Severe 2011 ozone depletion assessed with 11 years of ozone, NO2, and OClO measurements at 80°N

Unusually cold conditions in Arctic winter 2010/11 led to large stratospheric ozone loss. We investigate this with UV‐visible measurements made at Eureka, Canada (80.05°N, 86.42°W) from 1999–2011. For 8–22 March 2011, OClO was enhanced, indicating chlorine activation above Eureka. Ozone columns were...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geophysical research letters 2012-03, Vol.39 (5), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Adams, C., Strong, K., Zhao, X., Bassford, M. R., Chipperfield, M. P., Daffer, W., Drummond, J. R., Farahani, E. E., Feng, W., Fraser, A., Goutail, F., Manney, G., McLinden, C. A., Pazmino, A., Rex, M., Walker, Kaley A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 5
container_start_page
container_title Geophysical research letters
container_volume 39
creator Adams, C.
Strong, K.
Zhao, X.
Bassford, M. R.
Chipperfield, M. P.
Daffer, W.
Drummond, J. R.
Farahani, E. E.
Feng, W.
Fraser, A.
Goutail, F.
Manney, G.
McLinden, C. A.
Pazmino, A.
Rex, M.
Walker, Kaley A.
description Unusually cold conditions in Arctic winter 2010/11 led to large stratospheric ozone loss. We investigate this with UV‐visible measurements made at Eureka, Canada (80.05°N, 86.42°W) from 1999–2011. For 8–22 March 2011, OClO was enhanced, indicating chlorine activation above Eureka. Ozone columns were lower than in any other year in the record, reaching minima of 237 DU and 247 DU in two datasets. The average NO2 column inside the vortex, measured at visible and UV wavelengths, was 46 ± 30% and 45 ± 27% lower in 2011 than the average NO2column from previous years. Ozone column loss was estimated from two ozone datasets, using a modeled passive ozone tracer. For 12–20 March 2011, the average ozone loss was 27% and 29% (99 DU and 108 DU). The largest percent ozone loss in the 11‐year record of 47% (250 DU and 251 DU) was observed on 5 April 2011. Key Points Unprecedented low ozone and NO2 columns were observed in 2011 Low ozone and NO2 columns are attributed to dynamics as well as chemistry 47% maximum column ozone loss observed, the largest loss in the 11‐year record
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2011GL050478
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00671665v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2617702161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-h2650-b56911133154f4528b498e2466c14d295f44dadd0b403bd10cc90240842367d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkNFKwzAUhoMoOKd3PkDwTrB6TpImzaUM3cSyiQ53GbMlY9WunU2nzqfyGXwyOyoiHDiHw_f__PyEHCOcIzB9wQCxn0IMQiU7pINaiCgBULukA6Cbmym5Tw5CeAYADhw75OnBv_nK062Ulp9l4anzq9zXWVlQG4JvxtH3rF7QBth4WwVazlvyjA5H7IzawtFRLx_RpbdhXfmlL-pAbU0T-P4aHpK9uc2DP_rdXTK-vhr3BlE66t_0LtNowWQM0TSWGhE5x1jMRcySqdCJZ0LKGQrHdDwXwlnnYCqATx3CbKaBCUgE41I53iWnre3C5mZVZUtbbUxpMzO4TM32ByAVShm_YcOetOyqKl_XPtTmuVxXRZPOaAGKoUbVQKyF3rPcb_4sEcy2avO_atO_T1mim0q7JGpFWaj9x5_IVi9GKq5iMxn2jbi7HQ4GYmIe-Q908H02</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>940721917</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Severe 2011 ozone depletion assessed with 11 years of ozone, NO2, and OClO measurements at 80°N</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Adams, C. ; Strong, K. ; Zhao, X. ; Bassford, M. R. ; Chipperfield, M. P. ; Daffer, W. ; Drummond, J. R. ; Farahani, E. E. ; Feng, W. ; Fraser, A. ; Goutail, F. ; Manney, G. ; McLinden, C. A. ; Pazmino, A. ; Rex, M. ; Walker, Kaley A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Adams, C. ; Strong, K. ; Zhao, X. ; Bassford, M. R. ; Chipperfield, M. P. ; Daffer, W. ; Drummond, J. R. ; Farahani, E. E. ; Feng, W. ; Fraser, A. ; Goutail, F. ; Manney, G. ; McLinden, C. A. ; Pazmino, A. ; Rex, M. ; Walker, Kaley A.</creatorcontrib><description>Unusually cold conditions in Arctic winter 2010/11 led to large stratospheric ozone loss. We investigate this with UV‐visible measurements made at Eureka, Canada (80.05°N, 86.42°W) from 1999–2011. For 8–22 March 2011, OClO was enhanced, indicating chlorine activation above Eureka. Ozone columns were lower than in any other year in the record, reaching minima of 237 DU and 247 DU in two datasets. The average NO2 column inside the vortex, measured at visible and UV wavelengths, was 46 ± 30% and 45 ± 27% lower in 2011 than the average NO2column from previous years. Ozone column loss was estimated from two ozone datasets, using a modeled passive ozone tracer. For 12–20 March 2011, the average ozone loss was 27% and 29% (99 DU and 108 DU). The largest percent ozone loss in the 11‐year record of 47% (250 DU and 251 DU) was observed on 5 April 2011. Key Points Unprecedented low ozone and NO2 columns were observed in 2011 Low ozone and NO2 columns are attributed to dynamics as well as chemistry 47% maximum column ozone loss observed, the largest loss in the 11‐year record</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-8276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8007</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2011GL050478</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Arctic ozone depletion ; Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics ; Atmospheric sciences ; CANDAC ; Chlorine ; DOAS ; Emission measurements ; Nitrogen dioxide ; Ozone ; Ozone depletion ; PEARL ; Physics ; polar vortex ; Remote sensing ; Scientific apparatus &amp; instruments ; UV-visible spectroscopy ; Wavelengths</subject><ispartof>Geophysical research letters, 2012-03, Vol.39 (5), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2012 by the American Geophysical Union</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-9008-592X ; 0000-0002-1431-1542</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2011GL050478$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2011GL050478$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1416,1432,11513,27923,27924,45573,45574,46408,46467,46832,46891</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-00671665$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adams, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strong, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bassford, M. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chipperfield, M. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daffer, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drummond, J. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farahani, E. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraser, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goutail, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manney, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLinden, C. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pazmino, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rex, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Kaley A.</creatorcontrib><title>Severe 2011 ozone depletion assessed with 11 years of ozone, NO2, and OClO measurements at 80°N</title><title>Geophysical research letters</title><addtitle>Geophys. Res. Lett</addtitle><description>Unusually cold conditions in Arctic winter 2010/11 led to large stratospheric ozone loss. We investigate this with UV‐visible measurements made at Eureka, Canada (80.05°N, 86.42°W) from 1999–2011. For 8–22 March 2011, OClO was enhanced, indicating chlorine activation above Eureka. Ozone columns were lower than in any other year in the record, reaching minima of 237 DU and 247 DU in two datasets. The average NO2 column inside the vortex, measured at visible and UV wavelengths, was 46 ± 30% and 45 ± 27% lower in 2011 than the average NO2column from previous years. Ozone column loss was estimated from two ozone datasets, using a modeled passive ozone tracer. For 12–20 March 2011, the average ozone loss was 27% and 29% (99 DU and 108 DU). The largest percent ozone loss in the 11‐year record of 47% (250 DU and 251 DU) was observed on 5 April 2011. Key Points Unprecedented low ozone and NO2 columns were observed in 2011 Low ozone and NO2 columns are attributed to dynamics as well as chemistry 47% maximum column ozone loss observed, the largest loss in the 11‐year record</description><subject>Arctic ozone depletion</subject><subject>Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics</subject><subject>Atmospheric sciences</subject><subject>CANDAC</subject><subject>Chlorine</subject><subject>DOAS</subject><subject>Emission measurements</subject><subject>Nitrogen dioxide</subject><subject>Ozone</subject><subject>Ozone depletion</subject><subject>PEARL</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>polar vortex</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Scientific apparatus &amp; instruments</subject><subject>UV-visible spectroscopy</subject><subject>Wavelengths</subject><issn>0094-8276</issn><issn>1944-8007</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkNFKwzAUhoMoOKd3PkDwTrB6TpImzaUM3cSyiQ53GbMlY9WunU2nzqfyGXwyOyoiHDiHw_f__PyEHCOcIzB9wQCxn0IMQiU7pINaiCgBULukA6Cbmym5Tw5CeAYADhw75OnBv_nK062Ulp9l4anzq9zXWVlQG4JvxtH3rF7QBth4WwVazlvyjA5H7IzawtFRLx_RpbdhXfmlL-pAbU0T-P4aHpK9uc2DP_rdXTK-vhr3BlE66t_0LtNowWQM0TSWGhE5x1jMRcySqdCJZ0LKGQrHdDwXwlnnYCqATx3CbKaBCUgE41I53iWnre3C5mZVZUtbbUxpMzO4TM32ByAVShm_YcOetOyqKl_XPtTmuVxXRZPOaAGKoUbVQKyF3rPcb_4sEcy2avO_atO_T1mim0q7JGpFWaj9x5_IVi9GKq5iMxn2jbi7HQ4GYmIe-Q908H02</recordid><startdate>201203</startdate><enddate>201203</enddate><creator>Adams, C.</creator><creator>Strong, K.</creator><creator>Zhao, X.</creator><creator>Bassford, M. R.</creator><creator>Chipperfield, M. P.</creator><creator>Daffer, W.</creator><creator>Drummond, J. R.</creator><creator>Farahani, E. E.</creator><creator>Feng, W.</creator><creator>Fraser, A.</creator><creator>Goutail, F.</creator><creator>Manney, G.</creator><creator>McLinden, C. A.</creator><creator>Pazmino, A.</creator><creator>Rex, M.</creator><creator>Walker, Kaley A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9008-592X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1431-1542</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201203</creationdate><title>Severe 2011 ozone depletion assessed with 11 years of ozone, NO2, and OClO measurements at 80°N</title><author>Adams, C. ; Strong, K. ; Zhao, X. ; Bassford, M. R. ; Chipperfield, M. P. ; Daffer, W. ; Drummond, J. R. ; Farahani, E. E. ; Feng, W. ; Fraser, A. ; Goutail, F. ; Manney, G. ; McLinden, C. A. ; Pazmino, A. ; Rex, M. ; Walker, Kaley A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h2650-b56911133154f4528b498e2466c14d295f44dadd0b403bd10cc90240842367d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Arctic ozone depletion</topic><topic>Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics</topic><topic>Atmospheric sciences</topic><topic>CANDAC</topic><topic>Chlorine</topic><topic>DOAS</topic><topic>Emission measurements</topic><topic>Nitrogen dioxide</topic><topic>Ozone</topic><topic>Ozone depletion</topic><topic>PEARL</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>polar vortex</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Scientific apparatus &amp; instruments</topic><topic>UV-visible spectroscopy</topic><topic>Wavelengths</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adams, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strong, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bassford, M. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chipperfield, M. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daffer, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drummond, J. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farahani, E. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraser, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goutail, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manney, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLinden, C. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pazmino, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rex, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Kaley A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adams, C.</au><au>Strong, K.</au><au>Zhao, X.</au><au>Bassford, M. R.</au><au>Chipperfield, M. P.</au><au>Daffer, W.</au><au>Drummond, J. R.</au><au>Farahani, E. E.</au><au>Feng, W.</au><au>Fraser, A.</au><au>Goutail, F.</au><au>Manney, G.</au><au>McLinden, C. A.</au><au>Pazmino, A.</au><au>Rex, M.</au><au>Walker, Kaley A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Severe 2011 ozone depletion assessed with 11 years of ozone, NO2, and OClO measurements at 80°N</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle><addtitle>Geophys. Res. Lett</addtitle><date>2012-03</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>5</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0094-8276</issn><eissn>1944-8007</eissn><abstract>Unusually cold conditions in Arctic winter 2010/11 led to large stratospheric ozone loss. We investigate this with UV‐visible measurements made at Eureka, Canada (80.05°N, 86.42°W) from 1999–2011. For 8–22 March 2011, OClO was enhanced, indicating chlorine activation above Eureka. Ozone columns were lower than in any other year in the record, reaching minima of 237 DU and 247 DU in two datasets. The average NO2 column inside the vortex, measured at visible and UV wavelengths, was 46 ± 30% and 45 ± 27% lower in 2011 than the average NO2column from previous years. Ozone column loss was estimated from two ozone datasets, using a modeled passive ozone tracer. For 12–20 March 2011, the average ozone loss was 27% and 29% (99 DU and 108 DU). The largest percent ozone loss in the 11‐year record of 47% (250 DU and 251 DU) was observed on 5 April 2011. Key Points Unprecedented low ozone and NO2 columns were observed in 2011 Low ozone and NO2 columns are attributed to dynamics as well as chemistry 47% maximum column ozone loss observed, the largest loss in the 11‐year record</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2011GL050478</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9008-592X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1431-1542</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-8276
ispartof Geophysical research letters, 2012-03, Vol.39 (5), p.n/a
issn 0094-8276
1944-8007
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00671665v1
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Free Content; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Arctic ozone depletion
Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics
Atmospheric sciences
CANDAC
Chlorine
DOAS
Emission measurements
Nitrogen dioxide
Ozone
Ozone depletion
PEARL
Physics
polar vortex
Remote sensing
Scientific apparatus & instruments
UV-visible spectroscopy
Wavelengths
title Severe 2011 ozone depletion assessed with 11 years of ozone, NO2, and OClO measurements at 80°N
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T01%3A14%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Severe%202011%20ozone%20depletion%20assessed%20with%2011%20years%20of%20ozone,%20NO2,%20and%20OClO%20measurements%20at%2080%C2%B0N&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20research%20letters&rft.au=Adams,%20C.&rft.date=2012-03&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=5&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0094-8276&rft.eissn=1944-8007&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2011GL050478&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2617702161%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=940721917&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true