Current developments and challenges in the assessment of negative symptoms
Abstract Reliable and valid assessment of negative symptoms is crucial to further develop etiological models and improve treatments. Our understanding of the concept of negative symptoms has undergone significant advances since the introduction of quantitative assessments of negative symptoms in the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Schizophrenia research 2017-08, Vol.186, p.8-18 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 18 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 8 |
container_title | Schizophrenia research |
container_volume | 186 |
creator | Lincoln, Tania M Dollfus, Sonia Lyne, John |
description | Abstract Reliable and valid assessment of negative symptoms is crucial to further develop etiological models and improve treatments. Our understanding of the concept of negative symptoms has undergone significant advances since the introduction of quantitative assessments of negative symptoms in the 1980s. These include the conceptualization of cognitive dysfunction as separate from negative symptoms and the distinction of two main negative symptom factors (avolition and diminished expression). In this review we provide an overview of existing negative symptom scales, focusing on both observer-rated and self-rated measurement of negative symptoms. We also distinguish between measures that assess negative symptoms as part of a broader assessment of schizophrenia symptoms, those specifically developed for negative symptoms and those that assess specific domains of negative symptoms within and beyond the context of psychotic disorders. We critically discuss strengths and limitations of these measures in the light of some existing challenges, i.e. observed and subjective symptom experiences, the challenge of distinguishing between primary and secondary negative symptoms, and the overlap between negative symptoms and related factors (e.g. personality traits and premorbid functioning). This review is aimed to inform the ongoing development of negative symptom scales. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.schres.2016.02.035 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01543302v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S092099641630086X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1826656757</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-4280c9bbf4e238076d44600e2f44d3962b977863ce968d0c0a8d2ca8ed2b3e3e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhS0EosPAP0AoS1gkXD_ixBukalRo0UgsAImd5dg3HQ95DHYy0vx7HKXtgg3ywr7WOefa3yXkLYWCApUfj0W0h4CxYKkqgBXAy2dkQ8uK56wE9ZxsQDHIlZLiiryK8QgAtITqJbliUklQot6Qr7s5BBymzOEZu_HUp3PMzOAyezBdh8M9xswP2XTAzMSIMS6KbGyzAe_N5M-YxUt_msY-viYvWtNFfPOwb8nPzzc_drf5_tuXu931PreipFMuWA1WNU0rkPEaKumEkADIWiEcV5I1qqpqyS0qWTuwYGrHrKnRsYZjWlvyYc1ND9Sn4HsTLno0Xt9e7_Vyl34pOAd2pkn7ftWewvhnxjjp3keLXWcGHOeoac2kLGWVoG2JWKU2jDEGbJ-yKeiFuD7qlbheiGtgOhFPtncPHeamR_dkekScBJ9WASYmZ48hpXgcLDof0E7ajf5_Hf4NsJ0fvDXdb7xgPI5zGBJvTXVMBv19mfoydCo5QC1_8b-GNKgh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826656757</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Current developments and challenges in the assessment of negative symptoms</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Lincoln, Tania M ; Dollfus, Sonia ; Lyne, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Lincoln, Tania M ; Dollfus, Sonia ; Lyne, John</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Reliable and valid assessment of negative symptoms is crucial to further develop etiological models and improve treatments. Our understanding of the concept of negative symptoms has undergone significant advances since the introduction of quantitative assessments of negative symptoms in the 1980s. These include the conceptualization of cognitive dysfunction as separate from negative symptoms and the distinction of two main negative symptom factors (avolition and diminished expression). In this review we provide an overview of existing negative symptom scales, focusing on both observer-rated and self-rated measurement of negative symptoms. We also distinguish between measures that assess negative symptoms as part of a broader assessment of schizophrenia symptoms, those specifically developed for negative symptoms and those that assess specific domains of negative symptoms within and beyond the context of psychotic disorders. We critically discuss strengths and limitations of these measures in the light of some existing challenges, i.e. observed and subjective symptom experiences, the challenge of distinguishing between primary and secondary negative symptoms, and the overlap between negative symptoms and related factors (e.g. personality traits and premorbid functioning). This review is aimed to inform the ongoing development of negative symptom scales.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0920-9964</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2509</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.02.035</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26960948</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Affective Symptoms - diagnosis ; Affective Symptoms - etiology ; Assessment ; Diagnostic Self Evaluation ; Humans ; Life Sciences ; Measurement ; Negative symptoms ; Observer-rating ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Psychiatry ; Psychometric properties ; Psychometrics ; Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis ; Psychotic Disorders - etiology ; Schizophrenia - complications ; Schizophrenia - physiopathology ; Schizophrenic Psychology ; Self-rating</subject><ispartof>Schizophrenia research, 2017-08, Vol.186, p.8-18</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-4280c9bbf4e238076d44600e2f44d3962b977863ce968d0c0a8d2ca8ed2b3e3e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-4280c9bbf4e238076d44600e2f44d3962b977863ce968d0c0a8d2ca8ed2b3e3e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6674-2440</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092099641630086X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26960948$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01543302$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lincoln, Tania M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dollfus, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyne, John</creatorcontrib><title>Current developments and challenges in the assessment of negative symptoms</title><title>Schizophrenia research</title><addtitle>Schizophr Res</addtitle><description>Abstract Reliable and valid assessment of negative symptoms is crucial to further develop etiological models and improve treatments. Our understanding of the concept of negative symptoms has undergone significant advances since the introduction of quantitative assessments of negative symptoms in the 1980s. These include the conceptualization of cognitive dysfunction as separate from negative symptoms and the distinction of two main negative symptom factors (avolition and diminished expression). In this review we provide an overview of existing negative symptom scales, focusing on both observer-rated and self-rated measurement of negative symptoms. We also distinguish between measures that assess negative symptoms as part of a broader assessment of schizophrenia symptoms, those specifically developed for negative symptoms and those that assess specific domains of negative symptoms within and beyond the context of psychotic disorders. We critically discuss strengths and limitations of these measures in the light of some existing challenges, i.e. observed and subjective symptom experiences, the challenge of distinguishing between primary and secondary negative symptoms, and the overlap between negative symptoms and related factors (e.g. personality traits and premorbid functioning). This review is aimed to inform the ongoing development of negative symptom scales.