Rapid quantification of viable fungi in hospital environments: analysis of air and surface samples using solid-phase cytometry
Summary Background Environmental surveillance is important in high-risk areas of hospitals to prevent fungal infections in immunosuppressed patients. Conventional culture methods for enumerating environmental fungi are time-consuming. Aim In this field study, a solid-phase cytometry technique (SPC)...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of hospital infection 2013-02, Vol.83 (2), p.122-126 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 126 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 122 |
container_title | The Journal of hospital infection |
container_volume | 83 |
creator | Méheust, D Le Cann, P Gangneux, J.-P |
description | Summary Background Environmental surveillance is important in high-risk areas of hospitals to prevent fungal infections in immunosuppressed patients. Conventional culture methods for enumerating environmental fungi are time-consuming. Aim In this field study, a solid-phase cytometry technique (SPC) and a more conventional culture-based method to quantify fungal contamination of hospital air and surface samples were compared. Methods For the air sampling, a liquid cyclone air sampler was used with a flow rate of 300 L/min for 10 min in each of four hospital locations. Surface swabbing was done in two locations, with two different swab types. Samples from all areas were processed by SPC and by culture on malt extract agar. Findings The mean airborne concentrations of viable fungi determined by SPC were about 1.5-fold higher than the mean concentrations obtained with the culture-based method. These differences for air samples were significant in three hospital environments. No significant difference was observed for surface samples between the two swab types and between the two analytical methods. One of the prominent advantages of SPC was its rapidity in comparison with the culture-based method (5 h versus 5 days). Conclusion In this study, we showed that SPC allows for rapid monitoring of viable fungi in hospital environments. SPC can thus be used to provide an early warning and a rapid implementation of corrective measures. Viable fungi detection may be an important tool to assess infectious risk in wards with immunosuppressed patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.10.004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00874713v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0195670112003416</els_id><sourcerecordid>1283725570</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-e8dac49952badf615446c2e4eff1c9be876ef20b011ceeac33a4268709242b143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkkuLFDEUhQtRnJ7RP-BCshF0UW1e9ZJBGIbRERoEH-uQSt2avm0qqUmqGnrjbzdFtyO40FXI4TuXm5yTZS8YXTPKyre79W6Lbs0p40lYUyofZStWCJ7zRjSPsxVlTZGXFWVn2XmMO0pp0oun2RkXggla16vs5xc9YkfuZ-0m7NHoCb0jvid71K0F0s_uDgk6svVxxElbAm6PwbsB3BTfEe20PUSMi0VjSPeOxDn02gCJehgtRDJHdHckeotdPm51BGIOkx9gCodn2ZNe2wjPT-dF9v3Dzbfr23zz-eOn66tNbgpaTznUnTayaQre6q4vWSFlaThI6HtmmhbqqoSe05YyZgC0EUJLXtYVbbjkLZPiIntznLvVVo0BBx0OymtUt1cbtWiU1pWsmNizxL4-smPw9zPESQ0YDVirHfg5KiZYXTalkPz_KK9FxYuiognlR9QEH2OA_mENRtUSp9qpJU61xLloKc5kenmaP7cDdA-W3_kl4NUJ0NFo2wftDMY_XNlQ2YgycZdHDtIn7xGCigbBGegwgJlU5_Hfe7z_y24sutQW-wMOEHd-DqkH6b0qckXV16V4S-8Yp1RIVopfgavTjA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1283725570</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rapid quantification of viable fungi in hospital environments: analysis of air and surface samples using solid-phase cytometry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Méheust, D ; Le Cann, P ; Gangneux, J.-P</creator><creatorcontrib>Méheust, D ; Le Cann, P ; Gangneux, J.-P</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background Environmental surveillance is important in high-risk areas of hospitals to prevent fungal infections in immunosuppressed patients. Conventional culture methods for enumerating environmental fungi are time-consuming. Aim In this field study, a solid-phase cytometry technique (SPC) and a more conventional culture-based method to quantify fungal contamination of hospital air and surface samples were compared. Methods For the air sampling, a liquid cyclone air sampler was used with a flow rate of 300 L/min for 10 min in each of four hospital locations. Surface swabbing was done in two locations, with two different swab types. Samples from all areas were processed by SPC and by culture on malt extract agar. Findings The mean airborne concentrations of viable fungi determined by SPC were about 1.5-fold higher than the mean concentrations obtained with the culture-based method. These differences for air samples were significant in three hospital environments. No significant difference was observed for surface samples between the two swab types and between the two analytical methods. One of the prominent advantages of SPC was its rapidity in comparison with the culture-based method (5 h versus 5 days). Conclusion In this study, we showed that SPC allows for rapid monitoring of viable fungi in hospital environments. SPC can thus be used to provide an early warning and a rapid implementation of corrective measures. Viable fungi detection may be an important tool to assess infectious risk in wards with immunosuppressed patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.10.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23313088</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Air Microbiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colony Count, Microbial ; Colony Count, Microbial - methods ; Environmental Microbiology ; Environmental surveillance ; Fungi ; Fungi - isolation & purification ; Hospital ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Image Cytometry ; Image Cytometry - methods ; Infectious Disease ; Infectious diseases ; Life Sciences ; Medical sciences ; Microbial Viability ; Microbiology and Parasitology ; Santé publique et épidémiologie ; Solid-phase cytometry ; Viable fungi</subject><ispartof>The Journal of hospital infection, 2013-02, Vol.83 (2), p.122-126</ispartof><rights>The Healthcare Infection Society</rights><rights>2012 The Healthcare Infection Society</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-e8dac49952badf615446c2e4eff1c9be876ef20b011ceeac33a4268709242b143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-e8dac49952badf615446c2e4eff1c9be876ef20b011ceeac33a4268709242b143</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5329-4311 ; 0000-0002-4974-5607</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670112003416$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26904936$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23313088$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-00874713$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Méheust, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Cann, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gangneux, J.-P</creatorcontrib><title>Rapid quantification of viable fungi in hospital environments: analysis of air and surface samples using solid-phase cytometry</title><title>The Journal of hospital infection</title><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><description>Summary Background Environmental surveillance is important in high-risk areas of hospitals to prevent fungal infections in immunosuppressed patients. Conventional culture methods for enumerating environmental fungi are time-consuming. Aim In this field study, a solid-phase cytometry technique (SPC) and a more conventional culture-based method to quantify fungal contamination of hospital air and surface samples were compared. Methods For the air sampling, a liquid cyclone air sampler was used with a flow rate of 300 L/min for 10 min in each of four hospital locations. Surface swabbing was done in two locations, with two different swab types. Samples from all areas were processed by SPC and by culture on malt extract agar. Findings The mean airborne concentrations of viable fungi determined by SPC were about 1.5-fold higher than the mean concentrations obtained with the culture-based method. These differences for air samples were significant in three hospital environments. No significant difference was observed for surface samples between the two swab types and between the two analytical methods. One of the prominent advantages of SPC was its rapidity in comparison with the culture-based method (5 h versus 5 days). Conclusion In this study, we showed that SPC allows for rapid monitoring of viable fungi in hospital environments. SPC can thus be used to provide an early warning and a rapid implementation of corrective measures. Viable fungi detection may be an important tool to assess infectious risk in wards with immunosuppressed patients.</description><subject>Air Microbiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial - methods</subject><subject>Environmental Microbiology</subject><subject>Environmental surveillance</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Fungi - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Hospital</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Cytometry</subject><subject>Image Cytometry - methods</subject><subject>Infectious Disease</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microbial Viability</subject><subject>Microbiology and Parasitology</subject><subject>Santé publique et épidémiologie</subject><subject>Solid-phase cytometry</subject><subject>Viable fungi</subject><issn>0195-6701</issn><issn>1532-2939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkkuLFDEUhQtRnJ7RP-BCshF0UW1e9ZJBGIbRERoEH-uQSt2avm0qqUmqGnrjbzdFtyO40FXI4TuXm5yTZS8YXTPKyre79W6Lbs0p40lYUyofZStWCJ7zRjSPsxVlTZGXFWVn2XmMO0pp0oun2RkXggla16vs5xc9YkfuZ-0m7NHoCb0jvid71K0F0s_uDgk6svVxxElbAm6PwbsB3BTfEe20PUSMi0VjSPeOxDn02gCJehgtRDJHdHckeotdPm51BGIOkx9gCodn2ZNe2wjPT-dF9v3Dzbfr23zz-eOn66tNbgpaTznUnTayaQre6q4vWSFlaThI6HtmmhbqqoSe05YyZgC0EUJLXtYVbbjkLZPiIntznLvVVo0BBx0OymtUt1cbtWiU1pWsmNizxL4-smPw9zPESQ0YDVirHfg5KiZYXTalkPz_KK9FxYuiognlR9QEH2OA_mENRtUSp9qpJU61xLloKc5kenmaP7cDdA-W3_kl4NUJ0NFo2wftDMY_XNlQ2YgycZdHDtIn7xGCigbBGegwgJlU5_Hfe7z_y24sutQW-wMOEHd-DqkH6b0qckXV16V4S-8Yp1RIVopfgavTjA</recordid><startdate>20130201</startdate><enddate>20130201</enddate><creator>Méheust, D</creator><creator>Le Cann, P</creator><creator>Gangneux, J.