Comparison of CH4 inversions based on 15 months of GOSAT and SCIAMACHY observations
Over the past decade the development of Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Chartography (SCIAMACHY) retrievals has increased the interest in the use of satellite measurements for studying the global sources and sinks of methane. Meanwhile, measurements are becoming available fr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres 2013-10, Vol.118 (20), p.11,807-11,823 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 11,823 |
---|---|
container_issue | 20 |
container_start_page | 11,807 |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres |
container_volume | 118 |
creator | Monteil, Guillaume Houweling, Sander Butz, André Guerlet, Sandrine Schepers, Dinand Hasekamp, Otto Frankenberg, Christian Scheepmaker, Remco Aben, Ilse Röckmann, Thomas |
description | Over the past decade the development of Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Chartography (SCIAMACHY) retrievals has increased the interest in the use of satellite measurements for studying the global sources and sinks of methane. Meanwhile, measurements are becoming available from the more advanced Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT). The aim of this study is to investigate the application of GOSAT retrievals to inverse modeling, for which we make use of the TM5‐4DVAR inverse modeling framework. Inverse modeling calculations are performed using data from two different retrieval approaches: a full physics and a lightpath proxy ratio method. The performance of these inversions is analyzed in comparison with inversions using SCIAMACHY retrievals and measurements from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration‐Earth System Research Laboratory flask‐sampling network. In addition, we compare the inversion results against independent surface, aircraft, and total‐column measurements. Inversions with GOSAT data show good agreement with surface measurements, whereas for SCIAMACHY a similar performance can only be achieved after significant bias corrections. Some inconsistencies between surface and total‐column methane remain in the Southern Hemisphere. However, comparisons with measurements from the Total Column Carbon Observing Network in situ Fourier transform spectrometer network indicate that those may be caused by systematic model errors rather than by shortcomings in the GOSAT retrievals. The global patterns of methane emissions derived from SCIAMACHY (with bias correction) and GOSAT retrievals are in remarkable agreement and allow an increased resolution of tropical emissions. The satellite inversions increase tropical methane emission by 30 to 60 TgCH4/yr compared to initial a priori estimates, partly counterbalanced by reductions in emissions at midlatitudes to high latitudes.
Key Points
GOSAT and SCIAMACHY retrievals lead to comparable emission patterns
GOSAT retrievals are found much less affected by biases than SCIAMACHY
Combining satellite and in‐situ observations point to remaining inconsistencies |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/2013JD019760 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01091235v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3531983821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-h3671-66aa5d355e6395536807ee1a69fbdaaef93f4f0e5625f0411304b2958329d4be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkd9LwzAQx4soKOqbf0BAfPChemmaNHks1XUbU8HNny_halNW3ZqZbFP_e1smw-PgjrvP98vBBcEJhQsKEF1GQNnwCqhKBOwEBxEVKpRKid1tnzzvB8fev0MbEljM44NgnNn5Al3tbUNsRbJ-TOpmbZyvbeNJgd6UpF1RTua2WU59B-V343RCsCnJOBukN2nWfyG28MatcdnJjoK9CmfeHP_Vw-Chdz3J-uHoLh9k6SicMpHQUAhEXjLOjWCKcyYkJMZQFKoqSkRTKVbFFRguIl5BTCmDuIgUlyxSZVwYdhicb3ynONMLV8_R_WiLte6nI93NgIKiEeNr2rKnG3bh7OfK-KV-tyvXtOdpKphkXECsWursj0L_hrPKYfNW-613JKFNAS3HNtxXPTM_2z0F3b1C_3-FHub3Vxyk7G4IN6raL833VoXuQ4uEJVw_3eb6cSLVay57OmG_HzWHdg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1638356049</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of CH4 inversions based on 15 months of GOSAT and SCIAMACHY observations</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Monteil, Guillaume ; Houweling, Sander ; Butz, André ; Guerlet, Sandrine ; Schepers, Dinand ; Hasekamp, Otto ; Frankenberg, Christian ; Scheepmaker, Remco ; Aben, Ilse ; Röckmann, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Monteil, Guillaume ; Houweling, Sander ; Butz, André ; Guerlet, Sandrine ; Schepers, Dinand ; Hasekamp, Otto ; Frankenberg, Christian ; Scheepmaker, Remco ; Aben, Ilse ; Röckmann, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>Over the past decade the development of Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Chartography (SCIAMACHY) retrievals has increased the interest in the use of satellite measurements for studying the global sources and sinks of methane. Meanwhile, measurements are becoming available from the more advanced Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT). The aim of this study is to investigate the application of GOSAT retrievals to inverse modeling, for which we make use of the TM5‐4DVAR inverse modeling framework. Inverse modeling calculations are performed using data from two different retrieval approaches: a full physics and a lightpath proxy ratio method. The performance of these inversions is analyzed in comparison with inversions using SCIAMACHY retrievals and measurements from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration‐Earth System Research Laboratory flask‐sampling network. In addition, we compare the inversion results against independent surface, aircraft, and total‐column measurements. Inversions with GOSAT data show good agreement with surface measurements, whereas for SCIAMACHY a similar performance can only be achieved after significant bias corrections. Some inconsistencies between surface and total‐column methane remain in the Southern Hemisphere. However, comparisons with measurements from the Total Column Carbon Observing Network in situ Fourier transform spectrometer network indicate that those may be caused by systematic model errors rather than by shortcomings in the GOSAT retrievals. The global patterns of methane emissions derived from SCIAMACHY (with bias correction) and GOSAT retrievals are in remarkable agreement and allow an increased resolution of tropical emissions. The satellite inversions increase tropical methane emission by 30 to 60 TgCH4/yr compared to initial a priori estimates, partly counterbalanced by reductions in emissions at midlatitudes to high latitudes.
