Testing Unilateral and Bilateral Link Formation

Empirical analysis of social networks is often based on self-reported links from survey data. How we interpret such data is crucial for drawing correct inference on network effects. We propose a method for testing whether survey responses can safely be interpreted as a link and, if so, whether links...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Economic journal (London) 2014-09, Vol.124 (579), p.954-976
Hauptverfasser: Comola, Margherita, Fafchamps, Marcel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 976
container_issue 579
container_start_page 954
container_title The Economic journal (London)
container_volume 124
creator Comola, Margherita
Fafchamps, Marcel
description Empirical analysis of social networks is often based on self-reported links from survey data. How we interpret such data is crucial for drawing correct inference on network effects. We propose a method for testing whether survey responses can safely be interpreted as a link and, if so, whether links are generated by a unilateral or bilateral link formation process. We present two empirical illustrations of the test on risk-sharing links in Tanzania and on communication among Indian farmers, respectively, demonstrating the ability of the methodology to discriminate between competing data-generating processes.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ecoj.12071
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00825261v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24029355</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24029355</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6651-1eef95e01217c07559ffd801a9cc9a27dffe1d2db36702d3b6e313b7b6d6f4943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9PwyAUx4nRxPnj4t1kiRc1qfKgwHqcc25q43bQeCSspcrWlQmduv9eZnUHD76EEPh-vi98HwgdAb6AUJc6s9MLIFjAFmpBzDsRJonYRi2MgUZh0V205_0UhyI0bqHLR-1rU720nypTqlo7VbZVlbevNqfUVLP2jXVzVRtbHaCdQpVeH_7s--jppv_YG0bpaHDb66ZRxjmDCLQuEqYxEBAZFowlRZF3MKgkyxJFRF4UGnKSTygXmOR0wjUFOhETnvMiTmK6j86avq-qlAtn5sqtpFVGDrupXN9h3CGMcHiHwJ427MLZt2XII-fGZ7osVaXt0ktgnFPBYk4CevIHndqlq0KSNQVABMZJoM4bKnPWe6eLzQsAy_Wc5XrO8nvOAYYG_jClXv1Dyn5vdPfrOW48U19bt_GQOPwWZSzoUaMbX-vPja7cTHIRosjnh4G8F-x5fD1-kAP6Bfl5lVI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1561127009</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Testing Unilateral and Bilateral Link Formation</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Comola, Margherita ; Fafchamps, Marcel</creator><creatorcontrib>Comola, Margherita ; Fafchamps, Marcel</creatorcontrib><description>Empirical analysis of social networks is often based on self-reported links from survey data. How we interpret such data is crucial for drawing correct inference on network effects. We propose a method for testing whether survey responses can safely be interpreted as a link and, if so, whether links are generated by a unilateral or bilateral link formation process. We present two empirical illustrations of the test on risk-sharing links in Tanzania and on communication among Indian farmers, respectively, demonstrating the ability of the methodology to discriminate between competing data-generating processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-0133</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-0297</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ecoj.12071</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECJOAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Communication ; Demonstrations ; Dyadics ; Economic models ; Economics and Finance ; Empirical research ; Farmers ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Hyperlinks ; India ; Information processing ; Responses ; Risk sharing ; Social networks ; Spreading risk ; Standard error ; Studies ; Survey responses ; Tanzania ; Villages ; Working papers</subject><ispartof>The Economic journal (London), 2014-09, Vol.124 (579), p.954-976</ispartof><rights>2014 Royal Economic Society</rights><rights>2013 Royal Economic Society</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Sep 2014</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6651-1eef95e01217c07559ffd801a9cc9a27dffe1d2db36702d3b6e313b7b6d6f4943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6651-1eef95e01217c07559ffd801a9cc9a27dffe1d2db36702d3b6e313b7b6d6f4943</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6836-1759</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24029355$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24029355$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,799,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-00825261$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Comola, Margherita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fafchamps, Marcel</creatorcontrib><title>Testing Unilateral and Bilateral Link Formation</title><title>The Economic journal (London)</title><addtitle>Econ J</addtitle><description>Empirical analysis of social networks is often based on self-reported links from survey data. How we interpret such data is crucial for drawing correct inference on network effects. We propose a method for testing whether survey responses can safely be interpreted as a link and, if so, whether links are generated by a unilateral or bilateral link formation process. We present two empirical illustrations of the test on risk-sharing links in Tanzania and on communication among Indian farmers, respectively, demonstrating the ability of the methodology to discriminate between competing data-generating processes.