Impact of temperature sampling strategy on the risk of Clostridium growth: Application to rapid cooling of food in institutional food service facilities

In French institutional food services, cooked food must be cooled within 2 h of cooking and the temperature of the cooked food must then be lower than 10 °C to avoid significant growth of Clostridium perfringens. However, food placed on trolleys and put in a rapid cooling unit (a blast-chiller) show...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Food control 2013-04, Vol.30 (2), p.642-648
Hauptverfasser: Commeau, Natalie, Jaloustre, Séverine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 648
container_issue 2
container_start_page 642
container_title Food control
container_volume 30
creator Commeau, Natalie
Jaloustre, Séverine
description In French institutional food services, cooked food must be cooled within 2 h of cooking and the temperature of the cooked food must then be lower than 10 °C to avoid significant growth of Clostridium perfringens. However, food placed on trolleys and put in a rapid cooling unit (a blast-chiller) shows great variation in temperature. What criterion should then be used to decide when the trolley can be removed from the blast-chiller? We studied four different strategies of when to remove the trolley by fitting 217 time–temperature profiles collected in a central hospital kitchen to mixed-effect models. We modelled the temperatures between and within containers holding meals on trolleys. We compared the strategies as to the probability that C. perfringens can proliferate to at least 1 log CFU g−1. For each strategy, this probability was plotted against the probability of the trolley leaving the blast-chiller. The probability of leaving the blast-chiller varied, depending on the number of measurements taken on the trolley and on the points where temperature was measured. The best strategy depends on the risk of C. perfringens growth exceeding 1 log10 CFU g−1 the food service operator accepts and the temperature monitoring protocol that is implemented. ► The temperature variability of cooked food in a blast-chiller can be wide. ► We modelled the food temperature inside a blast-chiller. ► Four strategies of when to remove the trolley from the blast-chiller are compared. ► The comparison is made on the probability of Clostridium perfringens growth. ► The best strategy differs according to the risk the manager is ready to take.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.08.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01001096v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0956713512004586</els_id><sourcerecordid>1285098399</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-e53d99a2cf9d92ba89fa3e834a14b7af94125be7a4a2a6752a20b69ff0a092523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc-O0zAQxiMEEmXhFcAXJDg0jJ3mjzlRVcCuVIkD7NmaOuPWJYmD7RTtm_C4OJtlr0gj2Rr_5pvxfFn2mkPOgVcfzrlxrtVuiLkALnJocuDwJFvxpi7WNRfyabYCWVbpXpTPsxchnAF4naBV9uemH1FH5gyL1I_kMU6eWMB-7OxwZCGmDB3vmBtYPBHzNvyc4V3n0pNt7dSzo3e_4-kj246pRmO0M-uYx9G2TDt3L5Rq5jGZHVKEaOM0c9gt2UD-YjUxg9p2NloKL7NnBrtArx7Oq-z2y-cfu-v1_tvXm912v9ZFA3FNZdFKiUIb2UpxwEYaLKgpNsg3hxqN3HBRHqjGDQqs6lKggEMljQEEKUpRXGXvF90Tdmr0tkd_pxxadb3dqzmX1pRCVhee2HcLO3r3a6IQVW-Dpq7DgdwUFBdNCbIppExotaDauxA8mUdtDmq2TZ3VP9vUbJuCZm6VCt8-9MCgsTMeB23DY7WoJNRVNTd4s3AGncJj8kXdfk9CJQBUm-b-Z58WgtL6Lpa8CtrSoKm1nnRUrbP_G-YvqmC9ag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1285098399</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of temperature sampling strategy on the risk of Clostridium growth: Application to rapid cooling of food in institutional food service facilities</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Commeau, Natalie ; Jaloustre, Séverine</creator><creatorcontrib>Commeau, Natalie ; Jaloustre, Séverine</creatorcontrib><description>In French institutional food services, cooked food must be cooled within 2 h of cooking and the temperature of the cooked food must then be lower than 10 °C to avoid significant growth of Clostridium perfringens. However, food placed on trolleys and put in a rapid cooling unit (a blast-chiller) shows great variation in temperature. What criterion should then be used to decide when the trolley can be removed from the blast-chiller? We studied four different strategies of when to remove the trolley by fitting 217 time–temperature profiles collected in a central hospital kitchen to mixed-effect models. We modelled the temperatures between and within containers holding meals on trolleys. We compared the strategies as to the probability that C. perfringens can proliferate to at least 1 log CFU g−1. For each strategy, this probability was plotted against the probability of the trolley leaving the blast-chiller. The probability of leaving the blast-chiller varied, depending on the number of measurements taken on the trolley and on the points where temperature was measured. The best strategy depends on the risk of C. perfringens growth exceeding 1 log10 CFU g−1 the food service operator accepts and the temperature monitoring protocol that is implemented. ► The temperature variability of cooked food in a blast-chiller can be wide. ► We modelled the food temperature inside a blast-chiller. ► Four strategies of when to remove the trolley from the blast-chiller are compared. ► The comparison is made on the probability of Clostridium perfringens growth. ► The best strategy differs according to the risk the manager is ready to take.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-7135</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7129</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.08.010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chill chain ; Clostridium ; Clostridium perfringens ; containers ; Control measures ; Cooking ; cooling ; Food industries ; food service ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Life Sciences ; monitoring ; risk ; Sampling strategy ; temperature ; Thermal model</subject><ispartof>Food control, 2013-04, Vol.30 (2), p.642-648</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-e53d99a2cf9d92ba89fa3e834a14b7af94125be7a4a2a6752a20b69ff0a092523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956713512004586$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26907669$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01001096$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Commeau, Natalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaloustre, Séverine</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of temperature sampling strategy on the risk of Clostridium growth: Application to rapid cooling of food in institutional food service facilities</title><title>Food control</title><description>In French institutional food services, cooked food must be cooled within 2 h of cooking and the temperature of the cooked food must then be lower than 10 °C to avoid significant growth of Clostridium perfringens. However, food placed on trolleys and put in a rapid cooling unit (a blast-chiller) shows great variation in temperature. What criterion should then be used to decide when the trolley can be removed from the blast-chiller? We studied four different strategies of when to remove the trolley by fitting 217 time–temperature profiles collected in a central hospital kitchen to mixed-effect models. We modelled the temperatures between and within containers holding meals on trolleys. We compared the strategies as to the probability that C. perfringens can proliferate to at least 1 log CFU g−1. For each strategy, this probability was plotted against the probability of the trolley leaving the blast-chiller. The probability of leaving the blast-chiller varied, depending on the number of measurements taken on the trolley and on the points where temperature was measured. The best strategy depends on the risk of C. perfringens growth exceeding 1 log10 CFU g−1 the food service operator accepts and the temperature monitoring protocol that is implemented. ► The temperature variability of cooked food in a blast-chiller can be wide. ► We modelled the food temperature inside a blast-chiller. ► Four strategies of when to remove the trolley from the blast-chiller are compared. ► The comparison is made on the probability of Clostridium perfringens growth. ► The best strategy differs according to the risk the manager is ready to take.</description><subject>Agricultural sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chill chain</subject><subject>Clostridium</subject><subject>Clostridium perfringens</subject><subject>containers</subject><subject>Control measures</subject><subject>Cooking</subject><subject>cooling</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>food service</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>monitoring</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>Sampling strategy</subject><subject>temperature</subject><subject>Thermal model</subject><issn>0956-7135</issn><issn>1873-7129</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc-O0zAQxiMEEmXhFcAXJDg0jJ3mjzlRVcCuVIkD7NmaOuPWJYmD7RTtm_C4OJtlr0gj2Rr_5pvxfFn2mkPOgVcfzrlxrtVuiLkALnJocuDwJFvxpi7WNRfyabYCWVbpXpTPsxchnAF4naBV9uemH1FH5gyL1I_kMU6eWMB-7OxwZCGmDB3vmBtYPBHzNvyc4V3n0pNt7dSzo3e_4-kj246pRmO0M-uYx9G2TDt3L5Rq5jGZHVKEaOM0c9gt2UD-YjUxg9p2NloKL7NnBrtArx7Oq-z2y-cfu-v1_tvXm912v9ZFA3FNZdFKiUIb2UpxwEYaLKgpNsg3hxqN3HBRHqjGDQqs6lKggEMljQEEKUpRXGXvF90Tdmr0tkd_pxxadb3dqzmX1pRCVhee2HcLO3r3a6IQVW-Dpq7DgdwUFBdNCbIppExotaDauxA8mUdtDmq2TZ3VP9vUbJuCZm6VCt8-9MCgsTMeB23DY7WoJNRVNTd4s3AGncJj8kXdfk9CJQBUm-b-Z58WgtL6Lpa8CtrSoKm1nnRUrbP_G-YvqmC9ag</recordid><startdate>20130401</startdate><enddate>20130401</enddate><creator>Commeau, Natalie</creator><creator>Jaloustre, Séverine</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>1XC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130401</creationdate><title>Impact of temperature sampling strategy on the risk of Clostridium growth: Application to rapid cooling of food in institutional food service facilities</title><author>Commeau, Natalie ; Jaloustre, Séverine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-e53d99a2cf9d92ba89fa3e834a14b7af94125be7a4a2a6752a20b69ff0a092523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Agricultural sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chill chain</topic><topic>Clostridium</topic><topic>Clostridium perfringens</topic><topic>containers</topic><topic>Control measures</topic><topic>Cooking</topic><topic>cooling</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>food service</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>monitoring</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>Sampling strategy</topic><topic>temperature</topic><topic>Thermal model</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Commeau, Natalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaloustre, Séverine</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Food control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Commeau, Natalie</au><au>Jaloustre, Séverine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of temperature sampling strategy on the risk of Clostridium growth: Application to rapid cooling of food in institutional food service facilities</atitle><jtitle>Food control</jtitle><date>2013-04-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>642</spage><epage>648</epage><pages>642-648</pages><issn>0956-7135</issn><eissn>1873-7129</eissn><abstract>In French institutional food services, cooked food must be cooled within 2 h of cooking and the temperature of the cooked food must then be lower than 10 °C to avoid significant growth of Clostridium perfringens. However, food placed on trolleys and put in a rapid cooling unit (a blast-chiller) shows great variation in temperature. What criterion should then be used to decide when the trolley can be removed from the blast-chiller? We studied four different strategies of when to remove the trolley by fitting 217 time–temperature profiles collected in a central hospital kitchen to mixed-effect models. We modelled the temperatures between and within containers holding meals on trolleys. We compared the strategies as to the probability that C. perfringens can proliferate to at least 1 log CFU g−1. For each strategy, this probability was plotted against the probability of the trolley leaving the blast-chiller. The probability of leaving the blast-chiller varied, depending on the number of measurements taken on the trolley and on the points where temperature was measured. The best strategy depends on the risk of C. perfringens growth exceeding 1 log10 CFU g−1 the food service operator accepts and the temperature monitoring protocol that is implemented. ► The temperature variability of cooked food in a blast-chiller can be wide. ► We modelled the food temperature inside a blast-chiller. ► Four strategies of when to remove the trolley from the blast-chiller are compared. ► The comparison is made on the probability of Clostridium perfringens growth. ► The best strategy differs according to the risk the manager is ready to take.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.08.010</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0956-7135
ispartof Food control, 2013-04, Vol.30 (2), p.642-648
issn 0956-7135
1873-7129
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01001096v1
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Agricultural sciences
Biological and medical sciences
Chill chain
Clostridium
Clostridium perfringens
containers
Control measures
Cooking
cooling
Food industries
food service
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Life Sciences
monitoring
risk
Sampling strategy
temperature
Thermal model
title Impact of temperature sampling strategy on the risk of Clostridium growth: Application to rapid cooling of food in institutional food service facilities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T19%3A20%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20temperature%20sampling%20strategy%20on%20the%20risk%20of%20Clostridium%20growth:%20Application%20to%20rapid%20cooling%20of%20food%20in%20institutional%20food%20service%20facilities&rft.jtitle=Food%20control&rft.au=Commeau,%20Natalie&rft.date=2013-04-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=642&rft.epage=648&rft.pages=642-648&rft.issn=0956-7135&rft.eissn=1873-7129&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.08.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1285098399%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1285098399&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0956713512004586&rfr_iscdi=true