Key Points
GOSAT and SCIAMACHY retrievals lead to comparable emission patterns
GOSAT retrievals are found much less affected by biases than SCIAMACHY
Combining satellite and in‐situ observations point to remaining inconsistencies</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-897X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8996</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2013JD019760</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Bias ; Earth, ocean, space ; Emissions ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Fourier transforms ; Geophysics ; GOSAT ; Greenhouse gases ; inverse modelling ; Meteorology ; Methane ; Ocean, Atmosphere ; Satellites ; SCIAMACHY ; Sciences of the Universe</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2013-10, Vol.118 (20), p.11,807-11,823</ispartof><rights>2013. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-5019-899X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2013JD019760$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2013JD019760$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28028060$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01091235$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Monteil, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houweling, Sander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butz, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerlet, Sandrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schepers, Dinand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasekamp, Otto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frankenberg, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheepmaker, Remco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aben, Ilse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Röckmann, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of CH4 inversions based on 15 months of GOSAT and SCIAMACHY observations</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Atmos</addtitle><description>Over the past decade the development of Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Chartography (SCIAMACHY) retrievals has increased the interest in the use of satellite measurements for studying the global sources and sinks of methane. Meanwhile, measurements are becoming available from the more advanced Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT). The aim of this study is to investigate the application of GOSAT retrievals to inverse modeling, for which we make use of the TM5‐4DVAR inverse modeling framework. Inverse modeling calculations are performed using data from two different retrieval approaches: a full physics and a lightpath proxy ratio method. The performance of these inversions is analyzed in comparison with inversions using SCIAMACHY retrievals and measurements from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration‐Earth System Research Laboratory flask‐sampling network. In addition, we compare the inversion results against independent surface, aircraft, and total‐column measurements. Inversions with GOSAT data show good agreement with surface measurements, whereas for SCIAMACHY a similar performance can only be achieved after significant bias corrections. Some inconsistencies between surface and total‐column methane remain in the Southern Hemisphere. However, comparisons with measurements from the Total Column Carbon Observing Network in situ Fourier transform spectrometer network indicate that those may be caused by systematic model errors rather than by shortcomings in the GOSAT retrievals. The global patterns of methane emissions derived from SCIAMACHY (with bias correction) and GOSAT retrievals are in remarkable agreement and allow an increased resolution of tropical emissions. The satellite inversions increase tropical methane emission by 30 to 60 TgCH4/yr compared to initial a priori estimates, partly counterbalanced by reductions in emissions at midlatitudes to high latitudes.
