Relationship value and relationship quality: Broadening the nomological network of business‐to‐business relationships
Established models of buyer-seller relationships do not reflect managerial emphasis on supplier performance evaluation when modeling business relationships. This paper proposes that relationship value should be included as a key constituent in such models. This paper aims to explore the construct...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of marketing 2006-01, Vol.40 (3/4), p.311-327 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 327 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3/4 |
container_start_page | 311 |
container_title | European journal of marketing |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Ulaga, Wolfgang Eggert, Andreas |
description | Established models of buyer-seller relationships do not reflect managerial emphasis on supplier performance evaluation when modeling business relationships. This paper proposes that relationship value should be included as a key constituent in such models. This paper aims to explore the construct's links with key constituents of relationship quality, i.e. commitment, satisfaction, and trust. A two-stage research design was used. First, depth-interviews were conducted with ten senior-level purchasing managers in US manufacturing companies. Second, data were gathered in a nation-wide mail survey among 400 purchasing professionals. The findings suggest that relationship value is an antecedent to relationship quality and behavioral outcomes in the nomological network of relationship marketing. Value displays a stronger impact on satisfaction than on commitment and trust. Contrary to previous research, trust does not appear in this study as an antecedent of behavioral outcomes, but as a mediator of the satisfaction-commitment link. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/03090560610648075 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00482522v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1028907281</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-4bb39824c6cbe489a8f7a06de9143b890775f2da1990da149cb9c2a6ccd44e3e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkFtLw0AQhRdRsFZ_gG_BB0EkOnvJXh5LUSsUBNHnZbPZ0JRt0u4mhf57t0RE9GUGznwzwzkIXWN4wBjkI1BQUHDgGDiTIIoTNMGikLnAhJ6iyXGeJ4Cfo4sY1wBpi4oJun933vRN18ZVs832xg8uM22Vhd_ybjC-6Q-X6Kw2Prqr7z5Fn89PH_NFvnx7eZ3PlrklUvU5K0uqJGGW29IxqYyshQFeOYUZLaUCIYqaVAYrBakyZUtlieHWVow56ugU3Y13V8brbWg2Jhx0Zxq9mC31UQNgkhSE7HFib0d2G7rd4GKvN020znvTum6ImmLAIllN4M0fcN0NoU0-NKEixZPySxAeIRu6GIOrf95j0Mec9b-c6RdFrW14</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>237030090</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relationship value and relationship quality: Broadening the nomological network of business‐to‐business relationships</title><source>Emerald eJournals</source><creator>Ulaga, Wolfgang ; Eggert, Andreas</creator><contributor>Zolkiewski, Judy</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ulaga, Wolfgang ; Eggert, Andreas ; Zolkiewski, Judy</creatorcontrib><description>Established models of buyer-seller relationships do not reflect managerial emphasis on supplier performance evaluation when modeling business relationships. This paper proposes that relationship value should be included as a key constituent in such models. This paper aims to explore the construct's links with key constituents of relationship quality, i.e. commitment, satisfaction, and trust. A two-stage research design was used. First, depth-interviews were conducted with ten senior-level purchasing managers in US manufacturing companies. Second, data were gathered in a nation-wide mail survey among 400 purchasing professionals. The findings suggest that relationship value is an antecedent to relationship quality and behavioral outcomes in the nomological network of relationship marketing. Value displays a stronger impact on satisfaction than on commitment and trust. Contrary to previous research, trust does not appear in this study as an antecedent of behavioral outcomes, but as a mediator of the satisfaction-commitment link.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-0566</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7123</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/03090560610648075</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Business administration ; Customer satisfaction ; Customers ; domain_shs.gestion.mark ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Manufacturing ; Marketing ; Performance evaluation ; Purchasing ; Relationship marketing ; Researchers ; Studies ; Suppliers ; Vendor supplier relations</subject><ispartof>European journal of marketing, 2006-01, Vol.40 (3/4), p.311-327</ispartof><rights>Copyright Emerald Group Publishing, Limited 2006</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-4bb39824c6cbe489a8f7a06de9143b890775f2da1990da149cb9c2a6ccd44e3e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,966,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hec.hal.science/hal-00482522$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Zolkiewski, Judy</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ulaga, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eggert, Andreas</creatorcontrib><title>Relationship value and relationship quality: Broadening the nomological network of business‐to‐business relationships</title><title>European journal of marketing</title><description>Established models of buyer-seller relationships do not reflect managerial emphasis on supplier performance evaluation when modeling business relationships. This paper proposes that relationship value should be included as a key constituent in such models. This paper aims to explore the construct's links with key constituents of relationship quality, i.e. commitment, satisfaction, and trust. A two-stage research design was used. First, depth-interviews were conducted with ten senior-level purchasing managers in US manufacturing companies. Second, data were gathered in a nation-wide mail survey among 400 purchasing professionals. The findings suggest that relationship value is an antecedent to relationship quality and behavioral outcomes in the nomological network of relationship marketing. Value displays a stronger impact on satisfaction than on commitment and trust. Contrary to previous research, trust does not appear in this study as an antecedent of behavioral outcomes, but as a mediator of the satisfaction-commitment link.