Toward a functional integration of anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis for a sustainable resource management. Comparison between solid-digestate and its derived pyrochar as soil amendment

[Display omitted] •Coupling anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis is technologically efficient.•This technology integration is environmentally sound and boosts circular economy.•Digestate and pyrochar are soil amendments with different but complementary properties.•While pyrochar sequesters carbon, dige...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied energy 2016-05, Vol.169, p.652-662
Hauptverfasser: Monlau, F., Francavilla, M., Sambusiti, C., Antoniou, N., Solhy, A., Libutti, A., Zabaniotou, A., Barakat, A., Monteleone, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 662
container_issue
container_start_page 652
container_title Applied energy
container_volume 169
creator Monlau, F.
Francavilla, M.
Sambusiti, C.
Antoniou, N.
Solhy, A.
Libutti, A.
Zabaniotou, A.
Barakat, A.
Monteleone, M.
description [Display omitted] •Coupling anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis is technologically efficient.•This technology integration is environmentally sound and boosts circular economy.•Digestate and pyrochar are soil amendments with different but complementary properties.•While pyrochar sequesters carbon, digestate could contribute to soil microbiological processes.•Their characteristics are fully consistent with those of agricultural soil amendments. The integration of different technologies acts as a leverage in boosting “circular economy” and improving resource use efficiency. In this respect, the coupling of anaerobic digestion with pyrolysis was the focus of this work. Solid-digestate obtained from anaerobic digestion was addressed to supply pyrolysis thus increasing the net energy gains and obtaining “biochar” (called “pyrochar” in our case) to be used as soil amendment alternatively to solid-digestate. The current interest on biochar is linked to its long-term soil carbon sequestration, thus contributing to global warming mitigation. A parallel detailed screening of the physical and chemical properties of both solid-digestate and pyrochar was performed, inferring their effects on soil quality. Results showed that while P and K are enriched in pyrochar, total N showed no significant differences. Heavy metals revealed higher concentrations in pyrochar, but always largely below the biochar quality thresholds. Pyrochar exhibited a higher surface area (49–88m2g−1), a greater water holding capacity (352–366%), and a more recalcitrant carbon structure. Both solid-digestate and pyrochar showed good soil amendments properties but with complementary effects. Although starting from the same biomass, being the original feedstock processed differently, their ability to improve the physical and chemical soil properties has proved to be different. While several other soil improvers of organic origin can substitute digestate, the important role played by biochar appears not-replaceable considering its precious “carbon negative” action.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.084
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01315573v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0306261916302240</els_id><sourcerecordid>1790940010</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-84dc67ba738ea65ccf011cbecfc35554341e112fee18a7ada2e57de9b7258e613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNksuO1DAQRSMEEs3ALyAvYZFQlXd2jFrAILXEZlhbFbvS41ZiBzvdo_40_g5nAmxhZZV17vFDN0neImQIWH84ZTSzZX-8ZnmcM8gzaMtnyQ7bJk87xPZ5soMC6jSvsXuZvArhBAA55rBLft67R_JakBjOVi3GWRqFsQsfPa2TcIMgS-xdb5TQ5sjhaZusFvPVu_EaTBCD89EQzmEhY6kfWXgO7uwViymmjzyxXTKxd9NM3oSY73l5ZLYiuNHodPPSwk9eswSh2ZsLb2eoB4r6EFkzCooqvepeJy8GGgO_-b3eJN8_f7rf36WHb1--7m8PqSobWNK21KpuemqKlqmulBoAUfWsBlVUVVUWJTJiPjBjSw1pyrlqNHd9k1ct11jcJO837wONcvZmIn-Vjoy8uz3IdQ-wwKpqisvKvtvY2bsf5_gkOZmgeBzJsjsHiS3W0BZY_wfadNCVAAgRrTdUeReC5-HvNRDkWgF5kn8qINcKSMhlrEAMftyCHP_nYtjLoAxbxdp4VovUzvxL8QutW8K2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1790940010</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toward a functional integration of anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis for a sustainable resource management. Comparison between solid-digestate and its derived pyrochar as soil amendment</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Monlau, F. ; Francavilla, M. ; Sambusiti, C. ; Antoniou, N. ; Solhy, A. ; Libutti, A. ; Zabaniotou, A. ; Barakat, A. ; Monteleone, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Monlau, F. ; Francavilla, M. ; Sambusiti, C. ; Antoniou, N. ; Solhy, A. ; Libutti, A. ; Zabaniotou, A. ; Barakat, A. ; Monteleone, M.</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted] •Coupling anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis is technologically efficient.•This technology integration is environmentally sound and boosts circular economy.•Digestate and pyrochar are soil amendments with different but complementary properties.•While pyrochar sequesters carbon, digestate could contribute to soil microbiological processes.•Their characteristics are fully consistent with those of agricultural soil amendments. The integration of different technologies acts as a leverage in boosting “circular economy” and improving resource use efficiency. In this respect, the coupling of anaerobic digestion with pyrolysis was the focus of this work. Solid-digestate obtained from anaerobic digestion was addressed to supply pyrolysis thus increasing the net energy gains and obtaining “biochar” (called “pyrochar” in our case) to be used as soil amendment alternatively to solid-digestate. The current interest on biochar is linked to its long-term soil carbon sequestration, thus contributing to global warming mitigation. A parallel detailed screening of the physical and chemical properties of both solid-digestate and pyrochar was performed, inferring their effects on soil quality. Results showed that while P and K are enriched in pyrochar, total N showed no significant differences. Heavy metals revealed higher concentrations in pyrochar, but always largely below the biochar quality thresholds. Pyrochar exhibited a higher surface area (49–88m2g−1), a greater water holding capacity (352–366%), and a more recalcitrant carbon structure. Both solid-digestate and pyrochar showed good soil amendments properties but with complementary effects. Although starting from the same biomass, being the original feedstock processed differently, their ability to improve the physical and chemical soil properties has proved to be different. While several other soil improvers of organic origin can substitute digestate, the important role played by biochar appears not-replaceable considering its precious “carbon negative” action.