Interpretation of clinical guidelines for poisoned patients: positive and negative effects of standard phrases used in TOXBASE
Introduction Electronic information sources are increasingly relied upon for clinical management advice. TOXBASE is a standardised online resource that offers clinical advice on the management of poisoned patients and is the first point of contact between clinicians and the National Poisons Informat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of clinical pharmacology 2009-10, Vol.65 (10), p.1007-1012 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1012 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1007 |
container_title | European journal of clinical pharmacology |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Waring, W. S McDonald, S. H Good, A. M Gordon, L. D Bateman, D. N |
description | Introduction Electronic information sources are increasingly relied upon for clinical management advice. TOXBASE is a standardised online resource that offers clinical advice on the management of poisoned patients and is the first point of contact between clinicians and the National Poisons Information Service in the United Kingdom. Advice is delivered using a series of standard phrases. The present study examined how healthcare professionals interpret the phrases and studied their impact on clinical decision-making. Methods A structured prospective written questionnaire was offered to healthcare staff in the Lothian region, and an electronic questionnaire issued to TOXBASE users across the United Kingdom. Participants were asked to respond to a variety of scenarios representing acutely poisoned patients. Clinical management advice was offered via TOXBASE using a variety of standard phrases, and participants were asked to express the likelihood that they would then administer gut decontamination treatment. Results There were 70 respondents to written questionnaires, and 119 respondents to the electronic version. Phrases that included didactic instructions, for example 'give', 'contraindicated', 'do' and 'perform' were associated with strongly positive or strongly negative responses. In contrast, advice that consisted of open phrases such as 'consider', 'benefit uncertain', and 'few data' were associated with inconsistent responses. Conclusion Didactic words and phrases are associated with more consistent interpretation and response than open-ended words and phrases. The choice of words and phrases used in electronic systems can have an independent impact on clinical decision-making and require further consideration. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00228-009-0669-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00534967v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21163975</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-42b521ea694e7787f996609c30580d40d553a80efeb7c8edaa5c226367820a9e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFrFDEUxgdR7Fr9A7zoICh4GH1JJsnE21qqLSz00Ba8hWzmZZsym2yTmYIX_3aznaUFD57Ce-_3fe-Fr6reEvhCAOTXDEBp1wCoBoRQjXpWLUjLaEOgJc-rBQAjjVASjqpXOd8CEK6AvayOiOJEEqCL6s95GDHtEo5m9DHU0dV28MFbM9SbyfdYCsy1i6neRZ9jwL7eFRTDmL-VVvajv8fahL4OuDEPBTqHdsx7rzyWiUlFc5NMLkZTLgY-1FcXv74vL09fVy-cGTK-ObzH1fWP06uTs2Z18fP8ZLlqLGdkbFq65pSgEapFKTvplBIClGXAO-hb6DlnpgN0uJa2w94YbikVTMiOglHIjqvPs--NGfQu-a1Jv3U0Xp8tV3rfA-CsVULek8J-mtldincT5lFvfbY4DCZgnLKmhAimJC_gh3_A2zilUP5RmLZV0CpZIDJDNsWcE7rH9QT0PkU9p1guUHqfolZF8-5gPK232D8pDrEV4OMBMLkk5ZIJ1udHjlKgEh4upDOXyyhsMD1d-L_t72eRM1GbTSrG15cUCAMiOlAg2F9DjLzh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214490497</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interpretation of clinical guidelines for poisoned patients: positive and negative effects of standard phrases used in TOXBASE</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Waring, W. S ; McDonald, S. H ; Good, A. M ; Gordon, L. D ; Bateman, D. N</creator><creatorcontrib>Waring, W. S ; McDonald, S. H ; Good, A. M ; Gordon, L. D ; Bateman, D. N</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Electronic information sources are increasingly relied upon for clinical management advice. TOXBASE is a standardised online resource that offers clinical advice on the management of poisoned patients and is the first point of contact between clinicians and the National Poisons Information Service in the United Kingdom. Advice is delivered using a series of standard phrases. The present study examined how healthcare professionals interpret the phrases and studied their impact on clinical decision-making. Methods A structured prospective written questionnaire was offered to healthcare staff in the Lothian region, and an electronic questionnaire issued to TOXBASE users across the United Kingdom. Participants were asked to respond to a variety of scenarios representing acutely poisoned patients. Clinical management advice was offered via TOXBASE using a variety of standard phrases, and participants were asked to express the likelihood that they would then administer gut decontamination treatment. Results There were 70 respondents to written questionnaires, and 119 respondents to the electronic version. Phrases that included didactic instructions, for example 'give', 'contraindicated', 'do' and 'perform' were associated with strongly positive or strongly negative responses. In contrast, advice that consisted of open phrases such as 'consider', 'benefit uncertain', and 'few data' were associated with inconsistent responses. Conclusion Didactic words and phrases are associated with more consistent interpretation and response than open-ended words and phrases. The choice of words and phrases used in electronic systems can have an independent impact on clinical decision-making and require further consideration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-6970</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1041</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00228-009-0669-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19517102</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Choice Behavior ; Databases, Factual ; Decision Making ; Decision support systems ; Decision Support Systems, Clinical - standards ; Drug overdose ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Female ; Health Care Surveys ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Medical treatment ; Middle Aged ; Nurses - statistics & numerical data ; Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; Physicians - statistics & numerical data ; Poisoning ; Poisoning - therapy ; Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Terminology as Topic ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2009-10, Vol.65 (10), p.1007-1012</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2009</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-42b521ea694e7787f996609c30580d40d553a80efeb7c8edaa5c226367820a9e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-42b521ea694e7787f996609c30580d40d553a80efeb7c8edaa5c226367820a9e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00228-009-0669-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00228-009-0669-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22027075$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19517102$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-00534967$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Waring, W. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, S. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Good, A. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, L. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bateman, D. N</creatorcontrib><title>Interpretation of clinical guidelines for poisoned patients: positive and negative effects of standard phrases used in TOXBASE</title><title>European journal of clinical pharmacology</title><addtitle>Eur J Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><description>Introduction Electronic information sources are increasingly relied upon for clinical management advice. TOXBASE is a standardised online resource that offers clinical advice on the management of poisoned patients and is the first point of contact between clinicians and the National Poisons Information Service in the United Kingdom. Advice is delivered using a series of standard phrases. The present study examined how healthcare professionals interpret the phrases and studied their impact on clinical decision-making. Methods A structured prospective written questionnaire was offered to healthcare staff in the Lothian region, and an electronic questionnaire issued to TOXBASE users across the United Kingdom. Participants were asked to respond to a variety of scenarios representing acutely poisoned patients. Clinical management advice was offered via TOXBASE using a variety of standard phrases, and participants were asked to express the likelihood that they would then administer gut decontamination treatment. Results There were 70 respondents to written questionnaires, and 119 respondents to the electronic version. Phrases that included didactic instructions, for example 'give', 'contraindicated', 'do' and 'perform' were associated with strongly positive or strongly negative responses. In contrast, advice that consisted of open phrases such as 'consider', 'benefit uncertain', and 'few data' were associated with inconsistent responses. Conclusion Didactic words and phrases are associated with more consistent interpretation and response than open-ended words and phrases. The choice of words and phrases used in electronic systems can have an independent impact on clinical decision-making and require further consideration.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Decision support systems</subject><subject>Decision Support Systems, Clinical - standards</subject><subject>Drug overdose</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nurses - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>Physicians - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Poisoning</subject><subject>Poisoning - therapy</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Terminology as Topic</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0031-6970</issn><issn>1432-1041</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFrFDEUxgdR7Fr9A7zoICh4GH1JJsnE21qqLSz00Ba8hWzmZZsym2yTmYIX_3aznaUFD57Ce-_3fe-Fr6reEvhCAOTXDEBp1wCoBoRQjXpWLUjLaEOgJc-rBQAjjVASjqpXOd8CEK6AvayOiOJEEqCL6s95GDHtEo5m9DHU0dV28MFbM9SbyfdYCsy1i6neRZ9jwL7eFRTDmL-VVvajv8fahL4OuDEPBTqHdsx7rzyWiUlFc5NMLkZTLgY-1FcXv74vL09fVy-cGTK-ObzH1fWP06uTs2Z18fP8ZLlqLGdkbFq65pSgEapFKTvplBIClGXAO-hb6DlnpgN0uJa2w94YbikVTMiOglHIjqvPs--NGfQu-a1Jv3U0Xp8tV3rfA-CsVULek8J-mtldincT5lFvfbY4DCZgnLKmhAimJC_gh3_A2zilUP5RmLZV0CpZIDJDNsWcE7rH9QT0PkU9p1guUHqfolZF8-5gPK232D8pDrEV4OMBMLkk5ZIJ1udHjlKgEh4upDOXyyhsMD1d-L_t72eRM1GbTSrG15cUCAMiOlAg2F9DjLzh</recordid><startdate>20091001</startdate><enddate>20091001</enddate><creator>Waring, W. S</creator><creator>McDonald, S. H</creator><creator>Good, A. M</creator><creator>Gordon, L. D</creator><creator>Bateman, D. N</creator><general>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091001</creationdate><title>Interpretation of clinical guidelines for poisoned patients: positive and negative effects of standard phrases used in TOXBASE</title><author>Waring, W. S ; McDonald, S. H ; Good, A. M ; Gordon, L. D ; Bateman, D. N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-42b521ea694e7787f996609c30580d40d553a80efeb7c8edaa5c226367820a9e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Decision support systems</topic><topic>Decision Support Systems, Clinical - standards</topic><topic>Drug overdose</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nurses - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>Physicians - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Poisoning</topic><topic>Poisoning - therapy</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Terminology as Topic</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Waring, W. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, S. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Good, A. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, L. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bateman, D. N</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>European journal of clinical pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Waring, W. S</au><au>McDonald, S. H</au><au>Good, A. M</au><au>Gordon, L. D</au><au>Bateman, D. N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interpretation of clinical guidelines for poisoned patients: positive and negative effects of standard phrases used in TOXBASE</atitle><jtitle>European journal of clinical pharmacology</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Clin Pharmacol</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><date>2009-10-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1007</spage><epage>1012</epage><pages>1007-1012</pages><issn>0031-6970</issn><eissn>1432-1041</eissn><abstract>Introduction Electronic information sources are increasingly relied upon for clinical management advice. TOXBASE is a standardised online resource that offers clinical advice on the management of poisoned patients and is the first point of contact between clinicians and the National Poisons Information Service in the United Kingdom. Advice is delivered using a series of standard phrases. The present study examined how healthcare professionals interpret the phrases and studied their impact on clinical decision-making. Methods A structured prospective written questionnaire was offered to healthcare staff in the Lothian region, and an electronic questionnaire issued to TOXBASE users across the United Kingdom. Participants were asked to respond to a variety of scenarios representing acutely poisoned patients. Clinical management advice was offered via TOXBASE using a variety of standard phrases, and participants were asked to express the likelihood that they would then administer gut decontamination treatment. Results There were 70 respondents to written questionnaires, and 119 respondents to the electronic version. Phrases that included didactic instructions, for example 'give', 'contraindicated', 'do' and 'perform' were associated with strongly positive or strongly negative responses. In contrast, advice that consisted of open phrases such as 'consider', 'benefit uncertain', and 'few data' were associated with inconsistent responses. Conclusion Didactic words and phrases are associated with more consistent interpretation and response than open-ended words and phrases. The choice of words and phrases used in electronic systems can have an independent impact on clinical decision-making and require further consideration.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>19517102</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00228-009-0669-9</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-6970 |
ispartof | European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2009-10, Vol.65 (10), p.1007-1012 |
issn | 0031-6970 1432-1041 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00534967v1 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Adult Attitude of Health Personnel Biological and medical sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Choice Behavior Databases, Factual Decision Making Decision support systems Decision Support Systems, Clinical - standards Drug overdose Evidence-Based Medicine Female Health Care Surveys Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Humans Male Medical sciences Medical treatment Middle Aged Nurses - statistics & numerical data Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription Pharmacology. Drug treatments Pharmacology/Toxicology Physicians - statistics & numerical data Poisoning Poisoning - therapy Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data Surveys and Questionnaires Terminology as Topic United Kingdom |
title | Interpretation of clinical guidelines for poisoned patients: positive and negative effects of standard phrases used in TOXBASE |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T11%3A05%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interpretation%20of%20clinical%20guidelines%20for%20poisoned%20patients:%20positive%20and%20negative%20effects%20of%20standard%20phrases%20used%20in%20TOXBASE&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20clinical%20pharmacology&rft.au=Waring,%20W.%20S&rft.date=2009-10-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1007&rft.epage=1012&rft.pages=1007-1012&rft.issn=0031-6970&rft.eissn=1432-1041&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00228-009-0669-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E21163975%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214490497&rft_id=info:pmid/19517102&rfr_iscdi=true |