Effect of Nutrient Availability on Progenitor Cells in Zebrafish (Danio Rerio)

In zebrafish brains, populations of continuously proliferating cells are present during an entire life span. Under normal conditions, stem cells give rise to rapidly proliferating progenitors that quickly exit the cell cycle and differentiate. Hence fish are favorable models to study what regulates...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Developmental neurobiology (Hoboken, N.J.) N.J.), 2017-01, Vol.77 (1), p.26-38
Hauptverfasser: Benítez‐Santana, Tibiábin, Simion, Matthieu, Corraze, Geneviève, Médale, Françoise, Joly, Jean‐Stéphane
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 38
container_issue 1
container_start_page 26
container_title Developmental neurobiology (Hoboken, N.J.)
container_volume 77
creator Benítez‐Santana, Tibiábin
Simion, Matthieu
Corraze, Geneviève
Médale, Françoise
Joly, Jean‐Stéphane
description In zebrafish brains, populations of continuously proliferating cells are present during an entire life span. Under normal conditions, stem cells give rise to rapidly proliferating progenitors that quickly exit the cell cycle and differentiate. Hence fish are favorable models to study what regulates postembryonic neurogenesis. The aim of this study was to determine if optic tectum (OT) cell proliferation is halted during nutritional deprivation (ND) and whether or not it can be restored with refeeding. We examined the effect of ND on the proliferation of Neuroepithelial/Ependymal Progenitor cell (NeEPC) and transitory‐amplifying progenitors (TAPs). Following ND, no PCNA immunostaining was found in OT of starved fish, while positive cell populations of PCNA positive progenitors are found at its periphery in control fish. This indicated that active proliferation stopped. To label retaining progenitor cells, BrdU was applied and a chase‐period was accompanied by ND. Positive NeEPCs were detected in the external tectum marginal zone of starved fish suggesting that these progenitors are relatively immune to ND. Moreover in the internal tectum marginal zone labeled retaining cells were observed leaving the possibility that some arrested TAPs were present to readily restart proliferation when nutrition was returned. Our results suggest that neurogenesis was maintained during ND and that a normal proliferative situation was recovered after refeeding. We point to the mTOR pathway as a necessary pathway in progenitors to regulate their mitosis activity. Thus, this study highlights mechanisms involved in neural stem and progenitor cell homeostatic maintenance in an adverse situation. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Develop Neurobiol 77: 26–38, 2017
doi_str_mv 10.1002/dneu.22406
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01346060v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826696748</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4246-b8030d08d8c8fd0979f67d0bd49acfb93d5adfacd3b62fff2c146eec3a3b8e8e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0V1LHDEUBuAgFrW2N_6AEvBGhbUnH5PJXC7rVgvLKqVC8SZk8lEjsxObzFj233fW0b3ohXh1wuHhJYcXoSMC5wSAfrWt688p5SB20AGpGJ1ILn7tbt8F2Ucfc34AKBgVsIf2aUlLJjk_QMu59850OHq87LsUXNvh6ZMOja5DE7o1ji2-SfG3a0MXE565psk4tPjO1Un7kO_xyYVuQ8Q_XArx9BP64HWT3eeXeYhuv81_zq4mi-vL77PpYmI45WJSS2BgQVpppLdQlZUXpYXa8kobX1fMFtp6bSyrBfXeU0O4cM4wzWrppGOH6HTMvdeNekxhpdNaRR3U1XShNjsgjAsQ8EQGezLaxxT_9C53ahWyGQ7RrYt9VkQWFa-4KMQ7KBWiEiWXAz3-jz7EPrXD0ZtAAME4LQZ1NiqTYs7J-e1nCahNeWpTnnoub8BfXiL7euXslr62NQAygr-hces3otTFcn47hv4DYIqioA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1850063425</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Nutrient Availability on Progenitor Cells in Zebrafish (Danio Rerio)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Benítez‐Santana, Tibiábin ; Simion, Matthieu ; Corraze, Geneviève ; Médale, Françoise ; Joly, Jean‐Stéphane</creator><creatorcontrib>Benítez‐Santana, Tibiábin ; Simion, Matthieu ; Corraze, Geneviève ; Médale, Françoise ; Joly, Jean‐Stéphane</creatorcontrib><description>In zebrafish brains, populations of continuously proliferating cells are present during an entire life span. Under normal conditions, stem cells give rise to rapidly proliferating progenitors that quickly exit the cell cycle and differentiate. Hence fish are favorable models to study what regulates postembryonic neurogenesis. The aim of this study was to determine if optic tectum (OT) cell proliferation is halted during nutritional deprivation (ND) and whether or not it can be restored with refeeding. We examined the effect of ND on the proliferation of Neuroepithelial/Ependymal Progenitor cell (NeEPC) and transitory‐amplifying progenitors (TAPs). Following ND, no PCNA immunostaining was found in OT of starved fish, while positive cell populations of PCNA positive progenitors are found at its periphery in control fish. This indicated that active proliferation stopped. To label retaining progenitor cells, BrdU was applied and a chase‐period was accompanied by ND. Positive NeEPCs were detected in the external tectum marginal zone of starved fish suggesting that these progenitors are relatively immune to ND. Moreover in the internal tectum marginal zone labeled retaining cells were observed leaving the possibility that some arrested TAPs were present to readily restart proliferation when nutrition was returned. Our results suggest that neurogenesis was maintained during ND and that a normal proliferative situation was recovered after refeeding. We point to the mTOR pathway as a necessary pathway in progenitors to regulate their mitosis activity. Thus, this study highlights mechanisms involved in neural stem and progenitor cell homeostatic maintenance in an adverse situation. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Develop Neurobiol 77: 26–38, 2017</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-8451</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-846X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/dneu.22406</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27273844</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena - physiology ; Animals ; Cell Proliferation - physiology ; Cognitive Sciences ; Danio rerio ; Ependyma - cytology ; Ependyma - physiology ; Life Sciences ; Models, Animal ; neural stem cells ; Neural Stem Cells - cytology ; Neural Stem Cells - physiology ; Neurobiology ; Neuroepithelial Cells - cytology ; Neuroepithelial Cells - physiology ; Neurogenesis - physiology ; Neurons and Cognition ; nutritional deprivation ; optic tectum ; Psychology and behavior ; Starvation ; Stem Cells - physiology ; Superior Colliculi - cytology ; Superior Colliculi - physiology ; Zebrafish</subject><ispartof>Developmental neurobiology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2017-01, Vol.77 (1), p.26-38</ispartof><rights>2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>Attribution - ShareAlike</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4246-b8030d08d8c8fd0979f67d0bd49acfb93d5adfacd3b62fff2c146eec3a3b8e8e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4246-b8030d08d8c8fd0979f67d0bd49acfb93d5adfacd3b62fff2c146eec3a3b8e8e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8083-1298 ; 0009-0001-8235-5299 ; 0000-0002-3584-5287</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fdneu.22406$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fdneu.22406$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,1427,4010,27900,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27273844$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01346060$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Benítez‐Santana, Tibiábin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simion, Matthieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corraze, Geneviève</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Médale, Françoise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joly, Jean‐Stéphane</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Nutrient Availability on Progenitor Cells in Zebrafish (Danio Rerio)</title><title>Developmental neurobiology (Hoboken, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Dev Neurobiol</addtitle><description>In zebrafish brains, populations of continuously proliferating cells are present during an entire life span. Under normal conditions, stem cells give rise to rapidly proliferating progenitors that quickly exit the cell cycle and differentiate. Hence fish are favorable models to study what regulates postembryonic neurogenesis. The aim of this study was to determine if optic tectum (OT) cell proliferation is halted during nutritional deprivation (ND) and whether or not it can be restored with refeeding. We examined the effect of ND on the proliferation of Neuroepithelial/Ependymal Progenitor cell (NeEPC) and transitory‐amplifying progenitors (TAPs). Following ND, no PCNA immunostaining was found in OT of starved fish, while positive cell populations of PCNA positive progenitors are found at its periphery in control fish. This indicated that active proliferation stopped. To label retaining progenitor cells, BrdU was applied and a chase‐period was accompanied by ND. Positive NeEPCs were detected in the external tectum marginal zone of starved fish suggesting that these progenitors are relatively immune to ND. Moreover in the internal tectum marginal zone labeled retaining cells were observed leaving the possibility that some arrested TAPs were present to readily restart proliferation when nutrition was returned. Our results suggest that neurogenesis was maintained during ND and that a normal proliferative situation was recovered after refeeding. We point to the mTOR pathway as a necessary pathway in progenitors to regulate their mitosis activity. Thus, this study highlights mechanisms involved in neural stem and progenitor cell homeostatic maintenance in an adverse situation. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Develop Neurobiol 77: 26–38, 2017</description><subject>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena - physiology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cell Proliferation - physiology</subject><subject>Cognitive Sciences</subject><subject>Danio rerio</subject><subject>Ependyma - cytology</subject><subject>Ependyma - physiology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Models, Animal</subject><subject>neural stem cells</subject><subject>Neural Stem Cells - cytology</subject><subject>Neural Stem Cells - physiology</subject><subject>Neurobiology</subject><subject>Neuroepithelial Cells - cytology</subject><subject>Neuroepithelial Cells - physiology</subject><subject>Neurogenesis - physiology</subject><subject>Neurons and Cognition</subject><subject>nutritional deprivation</subject><subject>optic tectum</subject><subject>Psychology and behavior</subject><subject>Starvation</subject><subject>Stem Cells - physiology</subject><subject>Superior Colliculi - cytology</subject><subject>Superior Colliculi - physiology</subject><subject>Zebrafish</subject><issn>1932-8451</issn><issn>1932-846X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0V1LHDEUBuAgFrW2N_6AEvBGhbUnH5PJXC7rVgvLKqVC8SZk8lEjsxObzFj233fW0b3ohXh1wuHhJYcXoSMC5wSAfrWt688p5SB20AGpGJ1ILn7tbt8F2Ucfc34AKBgVsIf2aUlLJjk_QMu59850OHq87LsUXNvh6ZMOja5DE7o1ji2-SfG3a0MXE565psk4tPjO1Un7kO_xyYVuQ8Q_XArx9BP64HWT3eeXeYhuv81_zq4mi-vL77PpYmI45WJSS2BgQVpppLdQlZUXpYXa8kobX1fMFtp6bSyrBfXeU0O4cM4wzWrppGOH6HTMvdeNekxhpdNaRR3U1XShNjsgjAsQ8EQGezLaxxT_9C53ahWyGQ7RrYt9VkQWFa-4KMQ7KBWiEiWXAz3-jz7EPrXD0ZtAAME4LQZ1NiqTYs7J-e1nCahNeWpTnnoub8BfXiL7euXslr62NQAygr-hces3otTFcn47hv4DYIqioA</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>Benítez‐Santana, Tibiábin</creator><creator>Simion, Matthieu</creator><creator>Corraze, Geneviève</creator><creator>Médale, Françoise</creator><creator>Joly, Jean‐Stéphane</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8083-1298</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8235-5299</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3584-5287</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>Effect of Nutrient Availability on Progenitor Cells in Zebrafish (Danio Rerio)</title><author>Benítez‐Santana, Tibiábin ; Simion, Matthieu ; Corraze, Geneviève ; Médale, Françoise ; Joly, Jean‐Stéphane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4246-b8030d08d8c8fd0979f67d0bd49acfb93d5adfacd3b62fff2c146eec3a3b8e8e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena - physiology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cell Proliferation - physiology</topic><topic>Cognitive Sciences</topic><topic>Danio rerio</topic><topic>Ependyma - cytology</topic><topic>Ependyma - physiology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Models, Animal</topic><topic>neural stem cells</topic><topic>Neural Stem Cells - cytology</topic><topic>Neural Stem Cells - physiology</topic><topic>Neurobiology</topic><topic>Neuroepithelial Cells - cytology</topic><topic>Neuroepithelial Cells - physiology</topic><topic>Neurogenesis - physiology</topic><topic>Neurons and Cognition</topic><topic>nutritional deprivation</topic><topic>optic tectum</topic><topic>Psychology and behavior</topic><topic>Starvation</topic><topic>Stem Cells - physiology</topic><topic>Superior Colliculi - cytology</topic><topic>Superior Colliculi - physiology</topic><topic>Zebrafish</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Benítez‐Santana, Tibiábin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simion, Matthieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corraze, Geneviève</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Médale, Françoise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joly, Jean‐Stéphane</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Developmental neurobiology (Hoboken, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Benítez‐Santana, Tibiábin</au><au>Simion, Matthieu</au><au>Corraze, Geneviève</au><au>Médale, Françoise</au><au>Joly, Jean‐Stéphane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Nutrient Availability on Progenitor Cells in Zebrafish (Danio Rerio)</atitle><jtitle>Developmental neurobiology (Hoboken, N.J.)