Rapid quantification of viable fungi in hospital environments: analysis of air and surface samples using solid-phase cytometry

Summary Background Environmental surveillance is important in high-risk areas of hospitals to prevent fungal infections in immunosuppressed patients. Conventional culture methods for enumerating environmental fungi are time-consuming. Aim In this field study, a solid-phase cytometry technique (SPC)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of hospital infection 2013-02, Vol.83 (2), p.122-126
Hauptverfasser: Méheust, D, Le Cann, P, Gangneux, J.-P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 126
container_issue 2
container_start_page 122
container_title The Journal of hospital infection
container_volume 83
creator Méheust, D
Le Cann, P
Gangneux, J.-P
description Summary Background Environmental surveillance is important in high-risk areas of hospitals to prevent fungal infections in immunosuppressed patients. Conventional culture methods for enumerating environmental fungi are time-consuming. Aim In this field study, a solid-phase cytometry technique (SPC) and a more conventional culture-based method to quantify fungal contamination of hospital air and surface samples were compared. Methods For the air sampling, a liquid cyclone air sampler was used with a flow rate of 300 L/min for 10 min in each of four hospital locations. Surface swabbing was done in two locations, with two different swab types. Samples from all areas were processed by SPC and by culture on malt extract agar. Findings The mean airborne concentrations of viable fungi determined by SPC were about 1.5-fold higher than the mean concentrations obtained with the culture-based method. These differences for air samples were significant in three hospital environments. No significant difference was observed for surface samples between the two swab types and between the two analytical methods. One of the prominent advantages of SPC was its rapidity in comparison with the culture-based method (5 h versus 5 days). Conclusion In this study, we showed that SPC allows for rapid monitoring of viable fungi in hospital environments. SPC can thus be used to provide an early warning and a rapid implementation of corrective measures. Viable fungi detection may be an important tool to assess infectious risk in wards with immunosuppressed patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.10.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00874713v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0195670112003416</els_id><sourcerecordid>1283725570</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-e8dac49952badf615446c2e4eff1c9be876ef20b011ceeac33a4268709242b143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkkuLFDEUhQtRnJ7RP-BCshF0UW1e9ZJBGIbRERoEH-uQSt2avm0qqUmqGnrjbzdFtyO40FXI4TuXm5yTZS8YXTPKyre79W6Lbs0p40lYUyofZStWCJ7zRjSPsxVlTZGXFWVn2XmMO0pp0oun2RkXggla16vs5xc9YkfuZ-0m7NHoCb0jvid71K0F0s_uDgk6svVxxElbAm6PwbsB3BTfEe20PUSMi0VjSPeOxDn02gCJehgtRDJHdHckeotdPm51BGIOkx9gCodn2ZNe2wjPT-dF9v3Dzbfr23zz-eOn66tNbgpaTznUnTayaQre6q4vWSFlaThI6HtmmhbqqoSe05YyZgC0EUJLXtYVbbjkLZPiIntznLvVVo0BBx0OymtUt1cbtWiU1pWsmNizxL4-smPw9zPESQ0YDVirHfg5KiZYXTalkPz_KK9FxYuiognlR9QEH2OA_mENRtUSp9qpJU61xLloKc5kenmaP7cDdA-W3_kl4NUJ0NFo2wftDMY_XNlQ2YgycZdHDtIn7xGCigbBGegwgJlU5_Hfe7z_y24sutQW-wMOEHd-DqkH6b0qckXV16V4S-8Yp1RIVopfgavTjA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1283725570</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rapid quantification of viable fungi in hospital environments: analysis of air and surface samples using solid-phase cytometry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Méheust, D ; Le Cann, P ; Gangneux, J.-P</creator><creatorcontrib>Méheust, D ; Le Cann, P ; Gangneux, J.-P</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background Environmental surveillance is important in high-risk areas of hospitals to prevent fungal infections in immunosuppressed patients. Conventional culture methods for enumerating environmental fungi are time-consuming. Aim In this field study, a solid-phase cytometry technique (SPC) and a more conventional culture-based method to quantify fungal contamination of hospital air and surface samples were compared. Methods For the air sampling, a liquid cyclone air sampler was used with a flow rate of 300 L/min for 10 min in each of four hospital locations. Surface swabbing was done in two locations, with two different swab types. Samples from all areas were processed by SPC and by culture on malt extract agar. Findings The mean airborne concentrations of viable fungi determined by SPC were about 1.5-fold higher than the mean concentrations obtained with the culture-based method. These differences for air samples were significant in three hospital environments. No significant difference was observed for surface samples between the two swab types and between the two analytical methods. One of the prominent advantages of SPC was its rapidity in comparison with the culture-based method (5 h versus 5 days). Conclusion In this study, we showed that SPC allows for rapid monitoring of viable fungi in hospital environments. SPC can thus be used to provide an early warning and a rapid implementation of corrective measures. Viable fungi detection may be an important tool to assess infectious risk in wards with immunosuppressed patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.10.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23313088</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Air Microbiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colony Count, Microbial ; Colony Count, Microbial - methods ; Environmental Microbiology ; Environmental surveillance ; Fungi ; Fungi - isolation &amp; purification ; Hospital ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Image Cytometry ; Image Cytometry - methods ; Infectious Disease ; Infectious diseases ; Life Sciences ; Medical sciences ; Microbial Viability ; Microbiology and Parasitology ; Santé publique et épidémiologie ; Solid-phase cytometry ; Viable fungi</subject><ispartof>The Journal of hospital infection, 2013-02, Vol.83 (2), p.122-126</ispartof><rights>The Healthcare Infection Society</rights><rights>2012 The Healthcare Infection Society</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-e8dac49952badf615446c2e4eff1c9be876ef20b011ceeac33a4268709242b143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-e8dac49952badf615446c2e4eff1c9be876ef20b011ceeac33a4268709242b143</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5329-4311 ; 0000-0002-4974-5607</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670112003416$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26904936$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23313088$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-00874713$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Méheust, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Cann, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gangneux, J.-P</creatorcontrib><title>Rapid quantification of viable fungi in hospital environments: analysis of air and surface samples using solid-phase cytometry</title><title>The Journal of hospital infection</title><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><description>Summary Background Environmental surveillance is important in high-risk areas of hospitals to prevent fungal infections in immunosuppressed patients. Conventional culture methods for enumerating environmental fungi are time-consuming. Aim In this field study, a solid-phase cytometry technique (SPC) and a more conventional culture-based method to quantify fungal contamination of hospital air and surface samples were compared. Methods For the air sampling, a liquid cyclone air sampler was used with a flow rate of 300 L/min for 10 min in each of four hospital locations. Surface swabbing was done in two locations, with two different swab types. Samples from all areas were processed by SPC and by culture on malt extract agar. Findings The mean airborne concentrations of viable fungi determined by SPC were about 1.5-fold higher than the mean concentrations obtained with the culture-based method. These differences for air samples were significant in three hospital environments. No significant difference was observed for surface samples between the two swab types and between the two analytical methods. One of the prominent advantages of SPC was its rapidity in comparison with the culture-based method (5 h versus 5 days). Conclusion In this study, we showed that SPC allows for rapid monitoring of viable fungi in hospital environments. SPC can thus be used to provide an early warning and a rapid implementation of corrective measures. Viable fungi detection may be an important tool to assess infectious risk in wards with immunosuppressed patients.</description><subject>Air Microbiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial - methods</subject><subject>Environmental Microbiology</subject><subject>Environmental surveillance</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Fungi - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Hospital</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Cytometry</subject><subject>Image Cytometry - methods</subject><subject>Infectious Disease</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microbial Viability</subject><subject>Microbiology and Parasitology</subject><subject>Santé publique et épidémiologie</subject><subject>Solid-phase cytometry</subject><subject>Viable fungi</subject><issn>0195-6701</issn><issn>1532-2939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkkuLFDEUhQtRnJ7RP-BCshF0UW1e9ZJBGIbRERoEH-uQSt2avm0qqUmqGnrjbzdFtyO40FXI4TuXm5yTZS8YXTPKyre79W6Lbs0p40lYUyofZStWCJ7zRjSPsxVlTZGXFWVn2XmMO0pp0oun2RkXggla16vs5xc9YkfuZ-0m7NHoCb0jvid71K0F0s_uDgk6svVxxElbAm6PwbsB3BTfEe20PUSMi0VjSPeOxDn02gCJehgtRDJHdHckeotdPm51BGIOkx9gCodn2ZNe2wjPT-dF9v3Dzbfr23zz-eOn66tNbgpaTznUnTayaQre6q4vWSFlaThI6HtmmhbqqoSe05YyZgC0EUJLXtYVbbjkLZPiIntznLvVVo0BBx0OymtUt1cbtWiU1pWsmNizxL4-smPw9zPESQ0YDVirHfg5KiZYXTalkPz_KK9FxYuiognlR9QEH2OA_mENRtUSp9qpJU61xLloKc5kenmaP7cDdA-W3_kl4NUJ0NFo2wftDMY_XNlQ2YgycZdHDtIn7xGCigbBGegwgJlU5_Hfe7z_y24sutQW-wMOEHd-DqkH6b0qckXV16V4S-8Yp1RIVopfgavTjA</recordid><startdate>20130201</startdate><enddate>20130201</enddate><creator>Méheust, D</creator><creator>Le Cann, P</creator><creator>Gangneux, J.