-P</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>WB Saunders</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5329-4311</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4974-5607</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20130201</creationdate><title>Rapid quantification of viable fungi in hospital environments: analysis of air and surface samples using solid-phase cytometry</title><author>Méheust, D ; Le Cann, P ; Gangneux, J.-P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-e8dac49952badf615446c2e4eff1c9be876ef20b011ceeac33a4268709242b143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Air Microbiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial - methods</topic><topic>Environmental Microbiology</topic><topic>Environmental surveillance</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Fungi - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Hospital</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Cytometry</topic><topic>Image Cytometry - methods</topic><topic>Infectious Disease</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microbial Viability</topic><topic>Microbiology and Parasitology</topic><topic>Santé publique et épidémiologie</topic><topic>Solid-phase cytometry</topic><topic>Viable fungi</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Méheust, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Cann, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gangneux, J.-P</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Méheust, D</au><au>Le Cann, P</au><au>Gangneux, J.-P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rapid quantification of viable fungi in hospital environments: analysis of air and surface samples using solid-phase cytometry</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><date>2013-02-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>122</spage><epage>126</epage><pages>122-126</pages><issn>0195-6701</issn><eissn>1532-2939</eissn><abstract>Summary Background Environmental surveillance is important in high-risk areas of hospitals to prevent fungal infections in immunosuppressed patients. Conventional culture methods for enumerating environmental fungi are time-consuming. Aim In this field study, a solid-phase cytometry technique (SPC) and a more conventional culture-based method to quantify fungal contamination of hospital air and surface samples were compared. Methods For the air sampling, a liquid cyclone air sampler was used with a flow rate of 300 L/min for 10 min in each of four hospital locations. Surface swabbing was done in two locations, with two different swab types. Samples from all areas were processed by SPC and by culture on malt extract agar. Findings The mean airborne concentrations of viable fungi determined by SPC were about 1.5-fold higher than the mean concentrations obtained with the culture-based method. These differences for air samples were significant in three hospital environments. No significant difference was observed for surface samples between the two swab types and between the two analytical methods. One of the prominent advantages of SPC was its rapidity in comparison with the culture-based method (5 h versus 5 days). Conclusion In this study, we showed that SPC allows for rapid monitoring of viable fungi in hospital environments. SPC can thus be used to provide an early warning and a rapid implementation of corrective measures. Viable fungi detection may be an important tool to assess infectious risk in wards with immunosuppressed patients.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>23313088</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jhin.2012.10.004</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5329-4311</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4974-5607</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0195-6701 |
ispartof | The Journal of hospital infection, 2013-02, Vol.83 (2), p.122-126 |
issn | 0195-6701 1532-2939 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00874713v1 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Air Microbiology Biological and medical sciences Colony Count, Microbial Colony Count, Microbial - methods Environmental Microbiology Environmental surveillance Fungi Fungi - isolation & purification Hospital Hospitals Humans Image Cytometry Image Cytometry - methods Infectious Disease Infectious diseases Life Sciences Medical sciences Microbial Viability Microbiology and Parasitology Santé publique et épidémiologie Solid-phase cytometry Viable fungi |
title | Rapid quantification of viable fungi in hospital environments: analysis of air and surface samples using solid-phase cytometry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T00%3A38%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rapid%20quantification%20of%20viable%20fungi%20in%20hospital%20environments:%20analysis%20of%20air%20and%20surface%20samples%20using%20solid-phase%20cytometry&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20hospital%20infection&rft.au=M%C3%A9heust,%20D&rft.date=2013-02-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=122&rft.epage=126&rft.pages=122-126&rft.issn=0195-6701&rft.eissn=1532-2939&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhin.2012.10.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1283725570%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1283725570&rft_id=info:pmid/23313088&rft_els_id=S0195670112003416&rfr_iscdi=true |