Cultivars to face climate change effects on crops and weeds: a review

Climate change is caused by the release of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Climate change will impact many activities, but its effects on agricultural production could be acute. Estimates of annual damages in agriculture due to temperature increase or extended periods of drought will be more cos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agronomy for sustainable development 2016-03, Vol.36 (1), p.1-22, Article 12
Hauptverfasser: Korres, Nicholas E., Norsworthy, Jason K., Tehranchian, Parsa, Gitsopoulos, Thomas K., Loka, Dimitra A., Oosterhuis, Derrick M., Gealy, David R., Moss, Stephen R., Burgos, Nilda R., Miller, M. Ryan, Palhano, Matheus
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 22
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Agronomy for sustainable development
container_volume 36
creator Korres, Nicholas E.
Norsworthy, Jason K.
Tehranchian, Parsa
Gitsopoulos, Thomas K.
Loka, Dimitra A.
Oosterhuis, Derrick M.
Gealy, David R.
Moss, Stephen R.
Burgos, Nilda R.
Miller, M. Ryan
Palhano, Matheus
description Climate change is caused by the release of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Climate change will impact many activities, but its effects on agricultural production could be acute. Estimates of annual damages in agriculture due to temperature increase or extended periods of drought will be more costly than damages in other activities. Yield losses are caused both by direct effects of climate change on crops and by indirect effects such as increased inputs in crop production for weed control. One possible solution to counteract the effects of climate change is to seek crop cultivars that are adapted to highly variable, extreme climatic conditions and pest changes. Here we review the effects of climate change on crop cultivars and weeds. Biomass increase will augment marketable yield by 8–70 % for C3 cereals, by 20–144 % for cash and vegetable crops, and by 6–35 % for flowers. Such positive effects could however be reduced by decreasing water and nutrient availability. Rising temperature will decrease yields of temperature-sensitive crops such as maize, soybean, wheat, and cotton or specialty crops such as almonds, grapes, berries, citrus, or stone fruits. Rice, which is expected to yield better under increased CO 2 , will suffer serious yield losses under high temperatures. Drought stress should decrease the production of tomato, soybean, maize, and cotton. Nevertheless, reviews on C4 photosynthesis response to water stress in interaction with CO 2 concentration reveal that elevated CO 2 concentration lessens the deleterious effect of drought on plant productivity. C3 weeds respond more strongly than C4 types to CO 2 increases through biomass and leaf area increases. The positive response of C3 crops to elevated CO 2 may make C4 weeds less competitive for C3 crops, whereas C3 weeds in C4 or C3 crops could become a problem, particularly in tropical regions. Temperature increases will mainly affect the distribution of weeds, particularly C4 type, by expanding their geographical range. This will enhance further yield losses and will affect weed management systems negatively. In addition, the expansion of invasive weed species such as itchgrass, cogongrass, and witchweed facilitated by temperature increases will increase the cost for their control. Under water or nutrient shortage scenarios, an r-strategist with characteristics in the order S-C-R, such as Palmer amaranth, large crabgrass, johnsongrass, and spurges, will most probably prevail. Selection of cult
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13593-016-0350-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01532407v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1880771791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-e938ae4554f870b8e3cc24aba4efd3a6db935b55d752e4cc0a7e9f4b58ef80083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwA9gsMTEEzrEdO2xVBRSpEgvMluOcaarQFDttxb_HIQixMN3p6XtPd4-QSwY3DEDdRsZlyTNgRQZcQiaPyIQpNShSHn_vIgMlilNyFuMaQAzKhNzPd23f7G2ItO-otw6pa5t326e5sps3pOg9uj7SbkNd6LaR2k1ND4h1vKOWBtw3eDgnJ962ES9-5pS8Pty_zBfZ8vnxaT5bZk7Iss-w5NqikFJ4raDSyJ3Lha2sQF9zW9RVyWUlZa1kjsI5sApLLyqp0WsAzafkesxd2dZsQ7ozfJrONmYxW5pBS9_yXIDas8Rejew2dB87jL1Zd7uwSecZpjUoxVQ5UGyk0m8xBvS_sQzM0KwZm03JhRmaNTJ58tETE5sqCn-S_zV9ARz3eec</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1880771791</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cultivars to face climate change effects on crops and weeds: a review</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Korres, Nicholas E. ; Norsworthy, Jason K. ; Tehranchian, Parsa ; Gitsopoulos, Thomas K. ; Loka, Dimitra A. ; Oosterhuis, Derrick M. ; Gealy, David R. ; Moss, Stephen R. ; Burgos, Nilda R. ; Miller, M. Ryan ; Palhano, Matheus</creator><creatorcontrib>Korres, Nicholas E. ; Norsworthy, Jason K. ; Tehranchian, Parsa ; Gitsopoulos, Thomas K. ; Loka, Dimitra A. ; Oosterhuis, Derrick M. ; Gealy, David R. ; Moss, Stephen R. ; Burgos, Nilda R. ; Miller, M. Ryan ; Palhano, Matheus</creatorcontrib><description>Climate change is caused by the release of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Climate change will impact many activities, but its effects on agricultural production could be acute. Estimates of annual damages in agriculture due to temperature increase or extended periods of drought will be more costly than damages in other activities. Yield losses are caused both by direct effects of climate change on crops and by indirect effects such as increased inputs in crop production for weed control. One possible solution to counteract the effects of climate change is to seek crop cultivars that are adapted to highly variable, extreme