quantitative assessments of negative symptoms in the 1980s. These include the conceptualization of cognitive dysfunction as separate from negative symptoms and the distinction of two main negative symptom factors (avolition and diminished expression). In this review we provide an overview of existing negative symptom scales, focusing on both observer-rated and self-rated measurement of negative symptoms. We also distinguish between measures that assess negative symptoms as part of a broader assessment of schizophrenia symptoms, those specifically developed for negative symptoms and those that assess specific domains of negative symptoms within and beyond the context of psychotic disorders. We critically discuss strengths and limitations of these measures in the light of some existing challenges, i.e. observed and subjective symptom experiences, the challenge of distinguishing between primary and secondary negative symptoms, and the overlap between negative symptoms and related factors (e.g. personality traits and premorbid functioning). This review is aimed to inform the ongoing development of negative symptom scales.</description><subject>Affective Symptoms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Affective Symptoms - etiology</subject><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>Diagnostic Self Evaluation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Negative symptoms</subject><subject>Observer-rating</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometric properties</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Schizophrenia - complications</subject><subject>Schizophrenia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Schizophrenic Psychology</subject><subject>Self-rating</subject><issn>0920-9964</issn><issn>1573-2509</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhS0EosPAP0AoS1gkXD_ixBukalRo0UgsAImd5dg3HQ95DHYy0vx7HKXtgg3ywr7WOefa3yXkLYWCApUfj0W0h4CxYKkqgBXAy2dkQ8uK56wE9ZxsQDHIlZLiiryK8QgAtITqJbliUklQot6Qr7s5BBymzOEZu_HUp3PMzOAyezBdh8M9xswP2XTAzMSIMS6KbGyzAe_N5M-YxUt_msY-viYvWtNFfPOwb8nPzzc_drf5_tuXu931PreipFMuWA1WNU0rkPEaKumEkADIWiEcV5I1qqpqyS0qWTuwYGrHrKnRsYZjWlvyYc1ND9Sn4HsTLno0Xt9e7_Vyl34pOAd2pkn7ftWewvhnxjjp3keLXWcGHOeoac2kLGWVoG2JWKU2jDEGbJ-yKeiFuD7qlbheiGtgOhFPtncPHeamR_dkekScBJ9WASYmZ48hpXgcLDof0E7ajf5_Hf4NsJ0fvDXdb7xgPI5zGBJvTXVMBv19mfoydCo5QC1_8b-GNKgh</recordid><startdate>20170801</startdate><enddate>20170801</enddate><creator>Lincoln, Tania M</creator><creator>Dollfus, Sonia</creator><creator>Lyne, John</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6674-2440</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170801</creationdate><title>Current developments and challenges in the assessment of negative symptoms</title><author>Lincoln, Tania M ; Dollfus, Sonia ; Lyne, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-4280c9bbf4e238076d44600e2f44d3962b977863ce968d0c0a8d2ca8ed2b3e3e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Affective Symptoms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Affective Symptoms - etiology</topic><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>Diagnostic Self Evaluation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Negative symptoms</topic><topic>Observer-rating</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometric properties</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Schizophrenia - complications</topic><topic>Schizophrenia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Schizophrenic Psychology</topic><topic>Self-rating</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lincoln, Tania M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dollfus, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyne, John</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Schizophrenia research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lincoln, Tania M</au><au>Dollfus, Sonia</au><au>Lyne, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Current developments and challenges in the assessment of negative symptoms</atitle><jtitle>Schizophrenia research</jtitle><addtitle>Schizophr Res</addtitle><date>2017-08-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>186</volume><spage>8</spage><epage>18</epage><pages>8-18</pages><issn>0920-9964</issn><eissn>1573-2509</eissn><abstract>Abstract Reliable and valid assessment of negative symptoms is crucial to further develop etiological models and improve treatments. Our understanding of the concept of negative symptoms has undergone significant advances since the introduction of quantitative assessments of negative symptoms in the 1980s. These include the conceptualization of cognitive dysfunction as separate from negative symptoms and the distinction of two main negative symptom factors (avolition and diminished expression). In this review we provide an overview of existing negative symptom scales, focusing on both observer-rated and self-rated measurement of negative symptoms. We also distinguish between measures that assess negative symptoms as part of a broader assessment of schizophrenia symptoms, those specifically developed for negative symptoms and those that assess specific domains of negative symptoms within and beyond the context of psychotic disorders. We critically discuss strengths and limitations of these measures in the light of some existing challenges, i.e. observed and subjective symptom experiences, the challenge of distinguishing between primary and secondary negative symptoms, and the overlap between negative symptoms and related factors (e.g. personality traits and premorbid functioning). This review is aimed to inform the ongoing development of negative symptom scales.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>26960948</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.schres.2016.02.035</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6674-2440</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0920-9964
ispartof Schizophrenia research, 2017-08, Vol.186, p.8-18
issn 0920-9964
1573-2509
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01543302v1
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Affective Symptoms - diagnosis
Affective Symptoms - etiology
Assessment
Diagnostic Self Evaluation
Humans
Life Sciences
Measurement
Negative symptoms
Observer-rating
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Psychiatry
Psychometric properties
Psychometrics
Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis
Psychotic Disorders - etiology
Schizophrenia - complications
Schizophrenia - physiopathology
Schizophrenic Psychology
Self-rating
title Current developments and challenges in the assessment of negative symptoms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T21%3A11%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Current%20developments%20and%20challenges%20in%20the%20assessment%20of%20negative%20symptoms&rft.jtitle=Schizophrenia%20research&rft.au=Lincoln,%20Tania%20M&rft.date=2017-08-01&rft.volume=186&rft.spage=8&rft.epage=18&rft.pages=8-18&rft.issn=0920-9964&rft.eissn=1573-2509&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.schres.2016.02.035&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1826656757%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826656757&rft_id=info:pmid/26960948&rft_els_id=S092099641630086X&rfr_iscdi=true