Biomechanics of buttressed trees: bending strains and stresses
The different hypotheses about buttress function and formation mainly involve mechanical theory. Forces were applied to two trees of Sloanea spp., a tropical genus that develops typical thin buttresses, and the three-dimensional strains were measured at different parts of the trunk base. Risks of fa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of botany 2003-09, Vol.90 (9), p.1349-1356 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1356 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1349 |
container_title | American journal of botany |
container_volume | 90 |
creator | Clair, Bruno Fournier, Meriem Prevost, Marie Francoise Beauchene, Jacques Bardet, Sandrine |
description | The different hypotheses about buttress function and formation mainly involve mechanical theory. Forces were applied to two trees of Sloanea spp., a tropical genus that develops typical thin buttresses, and the three-dimensional strains were measured at different parts of the trunk base. Risks of failure were greater on the buttress sides, where shear and tangential stresses are greater, not on the ridges, in spite of high longitudinal (parallel to the grain) stresses. A simple beam model, computed from the second moment of area of digitized cross sections, is consistent with longitudinal strain variations but cannot predict accurately variations with height. Patterns of longitudinal strain variation along ridges are very different in the two individuals, owing to a pronounced lateral curvature in one specimen. The constant stress hypothesis is discussed based on these results. Without chronological data during the development of the tree, it cannot be proved that buttress formation is activated by stress or strain. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3732/ajb.90.9.1349 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01032155v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4124143</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4124143</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5179-9ac718edb76f917464445ef869b89a90b25a0cbdab8afa9681024a8b6eddb623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1v1DAQxS1ERZfCkRtCEYciDlk8tpN4OCBtK2iLVuLSu2UnTterfBQ7Iep_X0dZFtRDTzNj_eb5jR4h74CuecHZF703a6RrXAMX-IKsIONFygCLl2RFKWUpAmOn5HUI-ziiQPaKnDLIM2Q8W5FvF65vbbnTnStD0teJGYfB2xBslcRqw9fE2K5y3V0SBq9dFxLdVXM_M-ENOal1E-zbQz0jtz--315ep9tfVzeXm21aZlBgirosQNrKFHmNUIhcCJHZWuZoJGqkhmWalqbSRupaYy6BMqGlyW1VmZzxM_J5kd3pRt1712r_oHrt1PVmq-Y3CpQzyLI_ENlPC3vv-9-jDYNqXSht0-jO9mNQsgAuuWA8kufPkiAlUkaLCH58Au770XfxYBU_jRTgrJYuUOn7ELytj0aBqjkqFaNSSBWqOarIfziIjqa11ZH-m00E-AJMrrEPz6upzc8LdpB9v2ztw9D745YAJkD8d_PO3e0m560KrW6a6AHUNE3_7D0CC86zbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215889193</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biomechanics of buttressed trees: bending strains and stresses</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Clair, Bruno ; Fournier, Meriem ; Prevost, Marie Francoise ; Beauchene, Jacques ; Bardet, Sandrine</creator><creatorcontrib>Clair, Bruno ; Fournier, Meriem ; Prevost, Marie Francoise ; Beauchene, Jacques ; Bardet, Sandrine</creatorcontrib><description>The different hypotheses about buttress function and formation mainly involve mechanical theory. Forces were applied to two trees of Sloanea spp., a tropical genus that develops typical thin buttresses, and the three-dimensional strains were measured at different parts of the trunk base. Risks of failure were greater on the buttress sides, where shear and tangential stresses are greater, not on the ridges, in spite of high longitudinal (parallel to the grain) stresses. A simple beam model, computed from the second moment of area of digitized cross sections, is consistent with longitudinal strain variations but cannot predict accurately variations with height. Patterns of longitudinal strain variation along ridges are very different in the two individuals, owing to a pronounced lateral curvature in one specimen. The constant stress hypothesis is discussed based on these results. Without chronological data during the development of the tree, it cannot be proved that buttress formation is activated by stress or strain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9122</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3732/ajb.90.9.1349</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21659235</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJBOAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Botanical Soc America</publisher><subject>Bending ; biomechanics ; Botanics ; Botany ; buttress ; Density ; Eleaocarpaceae ; Estimation bias ; French Guiana ; Life Sciences ; Modeling ; Moduli of elasticity ; Shear stress ; Sloanea spp ; Tensile stress ; Tree trunks ; Trees ; Tropical Biology ; tropical trees ; Vegetal Biology ; wood ; Youngs modulus</subject><ispartof>American journal of botany, 2003-09, Vol.90 (9), p.1349-1356</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 Botanical Society of America, Inc.</rights><rights>2003 Botanical Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright Botanical Society of America, Inc. Sep 2003</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5179-9ac718edb76f917464445ef869b89a90b25a0cbdab8afa9681024a8b6eddb623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5179-9ac718edb76f917464445ef869b89a90b25a0cbdab8afa9681024a8b6eddb623</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4093-9034 ; 0000-0002-7239-1499 ; 0000-0003-4578-3670 ; 0000-0003-2156-6014</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4124143$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4124143$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,803,885,1416,1432,27922,27923,45572,45573,46407,46831,58015,58248</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21659235$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01032155$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clair, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fournier, Meriem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prevost, Marie Francoise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beauchene, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bardet, Sandrine</creatorcontrib><title>Biomechanics of buttressed trees: bending strains and stresses</title><title>American journal of botany</title><addtitle>Am J Bot</addtitle><description>The different hypotheses about buttress function and formation mainly involve mechanical theory. Forces were applied to two trees of Sloanea spp., a tropical genus that develops typical thin buttresses, and the three-dimensional strains were measured at different parts of the trunk base. Risks of failure were greater on the buttress sides, where shear and tangential stresses are greater, not on the ridges, in spite of high longitudinal (parallel to the grain) stresses. A simple beam model, computed from the second moment of area of digitized cross sections, is consistent with longitudinal strain variations but cannot predict accurately variations with height. Patterns of longitudinal strain variation along ridges are very different in the two individuals, owing to a pronounced lateral curvature in one specimen. The constant stress hypothesis is discussed based on these results. Without chronological data during the development of the tree, it cannot be proved that buttress formation is activated by stress or strain.</description><subject>Bending</subject><subject>biomechanics</subject><subject>Botanics</subject><subject>Botany</subject><subject>buttress</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Eleaocarpaceae</subject><subject>Estimation bias</subject><subject>French Guiana</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Moduli of elasticity</subject><subject>Shear stress</subject><subject>Sloanea spp</subject><subject>Tensile stress</subject><subject>Tree trunks</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Tropical Biology</subject><subject>tropical trees</subject><subject>Vegetal Biology</subject><subject>wood</subject><subject>Youngs modulus</subject><issn>0002-9122</issn><issn>1537-2197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1v1DAQxS1ERZfCkRtCEYciDlk8tpN4OCBtK2iLVuLSu2UnTterfBQ7Iep_X0dZFtRDTzNj_eb5jR4h74CuecHZF703a6RrXAMX-IKsIONFygCLl2RFKWUpAmOn5HUI-ziiQPaKnDLIM2Q8W5FvF65vbbnTnStD0teJGYfB2xBslcRqw9fE2K5y3V0SBq9dFxLdVXM_M-ENOal1E-zbQz0jtz--315ep9tfVzeXm21aZlBgirosQNrKFHmNUIhcCJHZWuZoJGqkhmWalqbSRupaYy6BMqGlyW1VmZzxM_J5kd3pRt1712r_oHrt1PVmq-Y3CpQzyLI_ENlPC3vv-9-jDYNqXSht0-jO9mNQsgAuuWA8kufPkiAlUkaLCH58Au770XfxYBU_jRTgrJYuUOn7ELytj0aBqjkqFaNSSBWqOarIfziIjqa11ZH-m00E-AJMrrEPz6upzc8LdpB9v2ztw9D745YAJkD8d_PO3e0m560KrW6a6AHUNE3_7D0CC86zbQ</recordid><startdate>200309</startdate><enddate>200309</enddate><creator>Clair, Bruno</creator><creator>Fournier, Meriem</creator><creator>Prevost, Marie Francoise</creator><creator>Beauchene, Jacques</creator><creator>Bardet, Sandrine</creator><general>Botanical Soc America</general><general>Botanical Society of America</general><general>Botanical Society of America, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4093-9034</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7239-1499</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4578-3670</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2156-6014</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>200309</creationdate><title>Biomechanics