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Demonstrations</subject><subject>Dyadics</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Empirical research</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Hyperlinks</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Responses</subject><subject>Risk sharing</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Spreading risk</subject><subject>Standard error</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Survey responses</subject><subject>Tanzania</subject><subject>Villages</subject><subject>Working papers</subject><issn>0013-0133</issn><issn>1468-0297</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc9PwyAUx4nRxPnj4t1kiRc1qfKgwHqcc25q43bQeCSspcrWlQmduv9eZnUHD76EEPh-vi98HwgdAb6AUJc6s9MLIFjAFmpBzDsRJonYRi2MgUZh0V205_0UhyI0bqHLR-1rU720nypTqlo7VbZVlbevNqfUVLP2jXVzVRtbHaCdQpVeH_7s--jppv_YG0bpaHDb66ZRxjmDCLQuEqYxEBAZFowlRZF3MKgkyxJFRF4UGnKSTygXmOR0wjUFOhETnvMiTmK6j86avq-qlAtn5sqtpFVGDrupXN9h3CGMcHiHwJ427MLZt2XII-fGZ7osVaXt0ktgnFPBYk4CevIHndqlq0KSNQVABMZJoM4bKnPWe6eLzQsAy_Wc5XrO8nvOAYYG_jClXv1Dyn5vdPfrOW48U19bt_GQOPwWZSzoUaMbX-vPja7cTHIRosjnh4G8F-x5fD1-kAP6Bfl5lVI</recordid><startdate>201409</startdate><enddate>201409</enddate><creator>Comola, Margherita</creator><creator>Fafchamps, Marcel</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Academic</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6836-1759</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201409</creationdate><title>Testing Unilateral and Bilateral Link Formation</title><author>Comola, Margherita ; Fafchamps, Marcel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6651-1eef95e01217c07559ffd801a9cc9a27dffe1d2db36702d3b6e313b7b6d6f4943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Demonstrations</topic><topic>Dyadics</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Empirical research</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Hyperlinks</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Responses</topic><topic>Risk sharing</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Spreading risk</topic><topic>Standard error</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Survey responses</topic><topic>Tanzania</topic><topic>Villages</topic><topic>Working papers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Comola, Margherita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fafchamps, Marcel</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>The Economic journal (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Comola, Margherita</au><au>Fafchamps, Marcel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Testing Unilateral and Bilateral Link Formation</atitle><jtitle>The Economic journal (London)</jtitle><addtitle>Econ J</addtitle><date>2014-09</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>579</issue><spage>954</spage><epage>976</epage><pages>954-976</pages><issn>0013-0133</issn><eissn>1468-0297</eissn><coden>ECJOAB</coden><abstract>Empirical analysis of social networks is often based on self-reported links from survey data. How we interpret such data is crucial for drawing correct inference on network effects. We propose a method for testing whether survey responses can safely be interpreted as a link and, if so, whether links are generated by a unilateral or bilateral link formation process. We present two empirical illustrations of the test on risk-sharing links in Tanzania and on communication among Indian farmers, respectively, demonstrating the ability of the methodology to discriminate between competing data-generating processes.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ecoj.12071</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6836-1759</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-0133
ispartof The Economic journal (London), 2014-09, Vol.124 (579), p.954-976
issn 0013-0133
1468-0297
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00825261v1
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Business Source Complete
subjects Agriculture
Communication
Demonstrations
Dyadics
Economic models
Economics and Finance
Empirical research
Farmers
Humanities and Social Sciences
Hyperlinks
India
Information processing
Responses
Risk sharing
Social networks
Spreading risk
Standard error
Studies
Survey responses
Tanzania
Villages
Working papers
title Testing Unilateral and Bilateral Link Formation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T14%3A11%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testing%20Unilateral%20and%20Bilateral%20Link%20Formation&rft.jtitle=The%20Economic%20journal%20(London)&rft.au=Comola,%20Margherita&rft.date=2014-09&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=579&rft.spage=954&rft.epage=976&rft.pages=954-976&rft.issn=0013-0133&rft.eissn=1468-0297&rft.coden=ECJOAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ecoj.12071&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_hal_p%3E24029355%3C/jstor_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1561127009&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24029355&rfr_iscdi=true