The Three Domains structure of energy-climate transitions
This paper argues that the development of energy systems rests on a combination of three different domains of socio-economic processes and associated modes of decision-making. For shorthand these are termed ‘satisficing’, ‘optimising’, and ‘transforming’ domains, with corresponding underpinnings fou...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Technological forecasting & social change 2015-09, Vol.98, p.290-302 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 302 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 290 |
container_title | Technological forecasting & social change |
container_volume | 98 |
creator | Grubb, Michael Hourcade, Jean-Charles Neuhoff, Karsten |
description | This paper argues that the development of energy systems rests on a combination of three different domains of socio-economic processes and associated modes of decision-making. For shorthand these are termed ‘satisficing’, ‘optimising’, and ‘transforming’ domains, with corresponding underpinnings found in behavioural, neoclassical, and evolutionary economics respectively. Each domain operates at different scales of time and personal/organisational/societal decision-making, and explains different characteristics of how energy systems develop. At least since the industrial revolution, the nature of energy systems has depended on government policy, and each domain implies a need for different policy instruments; the combination of all three lays the foundations for far more coherent, effective, and mutually reinforcing policies, including those required to transform energy systems in the light of environmental constraints. The approach also provides a coherent theoretical framework for understanding the conditions under which co-benefits and ‘green growth’ may emerge from environmental policy.
•Delineates different scales, levels and theories of economic processes involved in transitions•Classifies ‘Three Domains’ drawing on a diversity of different economic theories•Explains why this going beyond ‘market failures’ frame aids a fuller understanding•Shows how the different domains imply different pillars of policy•Illustrates how these can interact as packages to transform energy systems |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.05.009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01187841v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0040162515001286</els_id><sourcerecordid>1778058805</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c660t-8b05f71ac17c7464378f16295b3b462b5536d0b55d6ddd2f53de0fb8ac3dd8523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9r3DAQxUVJoNskX6EYemkP3o4s649vCUnbFBZy2ZyFLI27WrxWIsmBfPvIbJNDLw2MGBh-83ijR8hnCmsKVHzfrzPa3RAirhugfA2loPtAVlRJVnMO3QlZAbRQU9Hwj-RTSnsAkEyJFem2O6y2u4hY3YSD8VOqUo6zzXPEKgwVThj_PNd29AeTscrRTMlnH6Z0Tk4HMya8-NvPyP3PH9vr23pz9-v39dWmtkJArlUPfJDUWCqtbEXLpBqKj473rG9F03POhIPSnHDONQNnDmHolbHMOcUbdka-HXV3ZtQPsfiIzzoYr2-vNnqZAS2HqpY-0cJ-PbIPMTzOmLI--GRxHM2EYU6aSqmAq_LegbaiyLKmK-iXf9B9mONUji4UZVLStlsocaRsDClFHN7MUtBLUHqvX4PSS1AaSsGyeHlcxPKLTx6jTtbjZNH5iDZrF_z_JF4ACGyc-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1713771499</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Three Domains structure of energy-climate transitions</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Grubb, Michael ; Hourcade, Jean-Charles ; Neuhoff, Karsten</creator><creatorcontrib>Grubb, Michael ; Hourcade, Jean-Charles ; Neuhoff, Karsten</creatorcontrib><description>This paper argues that the development of energy systems rests on a combination of three different domains of socio-economic processes and associated modes of decision-making. For shorthand these are termed ‘satisficing’, ‘optimising’, and ‘transforming’ domains, with corresponding underpinnings found in behavioural, neoclassical, and evolutionary economics respectively. Each domain operates at different scales of time and personal/organisational/societal decision-making, and explains different characteristics of how energy systems develop. At least since the industrial revolution, the nature of energy systems has depended on government policy, and each domain implies a need for different policy instruments; the combination of all three lays the foundations for far more coherent, effective, and mutually reinforcing policies, including those required to transform energy systems in the light of environmental constraints. The approach also provides a coherent theoretical framework for understanding the conditions under which co-benefits and ‘green growth’ may emerge from environmental policy.
•Delineates different scales, levels and theories of economic processes involved in transitions•Classifies ‘Three Domains’ drawing on a diversity of different economic theories•Explains why this going beyond ‘market failures’ frame aids a fuller understanding•Shows how the different domains imply different pillars of policy•Illustrates how these can interact as packages to transform energy systems</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-1625</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5509</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.05.009</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Behavioral decision theory ; Behavioural ; Behavioural economics ; Clean technology ; Climate policy ; Coherence ; Decision making ; Economic growth ; Economics ; Energy ; Energy innovation ; Energy policy ; Energy transitions ; Environmental economics ; Environmental policy ; Environmental Sciences ; Evolutionary ; Evolutionary economics ; Governments ; Industrial Revolution ; Optimization ; Socioeconomic factors ; Studies ; Sustainable development ; Three Domains</subject><ispartof>Technological forecasting & social change, 2015-09, Vol.98, p.290-302</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Sep 2015</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c660t-8b05f71ac17c7464378f16295b3b462b5536d0b55d6ddd2f53de0fb8ac3dd8523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c660t-8b05f71ac17c7464378f16295b3b462b5536d0b55d6ddd2f53de0fb8ac3dd8523</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2393-3041</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162515001286$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,33751,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://enpc.hal.science/hal-01187841$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grubb, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hourcade, Jean-Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neuhoff, Karsten</creatorcontrib><title>The Three Domains structure of energy-climate transitions</title><title>Technological forecasting & social change</title><description>This paper argues that the development of energy systems rests on a combination of three different domains of socio-economic processes and associated modes of decision-making. For shorthand these are termed ‘satisficing’, ‘optimising’, and ‘transforming’ domains, with corresponding underpinnings found in behavioural, neoclassical, and evolutionary economics respectively. Each domain operates at different scales of time and personal/organisational/societal decision-making, and explains different characteristics of how energy systems develop. At least since the industrial revolution, the nature of energy systems has depended on government policy, and each domain implies a need for different policy instruments; the combination of all three lays the foundations for far more coherent, effective, and mutually reinforcing policies, including those required to transform energy systems in the light of environmental constraints. The approach also provides a coherent theoretical framework for understanding the conditions under which co-benefits and ‘green growth’ may emerge from environmental policy.
•Delineates different scales, levels and theories of economic processes involved in transitions•Classifies ‘Three Domains’ drawing on a diversity of different economic theories•Explains why this going beyond ‘market failures’ frame aids a fuller understanding•Shows how the different domains imply different pillars of policy•Illustrates how these can interact as packages to transform energy systems</description><subject>Behavioral decision theory</subject><subject>Behavioural</subject><subject>Behavioural economics</subject><subject>Clean technology</subject><subject>Climate policy</subject><subject>Coherence</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy innovation</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Energy transitions</subject><subject>Environmental economics</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Evolutionary</subject><subject>Evolutionary economics</subject><subject>Governments</subject><subject>Industrial Revolution</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Three Domains</subject><issn>0040-1625</issn><issn>1873-5509</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9r3DAQxUVJoNskX6EYemkP3o4s649vCUnbFBZy2ZyFLI27WrxWIsmBfPvIbJNDLw2MGBh-83ijR8hnCmsKVHzfrzPa3RAirhugfA2loPtAVlRJVnMO3QlZAbRQU9Hwj-RTSnsAkEyJFem2O6y2u4hY3YSD8VOqUo6zzXPEKgwVThj_PNd29AeTscrRTMlnH6Z0Tk4HMya8-NvPyP3PH9vr23pz9-v39dWmtkJArlUPfJDUWCqtbEXLpBqKj473rG9F03POhIPSnHDONQNnDmHolbHMOcUbdka-HXV3ZtQPsfiIzzoYr2-vNnqZAS2HqpY-0cJ-PbIPMTzOmLI--GRxHM2EYU6aSqmAq_LegbaiyLKmK-iXf9B9mONUji4UZVLStlsocaRsDClFHN7MUtBLUHqvX4PSS1AaSsGyeHlcxPKLTx6jTtbjZNH5iDZrF_z_JF4ACGyc-w</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Grubb, Michael</creator><creator>Hourcade, Jean-Charles</creator><creator>Neuhoff, Karsten</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2393-3041</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>The Three Domains structure of energy-climate transitions</title><author>Grubb, Michael ; Hourcade, Jean-Charles ; Neuhoff, Karsten</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c660t-8b05f71ac17c7464378f16295b3b462b5536d0b55d6ddd2f53de0fb8ac3dd8523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Behavioral decision theory</topic><topic>Behavioural</topic><topic>Behavioural economics</topic><topic>Clean technology</topic><topic>Climate policy</topic><topic>Coherence</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy innovation</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Energy transitions</topic><topic>Environmental economics</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Evolutionary</topic><topic>Evolutionary economics</topic><topic>Governments</topic><topic>Industrial Revolution</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Three Domains</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grubb, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hourcade, Jean-Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neuhoff, Karsten</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Technological forecasting & social change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grubb, Michael</au><au>Hourcade, Jean-Charles</au><au>Neuhoff, Karsten</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Three Domains structure of energy-climate transitions</atitle><jtitle>Technological forecasting & social change</jtitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>98</volume><spage>290</spage><epage>302</epage><pages>290-302</pages><issn>0040-1625</issn><eissn>1873-5509</eissn><abstract>This paper argues that the development of energy systems rests on a combination of three different domains of socio-economic processes and associated modes of decision-making. For shorthand these are termed ‘satisficing’, ‘optimising’, and ‘transforming’ domains, with corresponding underpinnings found in behavioural, neoclassical, and evolutionary economics respectively. Each domain operates at different scales of time and personal/organisational/societal decision-making, and explains different characteristics of how energy systems develop. At least since the industrial revolution, the nature of energy systems has depended on government policy, and each domain implies a need for different policy instruments; the combination of all three lays the foundations for far more coherent, effective, and mutually reinforcing policies, including those required to transform energy systems in the light of environmental constraints. The approach also provides a coherent theoretical framework for understanding the conditions under which co-benefits and ‘green growth’ may emerge from environmental policy.
•Delineates different scales, levels and theories of economic processes involved in transitions•Classifies ‘Three Domains’ drawing on a diversity of different economic theories•Explains why this going beyond ‘market failures’ frame aids a fuller understanding•Shows how the different domains imply different pillars of policy•Illustrates how these can interact as packages to transform energy systems</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.techfore.2015.05.009</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2393-3041</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0040-1625 |
ispartof | Technological forecasting & social change, 2015-09, Vol.98, p.290-302 |
issn | 0040-1625 1873-5509 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01187841v1 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Behavioral decision theory Behavioural Behavioural economics Clean technology Climate policy Coherence Decision making Economic growth Economics Energy Energy innovation Energy policy Energy transitions Environmental economics Environmental policy Environmental Sciences Evolutionary Evolutionary economics Governments Industrial Revolution Optimization Socioeconomic factors Studies Sustainable development Three Domains |
title | The Three Domains structure of energy-climate transitions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T04%3A01%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Three%20Domains%20structure%20of%20energy-climate%20transitions&rft.jtitle=Technological%20forecasting%20&%20social%20change&rft.au=Grubb,%20Michael&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=98&rft.spage=290&rft.epage=302&rft.pages=290-302&rft.issn=0040-1625&rft.eissn=1873-5509&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.05.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1778058805%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1713771499&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0040162515001286&rfr_iscdi=true |