A confrontation of 1D and 2D RKDG numerical simulation of transitional flow at open-channel junction

In this study, a comparison between the 1D and 2D numerical simulation of transitional flow in open‐channel networks is presented and completely described allowing for a full comprehension of the modeling water flow. For flow in an open‐channel network, mutual effects exist among the channel branche...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal for numerical methods in fluids 2009-11, Vol.61 (7), p.752-767
Hauptverfasser: Ghostine, R., Kesserwani, G., Mosé, R., Vazquez, J., Ghenaim, A., Grégoire, C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 767
container_issue 7
container_start_page 752
container_title International journal for numerical methods in fluids
container_volume 61
creator Ghostine, R.
Kesserwani, G.
Mosé, R.
Vazquez, J.
Ghenaim, A.
Grégoire, C.
description In this study, a comparison between the 1D and 2D numerical simulation of transitional flow in open‐channel networks is presented and completely described allowing for a full comprehension of the modeling water flow. For flow in an open‐channel network, mutual effects exist among the channel branches joining at a junction. Therefore, for the 1D study, the whole system (branches and junction) cannot be treated individually. The 1D Saint Venant equations calculating the flow in the branches are then supplemented by various equations used at the junction: a discharge flow conservation equation between the branches arriving and leaving the junction, and a momentum or energy conservation equation. The disadvantages of the 1D study are that the equations used at the junction are of empirical nature due to certain parameters given by experimental results and moreover they often present a reduced field of validity. On the contrary, for the 2D study, the entire network is considered as a single unit and the flow in all the branches and junctions is solved simultaneously. Therefore, we simply apply the 2D Saint Venant equations, which are solved by a second‐order Runge–Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method. Finally, the experimental results obtained by Hager are used to validate and to compare the two approaches 1D and 2D. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/fld.1977
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00515956v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1671360516</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4667-3c23010888e98d11741ae050b5fac7b3af22a726b1d1e162efc66cedbe1e4ff43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10cFuEzEQBmALgUQoSDyCL0hw2DJj79q7x6hpUtQIBALBzXK8turi2GG9S-nb41WicOI08syn__CbkNcIlwjA3rvQX2In5ROyQOhkBVzwp2QBTGLFoMPn5EXO9wDQsZYvSL-kJkU3pDjq0adIk6O4ojr2lK3ol9vVhsZpbwdvdKDZ76dwZuOgY_bzq5xcSA9UjzQdbKzMnY7RBno_RTPfX5JnTodsX53mBfm2vv56dVNtP20-XC23lamFkBU3jANC27a2a3tEWaO20MCucdrIHdeOMS2Z2GGPFgWzzghhbL-zaGvnan5B3h1z73RQh8Hv9fCokvbqZrlV8w6gwaZrxG8s9u3RHob0a7J5VHufjQ1BR5umrFBI5KJ48Y-aIeU8WHfORlBz6aqUrubSC31zStW5NOZKRcbns2flB1qoeXHV0T34YB__m6fW29Up9-R9Hu2fs9fDTyUkl436_nGjhFi3n9lto37wv_fMnYE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671360516</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A confrontation of 1D and 2D RKDG numerical simulation of transitional flow at open-channel junction</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><creator>Ghostine, R. ; Kesserwani, G. ; Mosé, R. ; Vazquez, J. ; Ghenaim, A. ; Grégoire, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ghostine, R. ; Kesserwani, G. ; Mosé, R. ; Vazquez, J. ; Ghenaim, A. ; Grégoire, C.</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, a comparison between the 1D and 2D numerical simulation of transitional flow in open‐channel networks is presented and completely described allowing for a full comprehension of the modeling water flow. For flow in an open‐channel network, mutual effects exist among the channel branches joining at a junction. Therefore, for the 1D study, the whole system (branches and junction) cannot be treated individually. The 1D Saint Venant equations calculating the flow in the branches are then supplemented by various equations used at the junction: a discharge flow conservation equation between the branches arriving and leaving the junction, and a momentum or energy conservation equation. The disadvantages of the 1D study are that the equations used at the junction are of empirical nature due to certain parameters given by experimental results and moreover they often present a reduced field of validity. On the contrary, for the 2D study, the entire network is considered as a single unit and the flow in all the branches and junctions is solved simultaneously. Therefore, we simply apply the 2D Saint Venant equations, which are solved by a second‐order Runge–Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method. Finally, the experimental results obtained by Hager are used to validate and to compare the two approaches 1D and 2D. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0271-2091</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-0363</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0363</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/fld.1977</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJNFDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied fluid mechanics ; Channels ; Computational methods in fluid dynamics ; Computer simulation ; discontinuous Galerkin method ; Engineering Sciences ; Environmental Sciences ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fluid dynamics ; Fluid mechanics ; Fluids mechanics ; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) ; Galerkin methods ; Hydrodynamics, hydraulics, hydrostatics ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical models ; Mechanics ; momentum conservation ; Networks ; open channel junctions ; Physics ; Runge-Kutta method ; Saint Venant equations ; steady flow ; transitional flow ; Two dimensional</subject><ispartof>International journal for numerical methods in fluids, 2009-11, Vol.61 (7), p.752-767</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4667-3c23010888e98d11741ae050b5fac7b3af22a726b1d1e162efc66cedbe1e4ff43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4667-3c23010888e98d11741ae050b5fac7b3af22a726b1d1e162efc66cedbe1e4ff43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Ffld.1977$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Ffld.1977$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22098043$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-00515956$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ghostine, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesserwani, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosé, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vazquez, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghenaim, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grégoire, C.</creatorcontrib><title>A confrontation of 1D and 2D RKDG numerical simulation of transitional flow at open-channel junction</title><title>International journal for numerical methods in fluids</title><addtitle>Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids</addtitle><description>In this study, a comparison between the 1D and 2D numerical simulation of transitional flow in open‐channel networks is presented and completely described allowing for a full comprehension of the modeling water flow. For flow in an open‐channel network, mutual effects exist among the channel branches joining at a junction. Therefore, for the 1D study, the whole system (branches and junction) cannot be treated individually. The 1D Saint Venant equations calculating the flow in the branches are then supplemented by various equations used at the junction: a discharge flow conservation equation between the branches arriving and leaving the junction, and a momentum or energy conservation equation. The disadvantages of the 1D study are that the equations used at the junction are of empirical nature due to certain parameters given by experimental results and moreover they often present a reduced field of validity. On the contrary, for the 2D study, the entire network is considered as a single unit and the flow in all the branches and junctions is solved simultaneously. Therefore, we simply apply the 2D Saint Venant equations, which are solved by a second‐order Runge–Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method. Finally, the experimental results obtained by Hager are used to validate and to compare the two approaches 1D and 2D. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Applied fluid mechanics</subject><subject>Channels</subject><subject>Computational methods in fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>discontinuous Galerkin method</subject><subject>Engineering Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Fluid mechanics</subject><subject>Fluids mechanics</subject><subject>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</subject><subject>Galerkin methods</subject><subject>Hydrodynamics, hydraulics, hydrostatics</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mechanics</subject><subject>momentum conservation</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>open channel junctions</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Runge-Kutta method</subject><subject>Saint Venant equations</subject><subject>steady flow</subject><subject>transitional flow</subject><subject>Two dimensional</subject><issn>0271-2091</issn><issn>1097-0363</issn><issn>1097-0363</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10cFuEzEQBmALgUQoSDyCL0hw2DJj79q7x6hpUtQIBALBzXK8turi2GG9S-nb41WicOI08syn__CbkNcIlwjA3rvQX2In5ROyQOhkBVzwp2QBTGLFoMPn5EXO9wDQsZYvSL-kJkU3pDjq0adIk6O4ojr2lK3ol9vVhsZpbwdvdKDZ76dwZuOgY_bzq5xcSA9UjzQdbKzMnY7RBno_RTPfX5JnTodsX53mBfm2vv56dVNtP20-XC23lamFkBU3jANC27a2a3tEWaO20MCucdrIHdeOMS2Z2GGPFgWzzghhbL-zaGvnan5B3h1z73RQh8Hv9fCokvbqZrlV8w6gwaZrxG8s9u3RHob0a7J5VHufjQ1BR5umrFBI5KJ48Y-aIeU8WHfORlBz6aqUrubSC31zStW5NOZKRcbns2flB1qoeXHV0T34YB__m6fW29Up9-R9Hu2fs9fDTyUkl436_nGjhFi3n9lto37wv_fMnYE</recordid><startdate>20091110</startdate><enddate>20091110</enddate><creator>Ghostine, R.</creator><creator>Kesserwani, G.</creator><creator>Mosé, R.</creator><creator>Vazquez, J.</creator><creator>Ghenaim, A.</creator><creator>Grégoire, C.