Political versus economic institutions in the growth process
•The paper aims at establishing the different ways in which economic and political institutions affect growth.•We use a mixture of regression models that allows for the endogenous determination of both the number of growth regimes and the variables that determines to which regime a country belongs.•...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Comparative Economics 2014-02, Vol.42 (1), p.212-229 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 229 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 212 |
container_title | Journal of Comparative Economics |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Flachaire, Emmanuel García-Peñalosa, Cecilia Konte, Maty |
description | •The paper aims at establishing the different ways in which economic and political institutions affect growth.•We use a mixture of regression models that allows for the endogenous determination of both the number of growth regimes and the variables that determines to which regime a country belongs.•We find that political institutions are a key determinant of regime membership, but have no direct impact on growth within regimes.•In contrast, economic institutions affect growth within regimes and are particularly important for countries with weak political institutions.
After a decade of research on the relationship between institutions and growth, there is no consensus about the exact way in which these two variables interact. In this paper we re-examine the role that institutions play in the growth process using data for developed and developing economies over the period 1975–2005. Our results indicate that the data is best described by an econometric model with two growth regimes. Political institutions are the key determinant of which regime an economy belongs to, while economic institutions have a direct impact on growth rates within each regime. These findings support the hypothesis that political institutions are one of the deep causes of growth, setting the stage in which economic institutions and standard covariates operate. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jce.2013.05.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01474254v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0147596713000747</els_id><sourcerecordid>3225908291</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-ad025ead2fc151f7f9b9fc8958e7b6391f28c7364529b997c2d1b488898f60c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLxDAQhYMouK7-AG8FTx5aJ2nTJOhlEXWFBT3oOXTTxE3pNmuSrvjvTVnx6GmYme8Nbx5ClxgKDLi-6YpO6YIALgugBQA-QjMMguaMEHaMZoArllNRs1N0FkKXAExrmKG7V9fbaFXTZ3vtwxgyrdzgtlZldgjRxjFaN4TUZHGjsw_vvuIm23mndAjn6MQ0fdAXv3WO3h8f3u6X-erl6fl-scoVLUnMmxYI1U1LjMIUG2bEWhjFBeWaretSYEO4YmVdUZI2ginS4nXFORfc1KCqco6uD3c3TS933m4b_y1dY-VysZLTbPquIrTa48ReHdjk8XPUIcrOjX5I9iSmAIIAp3Wi8IFS3oXgtfk7i0FOgcpOpkDlFKgEKlNeSXN70Oj06t5qL4OyelC6tV6rKFtn_1H_AIEHfFU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1500920856</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Political versus economic institutions in the growth process</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Flachaire, Emmanuel ; García-Peñalosa, Cecilia ; Konte, Maty</creator><creatorcontrib>Flachaire, Emmanuel ; García-Peñalosa, Cecilia ; Konte, Maty</creatorcontrib><description>•The paper aims at establishing the different ways in which economic and political institutions affect growth.•We use a mixture of regression models that allows for the endogenous determination of both the number of growth regimes and the variables that determines to which regime a country belongs.•We find that political institutions are a key determinant of regime membership, but have no direct impact on growth within regimes.•In contrast, economic institutions affect growth within regimes and are particularly important for countries with weak political institutions.
After a decade of research on the relationship between institutions and growth, there is no consensus about the exact way in which these two variables interact. In this paper we re-examine the role that institutions play in the growth process using data for developed and developing economies over the period 1975–2005. Our results indicate that the data is best described by an econometric model with two growth regimes. Political institutions are the key determinant of which regime an economy belongs to, while economic institutions have a direct impact on growth rates within each regime. These findings support the hypothesis that political institutions are one of the deep causes of growth, setting the stage in which economic institutions and standard covariates operate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-5967</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-7227</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jce.2013.05.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Economic development ; Economics and Finance ; Financial institutions ; Government ; Growth ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Institutions ; Mixture regressions</subject><ispartof>Journal of Comparative Economics, 2014-02, Vol.42 (1), p.212-229</ispartof><rights>2013 Association for Comparative Economic Studies</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-ad025ead2fc151f7f9b9fc8958e7b6391f28c7364529b997c2d1b488898f60c43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-ad025ead2fc151f7f9b9fc8958e7b6391f28c7364529b997c2d1b488898f60c43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6830-898X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2013.05.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://amu.hal.science/hal-01474254$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Flachaire, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Peñalosa, Cecilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konte, Maty</creatorcontrib><title>Political versus economic institutions in the growth process</title><title>Journal of Comparative Economics</title><description>•The paper aims at establishing the different ways in which economic and political institutions affect growth.•We use a mixture of regression models that allows for the endogenous determination of both the number of growth regimes and the variables that determines to which regime a country belongs.•We find that political institutions are a key determinant of regime membership, but have no direct impact on growth within regimes.•In contrast, economic institutions affect growth within regimes and are particularly important for countries with weak political institutions.
After a decade of research on the relationship between institutions and growth, there is no consensus about the exact way in which these two variables interact. In this paper we re-examine the role that institutions play in the growth process using data for developed and developing economies over the period 1975–2005. Our results indicate that the data is best described by an econometric model with two growth regimes. Political institutions are the key determinant of which regime an economy belongs to, while economic institutions have a direct impact on growth rates within each regime. These findings support the hypothesis that political institutions are one of the deep causes of growth, setting the stage in which economic institutions and standard covariates operate.</description><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Financial institutions</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>Mixture regressions</subject><issn>0147-5967</issn><issn>1095-7227</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFLxDAQhYMouK7-AG8FTx5aJ2nTJOhlEXWFBT3oOXTTxE3pNmuSrvjvTVnx6GmYme8Nbx5ClxgKDLi-6YpO6YIALgugBQA-QjMMguaMEHaMZoArllNRs1N0FkKXAExrmKG7V9fbaFXTZ3vtwxgyrdzgtlZldgjRxjFaN4TUZHGjsw_vvuIm23mndAjn6MQ0fdAXv3WO3h8f3u6X-erl6fl-scoVLUnMmxYI1U1LjMIUG2bEWhjFBeWaretSYEO4YmVdUZI2ginS4nXFORfc1KCqco6uD3c3TS933m4b_y1dY-VysZLTbPquIrTa48ReHdjk8XPUIcrOjX5I9iSmAIIAp3Wi8IFS3oXgtfk7i0FOgcpOpkDlFKgEKlNeSXN70Oj06t5qL4OyelC6tV6rKFtn_1H_AIEHfFU</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Flachaire, Emmanuel</creator><creator>García-Peñalosa, Cecilia</creator><creator>Konte, Maty</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6830-898X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>Political versus economic institutions in the growth process</title><author>Flachaire, Emmanuel ; García-Peñalosa, Cecilia ; Konte, Maty</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-ad025ead2fc151f7f9b9fc8958e7b6391f28c7364529b997c2d1b488898f60c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Financial institutions</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>Mixture regressions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Flachaire, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Peñalosa, Cecilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konte, Maty</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>Journal of Comparative Economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Flachaire, Emmanuel</au><au>García-Peñalosa, Cecilia</au><au>Konte, Maty</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Political versus economic institutions in the growth process</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Comparative Economics</jtitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>212</spage><epage>229</epage><pages>212-229</pages><issn>0147-5967</issn><eissn>1095-7227</eissn><abstract>•The paper aims at establishing the different ways in which economic and political institutions affect growth.•We use a mixture of regression models that allows for the endogenous determination of both the number of growth regimes and the variables that determines to which regime a country belongs.•We find that political institutions are a key determinant of regime membership, but have no direct impact on growth within regimes.•In contrast, economic institutions affect growth within regimes and are particularly important for countries with weak political institutions.
After a decade of research on the relationship between institutions and growth, there is no consensus about the exact way in which these two variables interact. In this paper we re-examine the role that institutions play in the growth process using data for developed and developing economies over the period 1975–2005. Our results indicate that the data is best described by an econometric model with two growth regimes. Political institutions are the key determinant of which regime an economy belongs to, while economic institutions have a direct impact on growth rates within each regime. These findings support the hypothesis that political institutions are one of the deep causes of growth, setting the stage in which economic institutions and standard covariates operate.</abstract><cop>San Diego</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jce.2013.05.001</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6830-898X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0147-5967 |
ispartof | Journal of Comparative Economics, 2014-02, Vol.42 (1), p.212-229 |
issn | 0147-5967 1095-7227 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01474254v1 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Economic development Economics and Finance Financial institutions Government Growth Humanities and Social Sciences Institutions Mixture regressions |
title | Political versus economic institutions in the growth process |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T15%3A38%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Political%20versus%20economic%20institutions%20in%20the%20growth%20process&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Comparative%20Economics&rft.au=Flachaire,%20Emmanuel&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=212&rft.epage=229&rft.pages=212-229&rft.issn=0147-5967&rft.eissn=1095-7227&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jce.2013.05.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E3225908291%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1500920856&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0147596713000747&rfr_iscdi=true |