Comparison of CH4 inversions based on 15 months of GOSAT and SCIAMACHY observations

Over the past decade the development of Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Chartography (SCIAMACHY) retrievals has increased the interest in the use of satellite measurements for studying the global sources and sinks of methane. Meanwhile, measurements are becoming available fr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres 2013-10, Vol.118 (20), p.11,807-11,823
Hauptverfasser: Monteil, Guillaume, Houweling, Sander, Butz, André, Guerlet, Sandrine, Schepers, Dinand, Hasekamp, Otto, Frankenberg, Christian, Scheepmaker, Remco, Aben, Ilse, Röckmann, Thomas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 11,823
container_issue 20
container_start_page 11,807
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres
container_volume 118
creator Monteil, Guillaume
Houweling, Sander
Butz, André
Guerlet, Sandrine
Schepers, Dinand
Hasekamp, Otto
Frankenberg, Christian
Scheepmaker, Remco
Aben, Ilse
Röckmann, Thomas
description Over the past decade the development of Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Chartography (SCIAMACHY) retrievals has increased the interest in the use of satellite measurements for studying the global sources and sinks of methane. Meanwhile, measurements are becoming available from the more advanced Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT). The aim of this study is to investigate the application of GOSAT retrievals to inverse modeling, for which we make use of the TM5‐4DVAR inverse modeling framework. Inverse modeling calculations are performed using data from two different retrieval approaches: a full physics and a lightpath proxy ratio method. The performance of these inversions is analyzed in comparison with inversions using SCIAMACHY retrievals and measurements from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration‐Earth System Research Laboratory flask‐sampling network. In addition, we compare the inversion results against independent surface, aircraft, and total‐column measurements. Inversions with GOSAT data show good agreement with surface measurements, whereas for SCIAMACHY a similar performance can only be achieved after significant bias corrections. Some inconsistencies between surface and total‐column methane remain in the Southern Hemisphere. However, comparisons with measurements from the Total Column Carbon Observing Network in situ Fourier transform spectrometer network indicate that those may be caused by systematic model errors rather than by shortcomings in the GOSAT retrievals. The global patterns of methane emissions derived from SCIAMACHY (with bias correction) and GOSAT retrievals are in remarkable agreement and allow an increased resolution of tropical emissions. The satellite inversions increase tropical methane emission by 30 to 60 TgCH4/yr compared to initial a priori estimates, partly counterbalanced by reductions in emissions at midlatitudes to high latitudes. Key Points GOSAT and SCIAMACHY retrievals lead to comparable emission patterns GOSAT retrievals are found much less affected by biases than SCIAMACHY Combining satellite and in‐situ observations point to remaining inconsistencies
doi_str_mv 10.1002/2013JD019760
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01091235v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3531983821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-h3671-66aa5d355e6395536807ee1a69fbdaaef93f4f0e5625f0411304b2958329d4be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkd9LwzAQx4soKOqbf0BAfPChemmaNHks1XUbU8HNny_halNW3ZqZbFP_e1smw-PgjrvP98vBBcEJhQsKEF1GQNnwCqhKBOwEBxEVKpRKid1tnzzvB8fev0MbEljM44NgnNn5Al3tbUNsRbJ-TOpmbZyvbeNJgd6UpF1RTua2WU59B-V343RCsCnJOBukN2nWfyG28MatcdnJjoK9CmfeHP_Vw-Chdz3J-uHoLh9k6SicMpHQUAhEXjLOjWCKcyYkJMZQFKoqSkRTKVbFFRguIl5BTCmDuIgUlyxSZVwYdhicb3ynONMLV8_R_WiLte6nI93NgIKiEeNr2rKnG3bh7OfK-KV-tyvXtOdpKphkXECsWursj0L_hrPKYfNW-613JKFNAS3HNtxXPTM_2z0F3b1C_3-FHub3Vxyk7G4IN6raL833VoXuQ4uEJVw_3eb6cSLVay57OmG_HzWHdg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1638356049</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of CH4 inversions based on 15 months of GOSAT and SCIAMACHY observations</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Monteil, Guillaume ; Houweling, Sander ; Butz, André ; Guerlet, Sandrine ; Schepers, Dinand ; Hasekamp, Otto ; Frankenberg, Christian ; Scheepmaker, Remco ; Aben, Ilse ; Röckmann, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Monteil, Guillaume ; Houweling, Sander ; Butz, André ; Guerlet, Sandrine ; Schepers, Dinand ; Hasekamp, Otto ; Frankenberg, Christian ; Scheepmaker, Remco ; Aben, Ilse ; Röckmann, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>Over the past decade the development of Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Chartography (SCIAMACHY) retrievals has increased the interest in the use of satellite measurements for studying the global sources and sinks of methane. Meanwhile, measurements are becoming available from the more advanced Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT). The aim of this study is to investigate the application of GOSAT retrievals to inverse modeling, for which we make use of the TM5‐4DVAR inverse modeling framework. Inverse modeling calculations are performed using data from two different retrieval approaches: a full physics and a lightpath proxy ratio method. The performance of these inversions is analyzed in comparison with inversions using SCIAMACHY retrievals and measurements from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration‐Earth System Research Laboratory flask‐sampling network. In addition, we compare the inversion results against independent surface, aircraft, and total‐column measurements. Inversions with GOSAT data show good agreement with surface measurements, whereas for SCIAMACHY a similar performance can only be achieved after significant bias corrections. Some inconsistencies between surface and total‐column methane remain in the Southern