-P</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>WB Saunders</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5329-4311</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4974-5607</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20130201</creationdate><title>Rapid quantification of viable fungi in hospital environments: analysis of air and surface samples using solid-phase cytometry</title><author>Méheust, D ; Le Cann, P ; Gangneux, J.-P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-e8dac49952badf615446c2e4eff1c9be876ef20b011ceeac33a4268709242b143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Air Microbiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial - methods</topic><topic>Environmental Microbiology</topic><topic>Environmental surveillance</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Fungi - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Hospital</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Cytometry</topic><topic>Image Cytometry - methods</topic><topic>Infectious Disease</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microbial Viability</topic><topic>Microbiology and Parasitology</topic><topic>Santé publique et épidémiologie</topic><topic>Solid-phase cytometry</topic><topic>Viable fungi</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Méheust, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Cann, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gangneux, J.-P</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Méheust, D</au><au>Le Cann, P</au><au>Gangneux, J.-P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rapid quantification of viable fungi in hospital environments: analysis of air and surface samples using solid-phase cytometry</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><date>2013-02-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>122</spage><epage>126</epage><pages>122-126</pages><issn>0195-6701</issn><eissn>1532-2939</eissn><abstract>Summary Background Environmental surveillance is important in high-risk areas of hospitals to prevent fungal infections in immunosuppressed patients. Conventional culture methods for enumerating environmental fungi are time-consuming. Aim In this field study, a solid-phase cytometry technique (SPC) and a more conventional culture-based method to quantify fungal contamination of hospital air and surface samples were compared. Methods For the air sampling, a liquid cyclone air sampler was used with a flow rate of 300 L/min for 10 min in each of four hospital locations. Surface swabbing was done in two locations, with two different swab types. Samples from all areas were processed by SPC and by culture on malt extract agar. Findings The mean airborne concentrations of viable fungi determined by SPC were about 1.5-fold higher than the mean concentrations obtained with the culture-based method. These differences for air samples were significant in three hospital environments. No significant difference was observed for surface samples between the two swab types and between the two analytical methods. One of the prominent advantages of SPC was its rapidity in comparison with the culture-based method (5 h versus 5 days). Conclusion In this study, we showed that SPC allows for rapid monitoring of viable fungi in hospital environments. SPC can thus be used to provide an early warning and a rapid implementation of corrective measures. Viable fungi detection may be an important tool to assess infectious risk in wards with immunosuppressed patients.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>23313088</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jhin.2012.10.004</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5329-4311</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4974-5607</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-6701
ispartof The Journal of hospital infection, 2013-02, Vol.83 (2), p.122-126
issn 0195-6701
1532-2939
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00874713v1
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Air Microbiology
Biological and medical sciences
Colony Count, Microbial
Colony Count, Microbial - methods
Environmental Microbiology
Environmental surveillance
Fungi
Fungi - isolation & purification
Hospital
Hospitals
Humans
Image Cytometry
Image Cytometry - methods
Infectious Disease
Infectious diseases
Life Sciences
Medical sciences
Microbial Viability
Microbiology and Parasitology
Santé publique et épidémiologie
Solid-phase cytometry
Viable fungi
title Rapid quantification of viable fungi in hospital environments: analysis of air and surface samples using solid-phase cytometry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T00%3A38%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rapid%20quantification%20of%20viable%20fungi%20in%20hospital%20environments:%20analysis%20of%20air%20and%20surface%20samples%20using%20solid-phase%20cytometry&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20hospital%20infection&rft.au=M%C3%A9heust,%20D&rft.date=2013-02-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=122&rft.epage=126&rft.pages=122-126&rft.issn=0195-6701&rft.eissn=1532-2939&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhin.2012.10.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1283725570%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1283725570&rft_id=info:pmid/23313088&rft_els_id=S0195670112003416&rfr_iscdi=true