Assessment of bursting activity and interspike intervals variability: A case study for methodological comparison

The detection and characterization of bursting activity remains a topic where no consensual definition has been reached so far. We compare here three different approaches of spike trains variability: statistical characterization (average frequency, coefficient of variation), burst detection (Poisson...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neuroscience methods 2009-04, Vol.179 (1), p.142-149
Hauptverfasser: Robin, Kristelle, Maurice, Nicolas, Degos, Bertrand, Deniau, Jean-Michel, Martinerie, Jacques, Pezard, Laurent
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 149
container_issue 1
container_start_page 142
container_title Journal of neuroscience methods
container_volume 179
creator Robin, Kristelle
Maurice, Nicolas
Degos, Bertrand
Deniau, Jean-Michel
Martinerie, Jacques
Pezard, Laurent
description The detection and characterization of bursting activity remains a topic where no consensual definition has been reached so far. We compare here three different approaches of spike trains variability: statistical characterization (average frequency, coefficient of variation), burst detection (Poisson and rank surprise) and multi-scale analysis (detrended fluctuations analysis). Using both real and simulated data, we show that Poisson surprise provides information closely related to the coefficient of variation and that rank surprise detects significant bursts which are associated with long-range correlations. Since these long-range correlations are only adequately characterized with multi-scale analysis, this study emphasizes the complementarity of these approaches for the complete characterization of spike trains.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.01.020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00805401v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165027009000442</els_id><sourcerecordid>879478366</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e3bf4db613586b72a1692d49294369dd181d2dd8c6370380c04a86bc264e6f123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0UGP1CAUB3BiNO64-hU2nDR7aH1QSqknJxt1TSbxook3QoHuMralAm0y314mHfWmJwj5Pd7L-yN0Q6AkQPjbY3mc7DLa9FhSgLYEUgKFJ2hHREML3ojvT9Euw7oA2sAVehHjEQBYC_w5uiIto6KmsEPzPkYb42inhH2PuyXE5KYHrHRyq0snrCaD3ZRsiLP7YbfrqoaIVxWc6tyQ0Tu8x1pFi2NazAn3PuDzZN74wT84rQas_ThnH_30Ej3rc7l9dTmv0bePH77e3ReHL58-3-0PhWYVTYWtup6ZjpOqFrxrqCK8pYa1tGUVb40hghhqjNC8aqASoIGpDDXlzPKe0Ooa3W7_PqpBzsGNKpykV07e7w_y_AYgoGZAVpLtm83Owf9cbExydFHbYVCT9UuUomlZIyrOs3z9T8kbSkHUTYZ8gzr4GIPt_8xAQJ4TlEf5O0F5TlACkTnBXHhz6bB0ozV_yy6RZfB-AzZvb3U2yKidnbQ1LlidpPHufz1-AbMJsQ4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67220857</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of bursting activity and interspike intervals variability: A case study for methodological comparison</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Robin, Kristelle ; Maurice, Nicolas ; Degos, Bertrand ; Deniau, Jean-Michel ; Martinerie, Jacques ; Pezard, Laurent</creator><creatorcontrib>Robin, Kristelle ; Maurice, Nicolas ; Degos, Bertrand ; Deniau, Jean-Michel ; Martinerie, Jacques ; Pezard, Laurent</creatorcontrib><description>The detection and characterization of bursting activity remains a topic where no consensual definition has been reached so far. We compare here three different approaches of spike trains variability: statistical characterization (average frequency, coefficient of variation), burst detection (Poisson and rank surprise) and multi-scale analysis (detrended fluctuations analysis). Using both real and simulated data, we show that Poisson surprise provides information closely related to the coefficient of variation and that rank surprise detects significant bursts which are associated with long-range correlations. Since these long-range correlations are only adequately characterized with multi-scale analysis, this study emphasizes the complementarity of these approaches for the complete characterization of spike trains.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0270</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-678X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.01.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19428520</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Action Potentials - drug effects ; Algorithms ; Animals ; Benzazepines - pharmacology ; Bursting ; Complementarity ; Computer Science ; Computer Simulation ; Detrended fluctuation analysis ; Dopamine Antagonists - pharmacology ; Long-range correlations ; Medical Imaging ; Microelectrodes ; Models, Neurological ; Neurons - drug effects ; Neurons - physiology ; Poisson Distribution ; Poisson surprise method ; Raclopride - pharmacology ; Rank surprise method ; Rats ; Spike trains variability ; Substantia Nigra - drug effects ; Substantia Nigra - physiology ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of neuroscience methods, 2009-04, Vol.179 (1), p.142-149</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e3bf4db613586b72a1692d49294369dd181d2dd8c6370380c04a86bc264e6f123</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e3bf4db613586b72a1692d49294369dd181d2dd8c6370380c04a86bc264e6f123</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165027009000442$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19428520$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://inria.hal.science/hal-00805401$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Robin, Kristelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maurice, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Degos, Bertrand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deniau, Jean-Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinerie, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pezard, Laurent</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of bursting activity and interspike intervals variability: A case study for methodological comparison</title><title>Journal of neuroscience methods</title><addtitle>J Neurosci Methods</addtitle><description>The detection and characterization of bursting activity remains a topic where no consensual definition has been reached so far. We compare here three different approaches of spike trains variability: statistical characterization (average frequency, coefficient of variation), burst detection (Poisson and rank surprise) and multi-scale analysis (detrended fluctuations analysis). Using both real and simulated data, we show that Poisson surprise provides information closely related to the coefficient of variation and that rank surprise detects significant bursts which are associated with long-range correlations. Since these long-range correlations are only adequately characterized with multi-scale analysis, this study emphasizes the complementarity of these approaches for the complete characterization of spike trains.</description><subject>Action Potentials - drug effects</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Benzazepines - pharmacology</subject><subject>Bursting</subject><subject>Complementarity</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Detrended fluctuation analysis</subject><subject>Dopamine Antagonists - pharmacology</subject><subject>Long-range correlations</subject><subject>Medical Imaging</subject><subject>Microelectrodes</subject><subject>Models, Neurological</subject><subject>Neurons - drug effects</subject><subject>Neurons - physiology</subject><subject>Poisson Distribution</subject><subject>Poisson surprise method</subject><subject>Raclopride - pharmacology</subject><subject>Rank surprise method</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Spike trains variability</subject><subject>Substantia Nigra - drug effects</subject><subject>Substantia Nigra - physiology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0165-0270</issn><issn>1872-678X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0UGP1CAUB3BiNO64-hU2nDR7aH1QSqknJxt1TSbxook3QoHuMralAm0y314mHfWmJwj5Pd7L-yN0Q6AkQPjbY3mc7DLa9FhSgLYEUgKFJ2hHREML3ojvT9Euw7oA2sAVehHjEQBYC_w5uiIto6KmsEPzPkYb42inhH2PuyXE5KYHrHRyq0snrCaD3ZRsiLP7YbfrqoaIVxWc6tyQ0Tu8x1pFi2NazAn3PuDzZN74wT84rQas_ThnH_30Ej3rc7l9dTmv0bePH77e3ReHL58-3-0PhWYVTYWtup6ZjpOqFrxrqCK8pYa1tGUVb40hghhqjNC8aqASoIGpDDXlzPKe0Ooa3W7_PqpBzsGNKpykV07e7w_y_AYgoGZAVpLtm83Owf9cbExydFHbYVCT9UuUomlZIyrOs3z9T8kbSkHUTYZ8gzr4GIPt_8xAQJ4TlEf5O0F5TlACkTnBXHhz6bB0ozV_yy6RZfB-AzZvb3U2yKidnbQ1LlidpPHufz1-AbMJsQ4</recordid><startdate>20090430</startdate><enddate>20090430</enddate><creator>Robin, Kristelle</creator><creator>Maurice, Nicolas</creator><creator>Degos, Bertrand</creator><creator>Deniau, Jean-Michel</creator><creator>Martinerie, Jacques</creator><creator>Pezard, Laurent</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>1XC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090430</creationdate><title>Assessment of bursting activity and interspike intervals variability: A case study for methodological comparison</title><author>Robin, Kristelle ; Maurice, Nicolas ; Degos, Bertrand ; Deniau, Jean-Michel ; Martinerie, Jacques ; Pezard, Laurent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e3bf4db613586b72a1692d49294369dd181d2dd8c6370380c04a86bc264e6f123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Action Potentials - drug effects</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Benzazepines - pharmacology</topic><topic>Bursting</topic><topic>Complementarity</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Detrended fluctuation analysis</topic><topic>Dopamine Antagonists - pharmacology</topic><topic>Long-range correlations</topic><topic>Medical Imaging</topic><topic>Microelectrodes</topic><topic>Models, Neurological</topic><topic>Neurons - drug effects</topic><topic>Neurons - physiology</topic><topic>Poisson Distribution</topic><topic>Poisson surprise method</topic><topic>Raclopride - pharmacology</topic><topic>Rank surprise method</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Spike trains variability</topic><topic>Substantia Nigra - drug effects</topic><topic>Substantia Nigra - physiology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Robin, Kristelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maurice, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Degos, Bertrand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deniau, Jean-Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinerie, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pezard, Laurent</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Journal of neuroscience methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Robin, Kristelle</au><au>Maurice, Nicolas</au><au>Degos, Bertrand</au><au>Deniau, Jean-Michel</au><au>Martinerie, Jacques</au><au>Pezard, Laurent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of bursting activity and interspike intervals variability: A case study for methodological comparison</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neuroscience methods</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurosci Methods</addtitle><date>2009-04-30</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>179</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>142</spage><epage>149</epage><pages>142-149</pages><issn>0165-0270</issn><eissn>1872-678X</eissn><abstract>The detection and characterization of bursting activity remains a topic where no consensual definition has been reached so far. We compare here three different approaches of spike trains variability: statistical characterization (average frequency, coefficient of variation), burst detection (Poisson and rank surprise) and multi-scale analysis (detrended fluctuations analysis). Using both real and simulated data, we show that Poisson surprise provides information closely related to the coefficient of variation and that rank surprise detects significant bursts which are associated with long-range correlations. Since these long-range correlations are only adequately characterized with multi-scale analysis, this study emphasizes the complementarity of these approaches for the complete characterization of spike trains.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>19428520</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.01.020</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-0270
ispartof Journal of neuroscience methods, 2009-04, Vol.179 (1), p.142-149
issn 0165-0270
1872-678X
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00805401v1
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Action Potentials - drug effects
Algorithms
Animals
Benzazepines - pharmacology
Bursting
Complementarity
Computer Science
Computer Simulation
Detrended fluctuation analysis
Dopamine Antagonists - pharmacology
Long-range correlations
Medical Imaging
Microelectrodes
Models, Neurological
Neurons - drug effects
Neurons - physiology
Poisson Distribution
Poisson surprise method
Raclopride - pharmacology
Rank surprise method
Rats
Spike trains variability
Substantia Nigra - drug effects
Substantia Nigra - physiology
Time Factors
title Assessment of bursting activity and interspike intervals variability: A case study for methodological comparison
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T01%3A40%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20bursting%20activity%20and%20interspike%20intervals%20variability:%20A%20case%20study%20for%20methodological%20comparison&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neuroscience%20methods&rft.au=Robin,%20Kristelle&rft.date=2009-04-30&rft.volume=179&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=142&rft.epage=149&rft.pages=142-149&rft.issn=0165-0270&rft.eissn=1872-678X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.01.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E879478366%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67220857&rft_id=info:pmid/19428520&rft_els_id=S0165027009000442&rfr_iscdi=true