Testing Unilateral and Bilateral Link Formation
Empirical analysis of social networks is often based on self-reported links from survey data. How we interpret such data is crucial for drawing correct inference on network effects. We propose a method for testing whether survey responses can safely be interpreted as a link and, if so, whether links...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Economic journal (London) 2014-09, Vol.124 (579), p.954-976 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 976 |
---|---|
container_issue | 579 |
container_start_page | 954 |
container_title | The Economic journal (London) |
container_volume | 124 |
creator | Comola, Margherita Fafchamps, Marcel |
description | Empirical analysis of social networks is often based on self-reported links from survey data. How we interpret such data is crucial for drawing correct inference on network effects. We propose a method for testing whether survey responses can safely be interpreted as a link and, if so, whether links are generated by a unilateral or bilateral link formation process. We present two empirical illustrations of the test on risk-sharing links in Tanzania and on communication among Indian farmers, respectively, demonstrating the ability of the methodology to discriminate between competing data-generating processes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ecoj.12071 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00825261v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24029355</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24029355</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6651-1eef95e01217c07559ffd801a9cc9a27dffe1d2db36702d3b6e313b7b6d6f4943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9PwyAUx4nRxPnj4t1kiRc1qfKgwHqcc25q43bQeCSspcrWlQmduv9eZnUHD76EEPh-vi98HwgdAb6AUJc6s9MLIFjAFmpBzDsRJonYRi2MgUZh0V205_0UhyI0bqHLR-1rU720nypTqlo7VbZVlbevNqfUVLP2jXVzVRtbHaCdQpVeH_7s--jppv_YG0bpaHDb66ZRxjmDCLQuEqYxEBAZFowlRZF3MKgkyxJFRF4UGnKSTygXmOR0wjUFOhETnvMiTmK6j86avq-qlAtn5sqtpFVGDrupXN9h3CGMcHiHwJ427MLZt2XII-fGZ7osVaXt0ktgnFPBYk4CevIHndqlq0KSNQVABMZJoM4bKnPWe6eLzQsAy_Wc5XrO8nvOAYYG_jClXv1Dyn5vdPfrOW48U19bt_GQOPwWZSzoUaMbX-vPja7cTHIRosjnh4G8F-x5fD1-kAP6Bfl5lVI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1561127009</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Testing Unilateral and Bilateral Link Formation</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Comola, Margherita ; Fafchamps, Marcel</creator><creatorcontrib>Comola, Margherita ; Fafchamps, Marcel</creatorcontrib><description>Empirical analysis of social networks is often based on self-reported links from survey data. How we interpret such data is crucial for drawing correct inference on network effects. We propose a method for testing whether survey responses can safely be interpreted as a link and, if so, whether links are generated by a unilateral or bilateral link formation process. We present two empirical illustrations of the test on risk-sharing links in Tanzania and on communication among Indian farmers, respectively, demonstrating the ability of the methodology to discriminate between competing data-generating processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-0133</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-0297</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ecoj.12071</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECJOAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Communication ; Demonstrations ; Dyadics ; Economic models ; Economics and Finance ; Empirical research ; Farmers ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Hyperlinks ; India ; Information processing ; Responses ; Risk sharing ; Social networks ; Spreading risk ; Standard error ; Studies ; Survey responses ; Tanzania ; Villages ; Working papers</subject><ispartof>The Economic journal (London), 2014-09, Vol.124 (579), p.954-976</ispartof><rights>2014 Royal Economic Society</rights><rights>2013 Royal Economic Society</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Sep 2014</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6651-1eef95e01217c07559ffd801a9cc9a27dffe1d2db36702d3b6e313b7b6d6f4943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6651-1eef95e01217c07559ffd801a9cc9a27dffe1d2db36702d3b6e313b7b6d6f4943</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6836-1759</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24029355$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24029355$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,799,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-00825261$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Comola, Margherita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fafchamps, Marcel</creatorcontrib><title>Testing Unilateral and Bilateral Link Formation</title><title>The Economic journal (London)</title><addtitle>Econ J</addtitle><description>Empirical analysis of social networks is often based on self-reported links from survey data. How we interpret such data is crucial for drawing correct inference on network effects. We propose a method for testing whether survey responses can safely be interpreted as a link and, if so, whether links are generated by a unilateral or bilateral link formation process. We present two empirical illustrations of the test on risk-sharing links in Tanzania and on communication among Indian farmers, respectively, demonstrating the ability of the methodology to discriminate between competing data-generating processes.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Demonstrations</subject><subject>Dyadics</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Empirical research</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Hyperlinks</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Responses</subject><subject>Risk sharing</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Spreading risk</subject><subject>Standard error</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Survey responses</subject><subject>Tanzania</subject><subject>Villages</subject><subject>Working papers</subject><issn>0013-0133</issn><issn>1468-0297</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc9PwyAUx4nRxPnj4t1kiRc1qfKgwHqcc25q43bQeCSspcrWlQmduv9eZnUHD76EEPh-vi98HwgdAb6AUJc6s9MLIFjAFmpBzDsRJonYRi2MgUZh0V205_0UhyI0bqHLR-1rU720nypTqlo7VbZVlbevNqfUVLP2jXVzVRtbHaCdQpVeH_7s--jppv_YG0bpaHDb66ZRxjmDCLQuEqYxEBAZFowlRZF3MKgkyxJFRF4UGnKSTygXmOR0wjUFOhETnvMiTmK6j86avq-qlAtn5sqtpFVGDrupXN9h3CGMcHiHwJ427MLZt2XII-fGZ7osVaXt0ktgnFPBYk4CevIHndqlq0KSNQVABMZJoM4bKnPWe6eLzQsAy_Wc5XrO8nvOAYYG_jClXv1Dyn5vdPfrOW48U19bt_GQOPwWZSzoUaMbX-vPja7cTHIRosjnh4G8F-x5fD1-kAP6Bfl5lVI</recordid><startdate>201409</startdate><enddate>201409</enddate><creator>Comola, Margherita</creator><creator>Fafchamps, Marcel</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley & Sons Ltd</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Academic</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6836-1759</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201409</creationdate><title>Testing Unilateral and Bilateral Link Formation</title><author>Comola, Margherita ; Fafchamps, Marcel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6651-1eef95e01217c07559ffd801a9cc9a27dffe1d2db36702d3b6e313b7b6d6f4943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Demonstrations</topic><topic>Dyadics</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Empirical research</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Hyperlinks</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Responses</topic><topic>Risk sharing</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Spreading risk</topic><topic>Standard error</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Survey responses</topic><topic>Tanzania</topic><topic>Villages</topic><topic>Working papers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Comola, Margherita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fafchamps, Marcel</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>The Economic journal (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Comola, Margherita</au><au>Fafchamps, Marcel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Testing Unilateral and Bilateral Link Formation</atitle><jtitle>The Economic journal (London)</jtitle><addtitle>Econ J</addtitle><date>2014-09</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>579</issue><spage>954</spage><epage>976</epage><pages>954-976</pages><issn>0013-0133</issn><eissn>1468-0297</eissn><coden>ECJOAB</coden><abstract>Empirical analysis of social networks is often based on self-reported links from survey data. How we interpret such data is crucial for drawing correct inference on network effects. We propose a method for testing whether survey responses can safely be interpreted as a link and, if so, whether links are generated by a unilateral or bilateral link formation process. We present two empirical illustrations of the test on risk-sharing links in Tanzania and on communication among Indian farmers, respectively, demonstrating the ability of the methodology to discriminate between competing data-generating processes.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ecoj.12071</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6836-1759</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-0133 |
ispartof | The Economic journal (London), 2014-09, Vol.124 (579), p.954-976 |
issn | 0013-0133 1468-0297 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00825261v1 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Agriculture Communication Demonstrations Dyadics Economic models Economics and Finance Empirical research Farmers Humanities and Social Sciences Hyperlinks India Information processing Responses Risk sharing Social networks Spreading risk Standard error Studies Survey responses Tanzania Villages Working papers |
title | Testing Unilateral and Bilateral Link Formation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T14%3A11%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testing%20Unilateral%20and%20Bilateral%20Link%20Formation&rft.jtitle=The%20Economic%20journal%20(London)&rft.au=Comola,%20Margherita&rft.date=2014-09&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=579&rft.spage=954&rft.epage=976&rft.pages=954-976&rft.issn=0013-0133&rft.eissn=1468-0297&rft.coden=ECJOAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ecoj.12071&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_hal_p%3E24029355%3C/jstor_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1561127009&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24029355&rfr_iscdi=true |