Effect of a marine protected area on tropical estuarine fish assemblages: Comparison between protected and unprotected sites in Senegal

A comparative study of fish assemblages of a marine protected area and an exploited area was carried out in the Sine Saloum estuary (Senegal, West Africa). Data were collected at these two sites between 2008 and 2011. The two areas are morphologically similar, and comparison of the physicochemical p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ocean & coastal management 2015-11, Vol.116, p.257-269
Hauptverfasser: Sadio, Oumar, Simier, Monique, Ecoutin, Jean-Marc, Raffray, Jean, Laë, Raymond, Tito de Morais, Luis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 269
container_issue
container_start_page 257
container_title Ocean & coastal management
container_volume 116
creator Sadio, Oumar
Simier, Monique
Ecoutin, Jean-Marc
Raffray, Jean
Laë, Raymond
Tito de Morais, Luis
description A comparative study of fish assemblages of a marine protected area and an exploited area was carried out in the Sine Saloum estuary (Senegal, West Africa). Data were collected at these two sites between 2008 and 2011. The two areas are morphologically similar, and comparison of the physicochemical parameters (salinity, transparency, temperature and percentage of saturation of dissolved oxygen) showed that the water masses are similar. The bio-ecological indicators and ecological, trophic and size structures were also compared. Given the environmental similarity of the two sites, their differences in bio-ecological characteristics and fish assemblage organization can be explained by the protection status of the MPA. The species richness and fish abundance per sampling unit were higher in the exploited site, but the mean trophic level and the observed maximum size of individuals were higher in the MPA. Although slightly higher for the MPA, the differences observed for biomass and average size between the two sites were not significant. The beta diversity in the MPA was higher than in the exploited site. The fish assemblage was dominated in terms of abundance by two pelagic herbivores Ethmalosa fimbriata (80%) and Sardinella maderensis (12.3%) and in terms of biomass by E. fimbriata (37.4%) and a benthic predator, Arius latiscutatus (23.7%). The assemblage of the MPA had a marine affinity characterized by the presence of piscivorous or generalist predators; large individuals were not uncommon. In the exploited site, the fish assemblage was relatively stable, dominated in abundance by E. fimbriata (33.4%) and S. maderensis (32.8%). In terms of biomass, a species of mullet, Liza dumerili, ranked first (26.2%), followed by E. fimbriata (22.4%) and S. maderensis (14.9%). The assemblage in the exploited site had a more estuarine affinity, dominated by detritivorous or phytophagous herbivores. Individuals observed there were mostly of small or medium size. This study confirms that the establishment of MPA is an effective tool for restoring marine biodiversity and trophic structure of fish assemblages. •Fish assemblages of an MPA and an exploited site were compared in a tropical estuary.•Total richness, mean trophic level and maximum length were higher in the MPA.•The fish assemblage of the MPA had a marine affinity, with large predators.•MPA are an effective tool for restoring biodiversity and trophic structure.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.08.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01483007v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S096456911530003X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1761660344</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-72cf5fe56070d33c3989de37143fbb24c9c35ac80a8da85afcb54631324e1de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9u1DAQxi0EEkvhGfARDgnj-E8cbqtVoZVW4kAP3CzHGbdeJfYSZ4t4Ax6DZ-HJ6lVQ4Qan0cz85tPMfIS8ZlAzYOrdoU4OXbKTjXUDTNagawDxhGyYbnklG_HlKdlAp0QlVceekxc5HwCgkUpvyI9L79EtNHlq6WTnEJEe57SUGg7UzmhpinSZ0zE4O1LMy2mFfMh31OaMUz_aW8zv6S5Nx9LLhe9x-YYY_1aKAz3FP3kOC2Ya4q-fnzHirR1fkmfejhlf_Y4X5ObD5c3uqtp_-ni92-4rJ5RYqrZxXnqUCloYOHe8092AvGWC-75vhOscl9ZpsHqwWlrveikUZ7wRyAp4Qd6usnd2NMc5lJO_m2SDudruzbkGTGgO0N6zwr5Z2bL211M53UwhOxxHGzGdsmGtYkoBF-I_UC67BjroCtquqJtTzjP6xzUYmLOj5mAeHTVnRw1oUxwtk9t1Est_7gPOJruA0eEQ5vJVM6TwT40HPUSwqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1735920909</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of a marine protected area on tropical estuarine fish assemblages: Comparison between protected and unprotected sites in Senegal</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Sadio, Oumar ; Simier, Monique ; Ecoutin, Jean-Marc ; Raffray, Jean ; Laë, Raymond ; Tito de Morais, Luis</creator><creatorcontrib>Sadio, Oumar ; Simier, Monique ; Ecoutin, Jean-Marc ; Raffray, Jean ; Laë, Raymond ; Tito de Morais, Luis</creatorcontrib><description>A comparative study of fish assemblages of a marine protected area and an exploited area was carried out in the Sine Saloum estuary (Senegal, West Africa). Data were collected at these two sites between 2008 and 2011. The two areas are morphologically similar, and comparison of the physicochemical parameters (salinity, transparency, temperature and percentage of saturation of dissolved oxygen) showed that the water masses are similar. The bio-ecological indicators and ecological, trophic and size structures were also compared. Given the environmental similarity of the two sites, their differences in bio-ecological characteristics and fish assemblage organization can be explained by the protection status of the MPA. The species richness and fish abundance per sampling unit were higher in the exploited site, but the mean trophic level and the observed maximum size of individuals were higher in the MPA. Although slightly higher for the MPA, the differences observed for biomass and average size between the two sites were not significant. The beta diversity in the MPA was higher than in the exploited site. The fish assemblage was dominated in terms of abundance by two pelagic herbivores Ethmalosa fimbriata (80%) and Sardinella maderensis (12.3%) and in terms of biomass by E. fimbriata (37.4%) and a benthic predator, Arius latiscutatus (23.7%). The assemblage of the MPA had a marine affinity characterized by the presence of piscivorous or generalist predators; large individuals were not uncommon. In the exploited site, the fish assemblage was relatively stable, dominated in abundance by E. fimbriata (33.4%) and S. maderensis (32.8%). In terms of biomass, a species of mullet, Liza dumerili, ranked first (26.2%), followed by E. fimbriata (22.4%) and S. maderensis (14.9%). The assemblage in the exploited site had a more estuarine affinity, dominated by detritivorous or phytophagous herbivores. Individuals observed there were mostly of small or medium size. This study confirms that the establishment of MPA is an effective tool for restoring marine biodiversity and trophic structure of fish assemblages. •Fish assemblages of an MPA and an exploited site were compared in a tropical estuary.•Total richness, mean trophic level and maximum length were higher in the MPA.•The fish assemblage of the MPA had a marine affinity, with large predators.•MPA are an effective tool for restoring biodiversity and trophic structure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-5691</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-524X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.08.004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Arius ; Bio-ecological indicators ; Biodiversity ; Biodiversity and Ecology ; Brackish ; Ecology ; Environment ; Environmental Sciences ; Estuaries ; Ethmalosa fimbriata ; Fish assemblages ; Liza dumerili ; Marine ; Marine parks and reserves ; Marine protected area ; MPA effect ; Sampling ; Sardinella maderensis ; Senegal ; Tropical estuary ; Water ; West Africa</subject><ispartof>Ocean &amp; coastal management, 2015-11, Vol.116, p.257-269</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-72cf5fe56070d33c3989de37143fbb24c9c35ac80a8da85afcb54631324e1de3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-72cf5fe56070d33c3989de37143fbb24c9c35ac80a8da85afcb54631324e1de3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8436-5925 ; 0000-0001-8580-1808 ; 0000-0001-5522-9767 ; 0000-0002-6621-2490</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.08.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27865,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01483007$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sadio, Oumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simier, Monique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ecoutin, Jean-Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raffray, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laë, Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tito de Morais, Luis</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of a marine protected area on tropical estuarine fish assemblages: Comparison between protected and unprotected sites in Senegal</title><title>Ocean &amp; coastal management</title><description>A comparative study of fish assemblages of a marine protected area and an exploited area was carried out in the Sine Saloum estuary (Senegal, West Africa). Data were collected at these two sites between 2008 and 2011. The two areas are morphologically similar, and comparison of the physicochemical parameters (salinity, transparency, temperature and percentage of saturation of dissolved oxygen) showed that the water masses are similar. The bio-ecological indicators and ecological, trophic and size structures were also compared. Given the environmental similarity of the two sites, their differences in bio-ecological characteristics and fish assemblage organization can be explained by the protection status of the MPA. The species richness and fish abundance per sampling unit were higher in the exploited site, but the mean trophic level and the observed maximum size of individuals were higher in the MPA. Although slightly higher for the MPA, the differences observed for biomass and average size between the two sites were not significant. The beta diversity in the MPA was higher than in the exploited site. The fish assemblage was dominated in terms of abundance by two pelagic herbivores Ethmalosa fimbriata (80%) and Sardinella maderensis (12.3%) and in terms of biomass by E. fimbriata (37.4%) and a benthic predator, Arius latiscutatus (23.7%). The assemblage of the MPA had a marine affinity characterized by the presence of piscivorous or generalist predators; large individuals were not uncommon. In the exploited site, the fish assemblage was relatively stable, dominated in abundance by E. fimbriata (33.4%) and S. maderensis (32.8%). In terms of biomass, a species of mullet, Liza dumerili, ranked first (26.2%), followed by E. fimbriata (22.4%) and S. maderensis (14.9%). The assemblage in the exploited site had a more estuarine affinity, dominated by detritivorous or phytophagous herbivores. Individuals observed there were mostly of small or medium size. This study confirms that the establishment of MPA is an effective tool for restoring marine biodiversity and trophic structure of fish assemblages. •Fish assemblages of an MPA and an exploited site were compared in a tropical estuary.•Total richness, mean trophic level and maximum length were higher in the MPA.•The fish assemblage of the MPA had a marine affinity, with large predators.•MPA are an effective tool for restoring biodiversity and trophic structure.</description><subject>Arius</subject><subject>Bio-ecological indicators</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biodiversity and Ecology</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Ethmalosa fimbriata</subject><subject>Fish assemblages</subject><subject>Liza dumerili</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine parks and reserves</subject><subject>Marine protected area</subject><subject>MPA effect</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Sardinella maderensis</subject><subject>Senegal</subject><subject>Tropical estuary</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>West Africa</subject><issn>0964-5691</issn><issn>1873-524X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc9u1DAQxi0EEkvhGfARDgnj-E8cbqtVoZVW4kAP3CzHGbdeJfYSZ4t4Ax6DZ-HJ6lVQ4Qan0cz85tPMfIS8ZlAzYOrdoU4OXbKTjXUDTNagawDxhGyYbnklG_HlKdlAp0QlVceekxc5HwCgkUpvyI9L79EtNHlq6WTnEJEe57SUGg7UzmhpinSZ0zE4O1LMy2mFfMh31OaMUz_aW8zv6S5Nx9LLhe9x-YYY_1aKAz3FP3kOC2Ya4q-fnzHirR1fkmfejhlf_Y4X5ObD5c3uqtp_-ni92-4rJ5RYqrZxXnqUCloYOHe8092AvGWC-75vhOscl9ZpsHqwWlrveikUZ7wRyAp4Qd6usnd2NMc5lJO_m2SDudruzbkGTGgO0N6zwr5Z2bL211M53UwhOxxHGzGdsmGtYkoBF-I_UC67BjroCtquqJtTzjP6xzUYmLOj5mAeHTVnRw1oUxwtk9t1Est_7gPOJruA0eEQ5vJVM6TwT40HPUSwqw</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Sadio, Oumar</creator><creator>Simier, Monique</creator><creator>Ecoutin, Jean-Marc</creator><creator>Raffray, Jean</creator><creator>Laë, Raymond</creator><creator>Tito de Morais, Luis</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8436-5925</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8580-1808</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5522-9767</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6621-2490</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Effect of a marine protected area on tropical estuarine fish assemblages: Comparison between protected and unprotected sites in Senegal</title><author>Sadio, Oumar ; Simier, Monique ; Ecoutin, Jean-Marc ; Raffray, Jean ; Laë, Raymond ; Tito de Morais, Luis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-72cf5fe56070d33c3989de37143fbb24c9c35ac80a8da85afcb54631324e1de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Arius</topic><topic>Bio-ecological indicators</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biodiversity and Ecology</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Ethmalosa fimbriata</topic><topic>Fish assemblages</topic><topic>Liza dumerili</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine parks and reserves</topic><topic>Marine protected area</topic><topic>MPA effect</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Sardinella maderensis</topic><topic>Senegal</topic><topic>Tropical estuary</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>West Africa</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sadio, Oumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simier, Monique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ecoutin, Jean-Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raffray, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laë, Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tito de