The accuracy of acquisition of an imageless computer-assisted system and its implication for knee arthroplasty
Abstract The majority of the current computer-assisted systems (CAS) for knee prosthetic surgery require the acquisition of points using a tracker detected by an infrared camera. Two types of measurements are then essential: angles and distances. The goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The knee 2011-01, Vol.18 (1), p.15-20 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 20 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 15 |
container_title | The knee |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Lustig, S Fleury, C Goy, D Neyret, P Donell, S.T |
description | Abstract The majority of the current computer-assisted systems (CAS) for knee prosthetic surgery require the acquisition of points using a tracker detected by an infrared camera. Two types of measurements are then essential: angles and distances. The goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the data obtained during computer-assisted surgery using an in vitro protocol. Two models were developed to locate precisely both points (120 acquisitions) and distance measurements (144 acquisitions) and angles (170 acquisitions) with an image-free CAS using an infrared optical camera. For validation, a precise coordinate 3D measurement device was used to assess the accuracy of CAS acquisitions. The points, distances and angles had a mean error respectively of 0.638 mm (0.244 mm to 0.931 mm), 0.355 mm (0.001 mm to 1.338 mm) and 0.39° (0.06° to 0.69°). For all these acquisitions, the mean error was statistically less than 1 mm or 1° ( p < 0.001). By using a 3D measurement system, it was possible to determine the accuracy of the data obtained with the navigation system. The precision assessed at less than 1 mm or 1° corresponds with the accuracy needed in knee arthroplasty and with the use of CAS as a measurement tool. Variability in computer-assisted navigation may be more likely related to other aspects of the procedure such as bony landmark acquisition, tolerance of saw blades and cutting jigs than the accuracy of the imageless CAS itself. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.knee.2009.12.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00978690v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0968016009002567</els_id><sourcerecordid>821191674</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-592195c5e34fe2396e4ae9165f91a937d8219e0d1f6bbc75e3595165c9dcd8c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1r1UAUhgdR7G31D7iQgAtxkXgm3wNSKMVa4YIL63qYOznxzm2SSeckhfx7T3prhS5czdfznq93hHgnIZEgy8-H5HZATFIAlcg0AQkvxEbWVRYXNcBLsQFV1jGTcCJOiQ4AUKq8eC1OWFJCleYbMdzsMTLWzsHYJfIt7-9mR25yfng4DpHrzW_skCiyvh_nCUNsiBxN2ES08NIz1URuIkbHzlnzIG59iNb6IhOmffBjZ2ha3ohXrekI3z6uZ-LX1deby-t4--Pb98uLbWzzKp3iQqVSFbbALG8xzVSJuUEly6JV0qisamp-R2hkW-52tmKuUAU_W9XYprZVdiY-HePuTafHwC2ERXvj9PXFVq93PLOqLhXcS2Y_Htkx-LsZadK9I4tdZwb0M2nOJTl3lTP54Rl58HMYuBEtIctVXah6zZ0eKRs8UcD2qQAJejVOH_Q6GL0ap2Wq2TgWvX8MPe96bJ4kf51i4MsRQB7bvcOgyTocLDYuoJ10493_458_k9vODexVd4sL0r8-NLFA_1y_zvpzQAGkRVllfwBluL4X</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1034985987</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The accuracy of acquisition of an imageless computer-assisted system and its implication for knee arthroplasty</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Lustig, S ; Fleury, C ; Goy, D ; Neyret, P ; Donell, S.T</creator><creatorcontrib>Lustig, S ; Fleury, C ; Goy, D ; Neyret, P ; Donell, S.T</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The majority of the current computer-assisted systems (CAS) for knee prosthetic surgery require the acquisition of points using a tracker detected by an infrared camera. Two types of measurements are then essential: angles and distances. The goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the data obtained during computer-assisted surgery using an in vitro protocol. Two models were developed to locate precisely both points (120 acquisitions) and distance measurements (144 acquisitions) and angles (170 acquisitions) with an image-free CAS using an infrared optical camera. For validation, a precise coordinate 3D measurement device was used to assess the accuracy of CAS acquisitions. The points, distances and angles had a mean error respectively of 0.638 mm (0.244 mm to 0.931 mm), 0.355 mm (0.001 mm to 1.338 mm) and 0.39° (0.06° to 0.69°). For all these acquisitions, the mean error was statistically less than 1 mm or 1° ( p < 0.001). By using a 3D measurement system, it was possible to determine the accuracy of the data obtained with the navigation system. The precision assessed at less than 1 mm or 1° corresponds with the accuracy needed in knee arthroplasty and with the use of CAS as a measurement tool. Variability in computer-assisted navigation may be more likely related to other aspects of the procedure such as bony landmark acquisition, tolerance of saw blades and cutting jigs than the accuracy of the imageless CAS itself.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0968-0160</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.12.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20060724</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>3D system ; Accuracy ; Angle ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods ; Bills ; Biomechanics ; Computer Simulation ; Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) ; Distance ; Engineering Sciences ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Infrared Rays ; Joint surgery ; Knee Joint - pathology ; Knee Joint - surgery ; Mechanics ; Navigation systems ; Orthopedics ; Physics ; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted ; Reproducibility of Results ; Software ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Thermography - instrumentation ; Total knee replacement (TKR)</subject><ispartof>The knee, 2011-01, Vol.18 (1), p.15-20</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2010 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-592195c5e34fe2396e4ae9165f91a937d8219e0d1f6bbc75e3595165c9dcd8c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-592195c5e34fe2396e4ae9165f91a937d8219e0d1f6bbc75e3595165c9dcd8c73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6739-4601</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016009002567$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20060724$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-00978690$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lustig, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleury, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goy, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neyret, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donell, S.T</creatorcontrib><title>The accuracy of acquisition of an imageless computer-assisted system and its implication for knee arthroplasty</title><title>The knee</title><addtitle>Knee</addtitle><description>Abstract The majority of the current computer-assisted systems (CAS) for knee prosthetic surgery require the acquisition of points using a tracker detected by an infrared camera. Two types of measurements are then essential: angles and distances. The goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the data obtained during computer-assisted surgery using an in vitro protocol. Two models were developed to locate precisely both points (120 acquisitions) and distance measurements (144 acquisitions) and angles (170 acquisitions) with an image-free CAS using an infrared optical camera. For validation, a precise coordinate 3D measurement device was used to assess the accuracy of CAS acquisitions. The points, distances and angles had a mean error respectively of 0.638 mm (0.244 mm to 0.931 mm), 0.355 mm (0.001 mm to 1.338 mm) and 0.39° (0.06° to 0.69°). For all these acquisitions, the mean error was statistically less than 1 mm or 1° ( p < 0.001). By using a 3D measurement system, it was possible to determine the accuracy of the data obtained with the navigation system. The precision assessed at less than 1 mm or 1° corresponds with the accuracy needed in knee arthroplasty and with the use of CAS as a measurement tool. Variability in computer-assisted navigation may be more likely related to other aspects of the procedure such as bony landmark acquisition, tolerance of saw blades and cutting jigs than the accuracy of the imageless CAS itself.</description><subject>3D system</subject><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Angle</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</subject><subject>Bills</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Computer-assisted surgery (CAS)</subject><subject>Distance</subject><subject>Engineering Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Infrared Rays</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Knee Joint - pathology</subject><subject>Knee Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Mechanics</subject><subject>Navigation systems</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</subject><subject>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Thermography - instrumentation</subject><subject>Total knee replacement (TKR)</subject><issn>0968-0160</issn><issn>1873-5800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk1r1UAUhgdR7G31D7iQgAtxkXgm3wNSKMVa4YIL63qYOznxzm2SSeckhfx7T3prhS5czdfznq93hHgnIZEgy8-H5HZATFIAlcg0AQkvxEbWVRYXNcBLsQFV1jGTcCJOiQ4AUKq8eC1OWFJCleYbMdzsMTLWzsHYJfIt7-9mR25yfng4DpHrzW_skCiyvh_nCUNsiBxN2ES08NIz1URuIkbHzlnzIG59iNb6IhOmffBjZ2ha3ohXrekI3z6uZ-LX1deby-t4--Pb98uLbWzzKp3iQqVSFbbALG8xzVSJuUEly6JV0qisamp-R2hkW-52tmKuUAU_W9XYprZVdiY-HePuTafHwC2ERXvj9PXFVq93PLOqLhXcS2Y_Htkx-LsZadK9I4tdZwb0M2nOJTl3lTP54Rl58HMYuBEtIctVXah6zZ0eKRs8UcD2qQAJejVOH_Q6GL0ap2Wq2TgWvX8MPe96bJ4kf51i4MsRQB7bvcOgyTocLDYuoJ10493_458_k9vODexVd4sL0r8-NLFA_1y_zvpzQAGkRVllfwBluL4X</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Lustig, S</creator><creator>Fleury, C</creator><creator>Goy, D</creator><creator>Neyret, P</creator><creator>Donell, S.T</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6739-4601</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>The accuracy of acquisition of an imageless computer-assisted system and its implication for knee arthroplasty</title><author>Lustig, S ; Fleury, C ; Goy, D ; Neyret, P ; Donell, S.T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-592195c5e34fe2396e4ae9165f91a937d8219e0d1f6bbc75e3595165c9dcd8c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>3D system</topic><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Angle</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</topic><topic>Bills</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Computer-assisted surgery (CAS)</topic><topic>Distance</topic><topic>Engineering Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Infrared Rays</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Knee Joint - pathology</topic><topic>Knee Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Mechanics</topic><topic>Navigation systems</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</topic><topic>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Thermography - instrumentation</topic><topic>Total knee replacement (TKR)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lustig, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleury, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goy, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neyret, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donell, S.T</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>The knee</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lustig, S</au><au>Fleury, C</au><au>Goy, D</au><au>Neyret, P</au><au>Donell, S.T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The accuracy of acquisition of an imageless computer-assisted system and its implication for knee arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>The knee</jtitle><addtitle>Knee</addtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>20</epage><pages>15-20</pages><issn>0968-0160</issn><eissn>1873-5800</eissn><abstract>Abstract The majority of the current computer-assisted systems (CAS) for knee prosthetic surgery require the acquisition of points using a tracker detected by an infrared camera. Two types of measurements are then essential: angles and distances. The goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the data obtained during computer-assisted surgery using an in vitro protocol. Two models were developed to locate precisely both points (120 acquisitions) and distance measurements (144 acquisitions) and angles (170 acquisitions) with an image-free CAS using an infrared optical camera. For validation, a precise coordinate 3D measurement device was used to assess the accuracy of CAS acquisitions. The points, distances and angles had a mean error respectively of 0.638 mm (0.244 mm to 0.931 mm), 0.355 mm (0.001 mm to 1.338 mm) and 0.39° (0.06° to 0.69°). For all these acquisitions, the mean error was statistically less than 1 mm or 1° ( p < 0.001). By using a 3D measurement system, it was possible to determine the accuracy of the data obtained with the navigation system. The precision assessed at less than 1 mm or 1° corresponds with the accuracy needed in knee arthroplasty and with the use of CAS as a measurement tool. Variability in computer-assisted navigation may be more likely related to other aspects of the procedure such as bony landmark acquisition, tolerance of saw blades and cutting jigs than the accuracy of the imageless CAS itself.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>20060724</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.knee.2009.12.010</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6739-4601</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0968-0160 |
ispartof | The knee, 2011-01, Vol.18 (1), p.15-20 |
issn | 0968-0160 1873-5800 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00978690v1 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | 3D system Accuracy Angle Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods Bills Biomechanics Computer Simulation Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) Distance Engineering Sciences Humans Imaging, Three-Dimensional Infrared Rays Joint surgery Knee Joint - pathology Knee Joint - surgery Mechanics Navigation systems Orthopedics Physics Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted Reproducibility of Results Software Surgery, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods Thermography - instrumentation Total knee replacement (TKR) |
title | The accuracy of acquisition of an imageless computer-assisted system and its implication for knee arthroplasty |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T14%3A50%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20accuracy%20of%20acquisition%20of%20an%20imageless%20computer-assisted%20system%20and%20its%20implication%20for%20knee%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=The%20knee&rft.au=Lustig,%20S&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=20&rft.pages=15-20&rft.issn=0968-0160&rft.eissn=1873-5800&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.knee.2009.12.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E821191674%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1034985987&rft_id=info:pmid/20060724&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0968016009002567&rfr_iscdi=true |