of buttressed trees: bending strains and stresses</title><author>Clair, Bruno ; Fournier, Meriem ; Prevost, Marie Francoise ; Beauchene, Jacques ; Bardet, Sandrine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5179-9ac718edb76f917464445ef869b89a90b25a0cbdab8afa9681024a8b6eddb623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Bending</topic><topic>biomechanics</topic><topic>Botanics</topic><topic>Botany</topic><topic>buttress</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Eleaocarpaceae</topic><topic>Estimation bias</topic><topic>French Guiana</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Moduli of elasticity</topic><topic>Shear stress</topic><topic>Sloanea spp</topic><topic>Tensile stress</topic><topic>Tree trunks</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Tropical Biology</topic><topic>tropical trees</topic><topic>Vegetal Biology</topic><topic>wood</topic><topic>Youngs modulus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clair, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fournier, Meriem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prevost, Marie Francoise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beauchene, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bardet, Sandrine</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>American journal of botany</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clair, Bruno</au><au>Fournier, Meriem</au><au>Prevost, Marie Francoise</au><au>Beauchene, Jacques</au><au>Bardet, Sandrine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biomechanics of buttressed trees: bending strains and stresses</atitle><jtitle>American journal of botany</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Bot</addtitle><date>2003-09</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1349</spage><epage>1356</epage><pages>1349-1356</pages><issn>0002-9122</issn><eissn>1537-2197</eissn><coden>AJBOAA</coden><abstract>The different hypotheses about buttress function and formation mainly involve mechanical theory. Forces were applied to two trees of Sloanea spp., a tropical genus that develops typical thin buttresses, and the three-dimensional strains were measured at different parts of the trunk base. Risks of failure were greater on the buttress sides, where shear and tangential stresses are greater, not on the ridges, in spite of high longitudinal (parallel to the grain) stresses. A simple beam model, computed from the second moment of area of digitized cross sections, is consistent with longitudinal strain variations but cannot predict accurately variations with height. Patterns of longitudinal strain variation along ridges are very different in the two individuals, owing to a pronounced lateral curvature in one specimen. The constant stress hypothesis is discussed based on these results. Without chronological data during the development of the tree, it cannot be proved that buttress formation is activated by stress or strain.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Botanical Soc America</pub><pmid>21659235</pmid><doi>10.3732/ajb.90.9.1349</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4093-9034</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7239-1499</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4578-3670</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2156-6014</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9122 |
ispartof | American journal of botany, 2003-09, Vol.90 (9), p.1349-1356 |
issn | 0002-9122 1537-2197 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01032155v1 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Bending biomechanics Botanics Botany buttress Density Eleaocarpaceae Estimation bias French Guiana Life Sciences Modeling Moduli of elasticity Shear stress Sloanea spp Tensile stress Tree trunks Trees Tropical Biology tropical trees Vegetal Biology wood Youngs modulus |
title | Biomechanics of buttressed trees: bending strains and stresses |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T10%3A19%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biomechanics%20of%20buttressed%20trees:%20bending%20strains%20and%20stresses&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20botany&rft.au=Clair,%20Bruno&rft.date=2003-09&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1349&rft.epage=1356&rft.pages=1349-1356&rft.issn=0002-9122&rft.eissn=1537-2197&rft.coden=AJBOAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.3732/ajb.90.9.1349&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_hal_p%3E4124143%3C/jstor_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215889193&rft_id=info:pmid/21659235&rft_jstor_id=4124143&rfr_iscdi=true |