Key Points
GOSAT and SCIAMACHY retrievals lead to comparable emission patterns
GOSAT retrievals are found much less affected by biases than SCIAMACHY
Combining satellite and in‐situ observations point to remaining inconsistencies</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Fourier transforms</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>GOSAT</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>inverse modelling</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Ocean, Atmosphere</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>SCIAMACHY</subject><subject>Sciences of the Universe</subject><issn>2169-897X</issn><issn>2169-8996</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkd9LwzAQx4soKOqbf0BAfPChemmaNHks1XUbU8HNny_halNW3ZqZbFP_e1smw-PgjrvP98vBBcEJhQsKEF1GQNnwCqhKBOwEBxEVKpRKid1tnzzvB8fev0MbEljM44NgnNn5Al3tbUNsRbJ-TOpmbZyvbeNJgd6UpF1RTua2WU59B-V343RCsCnJOBukN2nWfyG28MatcdnJjoK9CmfeHP_Vw-Chdz3J-uHoLh9k6SicMpHQUAhEXjLOjWCKcyYkJMZQFKoqSkRTKVbFFRguIl5BTCmDuIgUlyxSZVwYdhicb3ynONMLV8_R_WiLte6nI93NgIKiEeNr2rKnG3bh7OfK-KV-tyvXtOdpKphkXECsWursj0L_hrPKYfNW-613JKFNAS3HNtxXPTM_2z0F3b1C_3-FHub3Vxyk7G4IN6raL833VoXuQ4uEJVw_3eb6cSLVay57OmG_HzWHdg</recordid><startdate>20131027</startdate><enddate>20131027</enddate><creator>Monteil, Guillaume</creator><creator>Houweling, Sander</creator><creator>Butz, André</creator><creator>Guerlet, Sandrine</creator><creator>Schepers, Dinand</creator><creator>Hasekamp, Otto</creator><creator>Frankenberg, Christian</creator><creator>Scheepmaker, Remco</creator><creator>Aben, Ilse</creator><creator>Röckmann, Thomas</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley & Sons</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5019-899X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20131027</creationdate><title>Comparison of CH4 inversions based on 15 months of GOSAT and SCIAMACHY observations</title><author>Monteil, Guillaume ; Houweling, Sander ; Butz, André ; Guerlet, Sandrine ; Schepers, Dinand ; Hasekamp, Otto ; Frankenberg, Christian ; Scheepmaker, Remco ; Aben, Ilse ; Röckmann, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h3671-66aa5d355e6395536807ee1a69fbdaaef93f4f0e5625f0411304b2958329d4be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Fourier transforms</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>GOSAT</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>inverse modelling</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Ocean, Atmosphere</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>SCIAMACHY</topic><topic>Sciences of the Universe</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Monteil, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houweling, Sander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butz, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerlet, Sandrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schepers, Dinand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasekamp, Otto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frankenberg, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheepmaker, Remco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aben, Ilse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Röckmann, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Monteil, Guillaume</au><au>Houweling, Sander</au><au>Butz, André</au><au>Guerlet, Sandrine</au><au>Schepers, Dinand</au><au>Hasekamp, Otto</au><au>Frankenberg, Christian</au><au>Scheepmaker, Remco</au><au>Aben, Ilse</au><au>Röckmann, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of CH4 inversions based on 15 months of GOSAT and SCIAMACHY observations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Atmos</addtitle><date>2013-10-27</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>11,807</spage><epage>11,823</epage><pages>11,807-11,823</pages><issn>2169-897X</issn><eissn>2169-8996</eissn><abstract>Over the past decade the development of Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Chartography (SCIAMACHY) retrievals has increased the interest in the use of satellite measurements for studying the global sources and sinks of methane. Meanwhile, measurements are becoming available from the more advanced Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT). The aim of this study is to investigate the application of GOSAT retrievals to inverse modeling, for which we make use of the TM5‐4DVAR inverse modeling framework. Inverse modeling calculations are performed using data from two different retrieval approaches: a full physics and a lightpath proxy ratio method. The performance of these inversions is analyzed in comparison with inversions using SCIAMACHY retrievals and measurements from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration‐Earth System Research Laboratory flask‐sampling network. In addition, we compare the inversion results against independent surface, aircraft, and total‐column measurements. Inversions with GOSAT data show good agreement with surface measurements, whereas for SCIAMACHY a similar performance can only be achieved after significant bias corrections. Some inconsistencies between surface and total‐column methane remain in the Southern Hemisphere. However, comparisons with measurements from the Total Column Carbon Observing Network in situ Fourier transform spectrometer network indicate that those may be caused by systematic model errors rather than by shortcomings in the GOSAT retrievals. The global patterns of methane emissions derived from SCIAMACHY (with bias correction) and GOSAT retrievals are in remarkable agreement and allow an increased resolution of tropical emissions. The satellite inversions increase tropical methane emission by 30 to 60 TgCH4/yr compared to initial a priori estimates, partly counterbalanced by reductions in emissions at midlatitudes to high latitudes.
Key Points
GOSAT and SCIAMACHY retrievals lead to comparable emission patterns
GOSAT retrievals are found much less affected by biases than SCIAMACHY
Combining satellite and in‐situ observations point to remaining inconsistencies</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/2013JD019760</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5019-899X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-897X |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2013-10, Vol.118 (20), p.11,807-11,823 |
issn | 2169-897X 2169-8996 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01091235v1 |
source | Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Bias Earth, ocean, space Emissions Exact sciences and technology External geophysics Fourier transforms Geophysics GOSAT Greenhouse gases inverse modelling Meteorology Methane Ocean, Atmosphere Satellites SCIAMACHY Sciences of the Universe |
title | Comparison of CH4 inversions based on 15 months of GOSAT and SCIAMACHY observations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T19%3A21%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20CH4%20inversions%20based%20on%2015%20months%20of%20GOSAT%20and%20SCIAMACHY%20observations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Monteil,%20Guillaume&rft.date=2013-10-27&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=11,807&rft.epage=11,823&rft.pages=11,807-11,823&rft.issn=2169-897X&rft.eissn=2169-8996&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2013JD019760&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E3531983821%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1638356049&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |