A confrontation of 1D and 2D RKDG numerical simulation of transitional flow at open-channel junction
In this study, a comparison between the 1D and 2D numerical simulation of transitional flow in open‐channel networks is presented and completely described allowing for a full comprehension of the modeling water flow. For flow in an open‐channel network, mutual effects exist among the channel branche...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal for numerical methods in fluids 2009-11, Vol.61 (7), p.752-767 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 767 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 752 |
container_title | International journal for numerical methods in fluids |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Ghostine, R. Kesserwani, G. Mosé, R. Vazquez, J. Ghenaim, A. Grégoire, C. |
description | In this study, a comparison between the 1D and 2D numerical simulation of transitional flow in open‐channel networks is presented and completely described allowing for a full comprehension of the modeling water flow. For flow in an open‐channel network, mutual effects exist among the channel branches joining at a junction. Therefore, for the 1D study, the whole system (branches and junction) cannot be treated individually. The 1D Saint Venant equations calculating the flow in the branches are then supplemented by various equations used at the junction: a discharge flow conservation equation between the branches arriving and leaving the junction, and a momentum or energy conservation equation. The disadvantages of the 1D study are that the equations used at the junction are of empirical nature due to certain parameters given by experimental results and moreover they often present a reduced field of validity. On the contrary, for the 2D study, the entire network is considered as a single unit and the flow in all the branches and junctions is solved simultaneously. Therefore, we simply apply the 2D Saint Venant equations, which are solved by a second‐order Runge–Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method. Finally, the experimental results obtained by Hager are used to validate and to compare the two approaches 1D and 2D. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/fld.1977 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00515956v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1671360516</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4667-3c23010888e98d11741ae050b5fac7b3af22a726b1d1e162efc66cedbe1e4ff43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10cFuEzEQBmALgUQoSDyCL0hw2DJj79q7x6hpUtQIBALBzXK8turi2GG9S-nb41WicOI08syn__CbkNcIlwjA3rvQX2In5ROyQOhkBVzwp2QBTGLFoMPn5EXO9wDQsZYvSL-kJkU3pDjq0adIk6O4ojr2lK3ol9vVhsZpbwdvdKDZ76dwZuOgY_bzq5xcSA9UjzQdbKzMnY7RBno_RTPfX5JnTodsX53mBfm2vv56dVNtP20-XC23lamFkBU3jANC27a2a3tEWaO20MCucdrIHdeOMS2Z2GGPFgWzzghhbL-zaGvnan5B3h1z73RQh8Hv9fCokvbqZrlV8w6gwaZrxG8s9u3RHob0a7J5VHufjQ1BR5umrFBI5KJ48Y-aIeU8WHfORlBz6aqUrubSC31zStW5NOZKRcbns2flB1qoeXHV0T34YB__m6fW29Up9-R9Hu2fs9fDTyUkl436_nGjhFi3n9lto37wv_fMnYE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671360516</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A confrontation of 1D and 2D RKDG numerical simulation of transitional flow at open-channel junction</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><creator>Ghostine, R. ; Kesserwani, G. ; Mosé, R. ; Vazquez, J. ; Ghenaim, A. ; Grégoire, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ghostine, R. ; Kesserwani, G. ; Mosé, R. ; Vazquez, J. ; Ghenaim, A. ; Grégoire, C.</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, a comparison between the 1D and 2D numerical simulation of transitional flow in open‐channel networks is presented and completely described allowing for a full comprehension of the modeling water flow. For flow in an open‐channel network, mutual effects exist among the channel branches joining at a junction. Therefore, for the 1D study, the whole system (branches and junction) cannot be treated individually. The 1D Saint Venant equations calculating the flow in the branches are then supplemented by various equations used at the junction: a discharge flow conservation equation between the branches arriving and leaving the junction, and a momentum or energy conservation equation. The disadvantages of the 1D study are that the equations used at the junction are of empirical nature due to certain parameters given by experimental results and moreover they often present a reduced field of validity. On the contrary, for the 2D study, the entire network is considered as a single unit and the flow in all the branches and junctions is solved simultaneously. Therefore, we simply apply the 2D Saint Venant equations, which are solved by a second‐order Runge–Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method. Finally, the experimental results obtained by Hager are used to validate and to compare the two approaches 1D and 2D. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0271-2091</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-0363</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0363</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/fld.1977</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJNFDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied fluid mechanics ; Channels ; Computational methods in fluid dynamics ; Computer simulation ; discontinuous Galerkin method ; Engineering Sciences ; Environmental Sciences ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fluid dynamics ; Fluid mechanics ; Fluids mechanics ; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) ; Galerkin methods ; Hydrodynamics, hydraulics, hydrostatics ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical models ; Mechanics ; momentum conservation ; Networks ; open channel junctions ; Physics ; Runge-Kutta method ; Saint Venant equations ; steady flow ; transitional flow ; Two dimensional</subject><ispartof>International journal for numerical methods in fluids, 2009-11, Vol.61 (7), p.752-767</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4667-3c23010888e98d11741ae050b5fac7b3af22a726b1d1e162efc66cedbe1e4ff43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4667-3c23010888e98d11741ae050b5fac7b3af22a726b1d1e162efc66cedbe1e4ff43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Ffld.1977$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Ffld.1977$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22098043$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-00515956$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ghostine, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesserwani, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosé, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vazquez, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghenaim, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grégoire, C.</creatorcontrib><title>A confrontation of 1D and 2D RKDG numerical simulation of transitional flow at open-channel junction</title><title>International journal for numerical methods in fluids</title><addtitle>Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids</addtitle><description>In this study, a comparison between the 1D and 2D numerical simulation of transitional flow in open‐channel networks is presented and completely described allowing for a full comprehension of the modeling water flow. For flow in an open‐channel network, mutual effects exist among the channel branches joining at a junction. Therefore, for the 1D study, the whole system (branches and junction) cannot be treated individually. The 1D Saint Venant equations calculating the flow in the branches are then supplemented by various equations used at the junction: a discharge flow conservation equation between the branches arriving and leaving the junction, and a momentum or energy conservation equation. The disadvantages of the 1D study are that the equations used at the junction are of empirical nature due to certain parameters given by experimental results and moreover they often present a reduced field of validity. On the contrary, for the 2D study, the entire network is considered as a single unit and the flow in all the branches and junctions is solved simultaneously. Therefore, we simply apply the 2D Saint Venant equations, which are solved by a second‐order Runge–Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method. Finally, the experimental results obtained by Hager are used to validate and to compare the two approaches 1D and 2D. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Applied fluid mechanics</subject><subject>Channels</subject><subject>Computational methods in fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>discontinuous Galerkin method</subject><subject>Engineering Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Fluid mechanics</subject><subject>Fluids mechanics</subject><subject>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</subject><subject>Galerkin methods</subject><subject>Hydrodynamics, hydraulics, hydrostatics</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mechanics</subject><subject>momentum conservation</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>open channel junctions</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Runge-Kutta method</subject><subject>Saint Venant equations</subject><subject>steady flow</subject><subject>transitional flow</subject><subject>Two dimensional</subject><issn>0271-2091</issn><issn>1097-0363</issn><issn>1097-0363</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10cFuEzEQBmALgUQoSDyCL0hw2DJj79q7x6hpUtQIBALBzXK8turi2GG9S-nb41WicOI08syn__CbkNcIlwjA3rvQX2In5ROyQOhkBVzwp2QBTGLFoMPn5EXO9wDQsZYvSL-kJkU3pDjq0adIk6O4ojr2lK3ol9vVhsZpbwdvdKDZ76dwZuOgY_bzq5xcSA9UjzQdbKzMnY7RBno_RTPfX5JnTodsX53mBfm2vv56dVNtP20-XC23lamFkBU3jANC27a2a3tEWaO20MCucdrIHdeOMS2Z2GGPFgWzzghhbL-zaGvnan5B3h1z73RQh8Hv9fCokvbqZrlV8w6gwaZrxG8s9u3RHob0a7J5VHufjQ1BR5umrFBI5KJ48Y-aIeU8WHfORlBz6aqUrubSC31zStW5NOZKRcbns2flB1qoeXHV0T34YB__m6fW29Up9-R9Hu2fs9fDTyUkl436_nGjhFi3n9lto37wv_fMnYE</recordid><startdate>20091110</startdate><enddate>20091110</enddate><creator>Ghostine, R.</creator><creator>Kesserwani, G.</creator><creator>Mosé, R.</creator><creator>Vazquez, J.</creator><creator>Ghenaim, A.</creator><creator>Grégoire, C.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>1XC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091110</creationdate><title>A confrontation of 1D and 2D RKDG numerical simulation of transitional flow at open-channel junction</title><author>Ghostine, R. ; Kesserwani, G. ; Mosé, R. ; Vazquez, J. ; Ghenaim, A. ; Grégoire, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4667-3c23010888e98d11741ae050b5fac7b3af22a726b1d1e162efc66cedbe1e4ff43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Applied fluid mechanics</topic><topic>Channels</topic><topic>Computational methods in fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>discontinuous Galerkin method</topic><topic>Engineering Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Fluid mechanics</topic><topic>Fluids mechanics</topic><topic>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</topic><topic>Galerkin methods</topic><topic>Hydrodynamics, hydraulics, hydrostatics</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mechanics</topic><topic>momentum conservation</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>open channel junctions</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Runge-Kutta method</topic><topic>Saint Venant equations</topic><topic>steady flow</topic><topic>transitional flow</topic><topic>Two dimensional</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ghostine, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesserwani, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosé, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vazquez, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghenaim, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grégoire, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>International journal for numerical methods in fluids</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ghostine, R.</au><au>Kesserwani, G.</au><au>Mosé, R.</au><au>Vazquez, J.</au><au>Ghenaim, A.</au><au>Grégoire, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A confrontation of 1D and 2D RKDG numerical simulation of transitional flow at open-channel junction</atitle><jtitle>International journal for numerical methods in fluids</jtitle><addtitle>Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids</addtitle><date>2009-11-10</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>752</spage><epage>767</epage><pages>752-767</pages><issn>0271-2091</issn><issn>1097-0363</issn><eissn>1097-0363</eissn><coden>IJNFDW</coden><abstract>In this study, a comparison between the 1D and 2D numerical simulation of transitional flow in open‐channel networks is presented and completely described allowing for a full comprehension of the modeling water flow. For flow in an open‐channel network, mutual effects exist among the channel branches joining at a junction. Therefore, for the 1D study, the whole system (branches and junction) cannot be treated individually. The 1D Saint Venant equations calculating the flow in the branches are then supplemented by various equations used at the junction: a discharge flow conservation equation between the branches arriving and leaving the junction, and a momentum or energy conservation equation. The disadvantages of the 1D study are that the equations used at the junction are of empirical nature due to certain parameters given by experimental results and moreover they often present a reduced field of validity. On the contrary, for the 2D study, the entire network is considered as a single unit and the flow in all the branches and junctions is solved simultaneously. Therefore, we simply apply the 2D Saint Venant equations, which are solved by a second‐order Runge–Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method. Finally, the experimental results obtained by Hager are used to validate and to compare the two approaches 1D and 2D. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/fld.1977</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0271-2091 |
ispartof | International journal for numerical methods in fluids, 2009-11, Vol.61 (7), p.752-767 |
issn | 0271-2091 1097-0363 1097-0363 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00515956v1 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals |
subjects | Applied fluid mechanics Channels Computational methods in fluid dynamics Computer simulation discontinuous Galerkin method Engineering Sciences Environmental Sciences Exact sciences and technology Fluid dynamics Fluid mechanics Fluids mechanics Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) Galerkin methods Hydrodynamics, hydraulics, hydrostatics Mathematical analysis Mathematical models Mechanics momentum conservation Networks open channel junctions Physics Runge-Kutta method Saint Venant equations steady flow transitional flow Two dimensional |
title | A confrontation of 1D and 2D RKDG numerical simulation of transitional flow at open-channel junction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T18%3A46%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20confrontation%20of%201D%20and%202D%20RKDG%20numerical%20simulation%20of%20transitional%20flow%20at%20open-channel%20junction&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20for%20numerical%20methods%20in%20fluids&rft.au=Ghostine,%20R.&rft.date=2009-11-10&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=752&rft.epage=767&rft.pages=752-767&rft.issn=0271-2091&rft.eissn=1097-0363&rft.coden=IJNFDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/fld.1977&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1671360516%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671360516&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |