Effect of willow short rotation coppice on soil properties after three years of growth as compared to forest, grassland and arable land uses
AIMS: Despite many studies on the impact of arable land conversion to Short Rotation Coppice (SRC), few studies have been carried out on soil biota. This study aims at assessing biological and physico-chemical soil properties that are affected by SRC compared to forestry, grassland and an agrosystem...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plant and soil 2014-04, Vol.377 (1-2), p.423-438 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 438 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1-2 |
container_start_page | 423 |
container_title | Plant and soil |
container_volume | 377 |
creator | Stauffer, M Leyval, C Brun, J.-J Leportier, P Berthelin, J |
description | AIMS: Despite many studies on the impact of arable land conversion to Short Rotation Coppice (SRC), few studies have been carried out on soil biota. This study aims at assessing biological and physico-chemical soil properties that are affected by SRC compared to forestry, grassland and an agrosystem. METHODS: All samples were collected in the Aisne valley (France), from the same type of soil, with four land uses, i.e. willow SRC, agrosystem, grassland and alluvial forest, 3 years after SRC was planted. We studied fertility, the biological community (earthworm diversity, density and biomass, bacterial and fungal density and community structures) and biochemical parameters (enzyme activities, basal respiration and nitrification). RESULTS: After 3 years’ growth, soil biological parameters (fungal abundance, laccase activity, anecic earthworm proportion and earthworm diversity) and CEC were higher in the SRC than in the agrosystem soil. In parallel, fungal abundance was higher in SRC than in forest and grassland soils. CONCLUSION: Compared to annual arable crops, SRC promoted biological properties. However, in the short term, the parameters we measured were lower than in the forest and grassland soils. The use of certain parameters as indicators of soil functioning/quality assessment to discriminate the four land uses is discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11104-013-1986-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01077471v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A372250486</galeid><jstor_id>44244633</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A372250486</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-921ebe957ffc26b9c53e18588806aa72565a807d438424efb402cae4cf32f5483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Ul2LEzEUHUTBuvoDfBADIig4az4nmceyrK5Q8EEXfAu36U07ZToZk9Sy_8EfbaazLOKDhJCPe87Jufemql4yesko1R8TY4zKmjJRs9Y0tXxULZjSolZUNI-rBaWC11S3P55Wz1La0-nMmkX1-9p7dJkET05d34cTSbsQM4khQ-7CQFwYx84hKdsUup6MMYwYc4eJgM8YSd5FRHKHENOkso3hlHcEUmEeRoi4ITkQHyKm_KFEIaUehg05zwjrHsn5fEyYnldPPPQJX9yvF9Xtp-vvVzf16uvnL1fLVe1ka3LdcoZrbJX23vFm3TolkBlljKENgOaqUWCo3khhJJfo15JyByidF9wracRF9X7W3UFvx9gdIN7ZAJ29Wa7sdEcZ1Vpq9osV7LsZWxL_eSxJ2EOXHPbFNIZjskyxRivBdFOgb_6B7sMxDiWTCUWFZkqIgrqcUVvo0XaDDzmCK2ODh86FAX1X7pdCc66oNJMsmwkuhpQi-gfLjNqp-XZufnEt7NR8Kwvn7b0VSA56H2FwXXogctNQLehUCT7jUgkNW4x_Wf6P-KuZtE85xAdRWYotm3OGr-e4h2BhG8vDt984ZbL8OlNKIMUfv8nQxg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1510371533</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of willow short rotation coppice on soil properties after three years of growth as compared to forest, grassland and arable land uses</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Stauffer, M ; Leyval, C ; Brun, J.-J ; Leportier, P ; Berthelin, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Stauffer, M ; Leyval, C ; Brun, J.-J ; Leportier, P ; Berthelin, J</creatorcontrib><description>AIMS: Despite many studies on the impact of arable land conversion to Short Rotation Coppice (SRC), few studies have been carried out on soil biota. This study aims at assessing biological and physico-chemical soil properties that are affected by SRC compared to forestry, grassland and an agrosystem. METHODS: All samples were collected in the Aisne valley (France), from the same type of soil, with four land uses, i.e. willow SRC, agrosystem, grassland and alluvial forest, 3 years after SRC was planted. We studied fertility, the biological community (earthworm diversity, density and biomass, bacterial and fungal density and community structures) and biochemical parameters (enzyme activities, basal respiration and nitrification). RESULTS: After 3 years’ growth, soil biological parameters (fungal abundance, laccase activity, anecic earthworm proportion and earthworm diversity) and CEC were higher in the SRC than in the agrosystem soil. In parallel, fungal abundance was higher in SRC than in forest and grassland soils. CONCLUSION: Compared to annual arable crops, SRC promoted biological properties. However, in the short term, the parameters we measured were lower than in the forest and grassland soils. The use of certain parameters as indicators of soil functioning/quality assessment to discriminate the four land uses is discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-079X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11104-013-1986-4</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PLSOA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Agricultural research ; Agricultural soils ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; arable soils ; Biogeochemistry ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological properties ; biomass ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biota ; Continental interfaces, environment ; coppicing ; crops ; Earthworms ; Ecology ; Environmental aspects ; Environmental Sciences ; Enzymatic activity ; enzyme activity ; Fertility ; Forest soils ; Forestry ; forests ; France ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; fungi ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Grassland soils ; Grasslands ; Growth ; Growth (Plants) ; laccase ; Land use ; land use change ; Life Sciences ; Nitrification ; Plant growth ; Plant Physiology ; Plant Sciences ; Plant-soil relationships ; planting ; Regular Article ; Sciences of the Universe ; Slope stability ; Soil biochemistry ; Soil biology ; Soil fungi ; Soil microorganisms ; Soil properties ; Soil quality ; Soil science ; Soil Science & Conservation ; Soil sciences ; Soil types ; Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility ; Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments ; Trees ; Willows</subject><ispartof>Plant and soil, 2014-04, Vol.377 (1-2), p.423-438</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Springer</rights><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-921ebe957ffc26b9c53e18588806aa72565a807d438424efb402cae4cf32f5483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-921ebe957ffc26b9c53e18588806aa72565a807d438424efb402cae4cf32f5483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44244633$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44244633$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,799,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28607308$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01077471$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stauffer, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leyval, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brun, J.-J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leportier, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berthelin, J</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of willow short rotation coppice on soil properties after three years of growth as compared to forest, grassland and arable land uses</title><title>Plant and soil</title><addtitle>Plant Soil</addtitle><description>AIMS: Despite many studies on the impact of arable land conversion to Short Rotation Coppice (SRC), few studies have been carried out on soil biota. This study aims at assessing biological and physico-chemical soil properties that are affected by SRC compared to forestry, grassland and an agrosystem. METHODS: All samples were collected in the Aisne valley (France), from the same type of soil, with four land uses, i.e. willow SRC, agrosystem, grassland and alluvial forest, 3 years after SRC was planted. We studied fertility, the biological community (earthworm diversity, density and biomass, bacterial and fungal density and community structures) and biochemical parameters (enzyme activities, basal respiration and nitrification). RESULTS: After 3 years’ growth, soil biological parameters (fungal abundance, laccase activity, anecic earthworm proportion and earthworm diversity) and CEC were higher in the SRC than in the agrosystem soil. In parallel, fungal abundance was higher in SRC than in forest and grassland soils. CONCLUSION: Compared to annual arable crops, SRC promoted biological properties. However, in the short term, the parameters we measured were lower than in the forest and grassland soils. The use of certain parameters as indicators of soil functioning/quality assessment to discriminate the four land uses is discussed.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural research</subject><subject>Agricultural soils</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>arable soils</subject><subject>Biogeochemistry</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological properties</subject><subject>biomass</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biota</subject><subject>Continental interfaces, environment</subject><subject>coppicing</subject><subject>crops</subject><subject>Earthworms</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Enzymatic activity</subject><subject>enzyme activity</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Forest soils</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>forests</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>fungi</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Grassland soils</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>Growth (Plants)</subject><subject>laccase</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>land use change</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Nitrification</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Plant Physiology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Plant-soil relationships</subject><subject>planting</subject><subject>Regular Article</subject><subject>Sciences of the Universe</subject><subject>Slope stability</subject><subject>Soil biochemistry</subject><subject>Soil biology</subject><subject>Soil fungi</subject><subject>Soil microorganisms</subject><subject>Soil properties</subject><subject>Soil quality</subject><subject>Soil science</subject><subject>Soil Science & Conservation</subject><subject>Soil sciences</subject><subject>Soil types</subject><subject>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility</subject><subject>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Willows</subject><issn>0032-079X</issn><issn>1573-5036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Ul2LEzEUHUTBuvoDfBADIig4az4nmceyrK5Q8EEXfAu36U07ZToZk9Sy_8EfbaazLOKDhJCPe87Jufemql4yesko1R8TY4zKmjJRs9Y0tXxULZjSolZUNI-rBaWC11S3P55Wz1La0-nMmkX1-9p7dJkET05d34cTSbsQM4khQ-7CQFwYx84hKdsUup6MMYwYc4eJgM8YSd5FRHKHENOkso3hlHcEUmEeRoi4ITkQHyKm_KFEIaUehg05zwjrHsn5fEyYnldPPPQJX9yvF9Xtp-vvVzf16uvnL1fLVe1ka3LdcoZrbJX23vFm3TolkBlljKENgOaqUWCo3khhJJfo15JyByidF9wracRF9X7W3UFvx9gdIN7ZAJ29Wa7sdEcZ1Vpq9osV7LsZWxL_eSxJ2EOXHPbFNIZjskyxRivBdFOgb_6B7sMxDiWTCUWFZkqIgrqcUVvo0XaDDzmCK2ODh86FAX1X7pdCc66oNJMsmwkuhpQi-gfLjNqp-XZufnEt7NR8Kwvn7b0VSA56H2FwXXogctNQLehUCT7jUgkNW4x_Wf6P-KuZtE85xAdRWYotm3OGr-e4h2BhG8vDt984ZbL8OlNKIMUfv8nQxg</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>Stauffer, M</creator><creator>Leyval, C</creator><creator>Brun, J.-J</creator><creator>Leportier, P</creator><creator>Berthelin, J</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>1XC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>Effect of willow short rotation coppice on soil properties after three years of growth as compared to forest, grassland and arable land uses</title><author>Stauffer, M ; Leyval, C ; Brun, J.-J ; Leportier, P ; Berthelin, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-921ebe957ffc26b9c53e18588806aa72565a807d438424efb402cae4cf32f5483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural research</topic><topic>Agricultural soils</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>arable soils</topic><topic>Biogeochemistry</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological properties</topic><topic>biomass</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biota</topic><topic>Continental interfaces, environment</topic><topic>coppicing</topic><topic>crops</topic><topic>Earthworms</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Enzymatic activity</topic><topic>enzyme activity</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Forest soils</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>forests</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>fungi</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Grassland soils</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>Growth (Plants)</topic><topic>laccase</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>land use change</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Nitrification</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Plant Physiology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Plant-soil relationships</topic><topic>planting</topic><topic>Regular Article</topic><topic>Sciences of the Universe</topic><topic>Slope stability</topic><topic>Soil biochemistry</topic><topic>Soil biology</topic><topic>Soil fungi</topic><topic>Soil microorganisms</topic><topic>Soil properties</topic><topic>Soil quality</topic><topic>Soil science</topic><topic>Soil Science & Conservation</topic><topic>Soil sciences</topic><topic>Soil types</topic><topic>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility</topic><topic>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Willows</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stauffer, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leyval, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brun, J.-J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leportier, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berthelin, J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stauffer, M</au><au>Leyval, C</au><au>Brun, J.-J</au><au>Leportier, P</au><au>Berthelin, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of willow short rotation coppice on soil properties after three years of growth as compared to forest, grassland and arable land uses</atitle><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle><stitle>Plant Soil</stitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>377</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>423</spage><epage>438</epage><pages>423-438</pages><issn>0032-079X</issn><eissn>1573-5036</eissn><coden>PLSOA2</coden><abstract>AIMS: Despite many studies on the impact of arable land conversion to Short Rotation Coppice (SRC), few studies have been carried out on soil biota. This study aims at assessing biological and physico-chemical soil properties that are affected by SRC compared to forestry, grassland and an agrosystem. METHODS: All samples were collected in the Aisne valley (France), from the same type of soil, with four land uses, i.e. willow SRC, agrosystem, grassland and alluvial forest, 3 years after SRC was planted. We studied fertility, the biological community (earthworm diversity, density and biomass, bacterial and fungal density and community structures) and biochemical parameters (enzyme activities, basal respiration and nitrification). RESULTS: After 3 years’ growth, soil biological parameters (fungal abundance, laccase activity, anecic earthworm proportion and earthworm diversity) and CEC were higher in the SRC than in the agrosystem soil. In parallel, fungal abundance was higher in SRC than in forest and grassland soils. CONCLUSION: Compared to annual arable crops, SRC promoted biological properties. However, in the short term, the parameters we measured were lower than in the forest and grassland soils. The use of certain parameters as indicators of soil functioning/quality assessment to discriminate the four land uses is discussed.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s11104-013-1986-4</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-079X |
ispartof | Plant and soil, 2014-04, Vol.377 (1-2), p.423-438 |
issn | 0032-079X 1573-5036 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01077471v1 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Agricultural land Agricultural research Agricultural soils Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Animal, plant and microbial ecology arable soils Biogeochemistry Biological and medical sciences Biological properties biomass Biomedical and Life Sciences Biota Continental interfaces, environment coppicing crops Earthworms Ecology Environmental aspects Environmental Sciences Enzymatic activity enzyme activity Fertility Forest soils Forestry forests France Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology fungi General agronomy. Plant production Grassland soils Grasslands Growth Growth (Plants) laccase Land use land use change Life Sciences Nitrification Plant growth Plant Physiology Plant Sciences Plant-soil relationships planting Regular Article Sciences of the Universe Slope stability Soil biochemistry Soil biology Soil fungi Soil microorganisms Soil properties Soil quality Soil science Soil Science & Conservation Soil sciences Soil types Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments Trees Willows |
title | Effect of willow short rotation coppice on soil properties after three years of growth as compared to forest, grassland and arable land uses |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T14%3A42%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20willow%20short%20rotation%20coppice%20on%20soil%20properties%20after%20three%20years%20of%20growth%20as%20compared%20to%20forest,%20grassland%20and%20arable%20land%20uses&rft.jtitle=Plant%20and%20soil&rft.au=Stauffer,%20M&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=377&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=423&rft.epage=438&rft.pages=423-438&rft.issn=0032-079X&rft.eissn=1573-5036&rft.coden=PLSOA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11104-013-1986-4&rft_dat=%3Cgale_hal_p%3EA372250486%3C/gale_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1510371533&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A372250486&rft_jstor_id=44244633&rfr_iscdi=true |