Comparison of unstructured, staggered grid methods for the shallow water equations
Unstructured grid models are receiving increased attention mainly because of their ability to provide a flexible spatial discretization. Hence, some areas can be resolved in great detail while not over-resolving other areas. Development of these models is an ongoing process with significant longstan...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ocean modelling (Oxford) 2009, Vol.28 (1), p.106-117 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 117 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 106 |
container_title | Ocean modelling (Oxford) |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Walters, R.A. Hanert, Emmanuel Pietrzak, J. Le Roux, D.Y. |
description | Unstructured grid models are receiving increased attention mainly because of their ability to provide a flexible spatial discretization. Hence, some areas can be resolved in great detail while not over-resolving other areas. Development of these models is an ongoing process with significant longstanding issues with spurious computational modes, efficiency, advection and Coriolis approximations, and so forth. However, many of these problems have been solved with the current generation of models which have much promise for coastal to global scale ocean modelling. Our purpose is to intercompare a class of unstructured grid models where the continuity equation reduces to a finite volume approximation. The momentum equations can be approximated with finite difference, finite element, or finite volume methods. Each of these methods can have advantages and disadvantages in different classes of problems that range from hydraulics to coastal and global ocean flows. Some of the more important differences are restrictions on grid irregularity and stability of the Coriolis term. The finite element version of the model has important advantages in the discretization of the Coriolis term and does not require a reconstruction of a tangential velocity component. The comparison is illustrated with a simple test case. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ocemod.2008.12.004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00864931v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1463500308001819</els_id><sourcerecordid>20477967</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f689555c886a4c92077ebc0d91bc867d8635587e1fea5daf0c3ca4ba2d937f6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kNFLwzAQxosoOKf_gQ95EgRbkyZN2hdhDHXCQBB9Dlly3TLaZktSh_-9HZU9-nQfx---u_uS5JbgjGDCH7eZ09A6k-UYlxnJM4zZWTIhjNO0wIScnzSml8lVCFuMiSC0mCQfc9fulLfBdcjVqO9C9L2OvQfzgEJU6zUMEq29NaiFuHEmoNp5FDeAwkY1jTugg4rgEex7Fa3rwnVyUasmwM1fnSZfL8-f80W6fH99m8-WqWZUxLTmZVUUhS5LrpiuciwErDQ2FVnpkgtTcloUpQBSgyqMqrGmWrGVyk1FRc2BTpP70Xc4Q-68bZX_kU5ZuZgt5bE3hMFZRck3Gdi7kd15t-8hRNnaoKFpVAeuDzLHTIiKiwFkI6i9C8FDfXImWB7Dlls5hi2PYUuSD2vYMPY0jsHw8LcFL4O20Gkw1oOO0jj7v8EvQfeKmw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20477967</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of unstructured, staggered grid methods for the shallow water equations</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Walters, R.A. ; Hanert, Emmanuel ; Pietrzak, J. ; Le Roux, D.Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Walters, R.A. ; Hanert, Emmanuel ; Pietrzak, J. ; Le Roux, D.Y.</creatorcontrib><description>Unstructured grid models are receiving increased attention mainly because of their ability to provide a flexible spatial discretization. Hence, some areas can be resolved in great detail while not over-resolving other areas. Development of these models is an ongoing process with significant longstanding issues with spurious computational modes, efficiency, advection and Coriolis approximations, and so forth. However, many of these problems have been solved with the current generation of models which have much promise for coastal to global scale ocean modelling. Our purpose is to intercompare a class of unstructured grid models where the continuity equation reduces to a finite volume approximation. The momentum equations can be approximated with finite difference, finite element, or finite volume methods. Each of these methods can have advantages and disadvantages in different classes of problems that range from hydraulics to coastal and global ocean flows. Some of the more important differences are restrictions on grid irregularity and stability of the Coriolis term. The finite element version of the model has important advantages in the discretization of the Coriolis term and does not require a reconstruction of a tangential velocity component. The comparison is illustrated with a simple test case.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1463-5003</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1463-5011</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2008.12.004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Finite difference ; Finite element ; Finite volume ; Marine ; Mathematics ; Numerical Analysis ; Shallow water equations ; Unstructured grid</subject><ispartof>Ocean modelling (Oxford), 2009, Vol.28 (1), p.106-117</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f689555c886a4c92077ebc0d91bc867d8635587e1fea5daf0c3ca4ba2d937f6e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f689555c886a4c92077ebc0d91bc867d8635587e1fea5daf0c3ca4ba2d937f6e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1463500308001819$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,4010,27902,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-00864931$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Walters, R.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanert, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pietrzak, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Roux, D.Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of unstructured, staggered grid methods for the shallow water equations</title><title>Ocean modelling (Oxford)</title><description>Unstructured grid models are receiving increased attention mainly because of their ability to provide a flexible spatial discretization. Hence, some areas can be resolved in great detail while not over-resolving other areas. Development of these models is an ongoing process with significant longstanding issues with spurious computational modes, efficiency, advection and Coriolis approximations, and so forth. However, many of these problems have been solved with the current generation of models which have much promise for coastal to global scale ocean modelling. Our purpose is to intercompare a class of unstructured grid models where the continuity equation reduces to a finite volume approximation. The momentum equations can be approximated with finite difference, finite element, or finite volume methods. Each of these methods can have advantages and disadvantages in different classes of problems that range from hydraulics to coastal and global ocean flows. Some of the more important differences are restrictions on grid irregularity and stability of the Coriolis term. The finite element version of the model has important advantages in the discretization of the Coriolis term and does not require a reconstruction of a tangential velocity component. The comparison is illustrated with a simple test case.</description><subject>Finite difference</subject><subject>Finite element</subject><subject>Finite volume</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Numerical Analysis</subject><subject>Shallow water equations</subject><subject>Unstructured grid</subject><issn>1463-5003</issn><issn>1463-5011</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kNFLwzAQxosoOKf_gQ95EgRbkyZN2hdhDHXCQBB9Dlly3TLaZktSh_-9HZU9-nQfx---u_uS5JbgjGDCH7eZ09A6k-UYlxnJM4zZWTIhjNO0wIScnzSml8lVCFuMiSC0mCQfc9fulLfBdcjVqO9C9L2OvQfzgEJU6zUMEq29NaiFuHEmoNp5FDeAwkY1jTugg4rgEex7Fa3rwnVyUasmwM1fnSZfL8-f80W6fH99m8-WqWZUxLTmZVUUhS5LrpiuciwErDQ2FVnpkgtTcloUpQBSgyqMqrGmWrGVyk1FRc2BTpP70Xc4Q-68bZX_kU5ZuZgt5bE3hMFZRck3Gdi7kd15t-8hRNnaoKFpVAeuDzLHTIiKiwFkI6i9C8FDfXImWB7Dlls5hi2PYUuSD2vYMPY0jsHw8LcFL4O20Gkw1oOO0jj7v8EvQfeKmw</recordid><startdate>2009</startdate><enddate>2009</enddate><creator>Walters, R.A.</creator><creator>Hanert, Emmanuel</creator><creator>Pietrzak, J.</creator><creator>Le Roux, D.Y.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>1XC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2009</creationdate><title>Comparison of unstructured, staggered grid methods for the shallow water equations</title><author>Walters, R.A. ; Hanert, Emmanuel ; Pietrzak, J. ; Le Roux, D.Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f689555c886a4c92077ebc0d91bc867d8635587e1fea5daf0c3ca4ba2d937f6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Finite difference</topic><topic>Finite element</topic><topic>Finite volume</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Numerical Analysis</topic><topic>Shallow water equations</topic><topic>Unstructured grid</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walters, R.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanert, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pietrzak, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Roux, D.Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Ocean modelling (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walters, R.A.</au><au>Hanert, Emmanuel</au><au>Pietrzak, J.</au><au>Le Roux, D.Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of unstructured, staggered grid methods for the shallow water equations</atitle><jtitle>Ocean modelling (Oxford)</jtitle><date>2009</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>106</spage><epage>117</epage><pages>106-117</pages><issn>1463-5003</issn><eissn>1463-5011</eissn><abstract>Unstructured grid models are receiving increased attention mainly because of their ability to provide a flexible spatial discretization. Hence, some areas can be resolved in great detail while not over-resolving other areas. Development of these models is an ongoing process with significant longstanding issues with spurious computational modes, efficiency, advection and Coriolis approximations, and so forth. However, many of these problems have been solved with the current generation of models which have much promise for coastal to global scale ocean modelling. Our purpose is to intercompare a class of unstructured grid models where the continuity equation reduces to a finite volume approximation. The momentum equations can be approximated with finite difference, finite element, or finite volume methods. Each of these methods can have advantages and disadvantages in different classes of problems that range from hydraulics to coastal and global ocean flows. Some of the more important differences are restrictions on grid irregularity and stability of the Coriolis term. The finite element version of the model has important advantages in the discretization of the Coriolis term and does not require a reconstruction of a tangential velocity component. The comparison is illustrated with a simple test case.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ocemod.2008.12.004</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1463-5003 |
ispartof | Ocean modelling (Oxford), 2009, Vol.28 (1), p.106-117 |
issn | 1463-5003 1463-5011 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00864931v1 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Finite difference Finite element Finite volume Marine Mathematics Numerical Analysis Shallow water equations Unstructured grid |
title | Comparison of unstructured, staggered grid methods for the shallow water equations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T18%3A10%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20unstructured,%20staggered%20grid%20methods%20for%20the%20shallow%20water%20equations&rft.jtitle=Ocean%20modelling%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Walters,%20R.A.&rft.date=2009&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=106&rft.epage=117&rft.pages=106-117&rft.issn=1463-5003&rft.eissn=1463-5011&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ocemod.2008.12.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E20477967%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20477967&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1463500308001819&rfr_iscdi=true |