Reinterpretation of an archaeological pebble culture from the Middle Mekong River valley, Cambodia
In 1963, E. Saurin and J.‐P. Carbonnel discovered the Sre Sbov site on an alluvial terrace of the Mekong River in central Cambodia. Saurin described a lithic typology dating to the Lower/Middle Pleistocene from this site. Although the original lithic assemblage has been lost, this typology has been...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Geoarchaeology 2010-01, Vol.25 (1), p.75-95 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 95 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 75 |
container_title | Geoarchaeology |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Demeter, Fabrice Patole-Edoumba, Elise Duringer, Philippe Bacon, Anne-Marie Sytha, Pheng Bano, Maxim Laychour, Vin Cheangleng, Mao Sari, Vân |
description | In 1963, E. Saurin and J.‐P. Carbonnel discovered the Sre Sbov site on an alluvial terrace of the Mekong River in central Cambodia. Saurin described a lithic typology dating to the Lower/Middle Pleistocene from this site. Although the original lithic assemblage has been lost, this typology has been used continuously as a reference by Southeast Asian prehistorians. In 2007, a Khmer–French team conducted excavations at Sre Sbov that yielded numerous pebbles and cobbles showing apparently convincing handmade removals, as Saurin had previously described. However, an in‐depth study of this assemblage, combined with a geological survey of the area, led to the conclusion that the stones were, in fact, of natural origin, and that for this reason their typology should be disregarded. Using satellite imagery and geological surveys, we explain how such a misinterpretation may have occurred and define a “buffer zone,” corresponding to the maximal extent of the proto‐Mekong River, where fluvially reworked pebbles and cobbles resembling artifacts may be recovered. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/gea.20298 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00838305v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>GEA20298</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3998-c50960cc4c42ea154ab320db86710030b0e04445e5eff99be341b5e4829c272a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtPGzEUha2KSg3QRf-Bt0gduOPHxF6mAQJqoBXiIXVjXTt3EsMkjjxDgH_foWlh1dWVjr7vSucw9qWEwxJAHM0JDwUIaz6wQakFFJVWZocNwBhZVFLLT2y3be8BwFrQA-avKK46yutMHXYxrXiqOa445rBASk2ax4ANX5P3DfHw2HSPmXid05J3C-IXcTbr8wt6SKs5v4obynyDTUMvX_kYlz7NIu6zjzU2LX3-e_fYzenJ9fismP6YnI9H0wKltaYIGmwFIaigBGGpFXopYOZNNeybSfBAoJTSpKmurfUkVek1KSNsEEOBco8dbP8usHHrHJeYX1zC6M5GU_eaARhpJOhN-c6GnNo2U_0mlOBeh3T9kO7PkD17tGWfYt_r_6CbnIz-GcXWiG1Hz28G5gdXDeVQu7vLibv9fnla_fz2yx3L3wc7g0E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reinterpretation of an archaeological pebble culture from the Middle Mekong River valley, Cambodia</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Demeter, Fabrice ; Patole-Edoumba, Elise ; Duringer, Philippe ; Bacon, Anne-Marie ; Sytha, Pheng ; Bano, Maxim ; Laychour, Vin ; Cheangleng, Mao ; Sari, Vân</creator><creatorcontrib>Demeter, Fabrice ; Patole-Edoumba, Elise ; Duringer, Philippe ; Bacon, Anne-Marie ; Sytha, Pheng ; Bano, Maxim ; Laychour, Vin ; Cheangleng, Mao ; Sari, Vân</creatorcontrib><description>In 1963, E. Saurin and J.‐P. Carbonnel discovered the Sre Sbov site on an alluvial terrace of the Mekong River in central Cambodia. Saurin described a lithic typology dating to the Lower/Middle Pleistocene from this site. Although the original lithic assemblage has been lost, this typology has been used continuously as a reference by Southeast Asian prehistorians. In 2007, a Khmer–French team conducted excavations at Sre Sbov that yielded numerous pebbles and cobbles showing apparently convincing handmade removals, as Saurin had previously described. However, an in‐depth study of this assemblage, combined with a geological survey of the area, led to the conclusion that the stones were, in fact, of natural origin, and that for this reason their typology should be disregarded. Using satellite imagery and geological surveys, we explain how such a misinterpretation may have occurred and define a “buffer zone,” corresponding to the maximal extent of the proto‐Mekong River, where fluvially reworked pebbles and cobbles resembling artifacts may be recovered. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-6353</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6548</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/gea.20298</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Biological anthropology ; Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>Geoarchaeology, 2010-01, Vol.25 (1), p.75-95</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3998-c50960cc4c42ea154ab320db86710030b0e04445e5eff99be341b5e4829c272a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3998-c50960cc4c42ea154ab320db86710030b0e04445e5eff99be341b5e4829c272a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1288-5534 ; 0000-0001-6213-5726 ; 0000-0003-4481-8974</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fgea.20298$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fgea.20298$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,4024,27923,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-00838305$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Demeter, Fabrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patole-Edoumba, Elise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duringer, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bacon, Anne-Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sytha, Pheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bano, Maxim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laychour, Vin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheangleng, Mao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sari, Vân</creatorcontrib><title>Reinterpretation of an archaeological pebble culture from the Middle Mekong River valley, Cambodia</title><title>Geoarchaeology</title><addtitle>Geoarchaeology</addtitle><description>In 1963, E. Saurin and J.‐P. Carbonnel discovered the Sre Sbov site on an alluvial terrace of the Mekong River in central Cambodia. Saurin described a lithic typology dating to the Lower/Middle Pleistocene from this site. Although the original lithic assemblage has been lost, this typology has been used continuously as a reference by Southeast Asian prehistorians. In 2007, a Khmer–French team conducted excavations at Sre Sbov that yielded numerous pebbles and cobbles showing apparently convincing handmade removals, as Saurin had previously described. However, an in‐depth study of this assemblage, combined with a geological survey of the area, led to the conclusion that the stones were, in fact, of natural origin, and that for this reason their typology should be disregarded. Using satellite imagery and geological surveys, we explain how such a misinterpretation may have occurred and define a “buffer zone,” corresponding to the maximal extent of the proto‐Mekong River, where fluvially reworked pebbles and cobbles resembling artifacts may be recovered. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Biological anthropology</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><issn>0883-6353</issn><issn>1520-6548</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtPGzEUha2KSg3QRf-Bt0gduOPHxF6mAQJqoBXiIXVjXTt3EsMkjjxDgH_foWlh1dWVjr7vSucw9qWEwxJAHM0JDwUIaz6wQakFFJVWZocNwBhZVFLLT2y3be8BwFrQA-avKK46yutMHXYxrXiqOa445rBASk2ax4ANX5P3DfHw2HSPmXid05J3C-IXcTbr8wt6SKs5v4obynyDTUMvX_kYlz7NIu6zjzU2LX3-e_fYzenJ9fismP6YnI9H0wKltaYIGmwFIaigBGGpFXopYOZNNeybSfBAoJTSpKmurfUkVek1KSNsEEOBco8dbP8usHHrHJeYX1zC6M5GU_eaARhpJOhN-c6GnNo2U_0mlOBeh3T9kO7PkD17tGWfYt_r_6CbnIz-GcXWiG1Hz28G5gdXDeVQu7vLibv9fnla_fz2yx3L3wc7g0E</recordid><startdate>201001</startdate><enddate>201001</enddate><creator>Demeter, Fabrice</creator><creator>Patole-Edoumba, Elise</creator><creator>Duringer, Philippe</creator><creator>Bacon, Anne-Marie</creator><creator>Sytha, Pheng</creator><creator>Bano, Maxim</creator><creator>Laychour, Vin</creator><creator>Cheangleng, Mao</creator><creator>Sari, Vân</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1288-5534</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6213-5726</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4481-8974</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201001</creationdate><title>Reinterpretation of an archaeological pebble culture from the Middle Mekong River valley, Cambodia</title><author>Demeter, Fabrice ; Patole-Edoumba, Elise ; Duringer, Philippe ; Bacon, Anne-Marie ; Sytha, Pheng ; Bano, Maxim ; Laychour, Vin ; Cheangleng, Mao ; Sari, Vân</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3998-c50960cc4c42ea154ab320db86710030b0e04445e5eff99be341b5e4829c272a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Biological anthropology</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Demeter, Fabrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patole-Edoumba, Elise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duringer, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bacon, Anne-Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sytha, Pheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bano, Maxim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laychour, Vin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheangleng, Mao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sari, Vân</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>Geoarchaeology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Demeter, Fabrice</au><au>Patole-Edoumba, Elise</au><au>Duringer, Philippe</au><au>Bacon, Anne-Marie</au><au>Sytha, Pheng</au><au>Bano, Maxim</au><au>Laychour, Vin</au><au>Cheangleng, Mao</au><au>Sari, Vân</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reinterpretation of an archaeological pebble culture from the Middle Mekong River valley, Cambodia</atitle><jtitle>Geoarchaeology</jtitle><addtitle>Geoarchaeology</addtitle><date>2010-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>75</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>75-95</pages><issn>0883-6353</issn><eissn>1520-6548</eissn><abstract>In 1963, E. Saurin and J.‐P. Carbonnel discovered the Sre Sbov site on an alluvial terrace of the Mekong River in central Cambodia. Saurin described a lithic typology dating to the Lower/Middle Pleistocene from this site. Although the original lithic assemblage has been lost, this typology has been used continuously as a reference by Southeast Asian prehistorians. In 2007, a Khmer–French team conducted excavations at Sre Sbov that yielded numerous pebbles and cobbles showing apparently convincing handmade removals, as Saurin had previously described. However, an in‐depth study of this assemblage, combined with a geological survey of the area, led to the conclusion that the stones were, in fact, of natural origin, and that for this reason their typology should be disregarded. Using satellite imagery and geological surveys, we explain how such a misinterpretation may have occurred and define a “buffer zone,” corresponding to the maximal extent of the proto‐Mekong River, where fluvially reworked pebbles and cobbles resembling artifacts may be recovered. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/gea.20298</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1288-5534</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6213-5726</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4481-8974</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0883-6353 |
ispartof | Geoarchaeology, 2010-01, Vol.25 (1), p.75-95 |
issn | 0883-6353 1520-6548 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00838305v1 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Biological anthropology Humanities and Social Sciences |
title | Reinterpretation of an archaeological pebble culture from the Middle Mekong River valley, Cambodia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T20%3A54%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reinterpretation%20of%20an%20archaeological%20pebble%20culture%20from%20the%20Middle%20Mekong%20River%20valley,%20Cambodia&rft.jtitle=Geoarchaeology&rft.au=Demeter,%20Fabrice&rft.date=2010-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=75&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=75-95&rft.issn=0883-6353&rft.eissn=1520-6548&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/gea.20298&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_hal_p%3EGEA20298%3C/wiley_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |