Cavitation vulnerability in roots and shoots: does Populus euphratica Oliv., a poplar from arid areas of Central Asia, differ from other poplar species?
Populus euphratica is a poplar species growing in arid regions of Central Asia, where its distribution remains nevertheless restricted to river-banks or to areas with an access to deep water tables. To test whether the hydraulic architecture of this species differs from that of other poplars with re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental botany 2005-08, Vol.56 (418), p.2003-2010 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2010 |
---|---|
container_issue | 418 |
container_start_page | 2003 |
container_title | Journal of experimental botany |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Hukin, D. Cochard, H. Dreyer, E. Thiec, D. Le Bogeat-Triboulot, M. B. |
description | Populus euphratica is a poplar species growing in arid regions of Central Asia, where its distribution remains nevertheless restricted to river-banks or to areas with an access to deep water tables. To test whether the hydraulic architecture of this species differs from that of other poplars with respect to this ecological distribution, the vulnerability to cavitation of P. euphratica was compared with that of P. alba and of P. trichocarpa×koreana. The occurrence of a potential hydraulic segmentation through cavitation was also investigated by assessing the vulnerability of roots, stems, and leaf mid-rib veins. Cryo-scanning electron microscopy (cryo-SEM) was used to assess the level of embolism in fine roots and leaf mid-ribs and a low pressure flowmeter (LPFM) was used for stems and main roots. The cryo-SEM technique was validated against LPFM measurements on paired samples. In P. alba and P. trichocarpa×koreana, leaf mid-ribs were more vulnerable to cavitation than stems and roots. In P. euphratica, leaf mid-ribs and stems were equally vulnerable and, contrary to what has been observed in other species, roots were significantly less vulnerable than shoots. P. euphratica was by far the most vulnerable. The water potential inducing 50% loss of conductivity in stems was close to −0.7 MPa, against ∼ −1.45 MPa for the two others species. Such a large vulnerability was confirmed by recording losses of conductivity during a gradual drought. Moreover, significant stem embolism was recorded before stomatal closure, indicating the lack of an efficient safety margin for hydraulic functions in this species. Embolism was not reversed by rewatering. These observations are discussed with respect to the ecology of P. euphratica. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jxb/eri198 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01189134v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24031284</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24031284</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-1ea5653520d2b96f15a5e9845dcbd065966d03cfeccdc65aef03bfd05b3c84ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkVGL1DAQx4so3nn64rsSBAXlejdpmrT1RZbFc5XFE1Q4fAnTJGWzdpuatMvdN_HjmqVlD3yZGeb_mxmGf5I8p3BBoWKX29v60nhLq_JBckpzAWmWM_owOQXIshQqXpwkT0LYAgAHzh8nJ5RXoihKOE3-LnFvBxys68h-bDvjsbatHe6I7Yh3bggEO03C5lC-J9qZQL65fmzHQMzYb3wcVUiuW7u_OCdIete36Enj3Y6gtzoGg4G4hixNN3hsySJYPCfaNo2ZOTdsYjlPht4oa8KHp8mjBttgns35LPl59fHHcpWurz99Xi7WqeKsHFJqkAvOeAY6qyvRUI7cVGXOtao1iPin0MBUY5TSSnA0DbC60cBrpsocDTtL3k57N9jK3tsd-jvp0MrVYi0PPaC0rCjL9zSybya29-7PaMIgdzYo07bYGTcGKUpgjOc8gq_-A7du9F38Q2aMAwjBRITeTZDyLgRvmuN5CvJgrIzGysnYCL-cN471zuh7dHYyAq9nAIPCtvHYKRvuOVFVAorD1RcTtw2D80c9y4HRrMyjnk66DYO5Perof0tRsILL1c0v-f3rlxt6xTIJ7B9xasYp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>235006636</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cavitation vulnerability in roots and shoots: does Populus euphratica Oliv., a poplar from arid areas of Central Asia, differ from other poplar species?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hukin, D. ; Cochard, H. ; Dreyer, E. ; Thiec, D. Le ; Bogeat-Triboulot, M. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hukin, D. ; Cochard, H. ; Dreyer, E. ; Thiec, D. Le ; Bogeat-Triboulot, M. B.</creatorcontrib><description>Populus euphratica is a poplar species growing in arid regions of Central Asia, where its distribution remains nevertheless restricted to river-banks or to areas with an access to deep water tables. To test whether the hydraulic architecture of this species differs from that of other poplars with respect to this ecological distribution, the vulnerability to cavitation of P. euphratica was compared with that of P. alba and of P. trichocarpa×koreana. The occurrence of a potential hydraulic segmentation through cavitation was also investigated by assessing the vulnerability of roots, stems, and leaf mid-rib veins. Cryo-scanning electron microscopy (cryo-SEM) was used to assess the level of embolism in fine roots and leaf mid-ribs and a low pressure flowmeter (LPFM) was used for stems and main roots. The cryo-SEM technique was validated against LPFM measurements on paired samples. In P. alba and P. trichocarpa×koreana, leaf mid-ribs were more vulnerable to cavitation than stems and roots. In P. euphratica, leaf mid-ribs and stems were equally vulnerable and, contrary to what has been observed in other species, roots were significantly less vulnerable than shoots. P. euphratica was by far the most vulnerable. The water potential inducing 50% loss of conductivity in stems was close to −0.7 MPa, against ∼ −1.45 MPa for the two others species. Such a large vulnerability was confirmed by recording losses of conductivity during a gradual drought. Moreover, significant stem embolism was recorded before stomatal closure, indicating the lack of an efficient safety margin for hydraulic functions in this species. Embolism was not reversed by rewatering. These observations are discussed with respect to the ecology of P. euphratica.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0957</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2431</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eri198</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15967780</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEBOA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Asia ; Biological and medical sciences ; Botanics ; Cavitation flow ; Drought ; Economic plant physiology ; embolism ; Embolisms ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; hydraulic architecture ; Hydraulic conductivity ; hydraulic segmentation ; Hydraulics ; Hydrostatic Pressure ; Life Sciences ; phreatophyte ; Plant Leaves - physiology ; Plant Leaves - ultrastructure ; Plant roots ; Plant Roots - physiology ; Plant Roots - ultrastructure ; Plant Shoots - physiology ; Plant Shoots - ultrastructure ; Plants ; Populus ; Populus - physiology ; Populus - ultrastructure ; Pressure ; Research Papers ; Soil water ; Species Specificity ; Stems ; stomatal conductance ; Vegetal Biology ; Water - physiology ; water relations ; Water relations, transpiration, stomata ; Xylem</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental botany, 2005-08, Vol.56 (418), p.2003-2010</ispartof><rights>Society for Experimental Biology 2005</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Aug 2005</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-1ea5653520d2b96f15a5e9845dcbd065966d03cfeccdc65aef03bfd05b3c84ae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-1ea5653520d2b96f15a5e9845dcbd065966d03cfeccdc65aef03bfd05b3c84ae3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3015-488X ; 0000-0002-4204-551X ; 0000-0002-2727-7072</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24031284$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24031284$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,803,885,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16996076$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15967780$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01189134$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hukin, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochard, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dreyer, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiec, D. Le</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogeat-Triboulot, M. B.</creatorcontrib><title>Cavitation vulnerability in roots and shoots: does Populus euphratica Oliv., a poplar from arid areas of Central Asia, differ from other poplar species?</title><title>Journal of experimental botany</title><addtitle>J. Exp. Bot</addtitle><description>Populus euphratica is a poplar species growing in arid regions of Central Asia, where its distribution remains nevertheless restricted to river-banks or to areas with an access to deep water tables. To test whether the hydraulic architecture of this species differs from that of other poplars with respect to this ecological distribution, the vulnerability to cavitation of P. euphratica was compared with that of P. alba and of P. trichocarpa×koreana. The occurrence of a potential hydraulic segmentation through cavitation was also investigated by assessing the vulnerability of roots, stems, and leaf mid-rib veins. Cryo-scanning electron microscopy (cryo-SEM) was used to assess the level of embolism in fine roots and leaf mid-ribs and a low pressure flowmeter (LPFM) was used for stems and main roots. The cryo-SEM technique was validated against LPFM measurements on paired samples. In P. alba and P. trichocarpa×koreana, leaf mid-ribs were more vulnerable to cavitation than stems and roots. In P. euphratica, leaf mid-ribs and stems were equally vulnerable and, contrary to what has been observed in other species, roots were significantly less vulnerable than shoots. P. euphratica was by far the most vulnerable. The water potential inducing 50% loss of conductivity in stems was close to −0.7 MPa, against ∼ −1.45 MPa for the two others species. Such a large vulnerability was confirmed by recording losses of conductivity during a gradual drought. Moreover, significant stem embolism was recorded before stomatal closure, indicating the lack of an efficient safety margin for hydraulic functions in this species. Embolism was not reversed by rewatering. These observations are discussed with respect to the ecology of P. euphratica.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Asia</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Botanics</subject><subject>Cavitation flow</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Economic plant physiology</subject><subject>embolism</subject><subject>Embolisms</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>hydraulic architecture</subject><subject>Hydraulic conductivity</subject><subject>hydraulic segmentation</subject><subject>Hydraulics</subject><subject>Hydrostatic Pressure</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>phreatophyte</subject><subject>Plant Leaves - physiology</subject><subject>Plant Leaves - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Plant roots</subject><subject>Plant Roots - physiology</subject><subject>Plant Roots - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Plant Shoots - physiology</subject><subject>Plant Shoots - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Populus</subject><subject>Populus - physiology</subject><subject>Populus - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Research Papers</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Stems</subject><subject>stomatal conductance</subject><subject>Vegetal Biology</subject><subject>Water - physiology</subject><subject>water relations</subject><subject>Water relations, transpiration, stomata</subject><subject>Xylem</subject><issn>0022-0957</issn><issn>1460-2431</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkVGL1DAQx4so3nn64rsSBAXlejdpmrT1RZbFc5XFE1Q4fAnTJGWzdpuatMvdN_HjmqVlD3yZGeb_mxmGf5I8p3BBoWKX29v60nhLq_JBckpzAWmWM_owOQXIshQqXpwkT0LYAgAHzh8nJ5RXoihKOE3-LnFvBxys68h-bDvjsbatHe6I7Yh3bggEO03C5lC-J9qZQL65fmzHQMzYb3wcVUiuW7u_OCdIete36Enj3Y6gtzoGg4G4hixNN3hsySJYPCfaNo2ZOTdsYjlPht4oa8KHp8mjBttgns35LPl59fHHcpWurz99Xi7WqeKsHFJqkAvOeAY6qyvRUI7cVGXOtao1iPin0MBUY5TSSnA0DbC60cBrpsocDTtL3k57N9jK3tsd-jvp0MrVYi0PPaC0rCjL9zSybya29-7PaMIgdzYo07bYGTcGKUpgjOc8gq_-A7du9F38Q2aMAwjBRITeTZDyLgRvmuN5CvJgrIzGysnYCL-cN471zuh7dHYyAq9nAIPCtvHYKRvuOVFVAorD1RcTtw2D80c9y4HRrMyjnk66DYO5Perof0tRsILL1c0v-f3rlxt6xTIJ7B9xasYp</recordid><startdate>20050801</startdate><enddate>20050801</enddate><creator>Hukin, D.</creator><creator>Cochard, H.</creator><creator>Dreyer, E.</creator><creator>Thiec, D. Le</creator><creator>Bogeat-Triboulot, M. B.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><general>Oxford University Press (OUP)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3015-488X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4204-551X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2727-7072</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20050801</creationdate><title>Cavitation vulnerability in roots and shoots: does Populus euphratica Oliv., a poplar from arid areas of Central Asia, differ from other poplar species?</title><author>Hukin, D. ; Cochard, H. ; Dreyer, E. ; Thiec, D. Le ; Bogeat-Triboulot, M. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-1ea5653520d2b96f15a5e9845dcbd065966d03cfeccdc65aef03bfd05b3c84ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Asia</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Botanics</topic><topic>Cavitation flow</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Economic plant physiology</topic><topic>embolism</topic><topic>Embolisms</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>hydraulic architecture</topic><topic>Hydraulic conductivity</topic><topic>hydraulic segmentation</topic><topic>Hydraulics</topic><topic>Hydrostatic Pressure</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>phreatophyte</topic><topic>Plant Leaves - physiology</topic><topic>Plant Leaves - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Plant roots</topic><topic>Plant Roots - physiology</topic><topic>Plant Roots - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Plant Shoots - physiology</topic><topic>Plant Shoots - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Populus</topic><topic>Populus - physiology</topic><topic>Populus - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Research Papers</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Stems</topic><topic>stomatal conductance</topic><topic>Vegetal Biology</topic><topic>Water - physiology</topic><topic>water relations</topic><topic>Water relations, transpiration, stomata</topic><topic>Xylem</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hukin, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochard, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dreyer, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiec, D. Le</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogeat-Triboulot, M. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental botany</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hukin, D.</au><au>Cochard, H.</au><au>Dreyer, E.</au><au>Thiec, D. Le</au><au>Bogeat-Triboulot, M. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cavitation vulnerability in roots and shoots: does Populus euphratica Oliv., a poplar from arid areas of Central Asia, differ from other poplar species?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental botany</jtitle><addtitle>J. Exp. Bot</addtitle><date>2005-08-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>418</issue><spage>2003</spage><epage>2010</epage><pages>2003-2010</pages><issn>0022-0957</issn><eissn>1460-2431</eissn><coden>JEBOA6</coden><abstract>Populus euphratica is a poplar species growing in arid regions of Central Asia, where its distribution remains nevertheless restricted to river-banks or to areas with an access to deep water tables. To test whether the hydraulic architecture of this species differs from that of other poplars with respect to this ecological distribution, the vulnerability to cavitation of P. euphratica was compared with that of P. alba and of P. trichocarpa×koreana. The occurrence of a potential hydraulic segmentation through cavitation was also investigated by assessing the vulnerability of roots, stems, and leaf mid-rib veins. Cryo-scanning electron microscopy (cryo-SEM) was used to assess the level of embolism in fine roots and leaf mid-ribs and a low pressure flowmeter (LPFM) was used for stems and main roots. The cryo-SEM technique was validated against LPFM measurements on paired samples. In P. alba and P. trichocarpa×koreana, leaf mid-ribs were more vulnerable to cavitation than stems and roots. In P. euphratica, leaf mid-ribs and stems were equally vulnerable and, contrary to what has been observed in other species, roots were significantly less vulnerable than shoots. P. euphratica was by far the most vulnerable. The water potential inducing 50% loss of conductivity in stems was close to −0.7 MPa, against ∼ −1.45 MPa for the two others species. Such a large vulnerability was confirmed by recording losses of conductivity during a gradual drought. Moreover, significant stem embolism was recorded before stomatal closure, indicating the lack of an efficient safety margin for hydraulic functions in this species. Embolism was not reversed by rewatering. These observations are discussed with respect to the ecology of P. euphratica.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>15967780</pmid><doi>10.1093/jxb/eri198</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3015-488X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4204-551X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2727-7072</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0957 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental botany, 2005-08, Vol.56 (418), p.2003-2010 |
issn | 0022-0957 1460-2431 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01189134v1 |
source | MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Asia Biological and medical sciences Botanics Cavitation flow Drought Economic plant physiology embolism Embolisms Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology hydraulic architecture Hydraulic conductivity hydraulic segmentation Hydraulics Hydrostatic Pressure Life Sciences phreatophyte Plant Leaves - physiology Plant Leaves - ultrastructure Plant roots Plant Roots - physiology Plant Roots - ultrastructure Plant Shoots - physiology Plant Shoots - ultrastructure Plants Populus Populus - physiology Populus - ultrastructure Pressure Research Papers Soil water Species Specificity Stems stomatal conductance Vegetal Biology Water - physiology water relations Water relations, transpiration, stomata Xylem |
title | Cavitation vulnerability in roots and shoots: does Populus euphratica Oliv., a poplar from arid areas of Central Asia, differ from other poplar species? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T04%3A23%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cavitation%20vulnerability%20in%20roots%20and%20shoots:%20does%20Populus%20euphratica%20Oliv.,%20a%20poplar%20from%20arid%20areas%20of%20Central%20Asia,%20differ%20from%20other%20poplar%20species?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20botany&rft.au=Hukin,%20D.&rft.date=2005-08-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=418&rft.spage=2003&rft.epage=2010&rft.pages=2003-2010&rft.issn=0022-0957&rft.eissn=1460-2431&rft.coden=JEBOA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jxb/eri198&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_hal_p%3E24031284%3C/jstor_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=235006636&rft_id=info:pmid/15967780&rft_jstor_id=24031284&rfr_iscdi=true |