Eubacterial PCR for Bacterial Detection and Identification in 100 Acute Postcataract Surgery Endophthalmitis
To evaluate eubacterial PCR compared with conventional cultures for detection and identification of bacterial agents in ocular samples from patients with acute postcataract endophthalmitis. Broad-range eubacterial PCR amplification was used, followed by direct DNA sequencing in ocular samples (aqueo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 2008-05, Vol.49 (5), p.1971-1978 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1978 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1971 |
container_title | Investigative ophthalmology & visual science |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Chiquet, Christophe Cornut, Pierre-Loic Benito, Yvonne Thuret, Gilles Maurin, Max Lafontaine, Pierre-Olivier Pechinot, Andre Palombi, Karine Lina, Gerard Bron, Alain Denis, Philippe Carricajo, Anne Creuzot, Catherine Romanet, Jean-Paul Vandenesch, Francois French Institutional Endophthalmitis Study (FRIENDS) Group |
description | To evaluate eubacterial PCR compared with conventional cultures for detection and identification of bacterial agents in ocular samples from patients with acute postcataract endophthalmitis.
Broad-range eubacterial PCR amplification was used, followed by direct DNA sequencing in ocular samples (aqueous humor, vitreous samples from tap or vitrectomy) from 100 consecutive patients presenting with acute postcataract endophthalmitis. Bacterial cultures were performed on the same ocular samples by using traditional methods (brain-heart infusion broth).
At the time of admission, the detection rate was not significantly different between cultures and PCR (38.2% for cultures versus 34.6% for PCR in aqueous humor samples; 54% versus 57% in vitreous from a vitreous tap). In contrast, in the vitreous obtained from vitrectomy, after intravitreous injection of antibiotics, PCR detected bacteria in 70% of the cases, compared with 9% in cultures. By combining PCR and cultures, bacterial identification was obtained in 47% of aqueous humor samples at admission, in 68% of vitreous samples from a vitreous tap at admission, and in 72% of vitreous samples from pars plana vitrectomy. Gram-positive bacteria predominated (94.3%). The concordance between cultures and PCR was 100%. The contamination rate was 2%.
Cultures and eubacterial PCR are complementary techniques for bacterial identification in eyes with acute postcataract endophthalmitis. PCR technique was needed for identification of the involved microbial pathogen in 25% of all the cases. Eubacterial PCR is more effective than cultures in detecting bacteria in vitreous samples from patients with previous intravitreous administration of antibiotics. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1167/iovs.07-1377 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00409986v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69136849</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-59f28fbadf8b6b4c9bcaa15638cea2aff97167f3e093e4f63d8823d45350ff773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkc1vEzEQxS0EoqFw44x8AQmJLfbau2sfQwi0UiQqPs7WrNdujLzr1PY26n-PQ6L0ZOnpN2887yH0lpIrStvuswsP6Yp0FWVd9wwtaNPUVdMJ9hwtCOVtRTjhF-hVSn8JqSmtyUt0QQVnrajFAvn13IPOJjrw-Hb1E9sQ8Zez8tVko7MLE4ZpwDeDmbKzTsN_yU2YEoKXes4G34aUiw6xzOJfc7wz8RGvpyHstnkLfnTZpdfohQWfzJvTe4n-fFv_Xl1Xmx_fb1bLTaW5ELlqpK2F7WGwom97rmWvAWjTMqEN1GCt7MrhlhkimeG2ZYMQNRt4wxpibdexS_Tx6FsWq110I8RHFcCp6-VGHTRSQpFStA-0sB-O7C6G-9mkrEaXtPEeJhPmpFpJS1RcFvDTEdQxpBSNPTtTog5NqEMTinTq0ETB35185340wxN8ir4A708AJA3eRpi0S2euJozQVsinD27d3XbvolFpBO-LLVX7_Z5L1ShaEmH_ALsxnuw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69136849</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Eubacterial PCR for Bacterial Detection and Identification in 100 Acute Postcataract Surgery Endophthalmitis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Chiquet, Christophe ; Cornut, Pierre-Loic ; Benito, Yvonne ; Thuret, Gilles ; Maurin, Max ; Lafontaine, Pierre-Olivier ; Pechinot, Andre ; Palombi, Karine ; Lina, Gerard ; Bron, Alain ; Denis, Philippe ; Carricajo, Anne ; Creuzot, Catherine ; Romanet, Jean-Paul ; Vandenesch, Francois ; French Institutional Endophthalmitis Study (FRIENDS) Group</creator><creatorcontrib>Chiquet, Christophe ; Cornut, Pierre-Loic ; Benito, Yvonne ; Thuret, Gilles ; Maurin, Max ; Lafontaine, Pierre-Olivier ; Pechinot, Andre ; Palombi, Karine ; Lina, Gerard ; Bron, Alain ; Denis, Philippe ; Carricajo, Anne ; Creuzot, Catherine ; Romanet, Jean-Paul ; Vandenesch, Francois ; French Institutional Endophthalmitis Study (FRIENDS) Group ; French Institutional Endophthalmitis Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate eubacterial PCR compared with conventional cultures for detection and identification of bacterial agents in ocular samples from patients with acute postcataract endophthalmitis.
