Topological aggregation, the twin paradox and the No Show paradox
Consider the framework of topological aggregation introduced by Chichilnisky (Adv Math 37(2): 165-176, 1980). We prove that in this framework the twin paradox and the No Show paradox cannot be avoided. Anonymity and unanimity are not needed to obtain these results.
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Social choice and welfare 2017-04, Vol.48 (4), p.707-715 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 715 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 707 |
| container_title | Social choice and welfare |
| container_volume | 48 |
| creator | Chèze, Guillaume |
| description | Consider the framework of topological aggregation introduced by Chichilnisky (Adv Math 37(2): 165-176, 1980). We prove that in this framework the twin paradox and the No Show paradox cannot be avoided. Anonymity and unanimity are not needed to obtain these results. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00355-017-1032-1 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01356720v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45094313</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45094313</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-af5bce03abbd77fca4d35654aae243a03d802b939049c1ae402c3752dcbd9c913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9LwzAcxYMoOKd_gAeh4Emw-s2PLu1xDHXC0IMTvIVv07TrqE1NOqf_va3V4clTwst7nzweIacUriiAvPYAPIpCoDKkwFlI98iIiu7CqHzZJ6PuYRJSScUhOfJ-DQCMiXhEpkvb2MoWpcYqwKJwpsC2tPVl0K5M0G7LOmjQYWY_Aqyzb_HBBk8ru_3Vj8lBjpU3Jz_nmDzf3ixn83DxeHc_my5C3dVoQ8yjVBvgmKaZlLlGkfFoEglEwwRH4FkMLE14AiLRFI0AprmMWKbTLNEJ5WNyMXBXWKnGla_oPpXFUs2nC9VrQDugZPDee88Hb-Ps28b4Vq3txtVdPUXjOBGCS9676ODSznrvTL7DUlD9qmpYtSNL1a-q-gwbMr7z1oVxf8j_hM6G0Nq31u1-EREkouvBvwDH5oHt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1889443731</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Topological aggregation, the twin paradox and the No Show paradox</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Chèze, Guillaume</creator><creatorcontrib>Chèze, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><description>Consider the framework of topological aggregation introduced by Chichilnisky (Adv Math 37(2): 165-176, 1980). We prove that in this framework the twin paradox and the No Show paradox cannot be avoided. Anonymity and unanimity are not needed to obtain these results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0176-1714</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-217X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00355-017-1032-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Computer Science ; Economic models ; Economic theory ; Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Game Theory ; International Political Economy ; Multiagent Systems ; Original Paper ; Preferences ; Public Finance ; Social and Behav. Sciences ; Social choice ; Social Policy ; Studies ; Voters</subject><ispartof>Social choice and welfare, 2017-04, Vol.48 (4), p.707-715</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2017</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017</rights><rights>Social Choice and Welfare is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-af5bce03abbd77fca4d35654aae243a03d802b939049c1ae402c3752dcbd9c913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45094313$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45094313$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,803,885,12845,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01356720$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chèze, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><title>Topological aggregation, the twin paradox and the No Show paradox</title><title>Social choice and welfare</title><addtitle>Soc Choice Welf</addtitle><description>Consider the framework of topological aggregation introduced by Chichilnisky (Adv Math 37(2): 165-176, 1980). We prove that in this framework the twin paradox and the No Show paradox cannot be avoided. Anonymity and unanimity are not needed to obtain these results.</description><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Game Theory</subject><subject>International Political Economy</subject><subject>Multiagent Systems</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Public Finance</subject><subject>Social and Behav. Sciences</subject><subject>Social choice</subject><subject>Social Policy</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Voters</subject><issn>0176-1714</issn><issn>1432-217X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9LwzAcxYMoOKd_gAeh4Emw-s2PLu1xDHXC0IMTvIVv07TrqE1NOqf_va3V4clTwst7nzweIacUriiAvPYAPIpCoDKkwFlI98iIiu7CqHzZJ6PuYRJSScUhOfJ-DQCMiXhEpkvb2MoWpcYqwKJwpsC2tPVl0K5M0G7LOmjQYWY_Aqyzb_HBBk8ru_3Vj8lBjpU3Jz_nmDzf3ixn83DxeHc_my5C3dVoQ8yjVBvgmKaZlLlGkfFoEglEwwRH4FkMLE14AiLRFI0AprmMWKbTLNEJ5WNyMXBXWKnGla_oPpXFUs2nC9VrQDugZPDee88Hb-Ps28b4Vq3txtVdPUXjOBGCS9676ODSznrvTL7DUlD9qmpYtSNL1a-q-gwbMr7z1oVxf8j_hM6G0Nq31u1-EREkouvBvwDH5oHt</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Chèze, Guillaume</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Topological aggregation, the twin paradox and the No Show paradox</title><author>Chèze, Guillaume</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-af5bce03abbd77fca4d35654aae243a03d802b939049c1ae402c3752dcbd9c913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Game Theory</topic><topic>International Political Economy</topic><topic>Multiagent Systems</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Public Finance</topic><topic>Social and Behav. Sciences</topic><topic>Social choice</topic><topic>Social Policy</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Voters</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chèze, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Social choice and welfare</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chèze, Guillaume</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Topological aggregation, the twin paradox and the No Show paradox</atitle><jtitle>Social choice and welfare</jtitle><stitle>Soc Choice Welf</stitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>707</spage><epage>715</epage><pages>707-715</pages><issn>0176-1714</issn><eissn>1432-217X</eissn><abstract>Consider the framework of topological aggregation introduced by Chichilnisky (Adv Math 37(2): 165-176, 1980). We prove that in this framework the twin paradox and the No Show paradox cannot be avoided. Anonymity and unanimity are not needed to obtain these results.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s00355-017-1032-1</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0176-1714 |
| ispartof | Social choice and welfare, 2017-04, Vol.48 (4), p.707-715 |
| issn | 0176-1714 1432-217X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01356720v1 |
| source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Computer Science Economic models Economic theory Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods Economics Economics and Finance Game Theory International Political Economy Multiagent Systems Original Paper Preferences Public Finance Social and Behav. Sciences Social choice Social Policy Studies Voters |
| title | Topological aggregation, the twin paradox and the No Show paradox |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A02%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Topological%20aggregation,%20the%20twin%20paradox%20and%20the%20No%20Show%20paradox&rft.jtitle=Social%20choice%20and%20welfare&rft.au=Ch%C3%A8ze,%20Guillaume&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=707&rft.epage=715&rft.pages=707-715&rft.issn=0176-1714&rft.eissn=1432-217X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00355-017-1032-1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_hal_p%3E45094313%3C/jstor_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1889443731&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=45094313&rfr_iscdi=true |