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>1XC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091110</creationdate><title>A confrontation of 1D and 2D RKDG numerical simulation of transitional flow at open-channel junction</title><author>Ghostine, R. ; Kesserwani, G. ; Mosé, R. ; Vazquez, J. ; Ghenaim, A. ; Grégoire, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4667-3c23010888e98d11741ae050b5fac7b3af22a726b1d1e162efc66cedbe1e4ff43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Applied fluid mechanics</topic><topic>Channels</topic><topic>Computational methods in fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>discontinuous Galerkin method</topic><topic>Engineering Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Fluid mechanics</topic><topic>Fluids mechanics</topic><topic>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</topic><topic>Galerkin methods</topic><topic>Hydrodynamics, hydraulics, hydrostatics</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mechanics</topic><topic>momentum conservation</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>open channel junctions</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Runge-Kutta method</topic><topic>Saint Venant equations</topic><topic>steady flow</topic><topic>transitional flow</topic><topic>Two dimensional</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ghostine, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesserwani, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosé, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vazquez, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghenaim, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grégoire, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>International journal for numerical methods in fluids</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ghostine, R.</au><au>Kesserwani, G.</au><au>Mosé, R.</au><au>Vazquez, J.</au><au>Ghenaim, A.</au><au>Grégoire, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A confrontation of 1D and 2D RKDG numerical simulation of transitional flow at open-channel junction</atitle><jtitle>International journal for numerical methods in fluids</jtitle><addtitle>Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids</addtitle><date>2009-11-10</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>752</spage><epage>767</epage><pages>752-767</pages><issn>0271-2091</issn><issn>1097-0363</issn><eissn>1097-0363</eissn><coden>IJNFDW</coden><abstract>In this study, a comparison between the 1D and 2D numerical simulation of transitional flow in open‐channel networks is presented and completely described allowing for a full comprehension of the modeling water flow. For flow in an open‐channel network, mutual effects exist among the channel branches joining at a junction. Therefore, for the 1D study, the whole system (branches and junction) cannot be treated individually. The 1D Saint Venant equations calculating the flow in the branches are then supplemented by various equations used at the junction: a discharge flow conservation equation between the branches arriving and leaving the junction, and a momentum or energy conservation equation. The disadvantages of the 1D study are that the equations used at the junction are of empirical nature due to certain parameters given by experimental results and moreover they often present a reduced field of validity. On the contrary, for the 2D study, the entire network is considered as a single unit and the flow in all the branches and junctions is solved simultaneously. Therefore, we simply apply the 2D Saint Venant equations, which are solved by a second‐order Runge–Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method. Finally, the experimental results obtained by Hager are used to validate and to compare the two approaches 1D and 2D. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/fld.1977</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0271-2091
ispartof International journal for numerical methods in fluids, 2009-11, Vol.61 (7), p.752-767
issn 0271-2091
1097-0363
1097-0363
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00515956v1
source Wiley Online Library Journals
subjects Applied fluid mechanics
Channels
Computational methods in fluid dynamics
Computer simulation
discontinuous Galerkin method
Engineering Sciences
Environmental Sciences
Exact sciences and technology
Fluid dynamics
Fluid mechanics
Fluids mechanics
Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)
Galerkin methods
Hydrodynamics, hydraulics, hydrostatics
Mathematical analysis
Mathematical models
Mechanics
momentum conservation
Networks
open channel junctions
Physics
Runge-Kutta method
Saint Venant equations
steady flow
transitional flow
Two dimensional
title A confrontation of 1D and 2D RKDG numerical simulation of transitional flow at open-channel junction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T18%3A46%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20confrontation%20of%201D%20and%202D%20RKDG%20numerical%20simulation%20of%20transitional%20flow%20at%20open-channel%20junction&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20for%20numerical%20methods%20in%20fluids&rft.au=Ghostine,%20R.&rft.date=2009-11-10&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=752&rft.epage=767&rft.pages=752-767&rft.issn=0271-2091&rft.eissn=1097-0363&rft.coden=IJNFDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/fld.1977&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1671360516%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671360516&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true