The costs and benefits of white certificates schemes
White certificate schemes mandate energy companies to promote energy efficiency with flexibility mechanisms, including the trading of energy savings. A unified framework is used to estimate the costs and benefits of the schemes implemented in Great Britain in 2002, in Italy in 2005 and in France in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energy efficiency 2012-05, Vol.5 (2), p.179-199 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 199 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 179 |
container_title | Energy efficiency |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Giraudet, Louis-Gaëtan Bodineau, Luc Finon, Dominique |
description | White certificate schemes mandate energy companies to promote energy efficiency with flexibility mechanisms, including the trading of energy savings. A unified framework is used to estimate the costs and benefits of the schemes implemented in Great Britain in 2002, in Italy in 2005 and in France in 2006. ‘Negawatt-hour cost’ estimates reach 0.009€/kWh saved in Great Britain and 0.037€/kWh saved in France, which compares favourably to energy prices in those countries. Moreover, the benefits of reduced energy bills and CO
2
emissions saved exceed the costs; thus, white certificate schemes pay for themselves. Overall, the policy instrument is cost-effective and economically efficient. A closer look at the differences amongst countries provides general insights about the conceptualization of the instrument: (a) Compared to utility demand-side management, to which they are related, white certificate schemes provide more transparency about energy savings, but less transparency around costs; (b) the substantial efficiency discrepancy between the British scheme and its French counterpart can be explained by differences in technological potentials, coexisting policies and supply-side systems in these countries and (c) the nature and amount of costs influence compliance strategies. Notably, if energy suppliers are allowed to set their retail price freely, they tend to grant subsidies to end-use consumers for energy efficient investments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12053-011-9134-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00755826v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2608727671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-ae383004fdde8024e42213855625a3e08d0765a2005e9452f6e7e8bd83e20f713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWGo_gLfFi3hYnfzd7LEUtULBSwVvId2duJF2tyZbxW9vlhUFQQhMJvN7L8wj5JzCNQUobiJlIHkOlOYl5SJXR2RCZQG5EoU-_rmr51Myi9FvgFOmeDoTItYNZlUX-5jZts422KLzqelc9tH4Ps0w9N75yvYYs1g1uMN4Rk6c3Uacfdcpebq7XS-W-erx_mExX-WVYKLPLXLNAYSra9TABArGKNdSKiYtR9A1FEpaBiCxFJI5hQXqTa05MnAF5VNyNfo2dmv2we9s-DSd9WY5X5nhLS0vpWbqfWAvR3YfurcDxt7sfKxwu7UtdodoSqWpBs15Ii_-kK_dIbRpEVOyQgso-WBHR6gKXYwB3c__FMwQuhlDNyl0M4RuVNKwURMT275g-DX-X_QFSnKAoA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>927840931</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The costs and benefits of white certificates schemes</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Giraudet, Louis-Gaëtan ; Bodineau, Luc ; Finon, Dominique</creator><creatorcontrib>Giraudet, Louis-Gaëtan ; Bodineau, Luc ; Finon, Dominique</creatorcontrib><description>White certificate schemes mandate energy companies to promote energy efficiency with flexibility mechanisms, including the trading of energy savings. A unified framework is used to estimate the costs and benefits of the schemes implemented in Great Britain in 2002, in Italy in 2005 and in France in 2006. ‘Negawatt-hour cost’ estimates reach 0.009€/kWh saved in Great Britain and 0.037€/kWh saved in France, which compares favourably to energy prices in those countries. Moreover, the benefits of reduced energy bills and CO
2
emissions saved exceed the costs; thus, white certificate schemes pay for themselves. Overall, the policy instrument is cost-effective and economically efficient. A closer look at the differences amongst countries provides general insights about the conceptualization of the instrument: (a) Compared to utility demand-side management, to which they are related, white certificate schemes provide more transparency about energy savings, but less transparency around costs; (b) the substantial efficiency discrepancy between the British scheme and its French counterpart can be explained by differences in technological potentials, coexisting policies and supply-side systems in these countries and (c) the nature and amount of costs influence compliance strategies. Notably, if energy suppliers are allowed to set their retail price freely, they tend to grant subsidies to end-use consumers for energy efficient investments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1570-646X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1570-6478</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12053-011-9134-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide emissions ; Compliance ; Cost analysis ; Cost benefit analysis ; Cost control ; Cost estimates ; Cost recovery ; Demand side management ; Economics ; Economics and Management ; Effectiveness ; Electricity ; Emissions ; Energy ; Energy conservation ; Energy consumption ; Energy Efficiency ; Energy industry ; Energy Policy ; Energy prices ; Environment ; Environmental Economics ; Environmental Sciences ; Flexibility ; Market prices ; Original Research ; Renewable and Green Energy ; Studies ; subsidies ; Suppliers ; Sustainable Development ; transparency</subject><ispartof>Energy efficiency, 2012-05, Vol.5 (2), p.179-199</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-ae383004fdde8024e42213855625a3e08d0765a2005e9452f6e7e8bd83e20f713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-ae383004fdde8024e42213855625a3e08d0765a2005e9452f6e7e8bd83e20f713</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4611-3564</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12053-011-9134-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12053-011-9134-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://enpc.hal.science/hal-00755826$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giraudet, Louis-Gaëtan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bodineau, Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finon, Dominique</creatorcontrib><title>The costs and benefits of white certificates schemes</title><title>Energy efficiency</title><addtitle>Energy Efficiency</addtitle><description>White certificate schemes mandate energy companies to promote energy efficiency with flexibility mechanisms, including the trading of energy savings. A unified framework is used to estimate the costs and benefits of the schemes implemented in Great Britain in 2002, in Italy in 2005 and in France in 2006. ‘Negawatt-hour cost’ estimates reach 0.009€/kWh saved in Great Britain and 0.037€/kWh saved in France, which compares favourably to energy prices in those countries. Moreover, the benefits of reduced energy bills and CO
2
emissions saved exceed the costs; thus, white certificate schemes pay for themselves. Overall, the policy instrument is cost-effective and economically efficient. A closer look at the differences amongst countries provides general insights about the conceptualization of the instrument: (a) Compared to utility demand-side management, to which they are related, white certificate schemes provide more transparency about energy savings, but less transparency around costs; (b) the substantial efficiency discrepancy between the British scheme and its French counterpart can be explained by differences in technological potentials, coexisting policies and supply-side systems in these countries and (c) the nature and amount of costs influence compliance strategies. Notably, if energy suppliers are allowed to set their retail price freely, they tend to grant subsidies to end-use consumers for energy efficient investments.</description><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide emissions</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Cost benefit analysis</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Cost estimates</subject><subject>Cost recovery</subject><subject>Demand side management</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Management</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy conservation</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy Efficiency</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>Energy Policy</subject><subject>Energy prices</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Economics</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Flexibility</subject><subject>Market prices</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Renewable and Green Energy</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>subsidies</subject><subject>Suppliers</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>transparency</subject><issn>1570-646X</issn><issn>1570-6478</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWGo_gLfFi3hYnfzd7LEUtULBSwVvId2duJF2tyZbxW9vlhUFQQhMJvN7L8wj5JzCNQUobiJlIHkOlOYl5SJXR2RCZQG5EoU-_rmr51Myi9FvgFOmeDoTItYNZlUX-5jZts422KLzqelc9tH4Ps0w9N75yvYYs1g1uMN4Rk6c3Uacfdcpebq7XS-W-erx_mExX-WVYKLPLXLNAYSra9TABArGKNdSKiYtR9A1FEpaBiCxFJI5hQXqTa05MnAF5VNyNfo2dmv2we9s-DSd9WY5X5nhLS0vpWbqfWAvR3YfurcDxt7sfKxwu7UtdodoSqWpBs15Ii_-kK_dIbRpEVOyQgso-WBHR6gKXYwB3c__FMwQuhlDNyl0M4RuVNKwURMT275g-DX-X_QFSnKAoA</recordid><startdate>20120501</startdate><enddate>20120501</enddate><creator>Giraudet, Louis-Gaëtan</creator><creator>Bodineau, Luc</creator><creator>Finon, Dominique</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4611-3564</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20120501</creationdate><title>The costs and benefits of white certificates schemes</title><author>Giraudet, Louis-Gaëtan ; Bodineau, Luc ; Finon, Dominique</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-ae383004fdde8024e42213855625a3e08d0765a2005e9452f6e7e8bd83e20f713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide emissions</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Cost benefit analysis</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Cost estimates</topic><topic>Cost recovery</topic><topic>Demand side management</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Management</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy conservation</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy Efficiency</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>Energy Policy</topic><topic>Energy prices</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Economics</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Flexibility</topic><topic>Market prices</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Renewable and Green Energy</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>subsidies</topic><topic>Suppliers</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>transparency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giraudet, Louis-Gaëtan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bodineau, Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finon, Dominique</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Energy efficiency</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giraudet, Louis-Gaëtan</au><au>Bodineau, Luc</au><au>Finon, Dominique</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The costs and benefits of white certificates schemes</atitle><jtitle>Energy efficiency</jtitle><stitle>Energy Efficiency</stitle><date>2012-05-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>179</spage><epage>199</epage><pages>179-199</pages><issn>1570-646X</issn><eissn>1570-6478</eissn><abstract>White certificate schemes mandate energy companies to promote energy efficiency with flexibility mechanisms, including the trading of energy savings. A unified framework is used to estimate the costs and benefits of the schemes implemented in Great Britain in 2002, in Italy in 2005 and in France in 2006. ‘Negawatt-hour cost’ estimates reach 0.009€/kWh saved in Great Britain and 0.037€/kWh saved in France, which compares favourably to energy prices in those countries. Moreover, the benefits of reduced energy bills and CO
2
emissions saved exceed the costs; thus, white certificate schemes pay for themselves. Overall, the policy instrument is cost-effective and economically efficient. A closer look at the differences amongst countries provides general insights about the conceptualization of the instrument: (a) Compared to utility demand-side management, to which they are related, white certificate schemes provide more transparency about energy savings, but less transparency around costs; (b) the substantial efficiency discrepancy between the British scheme and its French counterpart can be explained by differences in technological potentials, coexisting policies and supply-side systems in these countries and (c) the nature and amount of costs influence compliance strategies. Notably, if energy suppliers are allowed to set their retail price freely, they tend to grant subsidies to end-use consumers for energy efficient investments.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s12053-011-9134-6</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4611-3564</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1570-646X |
ispartof | Energy efficiency, 2012-05, Vol.5 (2), p.179-199 |
issn | 1570-646X 1570-6478 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00755826v1 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Carbon dioxide Carbon dioxide emissions Compliance Cost analysis Cost benefit analysis Cost control Cost estimates Cost recovery Demand side management Economics Economics and Management Effectiveness Electricity Emissions Energy Energy conservation Energy consumption Energy Efficiency Energy industry Energy Policy Energy prices Environment Environmental Economics Environmental Sciences Flexibility Market prices Original Research Renewable and Green Energy Studies subsidies Suppliers Sustainable Development transparency |
title | The costs and benefits of white certificates schemes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T04%3A56%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20costs%20and%20benefits%20of%20white%20certificates%20schemes&rft.jtitle=Energy%20efficiency&rft.au=Giraudet,%20Louis-Ga%C3%ABtan&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=179&rft.epage=199&rft.pages=179-199&rft.issn=1570-646X&rft.eissn=1570-6478&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12053-011-9134-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2608727671%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=927840931&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |