Biomechanics of buttressed trees: bending strains and stresses

The different hypotheses about buttress function and formation mainly involve mechanical theory. Forces were applied to two trees of Sloanea spp., a tropical genus that develops typical thin buttresses, and the three-dimensional strains were measured at different parts of the trunk base. Risks of fa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of botany 2003-09, Vol.90 (9), p.1349-1356
Hauptverfasser: Clair, Bruno, Fournier, Meriem, Prevost, Marie Francoise, Beauchene, Jacques, Bardet, Sandrine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1356
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1349
container_title American journal of botany
container_volume 90
creator Clair, Bruno
Fournier, Meriem
Prevost, Marie Francoise
Beauchene, Jacques
Bardet, Sandrine
description The different hypotheses about buttress function and formation mainly involve mechanical theory. Forces were applied to two trees of Sloanea spp., a tropical genus that develops typical thin buttresses, and the three-dimensional strains were measured at different parts of the trunk base. Risks of failure were greater on the buttress sides, where shear and tangential stresses are greater, not on the ridges, in spite of high longitudinal (parallel to the grain) stresses. A simple beam model, computed from the second moment of area of digitized cross sections, is consistent with longitudinal strain variations but cannot predict accurately variations with height. Patterns of longitudinal strain variation along ridges are very different in the two individuals, owing to a pronounced lateral curvature in one specimen. The constant stress hypothesis is discussed based on these results. Without chronological data during the development of the tree, it cannot be proved that buttress formation is activated by stress or strain.
doi_str_mv 10.3732/ajb.90.9.1349
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01032155v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4124143</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4124143</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5179-9ac718edb76f917464445ef869b89a90b25a0cbdab8afa9681024a8b6eddb623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1v1DAQxS1ERZfCkRtCEYciDlk8tpN4OCBtK2iLVuLSu2UnTterfBQ7Iep_X0dZFtRDTzNj_eb5jR4h74CuecHZF703a6RrXAMX-IKsIONFygCLl2RFKWUpAmOn5HUI-ziiQPaKnDLIM2Q8W5FvF65vbbnTnStD0teJGYfB2xBslcRqw9fE2K5y3V0SBq9dFxLdVXM_M-ENOal1E-zbQz0jtz--315ep9tfVzeXm21aZlBgirosQNrKFHmNUIhcCJHZWuZoJGqkhmWalqbSRupaYy6BMqGlyW1VmZzxM_J5kd3pRt1712r_oHrt1PVmq-Y3CpQzyLI_ENlPC3vv-9-jDYNqXSht0-jO9mNQsgAuuWA8kufPkiAlUkaLCH58Au770XfxYBU_jRTgrJYuUOn7ELytj0aBqjkqFaNSSBWqOarIfziIjqa11ZH-m00E-AJMrrEPz6upzc8LdpB9v2ztw9D745YAJkD8d_PO3e0m560KrW6a6AHUNE3_7D0CC86zbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215889193</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biomechanics of buttressed trees: bending strains and stresses</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Clair, Bruno ; Fournier, Meriem ; Prevost, Marie Francoise ; Beauchene, Jacques ; Bardet, Sandrine</creator><creatorcontrib>Clair, Bruno ; Fournier, Meriem ; Prevost, Marie Francoise ; Beauchene, Jacques ; Bardet, Sandrine</creatorcontrib><description>The different hypotheses about buttress function and formation mainly involve mechanical theory. Forces were applied to two trees of Sloanea spp., a tropical genus that develops typical thin buttresses, and the three-dimensional strains were measured at different parts of the trunk base. Risks of failure were greater on the buttress sides, where shear and tangential stresses are greater, not on the ridges, in spite of high longitudinal (parallel to the grain) stresses. A simple beam model, computed from the second moment of area of digitized cross sections, is consistent with longitudinal strain variations but cannot predict accurately variations with height. Patterns of longitudinal strain variation along ridges are very different in the two individuals, owing to a pronounced lateral curvature in one specimen. The constant stress hypothesis is discussed based on these results. Without chronological data during the development of the tree, it cannot be proved that buttress formation is activated by stress or strain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9122</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3732/ajb.90.9.1349</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21659235</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJBOAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Botanical Soc America</publisher><subject>Bending ; biomechanics ; Botanics ; Botany ; buttress ; Density ; Eleaocarpaceae ; Estimation bias ; French Guiana ; Life Sciences ; Modeling ; Moduli of elasticity ; Shear stress ; Sloanea spp ; Tensile stress ; Tree trunks ; Trees ; Tropical Biology ; tropical trees ; Vegetal Biology ; wood ; Youngs modulus</subject><ispartof>American journal of botany, 2003-09, Vol.90 (9), p.1349-1356</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 Botanical Society of America, Inc.</rights><rights>2003 Botanical Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright Botanical Society of America, Inc. Sep 2003</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5179-9ac718edb76f917464445ef869b89a90b25a0cbdab8afa9681024a8b6eddb623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5179-9ac718edb76f917464445ef869b89a90b25a0cbdab8afa9681024a8b6eddb623</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4093-9034 ; 0000-0002-7239-1499 ; 0000-0003-4578-3670 ; 0000-0003-2156-6014</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4124143$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4124143$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,803,885,1416,1432,27922,27923,45572,45573,46407,46831,58015,58248</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21659235$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01032155$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clair, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fournier, Meriem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prevost, Marie Francoise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beauchene, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bardet, Sandrine</creatorcontrib><title>Biomechanics of buttressed trees: bending strains and stresses</title><title>American journal of botany</title><addtitle>Am J Bot</addtitle><description>The different hypotheses about buttress function and formation mainly involve mechanical theory. Forces were applied to two trees of Sloanea spp., a tropical genus that develops typical thin buttresses, and the three-dimensional strains were measured at different parts of the trunk base. Risks of failure were greater on the buttress sides, where shear and tangential stresses are greater, not on the ridges, in spite of high longitudinal (parallel to the grain) stresses. A simple beam model, computed from the second moment of area of digitized cross sections, is consistent with longitudinal strain variations but cannot predict accurately variations with height. Patterns of longitudinal strain variation along ridges are very different in the two individuals, owing to a pronounced lateral curvature in one specimen. The constant stress hypothesis is discussed based on these results. Without chronological data during the development of the tree, it cannot be proved that buttress formation is activated by stress or strain.</description><subject>Bending</subject><subject>biomechanics</subject><subject>Botanics</subject><subject>Botany</subject><subject>buttress</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Eleaocarpaceae</subject><subject>Estimation bias</subject><subject>French Guiana</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Moduli of elasticity</subject><subject>Shear stress</subject><subject>Sloanea spp</subject><subject>Tensile stress</subject><subject>Tree trunks</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Tropical Biology</subject><subject>tropical trees</subject><subject>Vegetal Biology</subject><subject>wood</subject><subject>Youngs modulus</subject><issn>0002-9122</issn><issn>1537-2197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1v1DAQxS1ERZfCkRtCEYciDlk8tpN4OCBtK2iLVuLSu2UnTterfBQ7Iep_X0dZFtRDTzNj_eb5jR4h74CuecHZF703a6RrXAMX-IKsIONFygCLl2RFKWUpAmOn5HUI-ziiQPaKnDLIM2Q8W5FvF65vbbnTnStD0teJGYfB2xBslcRqw9fE2K5y3V0SBq9dFxLdVXM_M-ENOal1E-zbQz0jtz--315ep9tfVzeXm21aZlBgirosQNrKFHmNUIhcCJHZWuZoJGqkhmWalqbSRupaYy6BMqGlyW1VmZzxM_J5kd3pRt1712r_oHrt1PVmq-Y3CpQzyLI_ENlPC3vv-9-jDYNqXSht0-jO9mNQsgAuuWA8kufPkiAlUkaLCH58Au770XfxYBU_jRTgrJYuUOn7ELytj0aBqjkqFaNSSBWqOarIfziIjqa11ZH-m00E-AJMrrEPz6upzc8LdpB9v2ztw9D745YAJkD8d_PO3e0m560KrW6a6AHUNE3_7D0CC86zbQ</recordid><startdate>200309</startdate><enddate>200309</enddate><creator>Clair, Bruno</creator><creator>Fournier, Meriem</creator><creator>Prevost, Marie Francoise</creator><creator>Beauchene, Jacques</creator><creator>Bardet, Sandrine</creator><general>Botanical Soc America</general><general>Botanical Society of America</general><general>Botanical Society of America, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4093-9034</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7239-1499</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4578-3670</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2156-6014</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>200309</creationdate><title>Biomechanics of buttressed trees: bending strains and stresses</title><author>Clair, Bruno ; Fournier, Meriem ; Prevost, Marie Francoise ; Beauchene, Jacques ; Bardet, Sandrine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5179-9ac718edb76f917464445ef869b89a90b25a0cbdab8afa9681024a8b6eddb623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Bending</topic><topic>biomechanics</topic><topic>Botanics</topic><topic>Botany</topic><topic>buttress</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Eleaocarpaceae</topic><topic>Estimation bias</topic><topic>French Guiana</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Moduli of elasticity</topic><topic>Shear stress</topic><topic>Sloanea spp</topic><topic>Tensile stress</topic><topic>Tree trunks</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Tropical Biology</topic><topic>tropical trees</topic><topic>Vegetal Biology</topic><topic>wood</topic><topic>Youngs modulus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clair, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fournier, Meriem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prevost, Marie Francoise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beauchene, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bardet, Sandrine</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>American journal of botany</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clair, Bruno</au><au>Fournier, Meriem</au><au>Prevost, Marie Francoise</au><au>Beauchene, Jacques</au><au>Bardet, Sandrine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biomechanics of buttressed trees: bending strains and stresses</atitle><jtitle>American journal of botany</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Bot</addtitle><date>2003-09</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1349</spage><epage>1356</epage><pages>1349-1356</pages><issn>0002-9122</issn><eissn>1537-2197</eissn><coden>AJBOAA</coden><abstract>The different hypotheses about buttress function and formation mainly involve mechanical theory. Forces were applied to two trees of Sloanea spp., a tropical genus that develops typical thin buttresses, and the three-dimensional strains were measured at different parts of the trunk base. Risks of failure were greater on the buttress sides, where shear and tangential stresses are greater, not on the ridges, in spite of high longitudinal (parallel to the grain) stresses. A simple beam model, computed from the second moment of area of digitized cross sections, is consistent with longitudinal strain variations but cannot predict accurately variations with height. Patterns of longitudinal strain variation along ridges are very different in the two individuals, owing to a pronounced lateral curvature in one specimen. The constant stress hypothesis is discussed based on these results. Without chronological data during the development of the tree, it cannot be proved that buttress formation is activated by stress or strain.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Botanical Soc America</pub><pmid>21659235</pmid><doi>10.3732/ajb.90.9.1349</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4093-9034</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7239-1499</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4578-3670</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2156-6014</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9122
ispartof American journal of botany, 2003-09, Vol.90 (9), p.1349-1356
issn 0002-9122
1537-2197
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01032155v1
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Bending
biomechanics
Botanics
Botany
buttress
Density
Eleaocarpaceae
Estimation bias
French Guiana
Life Sciences
Modeling
Moduli of elasticity
Shear stress
Sloanea spp
Tensile stress
Tree trunks
Trees
Tropical Biology
tropical trees
Vegetal Biology
wood
Youngs modulus
title Biomechanics of buttressed trees: bending strains and stresses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T10%3A19%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biomechanics%20of%20buttressed%20trees:%20bending%20strains%20and%20stresses&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20botany&rft.au=Clair,%20Bruno&rft.date=2003-09&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1349&rft.epage=1356&rft.pages=1349-1356&rft.issn=0002-9122&rft.eissn=1537-2197&rft.coden=AJBOAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.3732/ajb.90.9.1349&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_hal_p%3E4124143%3C/jstor_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215889193&rft_id=info:pmid/21659235&rft_jstor_id=4124143&rfr_iscdi=true