</jtitle><addtitle>Dev Neurobiol</addtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>26</spage><epage>38</epage><pages>26-38</pages><issn>1932-8451</issn><eissn>1932-846X</eissn><abstract>In zebrafish brains, populations of continuously proliferating cells are present during an entire life span. Under normal conditions, stem cells give rise to rapidly proliferating progenitors that quickly exit the cell cycle and differentiate. Hence fish are favorable models to study what regulates postembryonic neurogenesis. The aim of this study was to determine if optic tectum (OT) cell proliferation is halted during nutritional deprivation (ND) and whether or not it can be restored with refeeding. We examined the effect of ND on the proliferation of Neuroepithelial/Ependymal Progenitor cell (NeEPC) and transitory‐amplifying progenitors (TAPs). Following ND, no PCNA immunostaining was found in OT of starved fish, while positive cell populations of PCNA positive progenitors are found at its periphery in control fish. This indicated that active proliferation stopped. To label retaining progenitor cells, BrdU was applied and a chase‐period was accompanied by ND. Positive NeEPCs were detected in the external tectum marginal zone of starved fish suggesting that these progenitors are relatively immune to ND. Moreover in the internal tectum marginal zone labeled retaining cells were observed leaving the possibility that some arrested TAPs were present to readily restart proliferation when nutrition was returned. Our results suggest that neurogenesis was maintained during ND and that a normal proliferative situation was recovered after refeeding. We point to the mTOR pathway as a necessary pathway in progenitors to regulate their mitosis activity. Thus, this study highlights mechanisms involved in neural stem and progenitor cell homeostatic maintenance in an adverse situation. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Develop Neurobiol 77: 26–38, 2017</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>27273844</pmid><doi>10.1002/dneu.22406</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8083-1298</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8235-5299</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3584-5287</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-8451
ispartof Developmental neurobiology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2017-01, Vol.77 (1), p.26-38
issn 1932-8451
1932-846X
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01346060v1
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena - physiology
Animals
Cell Proliferation - physiology
Cognitive Sciences
Danio rerio
Ependyma - cytology
Ependyma - physiology
Life Sciences
Models, Animal
neural stem cells
Neural Stem Cells - cytology
Neural Stem Cells - physiology
Neurobiology
Neuroepithelial Cells - cytology
Neuroepithelial Cells - physiology
Neurogenesis - physiology
Neurons and Cognition
nutritional deprivation
optic tectum
Psychology and behavior
Starvation
Stem Cells - physiology
Superior Colliculi - cytology
Superior Colliculi - physiology
Zebrafish
title Effect of Nutrient Availability on Progenitor Cells in Zebrafish (Danio Rerio)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T20%3A12%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Nutrient%20Availability%20on%20Progenitor%20Cells%20in%20Zebrafish%20(Danio%20Rerio)&rft.jtitle=Developmental%20neurobiology%20(Hoboken,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Ben%C3%ADtez%E2%80%90Santana,%20Tibi%C3%A1bin&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=26&rft.epage=38&rft.pages=26-38&rft.issn=1932-8451&rft.eissn=1932-846X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/dneu.22406&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1826696748%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1850063425&rft_id=info:pmid/27273844&rfr_iscdi=true