Assigned experts with competitive goals withhold information in group decision making
Expertise assignment has been proposed to improve unshared information pooling in group decision making. The current research revises this view by hypothesizing that expertise assignment is beneficial when group members have cooperative goals, but is detrimental when group members have competitive g...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of social psychology 2013-03, Vol.52 (1), p.161-172 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 172 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 161 |
| container_title | British journal of social psychology |
| container_volume | 52 |
| creator | Toma, Claudia Vasiljevic, Dimitri Oberlé, Dominique Butera, Fabrizio |
| description | Expertise assignment has been proposed to improve unshared information pooling in group decision making. The current research revises this view by hypothesizing that expertise assignment is beneficial when group members have cooperative goals, but is detrimental when group members have competitive goals. Three‐person groups were confronted with a hidden‐profile task. Members were either assigned experts or not and were instructed to either cooperate or compete with other members. The results confirmed that expertise decreased unshared information pooling and repetitions in competition, while the reverse was found in cooperation. This interaction effect was mediated by self–other difference in perceived competence. Thus, expertise favours or hinders information sharing in group decision making as a function of members’ cooperative or competitive goals. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02105.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01473276v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1773419553</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5835-905d08ce922addbd8e083e325d69e8f724ce532a6dbbc4291a10e1691a1bd2dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhiMEotvCX0CREBIcsvgjjuML0nbpB7Cih7ZwtJx4suttEgc7abf_Hocsi8QFfJnR-JnXM36jKMZojsN5v50TlKZJTpEIGSZzRDBi892TaHa4eBrNEA55lmXsKDr2fosQphTx59ERIYzznKaz6HbhvVm3oGPYdeB6Hz-YfhOXtumgN725h3htVT2VN7bWsWkr6xrVG9uGPF47O3SxhtL4sdKoO9OuX0TPqtAEL_fxJLo9P7tZXiarq4tPy8UqKVlOWSIQ0ygvQRCitC50DiinQAnTmYC84iQtgVGiMl0UZUoEVhgBzsZYaKI1PYneTbobVcvOmUa5R2mVkZeLlRxr4Qc4JTy7x4F9O7Gdsz8G8L1sjC-hrlULdvASp5gzkjEh_o1SzPOUiYwH9PVf6NYOrg1LS8w5TbFgjAYqn6jSWe8dVIdhMZKjo3IrR-PkaJwcHZW_HJW70Ppq_8BQNKAPjb8tDMCbPaB8qerKqTZ48YfjRBCGx6U-TNyDqeHxvweQp5-vr8Y0CCSTgPE97A4Cyt3J8BGcye9fL-Q15d9ulucf5Rf6Exz0yg8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1773419553</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assigned experts with competitive goals withhold information in group decision making</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Toma, Claudia ; Vasiljevic, Dimitri ; Oberlé, Dominique ; Butera, Fabrizio</creator><creatorcontrib>Toma, Claudia ; Vasiljevic, Dimitri ; Oberlé, Dominique ; Butera, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><description>Expertise assignment has been proposed to improve unshared information pooling in group decision making. The current research revises this view by hypothesizing that expertise assignment is beneficial when group members have cooperative goals, but is detrimental when group members have competitive goals. Three‐person groups were confronted with a hidden‐profile task. Members were either assigned experts or not and were instructed to either cooperate or compete with other members. The results confirmed that expertise decreased unshared information pooling and repetitions in competition, while the reverse was found in cooperation. This interaction effect was mediated by self–other difference in perceived competence. Thus, expertise favours or hinders information sharing in group decision making as a function of members’ cooperative or competitive goals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-6665</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-8309</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02105.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22577834</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJSPDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Assignment ; Biological and medical sciences ; Competence ; Competitive Behavior ; Cooperation ; Cooperative Behavior ; Decision Making ; Expert Testimony ; Experts ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Goals ; Group Decision Making ; Group Processes ; Groups ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; Information Dissemination ; Information sharing ; Male ; Objectives ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Social interactions. Communication. Group processes ; Social psychology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>British journal of social psychology, 2013-03, Vol.52 (1), p.161-172</ispartof><rights>©</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2012 The British Psychological Society.</rights><rights>2012 The British Psychological Society</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5835-905d08ce922addbd8e083e325d69e8f724ce532a6dbbc4291a10e1691a1bd2dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5835-905d08ce922addbd8e083e325d69e8f724ce532a6dbbc4291a10e1691a1bd2dd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8856-4374</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.2044-8309.2012.02105.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.2044-8309.2012.02105.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27923,27924,30998,33773,33774,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27292519$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22577834$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.parisnanterre.fr/hal-01473276$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Toma, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasiljevic, Dimitri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oberlé, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butera, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><title>Assigned experts with competitive goals withhold information in group decision making</title><title>British journal of social psychology</title><addtitle>Br J Soc Psychol</addtitle><description>Expertise assignment has been proposed to improve unshared information pooling in group decision making. The current research revises this view by hypothesizing that expertise assignment is beneficial when group members have cooperative goals, but is detrimental when group members have competitive goals. Three‐person groups were confronted with a hidden‐profile task. Members were either assigned experts or not and were instructed to either cooperate or compete with other members. The results confirmed that expertise decreased unshared information pooling and repetitions in competition, while the reverse was found in cooperation. This interaction effect was mediated by self–other difference in perceived competence. Thus, expertise favours or hinders information sharing in group decision making as a function of members’ cooperative or competitive goals.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Assignment</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Competence</subject><subject>Competitive Behavior</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Expert Testimony</subject><subject>Experts</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Goals</subject><subject>Group Decision Making</subject><subject>Group Processes</subject><subject>Groups</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Dissemination</subject><subject>Information sharing</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0144-6665</issn><issn>2044-8309</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhiMEotvCX0CREBIcsvgjjuML0nbpB7Cih7ZwtJx4suttEgc7abf_Hocsi8QFfJnR-JnXM36jKMZojsN5v50TlKZJTpEIGSZzRDBi892TaHa4eBrNEA55lmXsKDr2fosQphTx59ERIYzznKaz6HbhvVm3oGPYdeB6Hz-YfhOXtumgN725h3htVT2VN7bWsWkr6xrVG9uGPF47O3SxhtL4sdKoO9OuX0TPqtAEL_fxJLo9P7tZXiarq4tPy8UqKVlOWSIQ0ygvQRCitC50DiinQAnTmYC84iQtgVGiMl0UZUoEVhgBzsZYaKI1PYneTbobVcvOmUa5R2mVkZeLlRxr4Qc4JTy7x4F9O7Gdsz8G8L1sjC-hrlULdvASp5gzkjEh_o1SzPOUiYwH9PVf6NYOrg1LS8w5TbFgjAYqn6jSWe8dVIdhMZKjo3IrR-PkaJwcHZW_HJW70Ppq_8BQNKAPjb8tDMCbPaB8qerKqTZ48YfjRBCGx6U-TNyDqeHxvweQp5-vr8Y0CCSTgPE97A4Cyt3J8BGcye9fL-Q15d9ulucf5Rf6Exz0yg8</recordid><startdate>201303</startdate><enddate>201303</enddate><creator>Toma, Claudia</creator><creator>Vasiljevic, Dimitri</creator><creator>Oberlé, Dominique</creator><creator>Butera, Fabrizio</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>British Psychological Society</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8856-4374</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201303</creationdate><title>Assigned experts with competitive goals withhold information in group decision making</title><author>Toma, Claudia ; Vasiljevic, Dimitri ; Oberlé, Dominique ; Butera, Fabrizio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5835-905d08ce922addbd8e083e325d69e8f724ce532a6dbbc4291a10e1691a1bd2dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Assignment</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Competence</topic><topic>Competitive Behavior</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Expert Testimony</topic><topic>Experts</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Goals</topic><topic>Group Decision Making</topic><topic>Group Processes</topic><topic>Groups</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Dissemination</topic><topic>Information sharing</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Toma, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasiljevic, Dimitri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oberlé, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butera, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>British journal of social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Toma, Claudia</au><au>Vasiljevic, Dimitri</au><au>Oberlé, Dominique</au><au>Butera, Fabrizio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assigned experts with competitive goals withhold information in group decision making</atitle><jtitle>British journal of social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Soc Psychol</addtitle><date>2013-03</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>161</spage><epage>172</epage><pages>161-172</pages><issn>0144-6665</issn><eissn>2044-8309</eissn><coden>BJSPDA</coden><abstract>Expertise assignment has been proposed to improve unshared information pooling in group decision making. The current research revises this view by hypothesizing that expertise assignment is beneficial when group members have cooperative goals, but is detrimental when group members have competitive goals. Three‐person groups were confronted with a hidden‐profile task. Members were either assigned experts or not and were instructed to either cooperate or compete with other members. The results confirmed that expertise decreased unshared information pooling and repetitions in competition, while the reverse was found in cooperation. This interaction effect was mediated by self–other difference in perceived competence. Thus, expertise favours or hinders information sharing in group decision making as a function of members’ cooperative or competitive goals.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>22577834</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02105.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8856-4374</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0144-6665 |
| ispartof | British journal of social psychology, 2013-03, Vol.52 (1), p.161-172 |
| issn | 0144-6665 2044-8309 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01473276v1 |
| source | MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library All Journals |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Assignment Biological and medical sciences Competence Competitive Behavior Cooperation Cooperative Behavior Decision Making Expert Testimony Experts Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Goals Group Decision Making Group Processes Groups Humanities and Social Sciences Humans Information Dissemination Information sharing Male Objectives Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Social interactions. Communication. Group processes Social psychology Young Adult |
| title | Assigned experts with competitive goals withhold information in group decision making |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A56%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assigned%20experts%20with%20competitive%20goals%20withhold%20information%20in%20group%20decision%20making&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Toma,%20Claudia&rft.date=2013-03&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=161&rft.epage=172&rft.pages=161-172&rft.issn=0144-6665&rft.eissn=2044-8309&rft.coden=BJSPDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02105.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1773419553%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1773419553&rft_id=info:pmid/22577834&rfr_iscdi=true |