Broad-range eubacterial PCR amplification was used, followed by direct DNA sequencing in ocular samples (aqueous humor, vitreous samples from tap or vitrectomy) from 100 consecutive patients presenting with acute postcataract endophthalmitis. Bacterial cultures were performed on the same ocular samples by using traditional methods (brain-heart infusion broth).
At the time of admission, the detection rate was not significantly different between cultures and PCR (38.2% for cultures versus 34.6% for PCR in aqueous humor samples; 54% versus 57% in vitreous from a vitreous tap). In contrast, in the vitreous obtained from vitrectomy, after intravitreous injection of antibiotics, PCR detected bacteria in 70% of the cases, compared with 9% in cultures. By combining PCR and cultures, bacterial identification was obtained in 47% of aqueous humor samples at admission, in 68% of vitreous samples from a vitreous tap at admission, and in 72% of vitreous samples from pars plana vitrectomy. Gram-positive bacteria predominated (94.3%). The concordance between cultures and PCR was 100%. The contamination rate was 2%.
Cultures and eubacterial PCR are complementary techniques for bacterial identification in eyes with acute postcataract endophthalmitis. PCR technique was needed for identification of the involved microbial pathogen in 25% of all the cases. Eubacterial PCR is more effective than cultures in detecting bacteria in vitreous samples from patients with previous intravitreous administration of antibiotics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-0404</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1552-5783</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-5783</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1167/iovs.07-1377</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18436828</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IOVSDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Rockville, MD: ARVO</publisher><subject>Acute Disease ; Aged ; Aqueous Humor ; Aqueous Humor - microbiology ; Bacteria ; Bacteria - genetics ; Bacteria - isolation & purification ; Bacteriological Techniques ; Biochemistry, Molecular Biology ; Biological and medical sciences ; DNA, Bacterial ; DNA, Bacterial - analysis ; Endophthalmitis ; Endophthalmitis - microbiology ; Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision ; Eye Infections, Bacterial ; Eye Infections, Bacterial - microbiology ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Life Sciences ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Ophthalmology ; Phacoemulsification ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; Postoperative Complications ; Prospective Studies ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics ; Sequence Analysis, DNA ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs ; Vitreous Body ; Vitreous Body - microbiology</subject><ispartof>Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2008-05, Vol.49 (5), p.1971-1978</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-59f28fbadf8b6b4c9bcaa15638cea2aff97167f3e093e4f63d8823d45350ff773</citedby><orcidid>0009-0006-3944-3820 ; 0000-0001-9412-7106</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20301689$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18436828$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-00409986$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chiquet, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornut, Pierre-Loic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benito, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thuret, Gilles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maurin, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lafontaine, Pierre-Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pechinot, Andre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palombi, Karine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lina, Gerard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bron, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denis, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carricajo, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creuzot, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romanet, Jean-Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandenesch, Francois</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French Institutional Endophthalmitis Study (FRIENDS) Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French Institutional Endophthalmitis Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Eubacterial PCR for Bacterial Detection and Identification in 100 Acute Postcataract Surgery Endophthalmitis</title><title>Investigative ophthalmology & visual science</title><addtitle>Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci</addtitle><description>To evaluate eubacterial PCR compared with conventional cultures for detection and identification of bacterial agents in ocular samples from patients with acute postcataract endophthalmitis.
Broad-range eubacterial PCR amplification was used, followed by direct DNA sequencing in ocular samples (aqueous humor, vitreous samples from tap or vitrectomy) from 100 consecutive patients presenting with acute postcataract endophthalmitis. Bacterial cultures were performed on the same ocular samples by using traditional methods (brain-heart infusion broth).
