Interspecific differences in the oleoresin production of Copaifera L. (Fabaceae) in the Amazon rainforest

• CONTEXT : Copaifera species produce an oleoresin of commercial importance that is widely extracted in Amazon communities. • AIMS : This paper addresses two questions. (1) What are the morphological characteristics of Copaifera species that influence oleoresin production? (2) How do different Copai...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of forest science. 2013-05, Vol.70 (3), p.319-328
Hauptverfasser: Martins, Karina, Herrero-Jáuregui, Cristina, da Costa, Patrícia, Tonini, Hélio, de M. Bentes-Gama, Michelliny, Vieira, Abadio H, de O. Wadt, Lúcia Helena
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 328
container_issue 3
container_start_page 319
container_title Annals of forest science.
container_volume 70
creator Martins, Karina
Herrero-Jáuregui, Cristina
da Costa, Patrícia
Tonini, Hélio
de M. Bentes-Gama, Michelliny
Vieira, Abadio H
de O. Wadt, Lúcia Helena
description • CONTEXT : Copaifera species produce an oleoresin of commercial importance that is widely extracted in Amazon communities. • AIMS : This paper addresses two questions. (1) What are the morphological characteristics of Copaifera species that influence oleoresin production? (2) How do different Copaifera species respond to repeated harvests? • METHODS : We performed a large-scale experiment in the Brazilian Amazon. We tapped 110 Copaifera trees belonging to four species, and several morphological tree characteristics were measured to determine their effect on oleoresin production. • RESULTS : The proportion of Copaifera reticulata and Copaifera paupera trees that yielded more than 1 ml oleoresin was higher than the other species. The oleoresin volumes from yielding Copaifera pubiflora trees were significantly higher than those from C. reticulata and C. paupera, with Copaifera multijuga yielding intermediate values. Interestingly, none of the studied morphological tree characteristics had a significant effect on the proportion of yielding trees. Hollowed trees yielded significantly smaller volumes than non-hollowed trees. Both the proportion of yielding trees and oleoresin volumes decreased from the first to the second harvests for C. reticulata and C. paupera; however, the opposite pattern was observed for C. pubiflora. • CONCLUSIONS : Oleoresin production capacity varies by species, and management protocols should account for these differences.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13595-012-0254-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>hal_C6C</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01201470v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_HAL_hal_01201470v1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-f32f831cceb00fcaed0689f64aa31308712252fb0a1be1fdaf8fe7681c099d803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1L5TAUhsswwjg6P2BW082ALqrnJE2bLi8Xv-CCC0eYXTg3PdHItSlJFfTXm1J16Spfz_OS8xbFb4QTBGhPE0rVqQpQVCBUXelvxT6Krq26pvn_fd7rpqpVAz-Knyk9QAZ1jfuFvxomjmlk6523Ze-d48iD5VT6oZzuuQw7DpFTPo0x9E928mEogyvXYSSfYSo3J-XROW3JMvHxh7Z6pNcMRvKDm_3psNhztEv86309KG7Pz_6tL6vN9cXVerWpbI3dVDkpnJZoLW8BnCXuodGda2oiiRJ0i0Io4bZAuGV0PTntuG00Wui6XoM8KI6X3HvamTH6R4ovJpA3l6uNme_y6IB1C8-YWVxYG0NKkd2ngGDmXs3S6-yYuVejs_N3cUZKlnYu0mB9-hRFK5UGJTMnFi7lp-GOo3kIT3HIo38Z_meRHAVDdzEH397k7yoAULpRKN8Ae0qRLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interspecific differences in the oleoresin production of Copaifera L. (Fabaceae) in the Amazon rainforest</title><source>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</source><creator>Martins, Karina ; Herrero-Jáuregui, Cristina ; da Costa, Patrícia ; Tonini, Hélio ; de M. Bentes-Gama, Michelliny ; Vieira, Abadio H ; de O. Wadt, Lúcia Helena</creator><creatorcontrib>Martins, Karina ; Herrero-Jáuregui, Cristina ; da Costa, Patrícia ; Tonini, Hélio ; de M. Bentes-Gama, Michelliny ; Vieira, Abadio H ; de O. Wadt, Lúcia Helena</creatorcontrib><description>• CONTEXT : Copaifera species produce an oleoresin of commercial importance that is widely extracted in Amazon communities. • AIMS : This paper addresses two questions. (1) What are the morphological characteristics of Copaifera species that influence oleoresin production? (2) How do different Copaifera species respond to repeated harvests? • METHODS : We performed a large-scale experiment in the Brazilian Amazon. We tapped 110 Copaifera trees belonging to four species, and several morphological tree characteristics were measured to determine their effect on oleoresin production. • RESULTS : The proportion of Copaifera reticulata and Copaifera paupera trees that yielded more than 1 ml oleoresin was higher than the other species. The oleoresin volumes from yielding Copaifera pubiflora trees were significantly higher than those from C. reticulata and C. paupera, with Copaifera multijuga yielding intermediate values. Interestingly, none of the studied morphological tree characteristics had a significant effect on the proportion of yielding trees. Hollowed trees yielded significantly smaller volumes than non-hollowed trees. Both the proportion of yielding trees and oleoresin volumes decreased from the first to the second harvests for C. reticulata and C. paupera; however, the opposite pattern was observed for C. pubiflora. • CONCLUSIONS : Oleoresin production capacity varies by species, and management protocols should account for these differences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1286-4560</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1297-966X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13595-012-0254-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Paris: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Agricultural sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Copaifera ; Environment ; Forest management ; Forest management. Stand types and stand dynamics. Silvicultural treatments. Tending of stands. Natural regeneration ; Forestry ; Forestry Management ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; interspecific variation ; Life Sciences ; Original Paper ; Silviculture, forestry ; Tree Biology ; trees ; Wood Science &amp; Technology</subject><ispartof>Annals of forest science., 2013-05, Vol.70 (3), p.319-328</ispartof><rights>INRA and Springer-Verlag France 2012</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-f32f831cceb00fcaed0689f64aa31308712252fb0a1be1fdaf8fe7681c099d803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-f32f831cceb00fcaed0689f64aa31308712252fb0a1be1fdaf8fe7681c099d803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13595-012-0254-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-012-0254-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,782,786,887,27931,27932,41127,41495,42196,42564,51326,51583</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-012-0254-8$$EView_record_in_Springer_Nature$$FView_record_in_$$GSpringer_Nature</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27358053$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01201470$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martins, Karina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrero-Jáuregui, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Costa, Patrícia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tonini, Hélio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de M. Bentes-Gama, Michelliny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieira, Abadio H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de O. Wadt, Lúcia Helena</creatorcontrib><title>Interspecific differences in the oleoresin production of Copaifera L. (Fabaceae) in the Amazon rainforest</title><title>Annals of forest science.</title><addtitle>Annals of Forest Science</addtitle><description>• CONTEXT : Copaifera species produce an oleoresin of commercial importance that is widely extracted in Amazon communities. • AIMS : This paper addresses two questions. (1) What are the morphological characteristics of Copaifera species that influence oleoresin production? (2) How do different Copaifera species respond to repeated harvests? • METHODS : We performed a large-scale experiment in the Brazilian Amazon. We tapped 110 Copaifera trees belonging to four species, and several morphological tree characteristics were measured to determine their effect on oleoresin production. • RESULTS : The proportion of Copaifera reticulata and Copaifera paupera trees that yielded more than 1 ml oleoresin was higher than the other species. The oleoresin volumes from yielding Copaifera pubiflora trees were significantly higher than those from C. reticulata and C. paupera, with Copaifera multijuga yielding intermediate values. Interestingly, none of the studied morphological tree characteristics had a significant effect on the proportion of yielding trees. Hollowed trees yielded significantly smaller volumes than non-hollowed trees. Both the proportion of yielding trees and oleoresin volumes decreased from the first to the second harvests for C. reticulata and C. paupera; however, the opposite pattern was observed for C. pubiflora. • CONCLUSIONS : Oleoresin production capacity varies by species, and management protocols should account for these differences.</description><subject>Agricultural sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Copaifera</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forest management. Stand types and stand dynamics. Silvicultural treatments. Tending of stands. Natural regeneration</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Forestry Management</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>interspecific variation</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Silviculture, forestry</subject><subject>Tree Biology</subject><subject>trees</subject><subject>Wood Science &amp; Technology</subject><issn>1286-4560</issn><issn>1297-966X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1L5TAUhsswwjg6P2BW082ALqrnJE2bLi8Xv-CCC0eYXTg3PdHItSlJFfTXm1J16Spfz_OS8xbFb4QTBGhPE0rVqQpQVCBUXelvxT6Krq26pvn_fd7rpqpVAz-Knyk9QAZ1jfuFvxomjmlk6523Ze-d48iD5VT6oZzuuQw7DpFTPo0x9E928mEogyvXYSSfYSo3J-XROW3JMvHxh7Z6pNcMRvKDm_3psNhztEv86309KG7Pz_6tL6vN9cXVerWpbI3dVDkpnJZoLW8BnCXuodGda2oiiRJ0i0Io4bZAuGV0PTntuG00Wui6XoM8KI6X3HvamTH6R4ovJpA3l6uNme_y6IB1C8-YWVxYG0NKkd2ngGDmXs3S6-yYuVejs_N3cUZKlnYu0mB9-hRFK5UGJTMnFi7lp-GOo3kIT3HIo38Z_meRHAVDdzEH397k7yoAULpRKN8Ae0qRLg</recordid><startdate>20130501</startdate><enddate>20130501</enddate><creator>Martins, Karina</creator><creator>Herrero-Jáuregui, Cristina</creator><creator>da Costa, Patrícia</creator><creator>Tonini, Hélio</creator><creator>de M. Bentes-Gama, Michelliny</creator><creator>Vieira, Abadio H</creator><creator>de O. Wadt, Lúcia Helena</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>EDP Sciences</general><general>Springer Nature (since 2011)/EDP Science (until 2010)</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130501</creationdate><title>Interspecific differences in the oleoresin production of Copaifera L. (Fabaceae) in the Amazon rainforest</title><author>Martins, Karina ; Herrero-Jáuregui, Cristina ; da Costa, Patrícia ; Tonini, Hélio ; de M. Bentes-Gama, Michelliny ; Vieira, Abadio H ; de O. Wadt, Lúcia Helena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-f32f831cceb00fcaed0689f64aa31308712252fb0a1be1fdaf8fe7681c099d803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Agricultural sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Copaifera</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forest management. Stand types and stand dynamics. Silvicultural treatments. Tending of stands. Natural regeneration</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Forestry Management</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>interspecific variation</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Silviculture, forestry</topic><topic>Tree Biology</topic><topic>trees</topic><topic>Wood Science &amp; Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martins, Karina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrero-Jáuregui, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Costa, Patrícia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tonini, Hélio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de M. Bentes-Gama, Michelliny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieira, Abadio H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de O. Wadt, Lúcia Helena</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Annals of forest science.</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martins, Karina</au><au>Herrero-Jáuregui, Cristina</au><au>da Costa, Patrícia</au><au>Tonini, Hélio</au><au>de M. Bentes-Gama, Michelliny</au><au>Vieira, Abadio H</au><au>de O. Wadt, Lúcia Helena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interspecific differences in the oleoresin production of Copaifera L. (Fabaceae) in the Amazon rainforest</atitle><jtitle>Annals of forest science.</jtitle><stitle>Annals of Forest Science</stitle><date>2013-05-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>319</spage><epage>328</epage><pages>319-328</pages><issn>1286-4560</issn><eissn>1297-966X</eissn><abstract>• CONTEXT : Copaifera species produce an oleoresin of commercial importance that is widely extracted in Amazon communities. • AIMS : This paper addresses two questions. (1) What are the morphological characteristics of Copaifera species that influence oleoresin production? (2) How do different Copaifera species respond to repeated harvests? • METHODS : We performed a large-scale experiment in the Brazilian Amazon. We tapped 110 Copaifera trees belonging to four species, and several morphological tree characteristics were measured to determine their effect on oleoresin production. • RESULTS : The proportion of Copaifera reticulata and Copaifera paupera trees that yielded more than 1 ml oleoresin was higher than the other species. The oleoresin volumes from yielding Copaifera pubiflora trees were significantly higher than those from C. reticulata and C. paupera, with Copaifera multijuga yielding intermediate values. Interestingly, none of the studied morphological tree characteristics had a significant effect on the proportion of yielding trees. Hollowed trees yielded significantly smaller volumes than non-hollowed trees. Both the proportion of yielding trees and oleoresin volumes decreased from the first to the second harvests for C. reticulata and C. paupera; however, the opposite pattern was observed for C. pubiflora. • CONCLUSIONS : Oleoresin production capacity varies by species, and management protocols should account for these differences.</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s13595-012-0254-8</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1286-4560
ispartof Annals of forest science., 2013-05, Vol.70 (3), p.319-328
issn 1286-4560
1297-966X
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01201470v1
source Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
subjects Agricultural sciences
Biological and medical sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Copaifera
Environment
Forest management
Forest management. Stand types and stand dynamics. Silvicultural treatments. Tending of stands. Natural regeneration
Forestry
Forestry Management
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
interspecific variation
Life Sciences
Original Paper
Silviculture, forestry
Tree Biology
trees
Wood Science & Technology
title Interspecific differences in the oleoresin production of Copaifera L. (Fabaceae) in the Amazon rainforest
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T02%3A17%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hal_C6C&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interspecific%20differences%20in%20the%20oleoresin%20production%20of%20Copaifera%20L.%20(Fabaceae)%20in%20the%20Amazon%20rainforest&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20forest%20science.&rft.au=Martins,%20Karina&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=319&rft.epage=328&rft.pages=319-328&rft.issn=1286-4560&rft.eissn=1297-966X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13595-012-0254-8&rft_dat=%3Chal_C6C%3Eoai_HAL_hal_01201470v1%3C/hal_C6C%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true