</description><subject>Business administration</subject><subject>Customer satisfaction</subject><subject>Customers</subject><subject>domain_shs.gestion.mark</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Purchasing</subject><subject>Relationship marketing</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Suppliers</subject><subject>Vendor supplier relations</subject><issn>0309-0566</issn><issn>1758-7123</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNplkFtLw0AQhRdRsFZ_gG_BB0EkOnvJXh5LUSsUBNHnZbPZ0JRt0u4mhf57t0RE9GUGznwzwzkIXWN4wBjkI1BQUHDgGDiTIIoTNMGikLnAhJ6iyXGeJ4Cfo4sY1wBpi4oJun933vRN18ZVs832xg8uM22Vhd_ybjC-6Q-X6Kw2Prqr7z5Fn89PH_NFvnx7eZ3PlrklUvU5K0uqJGGW29IxqYyshQFeOYUZLaUCIYqaVAYrBakyZUtlieHWVow56ugU3Y13V8brbWg2Jhx0Zxq9mC31UQNgkhSE7HFib0d2G7rd4GKvN020znvTum6ImmLAIllN4M0fcN0NoU0-NKEixZPySxAeIRu6GIOrf95j0Mec9b-c6RdFrW14</recordid><startdate>20060101</startdate><enddate>20060101</enddate><creator>Ulaga, Wolfgang</creator><creator>Eggert, Andreas</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0Q</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060101</creationdate><title>Relationship value and relationship quality</title><author>Ulaga, Wolfgang ; Eggert, Andreas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-4bb39824c6cbe489a8f7a06de9143b890775f2da1990da149cb9c2a6ccd44e3e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Business administration</topic><topic>Customer satisfaction</topic><topic>Customers</topic><topic>domain_shs.gestion.mark</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Purchasing</topic><topic>Relationship marketing</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Suppliers</topic><topic>Vendor supplier relations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ulaga, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eggert, Andreas</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>European Business Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>European journal of marketing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ulaga, Wolfgang</au><au>Eggert, Andreas</au><au>Zolkiewski, Judy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relationship value and relationship quality: Broadening the nomological network of business‐to‐business relationships</atitle><jtitle>European journal of marketing</jtitle><date>2006-01-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>3/4</issue><spage>311</spage><epage>327</epage><pages>311-327</pages><issn>0309-0566</issn><eissn>1758-7123</eissn><abstract>Established models of buyer-seller relationships do not reflect managerial emphasis on supplier performance evaluation when modeling business relationships. This paper proposes that relationship value should be included as a key constituent in such models. This paper aims to explore the construct's links with key constituents of relationship quality, i.e. commitment, satisfaction, and trust. A two-stage research design was used. First, depth-interviews were conducted with ten senior-level purchasing managers in US manufacturing companies. Second, data were gathered in a nation-wide mail survey among 400 purchasing professionals. The findings suggest that relationship value is an antecedent to relationship quality and behavioral outcomes in the nomological network of relationship marketing. Value displays a stronger impact on satisfaction than on commitment and trust. Contrary to previous research, trust does not appear in this study as an antecedent of behavioral outcomes, but as a mediator of the satisfaction-commitment link.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/03090560610648075</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0309-0566 |
ispartof | European journal of marketing, 2006-01, Vol.40 (3/4), p.311-327 |
issn | 0309-0566 1758-7123 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00482522v1 |
source | Emerald eJournals |
subjects | Business administration Customer satisfaction Customers domain_shs.gestion.mark Humanities and Social Sciences Manufacturing Marketing Performance evaluation Purchasing Relationship marketing Researchers Studies Suppliers Vendor supplier relations |
title | Relationship value and relationship quality: Broadening the nomological network of business‐to‐business relationships |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T16%3A24%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relationship%20value%20and%20relationship%20quality:%20Broadening%20the%20nomological%20network%20of%20business%E2%80%90to%E2%80%90business%20relationships&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20marketing&rft.au=Ulaga,%20Wolfgang&rft.date=2006-01-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=3/4&rft.spage=311&rft.epage=327&rft.pages=311-327&rft.issn=0309-0566&rft.eissn=1758-7123&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/03090560610648075&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1028907281%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=237030090&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |