Simulation of rainfall anomalies leading to the 2005 drought in Amazonia using the CLARIS LPB regional climate models

The meteorological characteristics of the drought of 2005 in Amazonia, one of the most severe in the last 100 years were assessed using a suite of seven regional models obtained from the CLARIS LPB project. The models were forced with the ERA-Interim reanalyses as boundary conditions. We used a comb...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Climate dynamics 2013-12, Vol.41 (11-12), p.2937-2955
Hauptverfasser: Marengo, J., Chou, S., Mourao, C., Solman, S., Sanchez, E., Samuelsson, P., da Rocha, R. P., Li, L., Pessacg, N., Remedio, A. R. C., Carril, A. F., F Cavalcanti, I., Jacob, D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2955
container_issue 11-12
container_start_page 2937
container_title Climate dynamics
container_volume 41
creator Marengo, J.
Chou, S.
Mourao, C.
Solman, S.
Sanchez, E.
Samuelsson, P.
da Rocha, R. P.
Li, L.
Pessacg, N.
Remedio, A. R. C.
Carril, A. F.
F Cavalcanti, I.
Jacob, D.
description The meteorological characteristics of the drought of 2005 in Amazonia, one of the most severe in the last 100 years were assessed using a suite of seven regional models obtained from the CLARIS LPB project. The models were forced with the ERA-Interim reanalyses as boundary conditions. We used a combination of rainfall and temperature observations and the low-level circulation and evaporation fields from the reanalyses to determine the climatic and meteorological characteristics of this particular drought. The models reproduce in some degree the observed annual cycle of precipitation and the geographical distribution of negative rainfall anomalies during the summer months of 2005. With respect to the evolution of rainfall during 2004–2006, some of the models were able to simulate the negative rainfall departures during early summer of 2005 (December 2004 to February 2005). The interannual variability of rainfall anomalies for both austral summer and fall over northern and southern Amazonia show a large spread among models, with some of them capable of reproducing the 2005 observed negative rainfall departures (four out of seven models in southern Amazonia during DJF). In comparison, all models simulated the observed southern Amazonia negative rainfall and positive air temperature anomalies during the El Nino-related drought in 1998. The spatial structure of the simulated rainfall and temperature anomalies in DJF and MAM 2005 shows biases that are different among models. While some models simulated the observed negative rainfall anomalies over parts of western and southern Amazonia during DJF, others simulated positive rainfall departures over central Amazonia. The simulated circulation patterns indicate a weaker northeasterly flow from the tropical North Atlantic into Amazonia, and reduced flows from southern Amazonia into the La Plata basin in DJF, which is consistent with observations. In general, we can say that in some degree the regional models are able to capture the response to the forcing from the tropical Atlantic during the drought of 2005 in Amazonia. Moreover, extreme climatic conditions in response to anomalous low-level circulation features are also well captured, since the boundary conditions come from reanalysis and the models are largely constrained by the information provided at the boundaries. The analysis of the 2005 drought suggests that when the forcing leading to extreme anomalous conditions is associated with both local and non-local
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00382-013-1919-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01103536v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A353212376</galeid><sourcerecordid>A353212376</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-45c6eb7af1a673ce02fccea0660e410ee4fbc6c259dce40d10b9fad1a09534833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kt-L1DAQx4souJ7-Ab4FRNGHnpOmP7aP66J3CwXlVp_DbDrt5kibM0lF_etNr8t5J0geApPPfGfmm0mSlxzOOUD13gOIdZYCFymveZ3yR8mK5yJG1nX-OFlBLSCtiqp4mjzz_hqA52WVrZJpr4fJYNB2ZLZjDvXYoTEMRzug0eSZIWz12LNgWTgSywAK1jo79cfA9Mg2A_62o0Y2-VsqIttmc7Xbs-bLB-aoj8pomDJ6wEBssC0Z_zx5Eqt4enG6z5Jvnz5-3V6mzeeL3XbTpKooIaR5oUo6VNhxLCuhCLJOKUIoS6CcA1HeHVSpsqJuFeXQcjjUHbYcoS5EvhbiLHm36B7RyBsXW3C_pEUtLzeNnGPAOYhClD94ZN8u7I2z3yfyQQ7aKzIGR7KTl9GwdbSYi3VEX_2DXtvJxTFnqqgFn8lInS9Uj4Zk9NUGhyqelgat7EidjvFNLJ_xTFTl325PCZEJ9DP0OHkvd_urh-ybe-yR0ISjt2aaP9I_BPkCKme9d9Td-cBBzqsjl9WJVgg5r46crXh9mg-9QtM5HJX2d4lZVZdVXcza2cL5-DT25O758F_xPzMCzzs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1459316838</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Simulation of rainfall anomalies leading to the 2005 drought in Amazonia using the CLARIS LPB regional climate models</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Marengo, J. ; Chou, S. ; Mourao, C. ; Solman, S. ; Sanchez, E. ; Samuelsson, P. ; da Rocha, R. P. ; Li, L. ; Pessacg, N. ; Remedio, A. R. C. ; Carril, A. F. ; F Cavalcanti, I. ; Jacob, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Marengo, J. ; Chou, S. ; Mourao, C. ; Solman, S. ; Sanchez, E. ; Samuelsson, P. ; da Rocha, R. P. ; Li, L. ; Pessacg, N. ; Remedio, A. R. C. ; Carril, A. F. ; F Cavalcanti, I. ; Jacob, D.