</description><subject>Affective Symptoms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Affective Symptoms - etiology</subject><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>Diagnostic Self Evaluation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Negative symptoms</subject><subject>Observer-rating</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometric properties</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Schizophrenia - complications</subject><subject>Schizophrenia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Schizophrenic Psychology</subject><subject>Self-rating</subject><issn>0920-9964</issn><issn>1573-2509</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhS0EosPAP0AoS1gkXD_ixBukalRo0UgsAImd5dg3HQ95DHYy0vx7HKXtgg3ywr7WOefa3yXkLYWCApUfj0W0h4CxYKkqgBXAy2dkQ8uK56wE9ZxsQDHIlZLiiryK8QgAtITqJbliUklQot6Qr7s5BBymzOEZu_HUp3PMzOAyezBdh8M9xswP2XTAzMSIMS6KbGyzAe_N5M-YxUt_msY-viYvWtNFfPOwb8nPzzc_drf5_tuXu931PreipFMuWA1WNU0rkPEaKumEkADIWiEcV5I1qqpqyS0qWTuwYGrHrKnRsYZjWlvyYc1ND9Sn4HsTLno0Xt9e7_Vyl34pOAd2pkn7ftWewvhnxjjp3keLXWcGHOeoac2kLGWVoG2JWKU2jDEGbJ-yKeiFuD7qlbheiGtgOhFPtncPHeamR_dkekScBJ9WASYmZ48hpXgcLDof0E7ajf5_Hf4NsJ0fvDXdb7xgPI5zGBJvTXVMBv19mfoydCo5QC1_8b-GNKgh</recordid><startdate>20170801</startdate><enddate>20170801</enddate><creator>Lincoln, Tania M</creator><creator>Dollfus, Sonia</creator><creator>Lyne, John</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6674-2440</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170801</creationdate><title>Current developments and challenges in the assessment of negative symptoms</title><author>Lincoln, Tania M ; Dollfus, Sonia ; Lyne, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-4280c9bbf4e238076d44600e2f44d3962b977863ce968d0c0a8d2ca8ed2b3e3e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Affective Symptoms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Affective Symptoms - etiology</topic><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>Diagnostic Self Evaluation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Negative symptoms</topic><topic>Observer-rating</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometric properties</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Schizophrenia - complications</topic><topic>Schizophrenia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Schizophrenic Psychology</topic><topic>Self-rating</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lincoln, Tania M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dollfus, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyne, John</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Schizophrenia research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lincoln, Tania M</au><au>Dollfus, Sonia</au><au>Lyne, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Current developments and challenges in the assessment of negative symptoms</atitle><jtitle>Schizophrenia research</jtitle><addtitle>Schizophr Res</addtitle><date>2017-08-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>186</volume><spage>8</spage><epage>18</epage><pages>8-18</pages><issn>0920-9964</issn><eissn>1573-2509</eissn><abstract>Abstract Reliable and valid assessment of negative symptoms is crucial to further develop etiological models and improve treatments. Our understanding of the concept of negative symptoms has undergone significant advances since the introduction of quantitative assessments of negative symptoms in the 1980s. These include the conceptualization of cognitive dysfunction as separate from negative symptoms and the distinction of two main negative symptom factors (avolition and diminished expression). In this review we provide an overview of existing negative symptom scales, focusing on both observer-rated and self-rated measurement of negative symptoms. We also distinguish between measures that assess negative symptoms as part of a broader assessment of schizophrenia symptoms, those specifically developed for negative symptoms and those that assess specific domains of negative symptoms within and beyond the context of psychotic disorders. We critically discuss strengths and limitations of these measures in the light of some existing challenges, i.e. observed and subjective symptom experiences, the challenge of distinguishing between primary and secondary negative symptoms, and the overlap between negative symptoms and related factors (e.g. personality traits and premorbid functioning). This review is aimed to inform the ongoing development of negative symptom scales.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>26960948</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.schres.2016.02.035</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6674-2440</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0920-9964 |
ispartof | Schizophrenia research, 2017-08, Vol.186, p.8-18 |
issn | 0920-9964 1573-2509 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01543302v1 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Affective Symptoms - diagnosis Affective Symptoms - etiology Assessment Diagnostic Self Evaluation Humans Life Sciences Measurement Negative symptoms Observer-rating Psychiatric Status Rating Scales Psychiatry Psychometric properties Psychometrics Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis Psychotic Disorders - etiology Schizophrenia - complications Schizophrenia - physiopathology Schizophrenic Psychology Self-rating |
title | Current developments and challenges in the assessment of negative symptoms |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T21%3A11%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Current%20developments%20and%20challenges%20in%20the%20assessment%20of%20negative%20symptoms&rft.jtitle=Schizophrenia%20research&rft.au=Lincoln,%20Tania%20M&rft.date=2017-08-01&rft.volume=186&rft.spage=8&rft.epage=18&rft.pages=8-18&rft.issn=0920-9964&rft.eissn=1573-2509&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.schres.2016.02.035&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1826656757%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826656757&rft_id=info:pmid/26960948&rft_els_id=S092099641630086X&rfr_iscdi=true |