Morais, Luis</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Ocean &amp; coastal management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sadio, Oumar</au><au>Simier, Monique</au><au>Ecoutin, Jean-Marc</au><au>Raffray, Jean</au><au>Laë, Raymond</au><au>Tito de Morais, Luis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of a marine protected area on tropical estuarine fish assemblages: Comparison between protected and unprotected sites in Senegal</atitle><jtitle>Ocean &amp; coastal management</jtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>116</volume><spage>257</spage><epage>269</epage><pages>257-269</pages><issn>0964-5691</issn><eissn>1873-524X</eissn><abstract>A comparative study of fish assemblages of a marine protected area and an exploited area was carried out in the Sine Saloum estuary (Senegal, West Africa). Data were collected at these two sites between 2008 and 2011. The two areas are morphologically similar, and comparison of the physicochemical parameters (salinity, transparency, temperature and percentage of saturation of dissolved oxygen) showed that the water masses are similar. The bio-ecological indicators and ecological, trophic and size structures were also compared. Given the environmental similarity of the two sites, their differences in bio-ecological characteristics and fish assemblage organization can be explained by the protection status of the MPA. The species richness and fish abundance per sampling unit were higher in the exploited site, but the mean trophic level and the observed maximum size of individuals were higher in the MPA. Although slightly higher for the MPA, the differences observed for biomass and average size between the two sites were not significant. The beta diversity in the MPA was higher than in the exploited site. The fish assemblage was dominated in terms of abundance by two pelagic herbivores Ethmalosa fimbriata (80%) and Sardinella maderensis (12.3%) and in terms of biomass by E. fimbriata (37.4%) and a benthic predator, Arius latiscutatus (23.7%). The assemblage of the MPA had a marine affinity characterized by the presence of piscivorous or generalist predators; large individuals were not uncommon. In the exploited site, the fish assemblage was relatively stable, dominated in abundance by E. fimbriata (33.4%) and S. maderensis (32.8%). In terms of biomass, a species of mullet, Liza dumerili, ranked first (26.2%), followed by E. fimbriata (22.4%) and S. maderensis (14.9%). The assemblage in the exploited site had a more estuarine affinity, dominated by detritivorous or phytophagous herbivores. Individuals observed there were mostly of small or medium size. This study confirms that the establishment of MPA is an effective tool for restoring marine biodiversity and trophic structure of fish assemblages. •Fish assemblages of an MPA and an exploited site were compared in a tropical estuary.•Total richness, mean trophic level and maximum length were higher in the MPA.•The fish assemblage of the MPA had a marine affinity, with large predators.•MPA are an effective tool for restoring biodiversity and trophic structure.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.08.004</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8436-5925</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8580-1808</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5522-9767</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6621-2490</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0964-5691
ispartof Ocean & coastal management, 2015-11, Vol.116, p.257-269
issn 0964-5691
1873-524X
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01483007v1
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; PAIS Index
subjects Arius
Bio-ecological indicators
Biodiversity
Biodiversity and Ecology
Brackish
Ecology
Environment
Environmental Sciences
Estuaries
Ethmalosa fimbriata
Fish assemblages
Liza dumerili
Marine
Marine parks and reserves
Marine protected area
MPA effect
Sampling
Sardinella maderensis
Senegal
Tropical estuary
Water
West Africa
title Effect of a marine protected area on tropical estuarine fish assemblages: Comparison between protected and unprotected sites in Senegal
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T02%3A11%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20a%20marine%20protected%20area%20on%20tropical%20estuarine%20fish%20assemblages:%20Comparison%20between%20protected%20and%20unprotected%20sites%20in%C2%A0Senegal&rft.jtitle=Ocean%20&%20coastal%20management&rft.au=Sadio,%20Oumar&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=116&rft.spage=257&rft.epage=269&rft.pages=257-269&rft.issn=0964-5691&rft.eissn=1873-524X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.08.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1761660344%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1735920909&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S096456911530003X&rfr_iscdi=true