climatic conditions and pest changes. Here we review the effects of climate change on crop cultivars and weeds. Biomass increase will augment marketable yield by 8–70 % for C3 cereals, by 20–144 % for cash and vegetable crops, and by 6–35 % for flowers. Such positive effects could however be reduced by decreasing water and nutrient availability. Rising temperature will decrease yields of temperature-sensitive crops such as maize, soybean, wheat, and cotton or specialty crops such as almonds, grapes, berries, citrus, or stone fruits. Rice, which is expected to yield better under increased CO 2 , will suffer serious yield losses under high temperatures. Drought stress should decrease the production of tomato, soybean, maize, and cotton. Nevertheless, reviews on C4 photosynthesis response to water stress in interaction with CO 2 concentration reveal that elevated CO 2 concentration lessens the deleterious effect of drought on plant productivity. C3 weeds respond more strongly than C4 types to CO 2 increases through biomass and leaf area increases. The positive response of C3 crops to elevated CO 2 may make C4 weeds less competitive for C3 crops, whereas C3 weeds in C4 or C3 crops could become a problem, particularly in tropical regions. Temperature increases will mainly affect the distribution of weeds, particularly C4 type, by expanding their geographical range. This will enhance further yield losses and will affect weed management systems negatively. In addition, the expansion of invasive weed species such as itchgrass, cogongrass, and witchweed facilitated by temperature increases will increase the cost for their control. Under water or nutrient shortage scenarios, an r-strategist with characteristics in the order S-C-R, such as Palmer amaranth, large crabgrass, johnsongrass, and spurges, will most probably prevail. Selection of cultivars that secure high yields under climate change but also by competing weeds is of major importance. Traits related with (a) increased root/shoot ratio, (b) vernalization periods, (c) maturity, (d) regulation of node formation and/or internode distance, (e) harvest index variations, and (f) allelopathy merit further investigation. The cumulative effects of selecting a suitable stress tolerator-competitor cultivar will be reflected in reductions of environmental pollution, lower production costs, and sustainable food production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1774-0746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1773-0155</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13593-016-0350-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Paris: Springer Paris</publisher><subject>Agricultural management ; Agriculture ; Agronomy ; Amaranth ; Biomass ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Carbon dioxide ; Cereals ; Climate change ; Climate effects ; Cotton ; Crop production ; Crops ; Drought ; Flowers ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Life Sciences ; Management systems ; Photosynthesis ; Production costs ; Review Article ; Soil management ; Soil Science &amp; Conservation ; Soybeans ; Specialty crops ; Sustainable agriculture ; Sustainable Development ; Tropical environments ; Water pollution ; Weed control ; Weeds ; Wheat</subject><ispartof>Agronomy for sustainable development, 2016-03, Vol.36 (1), p.1-22, Article 12</ispartof><rights>INRA and Springer-Verlag France 2016</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science &amp; Business Media 2016</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-e938ae4554f870b8e3cc24aba4efd3a6db935b55d752e4cc0a7e9f4b58ef80083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-e938ae4554f870b8e3cc24aba4efd3a6db935b55d752e4cc0a7e9f4b58ef80083</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8328-4990</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-016-0350-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13593-016-0350-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01532407$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Korres, Nicholas E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norsworthy, Jason K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tehranchian, Parsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gitsopoulos, Thomas K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loka, Dimitra A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oosterhuis, Derrick M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gealy, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moss, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgos, Nilda R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, M. Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palhano, Matheus</creatorcontrib><title>Cultivars to face climate change effects on crops and weeds: a review</title><title>Agronomy for sustainable development</title><addtitle>Agron. Sustain. Dev</addtitle><description>Climate change is caused by the release of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Climate change will impact many activities, but its effects on agricultural production could be acute. Estimates of annual damages in agriculture due to temperature increase or extended periods of drought will be more costly than damages in other activities. Yield losses are caused both by direct effects of climate change on crops and by indirect effects such as increased inputs in crop production for weed control. One possible solution to counteract the effects of climate change is to seek crop cultivars that are adapted to highly variable, extreme climatic conditions and pest changes. Here we review the effects of climate change on crop cultivars and weeds. Biomass increase will augment marketable yield by 8–70 % for C3 cereals, by 20–144 % for cash and vegetable crops, and by 6–35 % for flowers. Such positive effects could however be reduced by decreasing water and nutrient availability. Rising temperature will decrease yields of temperature-sensitive crops such as maize, soybean, wheat, and cotton or specialty crops such as almonds, grapes, berries, citrus, or stone fruits. Rice, which is expected to yield better under increased CO 2 , will suffer serious yield losses under high temperatures. Drought stress should decrease the production of tomato, soybean, maize, and cotton. Nevertheless, reviews on C4 photosynthesis response to water stress in interaction with CO 2 concentration reveal that elevated CO 2 concentration lessens the deleterious effect of drought on plant productivity. C3 weeds respond more strongly than C4 types to CO 2 increases through biomass and leaf area increases. The positive response of C3 crops to elevated CO 2 may make C4 weeds less competitive for C3 crops, whereas C3 weeds in C4 or C3 crops could become a problem, particularly in tropical regions. Temperature increases will mainly affect the distribution of weeds, particularly C4 type, by expanding their geographical range. This will enhance further yield losses and will affect weed management systems negatively. In addition, the expansion of invasive weed species such as itchgrass, cogongrass, and witchweed facilitated by temperature increases will increase the cost for their control. Under water or nutrient shortage scenarios, an r-strategist with characteristics in the order S-C-R, such as Palmer amaranth, large crabgrass, johnsongrass, and spurges, will most probably prevail. Selection of cultivars that secure high yields under climate change but also by competing weeds is of major importance. Traits related with (a) increased root/shoot ratio, (b) vernalization periods, (c) maturity, (d) regulation of node formation and/or internode distance, (e) harvest index variations, and (f) allelopathy merit further investigation. The cumulative effects of selecting a suitable stress tolerator-competitor cultivar will be reflected in reductions of environmental pollution, lower production costs, and sustainable food production.</description><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agronomy</subject><subject>Amaranth</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Cereals</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate effects</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>Crop production</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Flowers</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Management systems</subject><subject>Photosynthesis</subject><subject>Production costs</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Soil management</subject><subject>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Specialty crops</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Tropical environments</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><issn>1774-0746</issn><issn>1773-0155</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwA9gsMTEEzrEdO2xVBRSpEgvMluOcaarQFDttxb_HIQixMN3p6XtPd4-QSwY3DEDdRsZlyTNgRQZcQiaPyIQpNShSHn_vIgMlilNyFuMaQAzKhNzPd23f7G2ItO-otw6pa5t326e5sps3pOg9uj7SbkNd6LaR2k1ND4h1vKOWBtw3eDgnJ962ES9-5pS8Pty_zBfZ8vnxaT5bZk7Iss-w5NqikFJ4raDSyJ3Lha2sQF9zW9RVyWUlZa1kjsI5sApLLyqp0WsAzafkesxd2dZsQ7ozfJrONmYxW5pBS9_yXIDas8Rejew2dB87jL1Zd7uwSecZpjUoxVQ5UGyk0m8xBvS_sQzM0KwZm03JhRmaNTJ58tETE5sqCn-S_zV9ARz3eec</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Korres, Nicholas E.</creator><creator>Norsworthy, Jason K.</creator><creator>Tehranchian, Parsa</creator><creator>Gitsopoulos, Thomas K.</creator><creator>Loka, Dimitra A.</creator><creator>Oosterhuis, Derrick M.</creator><creator>Gealy, David R.</creator><creator>Moss, Stephen R.</creator><creator>Burgos, Nilda R.</creator><creator>Miller, M. Ryan</creator><creator>Palhano, Matheus</creator><general>Springer Paris</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag/EDP Sciences/INRA</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8328-4990</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>Cultivars to face climate change effects on crops and weeds: a review</title><author>Korres, Nicholas E. ; Norsworthy, Jason K. ; Tehranchian, Parsa ; Gitsopoulos, Thomas K. ; Loka, Dimitra A. ; Oosterhuis, Derrick M. ; Gealy, David R. ; Moss, Stephen R. ; Burgos, Nilda R. ; Miller, M. Ryan ; Palhano, Matheus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-e938ae4554f870b8e3cc24aba4efd3a6db935b55d752e4cc0a7e9f4b58ef80083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agronomy</topic><topic>Amaranth</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Cereals</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate effects</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>Crop production</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Flowers</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Management systems</topic><topic>Photosynthesis</topic><topic>Production costs</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Soil management</topic><topic>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Specialty crops</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Tropical environments</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Korres, Nicholas E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norsworthy, Jason K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tehranchian, Parsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gitsopoulos, Thomas K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loka, Dimitra A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oosterhuis, Derrick M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gealy, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moss, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgos, Nilda R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, M. Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palhano, Matheus</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Agronomy for sustainable development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Korres, Nicholas E.</au><au>Norsworthy, Jason K.</au><au>Tehranchian, Parsa</au><au>Gitsopoulos, Thomas K.</au><au>Loka, Dimitra A.</au><au>Oosterhuis, Derrick M.</au><au>Gealy, David R.</au><au>Moss, Stephen R.</au><au>Burgos, Nilda R.</au><au>Miller, M. Ryan</au><au>Palhano, Matheus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cultivars to face climate change effects on crops and weeds: a review</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy for sustainable development</jtitle><stitle>Agron. Sustain. Dev</stitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>1-22</pages><artnum>12</artnum><issn>1774-0746</issn><eissn>1773-0155</eissn><abstract>Climate change is caused by the release of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Climate change will impact many activities, but its effects on agricultural production could be acute. Estimates of annual damages in agriculture due to temperature increase or extended periods of drought will be more costly than damages in other activities. Yield losses are caused both by direct effects of climate change on crops and by indirect effects such as increased inputs in crop production for weed control. One possible solution to counteract the effects of climate change is to seek crop cultivars that are adapted to highly variable, extreme climatic conditions and pest changes. Here we review the effects of climate change on crop cultivars and weeds. Biomass increase will augment marketable yield by 8–70 % for C3 cereals, by 20–144 % for cash and vegetable crops, and by 6–35 % for flowers. Such positive effects could however be reduced by decreasing water and nutrient availability. Rising temperature will decrease yields of temperature-sensitive crops such as maize, soybean, wheat, and cotton or specialty crops such as almonds, grapes, berries, citrus, or stone fruits. Rice, which is expected to yield better under increased CO 2 , will suffer serious yield losses under high temperatures. Drought stress should decrease the production of tomato, soybean, maize, and cotton. Nevertheless, reviews on C4 photosynthesis response to water stress in interaction with CO 2 concentration reveal that elevated CO 2 concentration lessens the deleterious effect of drought on plant productivity. C3 weeds respond more strongly than C4 types to CO 2 increases through biomass and leaf area increases. The positive response of C3 crops to elevated CO 2 may make C4 weeds less competitive for C3 crops, whereas C3 weeds in C4 or C3 crops could become a problem, particularly in tropical regions. Temperature increases will mainly affect the distribution of weeds, particularly C4 type, by expanding their geographical range. This will enhance further yield losses and will affect weed management systems negatively. In addition, the expansion of invasive weed species such as itchgrass, cogongrass, and witchweed facilitated by temperature increases will increase the cost for their control. Under water or nutrient shortage scenarios, an r-strategist with characteristics in the order S-C-R, such as Palmer amaranth, large crabgrass, johnsongrass, and spurges, will most probably prevail. Selection of cultivars that secure high yields under climate change but also by competing weeds is of major importance. Traits related with (a) increased root/shoot ratio, (b) vernalization periods, (c) maturity, (d) regulation of node formation and/or internode distance, (e) harvest index variations, and (f) allelopathy merit further investigation. The cumulative effects of selecting a suitable stress tolerator-competitor cultivar will be reflected in reductions of environmental pollution, lower production costs, and sustainable food production.</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>Springer Paris</pub><doi>10.1007/s13593-016-0350-5</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8328-4990</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1774-0746
ispartof Agronomy for sustainable development, 2016-03, Vol.36 (1), p.1-22, Article 12
issn 1774-0746
1773-0155
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01532407v1
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Agricultural management
Agriculture
Agronomy
Amaranth
Biomass
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Carbon dioxide
Cereals
Climate change
Climate effects
Cotton
Crop production
Crops
Drought
Flowers
Greenhouse effect
Greenhouse gases
Life Sciences
Management systems
Photosynthesis
Production costs
Review Article
Soil management
Soil Science & Conservation
Soybeans
Specialty crops
Sustainable agriculture
Sustainable Development
Tropical environments
Water pollution
Weed control
Weeds
Wheat
title Cultivars to face climate change effects on crops and weeds: a review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T09%3A45%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cultivars%20to%20face%20climate%20change%20effects%20on%20crops%20and%20weeds:%20a%20review&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20for%20sustainable%20development&rft.au=Korres,%20Nicholas%20E.&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=1-22&rft.artnum=12&rft.issn=1774-0746&rft.eissn=1773-0155&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13593-016-0350-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1880771791%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1880771791&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true