Measuring the effects of visual demand on lateral deviation: A comparison among driver’s performance indicators

In this study we compare the efficacy of three driver’s performance indicators based on lateral deviation in detecting significant on-road performance degradations while interacting with a secondary task: the High Frequency Component of steering wheel (HFC), and two indicators described in ISO/DIS 2...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied ergonomics 2012-05, Vol.43 (3), p.486-492
Hauptverfasser: Minin, Luca, Benedetto, Simone, Pedrotti, Marco, Re, Alessandra, Tesauri, Francesco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 492
container_issue 3
container_start_page 486
container_title Applied ergonomics
container_volume 43
creator Minin, Luca
Benedetto, Simone
Pedrotti, Marco
Re, Alessandra
Tesauri, Francesco
description In this study we compare the efficacy of three driver’s performance indicators based on lateral deviation in detecting significant on-road performance degradations while interacting with a secondary task: the High Frequency Component of steering wheel (HFC), and two indicators described in ISO/DIS 26022 (2007): the Normative and the Adapted Lane Change Test ( LCT). Sixteen participants were asked to perform a simulated lane-change task while interacting, when required, with a visual search task with two levels of difficulty. According to predictions, results showed that the Adapted LCT indicator, taking into consideration individual practices in performing the LCT, succeeded in discriminating between single and dual task conditions. Furthermore, this indicator was also able to detect whether the driver was interacting with an easy or a difficult secondary task. Despite predictions, results did not confirm Normative LCT and HFC to be reliable indicators of performance degradation within the simulated LCT. ► We compared three indicators in detecting drivers’ impairment in single and dual tasks. ► Two indicators based on lateral deviation – Adapted and Normative LCT – ISO/DIS26022. ► One indicator based on steering wheel variation (HFC). ► Adapted LCT discriminated drivers’ lateral impairment between single and dual task. ► Normative LCT and HFC were not reliable indicators of lateral degradation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.08.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00875922v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003687011001098</els_id><sourcerecordid>916527353</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-6ae29c4828535248a3ccf9167306e333ccb2f8a5af3251419d43558b669842043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxi0EosvCGyBkISHEIcF_4sTpAWlVAUVaxAXO1qwzab1K4q2dROLGa_T1-iR4m6VIHDhZY_9m5vP3EfKSs5wzXr7f53DAcOVzwTjPmc4Z44_IiutKZDUX5WOyYozJrNQVOyPPYtynUhdcPSVngte8ElKvyM1XhDgFN1zR8Ropti3aMVLf0tnFCTraYA9DQ_1AOxgx3N_MDkbnh3O6odb3BwgupnfofZrSBDdjuPt1G2mS1_qQ2i1SNzTOwuhDfE6etNBFfHE61-THp4_fLy6z7bfPXy4228wWtR6zElDUttBCK6lEoUFa29a8rCQrUcpU7USrQUErheIFr5tCKqV3ZVnrQrBCrsm7Ze41dOYQXA_hp_HgzOVma453yY1K1ULMPLFvF_YQ_M2EcTS9ixa7Dgb0UzRprxKVVDKRr_8h934KQ_rIPVQxzkSCigWywccYsH3Yz5k5hmf2ZgnPHMMzTCcxRxWvTrOnXY_NQ9OftBLw5gRAtNC1IVnr4l9OlZLJ5NCafFg4TP7ODoOJ1mGKoXEhxWsa7_6v5DdNiLj7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>916570102</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring the effects of visual demand on lateral deviation: A comparison among driver’s performance indicators</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Minin, Luca ; Benedetto, Simone ; Pedrotti, Marco ; Re, Alessandra ; Tesauri, Francesco</creator><creatorcontrib>Minin, Luca ; Benedetto, Simone ; Pedrotti, Marco ; Re, Alessandra ; Tesauri, Francesco</creatorcontrib><description>In this study we compare the efficacy of three driver’s performance indicators based on lateral deviation in detecting significant on-road performance degradations while interacting with a secondary task: the High Frequency Component of steering wheel (HFC), and two indicators described in ISO/DIS 26022 (2007): the Normative and the Adapted Lane Change Test ( LCT). Sixteen participants were asked to perform a simulated lane-change task while interacting, when required, with a visual search task with two levels of difficulty. According to predictions, results showed that the Adapted LCT indicator, taking into consideration individual practices in performing the LCT, succeeded in discriminating between single and dual task conditions. Furthermore, this indicator was also able to detect whether the driver was interacting with an easy or a difficult secondary task. Despite predictions, results did not confirm Normative LCT and HFC to be reliable indicators of performance degradation within the simulated LCT. ► We compared three indicators in detecting drivers’ impairment in single and dual tasks. ► Two indicators based on lateral deviation – Adapted and Normative LCT – ISO/DIS26022. ► One indicator based on steering wheel variation (HFC). ► Adapted LCT discriminated drivers’ lateral impairment between single and dual task. ► Normative LCT and HFC were not reliable indicators of lateral degradation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-6870</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9126</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.08.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21917238</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AERGBW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Applied physiology ; Attention - physiology ; Automobile drivers ; Automobile Driving - psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition - physiology ; Comparative studies ; Computer Science ; Computer Simulation ; Decision Making ; Driving performance measures ; Ergonomics ; Ergonomics. Work place. Occupational physiology ; Female ; Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology ; Humans ; Lane change test ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Modeling and Simulation ; Reaction Time ; Simulation ; Task Performance and Analysis ; Visual task performance ; Visual workload</subject><ispartof>Applied ergonomics, 2012-05, Vol.43 (3), p.486-492</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. May 2012</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-6ae29c4828535248a3ccf9167306e333ccb2f8a5af3251419d43558b669842043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-6ae29c4828535248a3ccf9167306e333ccb2f8a5af3251419d43558b669842043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2011.08.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25630367$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21917238$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-00875922$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Minin, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benedetto, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedrotti, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Re, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tesauri, Francesco</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring the effects of visual demand on lateral deviation: A comparison among driver’s performance indicators</title><title>Applied ergonomics</title><addtitle>Appl Ergon</addtitle><description>In this study we compare the efficacy of three driver’s performance indicators based on lateral deviation in detecting significant on-road performance degradations while interacting with a secondary task: the High Frequency Component of steering wheel (HFC), and two indicators described in ISO/DIS 26022 (2007): the Normative and the Adapted Lane Change Test ( LCT). Sixteen participants were asked to perform a simulated lane-change task while interacting, when required, with a visual search task with two levels of difficulty. According to predictions, results showed that the Adapted LCT indicator, taking into consideration individual practices in performing the LCT, succeeded in discriminating between single and dual task conditions. Furthermore, this indicator was also able to detect whether the driver was interacting with an easy or a difficult secondary task. Despite predictions, results did not confirm Normative LCT and HFC to be reliable indicators of performance degradation within the simulated LCT. ► We compared three indicators in detecting drivers’ impairment in single and dual tasks. ► Two indicators based on lateral deviation – Adapted and Normative LCT – ISO/DIS26022. ► One indicator based on steering wheel variation (HFC). ► Adapted LCT discriminated drivers’ lateral impairment between single and dual task. ► Normative LCT and HFC were not reliable indicators of lateral degradation.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Applied physiology</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Automobile drivers</subject><subject>Automobile Driving - psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition - physiology</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Driving performance measures</subject><subject>Ergonomics</subject><subject>Ergonomics. Work place. Occupational physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lane change test</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Modeling and Simulation</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><subject>Visual task performance</subject><subject>Visual workload</subject><issn>0003-6870</issn><issn>1872-9126</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxi0EosvCGyBkISHEIcF_4sTpAWlVAUVaxAXO1qwzab1K4q2dROLGa_T1-iR4m6VIHDhZY_9m5vP3EfKSs5wzXr7f53DAcOVzwTjPmc4Z44_IiutKZDUX5WOyYozJrNQVOyPPYtynUhdcPSVngte8ElKvyM1XhDgFN1zR8Ropti3aMVLf0tnFCTraYA9DQ_1AOxgx3N_MDkbnh3O6odb3BwgupnfofZrSBDdjuPt1G2mS1_qQ2i1SNzTOwuhDfE6etNBFfHE61-THp4_fLy6z7bfPXy4228wWtR6zElDUttBCK6lEoUFa29a8rCQrUcpU7USrQUErheIFr5tCKqV3ZVnrQrBCrsm7Ze41dOYQXA_hp_HgzOVma453yY1K1ULMPLFvF_YQ_M2EcTS9ixa7Dgb0UzRprxKVVDKRr_8h934KQ_rIPVQxzkSCigWywccYsH3Yz5k5hmf2ZgnPHMMzTCcxRxWvTrOnXY_NQ9OftBLw5gRAtNC1IVnr4l9OlZLJ5NCafFg4TP7ODoOJ1mGKoXEhxWsa7_6v5DdNiLj7</recordid><startdate>20120501</startdate><enddate>20120501</enddate><creator>Minin, Luca</creator><creator>Benedetto, Simone</creator><creator>Pedrotti, Marco</creator><creator>Re, Alessandra</creator><creator>Tesauri, Francesco</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120501</creationdate><title>Measuring the effects of visual demand on lateral deviation: A comparison among driver’s performance indicators</title><author>Minin, Luca ; Benedetto, Simone ; Pedrotti, Marco ; Re, Alessandra ; Tesauri, Francesco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-6ae29c4828535248a3ccf9167306e333ccb2f8a5af3251419d43558b669842043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Applied physiology</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Automobile drivers</topic><topic>Automobile Driving - psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition - physiology</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Driving performance measures</topic><topic>Ergonomics</topic><topic>Ergonomics. Work place. Occupational physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lane change test</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Modeling and Simulation</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><topic>Visual task performance</topic><topic>Visual workload</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Minin, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benedetto, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedrotti, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Re, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tesauri, Francesco</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Applied ergonomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Minin, Luca</au><au>Benedetto, Simone</au><au>Pedrotti, Marco</au><au>Re, Alessandra</au><au>Tesauri, Francesco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring the effects of visual demand on lateral deviation: A comparison among driver’s performance indicators</atitle><jtitle>Applied ergonomics</jtitle><addtitle>Appl Ergon</addtitle><date>2012-05-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>486</spage><epage>492</epage><pages>486-492</pages><issn>0003-6870</issn><eissn>1872-9126</eissn><coden>AERGBW</coden><abstract>In this study we compare the efficacy of three driver’s performance indicators based on lateral deviation in detecting significant on-road performance degradations while interacting with a secondary task: the High Frequency Component of steering wheel (HFC), and two indicators described in ISO/DIS 26022 (2007): the Normative and the Adapted Lane Change Test ( LCT). Sixteen participants were asked to perform a simulated lane-change task while interacting, when required, with a visual search task with two levels of difficulty. According to predictions, results showed that the Adapted LCT indicator, taking into consideration individual practices in performing the LCT, succeeded in discriminating between single and dual task conditions. Furthermore, this indicator was also able to detect whether the driver was interacting with an easy or a difficult secondary task. Despite predictions, results did not confirm Normative LCT and HFC to be reliable indicators of performance degradation within the simulated LCT. ► We compared three indicators in detecting drivers’ impairment in single and dual tasks. ► Two indicators based on lateral deviation – Adapted and Normative LCT – ISO/DIS26022. ► One indicator based on steering wheel variation (HFC). ► Adapted LCT discriminated drivers’ lateral impairment between single and dual task. ► Normative LCT and HFC were not reliable indicators of lateral degradation.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>21917238</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.apergo.2011.08.001</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-6870
ispartof Applied ergonomics, 2012-05, Vol.43 (3), p.486-492
issn 0003-6870
1872-9126
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00875922v1
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Applied physiology
Attention - physiology
Automobile drivers
Automobile Driving - psychology
Biological and medical sciences
Cognition - physiology
Comparative studies
Computer Science
Computer Simulation
Decision Making
Driving performance measures
Ergonomics
Ergonomics. Work place. Occupational physiology
Female
Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology
Humans
Lane change test
Male
Medical sciences
Modeling and Simulation
Reaction Time
Simulation
Task Performance and Analysis
Visual task performance
Visual workload
title Measuring the effects of visual demand on lateral deviation: A comparison among driver’s performance indicators
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T09%3A06%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20the%20effects%20of%20visual%20demand%20on%20lateral%20deviation:%20A%20comparison%20among%20driver%E2%80%99s%20performance%20indicators&rft.jtitle=Applied%20ergonomics&rft.au=Minin,%20Luca&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=486&rft.epage=492&rft.pages=486-492&rft.issn=0003-6870&rft.eissn=1872-9126&rft.coden=AERGBW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apergo.2011.08.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E916527353%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=916570102&rft_id=info:pmid/21917238&rft_els_id=S0003687011001098&rfr_iscdi=true