Comparison of systemic, compartmental and CFD modelling approaches: Application to the simulation of a biological reactor of wastewater treatment
Nowadays there exist two main approaches to simulate the hydrodynamics of chemical reactors: the systemic method, based on the description of a given reactor as a limited number of elementary reactors, and the more theoretical CFD approach, based on the resolution of the Navier–Stokes equations in a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Chemical engineering science 2010, Vol.65 (1), p.343-350 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 350 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 343 |
container_title | Chemical engineering science |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Le Moullec, Y. Gentric, C. Potier, O. Leclerc, J.P. |
description | Nowadays there exist two main approaches to simulate the hydrodynamics of chemical reactors: the systemic method, based on the description of a given reactor as a limited number of elementary reactors, and the more theoretical CFD approach, based on the resolution of the Navier–Stokes equations in a large number of computing cells. This work describes another recent modelling approach based on the description of the reactor as a network of both structural and functional compartments. The complete methodology to build such a model, using CFD simulations, tracer experiments, mass transfer and chemical processes, is described. The simulation results with such a model are then compared to those obtained with the systemic and CFD models in the case of a biological gas–liquid reactor for wastewater treatment, involving oxygen transfer and complex biological kinetics. This work shows that the compartmental model gives results very similar to those of a full CFD simulation but with lower calculation time (10 times in most cases) with the advantage of remaining almost as simple to manipulate as the systemic approach. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ces.2009.06.035 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00432294v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S000925090900431X</els_id><sourcerecordid>21110583</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-72dabb23c17d6c1ef36df9d6d7dac3c738e34cd4532bd60ed39992feac9cae423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1v1DAUjBBIXQo_oDdfQEJqUn8kzhpOq4VSpJW4wNl6a790vUriYHtb9Wf0H-M0VY9wsjyeN_M8UxQXjFaMMnl1rAzGilOqKiorKppXxYqtW1HWNW1eFyuaX0reUHVWvI3xmK9ty-iqeNz6YYLgoh-J70h8iAkHZy6JecLTgGOCnsBoyfb6Kxm8xb534y2BaQoezAHjZ7KZpt4ZSC6LJE_SAUl0w6lfkCwLZO98728zqScBwSQfZvwest09JAwkZfjJ7V3xpoM-4vvn87z4ff3t1_am3P38_mO72ZWm5iKVLbew33NhWGulYdgJaTtlpW0tGGFasUZRG1s3gu-tpGiFUop32VsZwCxxXnxadA_Q6ym4AcKD9uD0zWanZ4zSWnCu6juWuR8Xbv7znxPGpAcXTU4CRvSnqEWtpJBS_pfIGWO0WYtMZAvRBB9jwO5lBUb13Kg-6tyonhvVVOrcaJ758CwOMQfZBRiNiy-DnAu6btW8xJeFhzm-O4dBR-NwNGhdQJO09e4fLn8BaCK5EQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21110583</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of systemic, compartmental and CFD modelling approaches: Application to the simulation of a biological reactor of wastewater treatment</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Le Moullec, Y. ; Gentric, C. ; Potier, O. ; Leclerc, J.P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Le Moullec, Y. ; Gentric, C. ; Potier, O. ; Leclerc, J.P.</creatorcontrib><description>Nowadays there exist two main approaches to simulate the hydrodynamics of chemical reactors: the systemic method, based on the description of a given reactor as a limited number of elementary reactors, and the more theoretical CFD approach, based on the resolution of the Navier–Stokes equations in a large number of computing cells. This work describes another recent modelling approach based on the description of the reactor as a network of both structural and functional compartments. The complete methodology to build such a model, using CFD simulations, tracer experiments, mass transfer and chemical processes, is described. The simulation results with such a model are then compared to those obtained with the systemic and CFD models in the case of a biological gas–liquid reactor for wastewater treatment, involving oxygen transfer and complex biological kinetics. This work shows that the compartmental model gives results very similar to those of a full CFD simulation but with lower calculation time (10 times in most cases) with the advantage of remaining almost as simple to manipulate as the systemic approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-2509</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4405</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2009.06.035</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CESCAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Biological ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biotechnology ; Chemical and Process Engineering ; Chemical engineering ; Compartmental modelling ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Computer simulation ; Engineering Sciences ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General purification processes ; Hydrodynamics ; Hydrodynamics of contact apparatus ; Mathematical models ; Methods. Procedures. Technologies ; Modelling ; Multiphase reactors ; Navier-Stokes equations ; Others ; Pollution ; Reactors ; Simulation ; Tracer experiment ; Various methods and equipments ; Wastewater treatment ; Wastewaters ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Chemical engineering science, 2010, Vol.65 (1), p.343-350</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-72dabb23c17d6c1ef36df9d6d7dac3c738e34cd4532bd60ed39992feac9cae423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-72dabb23c17d6c1ef36df9d6d7dac3c738e34cd4532bd60ed39992feac9cae423</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3483-6490</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000925090900431X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,309,310,314,776,780,785,786,881,3537,4010,4036,4037,23909,23910,25118,27900,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22308796$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-00432294$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Le Moullec, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gentric, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potier, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leclerc, J.P.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of systemic, compartmental and CFD modelling approaches: Application to the simulation of a biological reactor of wastewater treatment</title><title>Chemical engineering science</title><description>Nowadays there exist two main approaches to simulate the hydrodynamics of chemical reactors: the systemic method, based on the description of a given reactor as a limited number of elementary reactors, and the more theoretical CFD approach, based on the resolution of the Navier–Stokes equations in a large number of computing cells. This work describes another recent modelling approach based on the description of the reactor as a network of both structural and functional compartments. The complete methodology to build such a model, using CFD simulations, tracer experiments, mass transfer and chemical processes, is described. The simulation results with such a model are then compared to those obtained with the systemic and CFD models in the case of a biological gas–liquid reactor for wastewater treatment, involving oxygen transfer and complex biological kinetics. This work shows that the compartmental model gives results very similar to those of a full CFD simulation but with lower calculation time (10 times in most cases) with the advantage of remaining almost as simple to manipulate as the systemic approach.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biological</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Chemical and Process Engineering</subject><subject>Chemical engineering</subject><subject>Compartmental modelling</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Engineering Sciences</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General purification processes</subject><subject>Hydrodynamics</subject><subject>Hydrodynamics of contact apparatus</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Methods. Procedures. Technologies</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Multiphase reactors</subject><subject>Navier-Stokes equations</subject><subject>Others</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Reactors</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Tracer experiment</subject><subject>Various methods and equipments</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Wastewaters</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0009-2509</issn><issn>1873-4405</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUU1v1DAUjBBIXQo_oDdfQEJqUn8kzhpOq4VSpJW4wNl6a790vUriYHtb9Wf0H-M0VY9wsjyeN_M8UxQXjFaMMnl1rAzGilOqKiorKppXxYqtW1HWNW1eFyuaX0reUHVWvI3xmK9ty-iqeNz6YYLgoh-J70h8iAkHZy6JecLTgGOCnsBoyfb6Kxm8xb534y2BaQoezAHjZ7KZpt4ZSC6LJE_SAUl0w6lfkCwLZO98728zqScBwSQfZvwest09JAwkZfjJ7V3xpoM-4vvn87z4ff3t1_am3P38_mO72ZWm5iKVLbew33NhWGulYdgJaTtlpW0tGGFasUZRG1s3gu-tpGiFUop32VsZwCxxXnxadA_Q6ym4AcKD9uD0zWanZ4zSWnCu6juWuR8Xbv7znxPGpAcXTU4CRvSnqEWtpJBS_pfIGWO0WYtMZAvRBB9jwO5lBUb13Kg-6tyonhvVVOrcaJ758CwOMQfZBRiNiy-DnAu6btW8xJeFhzm-O4dBR-NwNGhdQJO09e4fLn8BaCK5EQ</recordid><startdate>2010</startdate><enddate>2010</enddate><creator>Le Moullec, Y.</creator><creator>Gentric, C.</creator><creator>Potier, O.</creator><creator>Leclerc, J.P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3483-6490</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2010</creationdate><title>Comparison of systemic, compartmental and CFD modelling approaches: Application to the simulation of a biological reactor of wastewater treatment</title><author>Le Moullec, Y. ; Gentric, C. ; Potier, O. ; Leclerc, J.P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-72dabb23c17d6c1ef36df9d6d7dac3c738e34cd4532bd60ed39992feac9cae423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biological</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Chemical and Process Engineering</topic><topic>Chemical engineering</topic><topic>Compartmental modelling</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Engineering Sciences</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General purification processes</topic><topic>Hydrodynamics</topic><topic>Hydrodynamics of contact apparatus</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Methods. Procedures. Technologies</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Multiphase reactors</topic><topic>Navier-Stokes equations</topic><topic>Others</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Reactors</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Tracer experiment</topic><topic>Various methods and equipments</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Wastewaters</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Le Moullec, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gentric, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potier, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leclerc, J.P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Chemical engineering science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Le Moullec, Y.</au><au>Gentric, C.</au><au>Potier, O.</au><au>Leclerc, J.P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of systemic, compartmental and CFD modelling approaches: Application to the simulation of a biological reactor of wastewater treatment</atitle><jtitle>Chemical engineering science</jtitle><date>2010</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>343</spage><epage>350</epage><pages>343-350</pages><issn>0009-2509</issn><eissn>1873-4405</eissn><coden>CESCAC</coden><abstract>Nowadays there exist two main approaches to simulate the hydrodynamics of chemical reactors: the systemic method, based on the description of a given reactor as a limited number of elementary reactors, and the more theoretical CFD approach, based on the resolution of the Navier–Stokes equations in a large number of computing cells. This work describes another recent modelling approach based on the description of the reactor as a network of both structural and functional compartments. The complete methodology to build such a model, using CFD simulations, tracer experiments, mass transfer and chemical processes, is described. The simulation results with such a model are then compared to those obtained with the systemic and CFD models in the case of a biological gas–liquid reactor for wastewater treatment, involving oxygen transfer and complex biological kinetics. This work shows that the compartmental model gives results very similar to those of a full CFD simulation but with lower calculation time (10 times in most cases) with the advantage of remaining almost as simple to manipulate as the systemic approach.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ces.2009.06.035</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3483-6490</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0009-2509 |
ispartof | Chemical engineering science, 2010, Vol.65 (1), p.343-350 |
issn | 0009-2509 1873-4405 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00432294v1 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Applied sciences Biological Biological and medical sciences Biotechnology Chemical and Process Engineering Chemical engineering Compartmental modelling Computational fluid dynamics Computer simulation Engineering Sciences Exact sciences and technology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General purification processes Hydrodynamics Hydrodynamics of contact apparatus Mathematical models Methods. Procedures. Technologies Modelling Multiphase reactors Navier-Stokes equations Others Pollution Reactors Simulation Tracer experiment Various methods and equipments Wastewater treatment Wastewaters Water treatment and pollution |
title | Comparison of systemic, compartmental and CFD modelling approaches: Application to the simulation of a biological reactor of wastewater treatment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T02%3A41%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20systemic,%20compartmental%20and%20CFD%20modelling%20approaches:%20Application%20to%20the%20simulation%20of%20a%20biological%20reactor%20of%20wastewater%20treatment&rft.jtitle=Chemical%20engineering%20science&rft.au=Le%20Moullec,%20Y.&rft.date=2010&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=343&rft.epage=350&rft.pages=343-350&rft.issn=0009-2509&rft.eissn=1873-4405&rft.coden=CESCAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ces.2009.06.035&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E21110583%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21110583&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S000925090900431X&rfr_iscdi=true |