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-2619</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9118</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.084</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anaerobic digestion ; Biochar ; Carbon ; Carbon sequestration ; Chemical and Process Engineering ; Digestate ; Economics ; Engineering Sciences ; Enrichment ; Functional integration ; Pyrolysis ; Soil (material) ; Soil quality ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Applied energy, 2016-05, Vol.169, p.652-662</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-84dc67ba738ea65ccf011cbecfc35554341e112fee18a7ada2e57de9b7258e613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-84dc67ba738ea65ccf011cbecfc35554341e112fee18a7ada2e57de9b7258e613</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6849-3356 ; 0000-0003-4196-4351</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261916302240$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01315573$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Monlau, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francavilla, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sambusiti, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antoniou, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solhy, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Libutti, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zabaniotou, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barakat, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteleone, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Toward a functional integration of anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis for a sustainable resource management. Comparison between solid-digestate and its derived pyrochar as soil amendment</title><title>Applied energy</title><description>[Display omitted] •Coupling anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis is technologically efficient.•This technology integration is environmentally sound and boosts circular economy.•Digestate and pyrochar are soil amendments with different but complementary properties.•While pyrochar sequesters carbon, digestate could contribute to soil microbiological processes.•Their characteristics are fully consistent with those of agricultural soil amendments. The integration of different technologies acts as a leverage in boosting “circular economy” and improving resource use efficiency. In this respect, the coupling of anaerobic digestion with pyrolysis was the focus of this work. Solid-digestate obtained from anaerobic digestion was addressed to supply pyrolysis thus increasing the net energy gains and obtaining “biochar” (called “pyrochar” in our case) to be used as soil amendment alternatively to solid-digestate. The current interest on biochar is linked to its long-term soil carbon sequestration, thus contributing to global warming mitigation. A parallel detailed screening of the physical and chemical properties of both solid-digestate and pyrochar was performed, inferring their effects on soil quality. Results showed that while P and K are enriched in pyrochar, total N showed no significant differences. Heavy metals revealed higher concentrations in pyrochar, but always largely below the biochar quality thresholds. Pyrochar exhibited a higher surface area (49–88m2g−1), a greater water holding capacity (352–366%), and a more recalcitrant carbon structure. Both solid-digestate and pyrochar showed good soil amendments properties but with complementary effects. Although starting from the same biomass, being the original feedstock processed differently, their ability to improve the physical and chemical soil properties has proved to be different. While several other soil improvers of organic origin can substitute digestate, the important role played by biochar appears not-replaceable considering its precious “carbon negative” action.</description><subject>Anaerobic digestion</subject><subject>Biochar</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Chemical and Process Engineering</subject><subject>Digestate</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Engineering Sciences</subject><subject>Enrichment</subject><subject>Functional integration</subject><subject>Pyrolysis</subject><subject>Soil (material)</subject><subject>Soil quality</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>0306-2619</issn><issn>1872-9118</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNksuO1DAQRSMEEs3ALyAvYZFQlXd2jFrAILXEZlhbFbvS41ZiBzvdo_40_g5nAmxhZZV17vFDN0neImQIWH84ZTSzZX-8ZnmcM8gzaMtnyQ7bJk87xPZ5soMC6jSvsXuZvArhBAA55rBLft67R_JakBjOVi3GWRqFsQsfPa2TcIMgS-xdb5TQ5sjhaZusFvPVu_EaTBCD89EQzmEhY6kfWXgO7uwViymmjzyxXTKxd9NM3oSY73l5ZLYiuNHodPPSwk9eswSh2ZsLb2eoB4r6EFkzCooqvepeJy8GGgO_-b3eJN8_f7rf36WHb1--7m8PqSobWNK21KpuemqKlqmulBoAUfWsBlVUVVUWJTJiPjBjSw1pyrlqNHd9k1ct11jcJO837wONcvZmIn-Vjoy8uz3IdQ-wwKpqisvKvtvY2bsf5_gkOZmgeBzJsjsHiS3W0BZY_wfadNCVAAgRrTdUeReC5-HvNRDkWgF5kn8qINcKSMhlrEAMftyCHP_nYtjLoAxbxdp4VovUzvxL8QutW8K2</recordid><startdate>20160501</startdate><enddate>20160501</enddate><creator>Monlau, F.</creator><creator>Francavilla, M.</creator><creator>Sambusiti, C.</creator><creator>Antoniou, N.</creator><creator>Solhy, A.</creator><creator>Libutti, A.</creator><creator>Zabaniotou, A.</creator><creator>Barakat, A.