Hemisphere. However, comparisons with measurements from the Total Column Carbon Observing Network in situ Fourier transform spectrometer network indicate that those may be caused by systematic model errors rather than by shortcomings in the GOSAT retrievals. The global patterns of methane emissions derived from SCIAMACHY (with bias correction) and GOSAT retrievals are in remarkable agreement and allow an increased resolution of tropical emissions. The satellite inversions increase tropical methane emission by 30 to 60 TgCH4/yr compared to initial a priori estimates, partly counterbalanced by reductions in emissions at midlatitudes to high latitudes. Key Points GOSAT and SCIAMACHY retrievals lead to comparable emission patterns GOSAT retrievals are found much less affected by biases than SCIAMACHY Combining satellite and in‐situ observations point to remaining inconsistencies</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-897X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8996</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2013JD019760</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Bias ; Earth, ocean, space ; Emissions ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Fourier transforms ; Geophysics ; GOSAT ; Greenhouse gases ; inverse modelling ; Meteorology ; Methane ; Ocean, Atmosphere ; Satellites ; SCIAMACHY ; Sciences of the Universe</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2013-10, Vol.118 (20), p.11,807-11,823</ispartof><rights>2013. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-5019-899X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2013JD019760$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2013JD019760$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28028060$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01091235$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Monteil, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houweling, Sander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butz, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerlet, Sandrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schepers, Dinand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasekamp, Otto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frankenberg, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheepmaker, Remco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aben, Ilse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Röckmann, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of CH4 inversions based on 15 months of GOSAT and SCIAMACHY observations</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Atmos</addtitle><description>Over the past decade the development of Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Chartography (SCIAMACHY) retrievals has increased the interest in the use of satellite measurements for studying the global sources and sinks of methane. Meanwhile, measurements are becoming available from the more advanced Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT). The aim of this study is to investigate the application of GOSAT retrievals to inverse modeling, for which we make use of the TM5‐4DVAR inverse modeling framework. Inverse modeling calculations are performed using data from two different retrieval approaches: a full physics and a lightpath proxy ratio method. The performance of these inversions is analyzed in comparison with inversions using SCIAMACHY retrievals and measurements from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration‐Earth System Research Laboratory flask‐sampling network. In addition, we compare the inversion results against independent surface, aircraft, and total‐column measurements. Inversions with GOSAT data show good agreement with surface measurements, whereas for SCIAMACHY a similar performance can only be achieved after significant bias corrections. Some inconsistencies between surface and total‐column methane remain in the Southern Hemisphere. However, comparisons with measurements from the Total Column Carbon Observing Network in situ Fourier transform spectrometer network indicate that those may be caused by systematic model errors rather than by shortcomings in the GOSAT retrievals. The global patterns of methane emissions derived from SCIAMACHY (with bias correction) and GOSAT retrievals are in remarkable agreement and allow an increased resolution of tropical emissions. The satellite inversions increase tropical methane emission by 30 to 60 TgCH4/yr compared to initial a priori estimates, partly counterbalanced by reductions in emissions at midlatitudes to high latitudes. Key Points GOSAT and SCIAMACHY retrievals lead to comparable emission patterns GOSAT retrievals are found much less affected by biases than SCIAMACHY Combining satellite and in‐situ observations point to remaining inconsistencies</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Fourier transforms</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>GOSAT</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>inverse modelling</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Ocean, Atmosphere</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>SCIAMACHY</subject><subject>Sciences of the Universe</subject><issn>2169-897X</issn><issn>2169-8996</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkd9LwzAQx4soKOqbf0BAfPChemmaNHks1XUbU8HNny_halNW3ZqZbFP_e1smw-PgjrvP98vBBcEJhQsKEF1GQNnwCqhKBOwEBxEVKpRKid1tnzzvB8fev0MbEljM44NgnNn5Al3tbUNsRbJ-TOpmbZyvbeNJgd6UpF1RTua2WU59B-V343RCsCnJOBukN2nWfyG28MatcdnJjoK9CmfeHP_Vw-Chdz3J-uHoLh9k6SicMpHQUAhEXjLOjWCKcyYkJMZQFKoqSkRTKVbFFRguIl5BTCmDuIgUlyxSZVwYdhicb3ynONMLV8_R_WiLte6nI93NgIKiEeNr2rKnG3bh7OfK-KV-tyvXtOdpKphkXECsWursj0L_hrPKYfNW-613JKFNAS3HNtxXPTM_2z0F3b1C_3-FHub3Vxyk7G4IN6raL833VoXuQ4uEJVw_3eb6cSLVay57OmG_HzWHdg</recordid><startdate>20131027</startdate><enddate>20131027</enddate><creator>Monteil, Guillaume</creator><creator>Houweling, Sander</creator><creator>Butz, André</creator><creator>Guerlet, Sandrine</creator><creator>Schepers, Dinand</creator><creator>Hasekamp, Otto</creator><creator>Frankenberg, Christian</creator><creator>Scheepmaker, Remco</creator><creator>Aben, Ilse</creator><creator>Röckmann, Thomas</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5019-899X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20131027</creationdate><title>Comparison of CH4 inversions based on 15 months of GOSAT and SCIAMACHY observations</title><author>Monteil, Guillaume ; Houweling, Sander ; Butz, André ; Guerlet, Sandrine ; Schepers, Dinand ; Hasekamp, Otto ; Frankenberg, Christian ; Scheepmaker, Remco ; Aben, Ilse ; Röckmann, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h3671-66aa5d355e6395536807ee1a69fbdaaef93f4f0e5625f0411304b2958329d4be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Fourier transforms</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>GOSAT</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>inverse modelling</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Ocean, Atmosphere</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>SCIAMACHY</topic><topic>Sciences of the Universe</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Monteil, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houweling, Sander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butz, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerlet, Sandrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schepers, Dinand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasekamp, Otto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frankenberg, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheepmaker, Remco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aben, Ilse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Röckmann, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Monteil, Guillaume</au><au>Houweling, Sander</au><au>Butz, André</au><au>Guerlet, Sandrine</au><au>Schepers, Dinand</au><au>Hasekamp, Otto</au><au>Frankenberg, Christian</au><au>Scheepmaker, Remco</au><au>Aben, Ilse</au><au>Röckmann, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of CH4 inversions based on 15 months of GOSAT and SCIAMACHY observations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Atmos</addtitle><date>2013-10-27</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>11,807</spage><epage>11,823</epage><pages>11,807-11,823</pages><issn>2169-897X</issn><eissn>2169-8996</eissn><abstract>Over the past decade the development of Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Chartography (SCIAMACHY) retrievals has increased the interest in the use of satellite measurements for studying the global sources and sinks of methane. Meanwhile, measurements are becoming available from the more advanced Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT). The aim of this study is to investigate the application of GOSAT retrievals to inverse modeling, for which we make use of the TM5‐4DVAR inverse modeling framework. Inverse modeling calculations are performed using data from two different retrieval approaches: a full physics and a lightpath proxy ratio method. The performance of these inversions is analyzed in comparison with inversions using SCIAMACHY retrievals and measurements from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration‐Earth System Research Laboratory flask‐sampling network. In addition, we compare the inversion results against independent surface, aircraft, and total‐column measurements. Inversions with GOSAT data show good agreement with surface measurements, whereas for SCIAMACHY a similar performance can only be achieved after significant bias corrections. Some inconsistencies between surface and total‐column methane remain in the Southern Hemisphere. However, comparisons with measurements from the Total Column Carbon Observing Network in situ Fourier transform spectrometer network indicate that those may be caused by systematic model errors rather than by shortcomings in the GOSAT retrievals. The global patterns of methane emissions derived from SCIAMACHY (with bias correction) and GOSAT retrievals are in remarkable agreement and allow an increased resolution of tropical emissions. The satellite inversions increase tropical methane emission by 30 to 60 TgCH4/yr compared to initial a priori estimates, partly counterbalanced by reductions in emissions at midlatitudes to high latitudes. Key Points GOSAT and SCIAMACHY retrievals lead to comparable emission patterns GOSAT retrievals are found much less affected by biases than SCIAMACHY Combining satellite and in‐situ observations point to remaining inconsistencies</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/2013JD019760</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5019-899X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-897X
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2013-10, Vol.118 (20), p.11,807-11,823
issn 2169-897X
2169-8996
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01091235v1
source Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Bias
Earth, ocean, space
Emissions
Exact sciences and technology
External geophysics
Fourier transforms
Geophysics
GOSAT
Greenhouse gases
inverse modelling
Meteorology
Methane
Ocean, Atmosphere
Satellites
SCIAMACHY
Sciences of the Universe
title Comparison of CH4 inversions based on 15 months of GOSAT and SCIAMACHY observations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T19%3A21%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20CH4%20inversions%20based%20on%2015%20months%20of%20GOSAT%20and%20SCIAMACHY%20observations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Monteil,%20Guillaume&rft.date=2013-10-27&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=11,807&rft.epage=11,823&rft.pages=11,807-11,823&rft.issn=2169-897X&rft.eissn=2169-8996&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2013JD019760&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E3531983821%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1638356049&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true