</creatorcontrib><description>The meteorological characteristics of the drought of 2005 in Amazonia, one of the most severe in the last 100 years were assessed using a suite of seven regional models obtained from the CLARIS LPB project. The models were forced with the ERA-Interim reanalyses as boundary conditions. We used a combination of rainfall and temperature observations and the low-level circulation and evaporation fields from the reanalyses to determine the climatic and meteorological characteristics of this particular drought. The models reproduce in some degree the observed annual cycle of precipitation and the geographical distribution of negative rainfall anomalies during the summer months of 2005. With respect to the evolution of rainfall during 2004–2006, some of the models were able to simulate the negative rainfall departures during early summer of 2005 (December 2004 to February 2005). The interannual variability of rainfall anomalies for both austral summer and fall over northern and southern Amazonia show a large spread among models, with some of them capable of reproducing the 2005 observed negative rainfall departures (four out of seven models in southern Amazonia during DJF). In comparison, all models simulated the observed southern Amazonia negative rainfall and positive air temperature anomalies during the El Nino-related drought in 1998. The spatial structure of the simulated rainfall and temperature anomalies in DJF and MAM 2005 shows biases that are different among models. While some models simulated the observed negative rainfall anomalies over parts of western and southern Amazonia during DJF, others simulated positive rainfall departures over central Amazonia. The simulated circulation patterns indicate a weaker northeasterly flow from the tropical North Atlantic into Amazonia, and reduced flows from southern Amazonia into the La Plata basin in DJF, which is consistent with observations. In general, we can say that in some degree the regional models are able to capture the response to the forcing from the tropical Atlantic during the drought of 2005 in Amazonia. Moreover, extreme climatic conditions in response to anomalous low-level circulation features are also well captured, since the boundary conditions come from reanalysis and the models are largely constrained by the information provided at the boundaries. The analysis of the 2005 drought suggests that when the forcing leading to extreme anomalous conditions is associated with both local and non-local mechanisms (soil moisture feedbacks and remote SST anomalies, respectively) the models are not fully capable of representing these feedbacks and hence, the associated anomalies. The reason may be a deficient reproduction of the land–atmosphere interactions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-7575</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0894</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00382-013-1919-1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CLDYEM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Air temperature ; Argentina ; Atmospheric circulation ; Boundary conditions ; Climate models ; Climatic conditions ; Climatology ; Drought ; Droughts ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; El Nino ; Environmental aspects ; Evaporation ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Geographical distribution ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Hydrology ; Meteorology ; Ocean currents ; Oceanography ; Rain ; Rain and rainfall ; Rivers ; Sciences of the Universe ; Seasons ; Simulated rainfall ; Soil moisture ; Summer ; Temperature ; Water in the atmosphere (humidity, clouds, evaporation, precipitation)</subject><ispartof>Climate dynamics, 2013-12, Vol.41 (11-12), p.2937-2955</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Springer</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-45c6eb7af1a673ce02fccea0660e410ee4fbc6c259dce40d10b9fad1a09534833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-45c6eb7af1a673ce02fccea0660e410ee4fbc6c259dce40d10b9fad1a09534833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00382-013-1919-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00382-013-1919-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27967956$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01103536$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marengo, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mourao, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solman, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samuelsson, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Rocha, R. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pessacg, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remedio, A. R. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carril, A. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>F Cavalcanti, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacob, D.</creatorcontrib><title>Simulation of rainfall anomalies leading to the 2005 drought in Amazonia using the CLARIS LPB regional climate models</title><title>Climate dynamics</title><addtitle>Clim Dyn</addtitle><description>The meteorological characteristics of the drought of 2005 in Amazonia, one of the most severe in the last 100 years were assessed using a suite of seven regional models obtained from the CLARIS LPB project. The models were forced with the ERA-Interim reanalyses as boundary conditions. We used a combination of rainfall and temperature observations and the low-level circulation and evaporation fields from the reanalyses to determine the climatic and meteorological characteristics of this particular drought. The models reproduce in some degree the observed annual cycle of precipitation and the geographical distribution of negative rainfall anomalies during the summer months of 2005. With respect to the evolution of rainfall during 2004–2006, some of the models were able to simulate the negative rainfall departures during early summer of 2005 (December 2004 to February 2005). The interannual variability of rainfall anomalies for both austral summer and fall over northern and southern Amazonia show a large spread among models, with some of them capable of reproducing the 2005 observed negative rainfall departures (four out of seven models in southern Amazonia during DJF). In comparison, all models simulated the observed southern Amazonia negative rainfall and positive air temperature anomalies during the El Nino-related drought in 1998. The spatial structure of the simulated rainfall and temperature anomalies in DJF and MAM 2005 shows biases that are different among models. While some models simulated the observed negative rainfall anomalies over parts of western and southern Amazonia during DJF, others simulated positive rainfall departures over central Amazonia. The simulated circulation patterns indicate a weaker northeasterly flow from the tropical North Atlantic into Amazonia, and reduced flows from southern Amazonia into the La Plata basin in DJF, which is consistent with observations. In general, we can say that in some degree the regional models are able to capture the response to the forcing from the tropical Atlantic during the drought of 2005 in Amazonia. Moreover, extreme climatic conditions in response to anomalous low-level circulation features are also well captured, since the boundary conditions come from reanalysis and the models are largely constrained by the information provided at the boundaries. The analysis of the 2005 drought suggests that when the forcing leading to extreme anomalous conditions is associated with both local and non-local mechanisms (soil moisture feedbacks and remote SST anomalies, respectively) the models are not fully capable of representing these feedbacks and hence, the associated anomalies. The reason may be a deficient reproduction of the land–atmosphere interactions.</description><subject>Air temperature</subject><subject>Argentina</subject><subject>Atmospheric circulation</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Climatic conditions</subject><subject>Climatology</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Droughts</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>El Nino</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Evaporation</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Ocean currents</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rain and rainfall</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sciences of the Universe</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Simulated rainfall</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Water in the atmosphere (humidity, clouds, evaporation, precipitation)</subject><issn>0930-7575</issn><issn>1432-0894</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kt-L1DAQx4souJ7-Ab4FRNGHnpOmP7aP66J3CwXlVp_DbDrt5kibM0lF_etNr8t5J0geApPPfGfmm0mSlxzOOUD13gOIdZYCFymveZ3yR8mK5yJG1nX-OFlBLSCtiqp4mjzz_hqA52WVrZJpr4fJYNB2ZLZjDvXYoTEMRzug0eSZIWz12LNgWTgSywAK1jo79cfA9Mg2A_62o0Y2-VsqIttmc7Xbs-bLB-aoj8pomDJ6wEBssC0Z_zx5Eqt4enG6z5Jvnz5-3V6mzeeL3XbTpKooIaR5oUo6VNhxLCuhCLJOKUIoS6CcA1HeHVSpsqJuFeXQcjjUHbYcoS5EvhbiLHm36B7RyBsXW3C_pEUtLzeNnGPAOYhClD94ZN8u7I2z3yfyQQ7aKzIGR7KTl9GwdbSYi3VEX_2DXtvJxTFnqqgFn8lInS9Uj4Zk9NUGhyqelgat7EidjvFNLJ_xTFTl325PCZEJ9DP0OHkvd_urh-ybe-yR0ISjt2aaP9I_BPkCKme9d9Td-cBBzqsjl9WJVgg5r46crXh9mg-9QtM5HJX2d4lZVZdVXcza2cL5-DT25O758F_xPzMCzzs</recordid><startdate>20131201</startdate><enddate>20131201</enddate><creator>Marengo, J.</creator><creator>Chou, S.</creator><creator>Mourao, C.</creator><creator>Solman, S.</creator><creator>Sanchez, E.</creator><creator>Samuelsson, P.</creator><creator>da Rocha, R. P.</creator><creator>Li, L.</creator><creator>Pessacg, N.</creator><creator>Remedio, A. R. C.</creator><creator>Carril, A. F.</creator><creator>F Cavalcanti, I.</creator><creator>Jacob, D.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>1XC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131201</creationdate><title>Simulation of rainfall anomalies leading to the 2005 drought in Amazonia using the CLARIS LPB regional climate models</title><author>Marengo, J. ; Chou, S. ; Mourao, C. ; Solman, S. ; Sanchez, E. ; Samuelsson, P. ; da Rocha, R. P. ; Li, L. ; Pessacg, N. ; Remedio, A. R. C. ; Carril, A. F. ; F Cavalcanti, I. ; Jacob, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-45c6eb7af1a673ce02fccea0660e410ee4fbc6c259dce40d10b9fad1a09534833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Air temperature</topic><topic>Argentina</topic><topic>Atmospheric circulation</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Climatic conditions</topic><topic>Climatology</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Droughts</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>El Nino</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Evaporation</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Ocean currents</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rain and rainfall</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sciences of the Universe</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Simulated rainfall</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Water in the atmosphere (humidity, clouds, evaporation, precipitation)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marengo, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mourao, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solman, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samuelsson, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Rocha, R. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pessacg, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remedio, A. R. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carril, A. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>F Cavalcanti, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacob, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Climate dynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marengo, J.</au><au>Chou, S.</au><au>Mourao, C.</au><au>Solman, S.</au><au>Sanchez, E.</au><au>Samuelsson, P.</au><au>da Rocha, R. P.</au><au>Li, L.</au><au>Pessacg, N.</au><au>Remedio, A. R. C.</au><au>Carril, A. F.</au><au>F Cavalcanti, I.</au><au>Jacob, D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Simulation of rainfall anomalies leading to the 2005 drought in Amazonia using the CLARIS LPB regional climate models</atitle><jtitle>Climate dynamics</jtitle><stitle>Clim Dyn</stitle><date>2013-12-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>11-12</issue><spage>2937</spage><epage>2955</epage><pages>2937-2955</pages><issn>0930-7575</issn><eissn>1432-0894</eissn><coden>CLDYEM</coden><abstract>The meteorological characteristics of the drought of 2005 in Amazonia, one of the most severe in the last 100 years were assessed using a suite of seven regional models obtained from the CLARIS LPB project. The models were forced with the ERA-Interim reanalyses as boundary conditions. We used a combination of rainfall and temperature observations and the low-level circulation and evaporation fields from the reanalyses to determine the climatic and meteorological characteristics of this particular drought. The models reproduce in some degree the observed annual cycle of precipitation and the geographical distribution of negative rainfall anomalies during the summer months of 2005. With respect to the evolution of rainfall during 2004–2006, some of the models were able to simulate the negative rainfall departures during early summer of 2005 (December 2004 to February 2005). The interannual variability of rainfall anomalies for both austral summer and fall over northern and southern Amazonia show a large spread among models, with some of them capable of reproducing the 2005 observed negative rainfall departures (four out of seven models in southern Amazonia during DJF). In comparison, all models simulated the observed southern Amazonia negative rainfall and positive air temperature anomalies during the El Nino-related drought in 1998. The spatial structure of the simulated rainfall and temperature anomalies in DJF and MAM 2005 shows biases that are different among models. While some models simulated the observed negative rainfall anomalies over parts of western and southern Amazonia during DJF, others simulated positive rainfall departures over central Amazonia. The simulated circulation patterns indicate a weaker northeasterly flow from the tropical North Atlantic into Amazonia, and reduced flows from southern Amazonia into the La Plata basin in DJF, which is consistent with observations. In general, we can say that in some degree the regional models are able to capture the response to the forcing from the tropical Atlantic during the drought of 2005 in Amazonia. Moreover, extreme climatic conditions in response to anomalous low-level circulation features are also well captured, since the boundary conditions come from reanalysis and the models are largely constrained by the information provided at the boundaries. The analysis of the 2005 drought suggests that when the forcing leading to extreme anomalous conditions is associated with both local and non-local mechanisms (soil moisture feedbacks and remote SST anomalies, respectively) the models are not fully capable of representing these feedbacks and hence, the associated anomalies. The reason may be a deficient reproduction of the land–atmosphere interactions.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00382-013-1919-1</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0930-7575
ispartof Climate dynamics, 2013-12, Vol.41 (11-12), p.2937-2955
issn 0930-7575
1432-0894
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01103536v1
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Air temperature
Argentina
Atmospheric circulation
Boundary conditions
Climate models
Climatic conditions
Climatology
Drought
Droughts
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Earth, ocean, space
El Nino
Environmental aspects
Evaporation
Exact sciences and technology
External geophysics
Geographical distribution
Geophysics/Geodesy
Hydrology
Meteorology
Ocean currents
Oceanography
Rain
Rain and rainfall
Rivers
Sciences of the Universe
Seasons
Simulated rainfall
Soil moisture
Summer
Temperature
Water in the atmosphere (humidity, clouds, evaporation, precipitation)
title Simulation of rainfall anomalies leading to the 2005 drought in Amazonia using the CLARIS LPB regional climate models
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T14%3A40%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Simulation%20of%20rainfall%20anomalies%20leading%20to%20the%202005%20drought%20in%20Amazonia%20using%20the%20CLARIS%20LPB%20regional%20climate%20models&rft.jtitle=Climate%20dynamics&rft.au=Marengo,%20J.&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=11-12&rft.spage=2937&rft.epage=2955&rft.pages=2937-2955&rft.issn=0930-7575&rft.eissn=1432-0894&rft.coden=CLDYEM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00382-013-1919-1&rft_dat=%3Cgale_hal_p%3EA353212376%3C/gale_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1459316838&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A353212376&rfr_iscdi=true