</creator><creator>Monteleone, M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6849-3356</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4196-4351</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160501</creationdate><title>Toward a functional integration of anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis for a sustainable resource management. Comparison between solid-digestate and its derived pyrochar as soil amendment</title><author>Monlau, F. ; Francavilla, M. ; Sambusiti, C. ; Antoniou, N. ; Solhy, A. ; Libutti, A. ; Zabaniotou, A. ; Barakat, A. ; Monteleone, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-84dc67ba738ea65ccf011cbecfc35554341e112fee18a7ada2e57de9b7258e613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Anaerobic digestion</topic><topic>Biochar</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Chemical and Process Engineering</topic><topic>Digestate</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Engineering Sciences</topic><topic>Enrichment</topic><topic>Functional integration</topic><topic>Pyrolysis</topic><topic>Soil (material)</topic><topic>Soil quality</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Monlau, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francavilla, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sambusiti, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antoniou, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solhy, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Libutti, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zabaniotou, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barakat, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteleone, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Applied energy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Monlau, F.</au><au>Francavilla, M.</au><au>Sambusiti, C.</au><au>Antoniou, N.</au><au>Solhy, A.</au><au>Libutti, A.</au><au>Zabaniotou, A.</au><au>Barakat, A.</au><au>Monteleone, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toward a functional integration of anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis for a sustainable resource management. Comparison between solid-digestate and its derived pyrochar as soil amendment</atitle><jtitle>Applied energy</jtitle><date>2016-05-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>169</volume><spage>652</spage><epage>662</epage><pages>652-662</pages><issn>0306-2619</issn><eissn>1872-9118</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted] •Coupling anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis is technologically efficient.•This technology integration is environmentally sound and boosts circular economy.•Digestate and pyrochar are soil amendments with different but complementary properties.•While pyrochar sequesters carbon, digestate could contribute to soil microbiological processes.•Their characteristics are fully consistent with those of agricultural soil amendments. The integration of different technologies acts as a leverage in boosting “circular economy” and improving resource use efficiency. In this respect, the coupling of anaerobic digestion with pyrolysis was the focus of this work. Solid-digestate obtained from anaerobic digestion was addressed to supply pyrolysis thus increasing the net energy gains and obtaining “biochar” (called “pyrochar” in our case) to be used as soil amendment alternatively to solid-digestate. The current interest on biochar is linked to its long-term soil carbon sequestration, thus contributing to global warming mitigation. A parallel detailed screening of the physical and chemical properties of both solid-digestate and pyrochar was performed, inferring their effects on soil quality. Results showed that while P and K are enriched in pyrochar, total N showed no significant differences. Heavy metals revealed higher concentrations in pyrochar, but always largely below the biochar quality thresholds. Pyrochar exhibited a higher surface area (49–88m2g−1), a greater water holding capacity (352–366%), and a more recalcitrant carbon structure. Both solid-digestate and pyrochar showed good soil amendments properties but with complementary effects. Although starting from the same biomass, being the original feedstock processed differently, their ability to improve the physical and chemical soil properties has proved to be different. While several other soil improvers of organic origin can substitute digestate, the important role played by biochar appears not-replaceable considering its precious “carbon negative” action.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.084</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6849-3356</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4196-4351</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0306-2619
ispartof Applied energy, 2016-05, Vol.169, p.652-662
issn 0306-2619
1872-9118
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01315573v1
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Anaerobic digestion
Biochar
Carbon
Carbon sequestration
Chemical and Process Engineering
Digestate
Economics
Engineering Sciences
Enrichment
Functional integration
Pyrolysis
Soil (material)
Soil quality
Sustainability
title Toward a functional integration of anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis for a sustainable resource management. Comparison between solid-digestate and its derived pyrochar as soil amendment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T11%3A33%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toward%20a%20functional%20integration%20of%20anaerobic%20digestion%20and%20pyrolysis%20for%20a%20sustainable%20resource%20management.%20Comparison%20between%20solid-digestate%20and%20its%20derived%20pyrochar%20as%20soil%20amendment&rft.jtitle=Applied%20energy&rft.au=Monlau,%20F.&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.volume=169&rft.spage=652&rft.epage=662&rft.pages=652-662&rft.issn=0306-2619&rft.eissn=1872-9118&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.084&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1790940010%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1790940010&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0306261916302240&rfr_iscdi=true