At the time of admission, the detection rate was not significantly different between cultures and PCR (38.2% for cultures versus 34.6% for PCR in aqueous humor samples; 54% versus 57% in vitreous from a vitreous tap). In contrast, in the vitreous obtained from vitrectomy, after intravitreous injection of antibiotics, PCR detected bacteria in 70% of the cases, compared with 9% in cultures. By combining PCR and cultures, bacterial identification was obtained in 47% of aqueous humor samples at admission, in 68% of vitreous samples from a vitreous tap at admission, and in 72% of vitreous samples from pars plana vitrectomy. Gram-positive bacteria predominated (94.3%). The concordance between cultures and PCR was 100%. The contamination rate was 2%.
Cultures and eubacterial PCR are complementary techniques for bacterial identification in eyes with acute postcataract endophthalmitis. PCR technique was needed for identification of the involved microbial pathogen in 25% of all the cases. Eubacterial PCR is more effective than cultures in detecting bacteria in vitreous samples from patients with previous intravitreous administration of antibiotics.</description><subject>Acute Disease</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aqueous Humor</subject><subject>Aqueous Humor - microbiology</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacteria - genetics</subject><subject>Bacteria - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Bacteriological Techniques</subject><subject>Biochemistry, Molecular Biology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - analysis</subject><subject>Endophthalmitis</subject><subject>Endophthalmitis - microbiology</subject><subject>Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision</subject><subject>Eye Infections, Bacterial</subject><subject>Eye Infections, Bacterial - microbiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Phacoemulsification</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis, DNA</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><subject>Vitreous Body</subject><subject>Vitreous Body - microbiology</subject><issn>0146-0404</issn><issn>1552-5783</issn><issn>1552-5783</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkc1vEzEQxS0EoqFw44x8AQmJLfbau2sfQwi0UiQqPs7WrNdujLzr1PY26n-PQ6L0ZOnpN2887yH0lpIrStvuswsP6Yp0FWVd9wwtaNPUVdMJ9hwtCOVtRTjhF-hVSn8JqSmtyUt0QQVnrajFAvn13IPOJjrw-Hb1E9sQ8Zez8tVko7MLE4ZpwDeDmbKzTsN_yU2YEoKXes4G34aUiw6xzOJfc7wz8RGvpyHstnkLfnTZpdfohQWfzJvTe4n-fFv_Xl1Xmx_fb1bLTaW5ELlqpK2F7WGwom97rmWvAWjTMqEN1GCt7MrhlhkimeG2ZYMQNRt4wxpibdexS_Tx6FsWq110I8RHFcCp6-VGHTRSQpFStA-0sB-O7C6G-9mkrEaXtPEeJhPmpFpJS1RcFvDTEdQxpBSNPTtTog5NqEMTinTq0ETB35185340wxN8ir4A708AJA3eRpi0S2euJozQVsinD27d3XbvolFpBO-LLVX7_Z5L1ShaEmH_ALsxnuw</recordid><startdate>20080501</startdate><enddate>20080501</enddate><creator>Chiquet, Christophe</creator><creator>Cornut, Pierre-Loic</creator><creator>Benito, Yvonne</creator><creator>Thuret, Gilles</creator><creator>Maurin, Max</creator><creator>Lafontaine, Pierre-Olivier</creator><creator>Pechinot, Andre</creator><creator>Palombi, Karine</creator><creator>Lina, Gerard</creator><creator>Bron, Alain</creator><creator>Denis, Philippe</creator><creator>Carricajo, Anne</creator><creator>Creuzot, Catherine</creator><creator>Romanet, Jean-Paul</creator><creator>Vandenesch, Francois</creator><creator>French Institutional Endophthalmitis Study (FRIENDS) Group</creator><general>ARVO</general><general>Association for Research in Vision and Ophtalmology</general><general>Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3944-3820</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9412-7106</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20080501</creationdate><title>Eubacterial PCR for Bacterial Detection and Identification in 100 Acute Postcataract Surgery Endophthalmitis</title><author>Chiquet, Christophe ; Cornut, Pierre-Loic ; Benito, Yvonne ; Thuret, Gilles ; Maurin, Max ; Lafontaine, Pierre-Olivier ; Pechinot, Andre ; Palombi, Karine ; Lina, Gerard ; Bron, Alain ; Denis, Philippe ; Carricajo, Anne ; Creuzot, Catherine ; Romanet, Jean-Paul ; Vandenesch, Francois ; French Institutional Endophthalmitis Study (FRIENDS) Group</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-59f28fbadf8b6b4c9bcaa15638cea2aff97167f3e093e4f63d8823d45350ff773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Acute Disease</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aqueous Humor</topic><topic>Aqueous Humor - microbiology</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacteria - genetics</topic><topic>Bacteria - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Bacteriological Techniques</topic><topic>Biochemistry, Molecular Biology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - analysis</topic><topic>Endophthalmitis</topic><topic>Endophthalmitis - microbiology</topic><topic>Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision</topic><topic>Eye Infections, Bacterial</topic><topic>Eye Infections, Bacterial - microbiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Phacoemulsification</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis, DNA</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><topic>Vitreous Body</topic><topic>Vitreous Body - microbiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chiquet, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornut, Pierre-Loic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benito, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thuret, Gilles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maurin, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lafontaine, Pierre-Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pechinot, Andre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palombi, Karine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lina, Gerard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bron, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denis, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carricajo, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creuzot, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romanet, Jean-Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandenesch, Francois</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French Institutional Endophthalmitis Study (FRIENDS) Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French Institutional Endophthalmitis Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Investigative ophthalmology & visual science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chiquet, Christophe</au><au>Cornut, Pierre-Loic</au><au>Benito, Yvonne</au><au>Thuret, Gilles</au><au>Maurin, Max</au><au>Lafontaine, Pierre-Olivier</au><au>Pechinot, Andre</au><au>Palombi, Karine</au><au>Lina, Gerard</au><au>Bron, Alain</au><au>Denis, Philippe</au><au>Carricajo, Anne</au><au>Creuzot, Catherine</au><au>Romanet, Jean-Paul</au><au>Vandenesch, Francois</au><au>French Institutional Endophthalmitis Study (FRIENDS) Group</au><aucorp>French Institutional Endophthalmitis Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Eubacterial PCR for Bacterial Detection and Identification in 100 Acute Postcataract Surgery Endophthalmitis</atitle><jtitle>Investigative ophthalmology & visual science</jtitle><addtitle>Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci</addtitle><date>2008-05-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1971</spage><epage>1978</epage><pages>1971-1978</pages><issn>0146-0404</issn><issn>1552-5783</issn><eissn>1552-5783</eissn><coden>IOVSDA</coden><abstract>To evaluate eubacterial PCR compared with conventional cultures for detection and identification of bacterial agents in ocular samples from patients with acute postcataract endophthalmitis.
Broad-range eubacterial PCR amplification was used, followed by direct DNA sequencing in ocular samples (aqueous humor, vitreous samples from tap or vitrectomy) from 100 consecutive patients presenting with acute postcataract endophthalmitis. Bacterial cultures were performed on the same ocular samples by using traditional methods (brain-heart infusion broth).
At the time of admission, the detection rate was not significantly different between cultures and PCR (38.2% for cultures versus 34.6% for PCR in aqueous humor samples; 54% versus 57% in vitreous from a vitreous tap). In contrast, in the vitreous obtained from vitrectomy, after intravitreous injection of antibiotics, PCR detected bacteria in 70% of the cases, compared with 9% in cultures. By combining PCR and cultures, bacterial identification was obtained in 47% of aqueous humor samples at admission, in 68% of vitreous samples from a vitreous tap at admission, and in 72% of vitreous samples from pars plana vitrectomy. Gram-positive bacteria predominated (94.3%). The concordance between cultures and PCR was 100%. The contamination rate was 2%.
Cultures and eubacterial PCR are complementary techniques for bacterial identification in eyes with acute postcataract endophthalmitis. PCR technique was needed for identification of the involved microbial pathogen in 25% of all the cases. Eubacterial PCR is more effective than cultures in detecting bacteria in vitreous samples from patients with previous intravitreous administration of antibiotics.</abstract><cop>Rockville, MD</cop><pub>ARVO</pub><pmid>18436828</pmid><doi>10.1167/iovs.07-1377</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3944-3820</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9412-7106</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0146-0404 |
ispartof | Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2008-05, Vol.49 (5), p.1971-1978 |
issn | 0146-0404 1552-5783 1552-5783 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00409986v1 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Acute Disease Aged Aqueous Humor Aqueous Humor - microbiology Bacteria Bacteria - genetics Bacteria - isolation & purification Bacteriological Techniques Biochemistry, Molecular Biology Biological and medical sciences DNA, Bacterial DNA, Bacterial - analysis Endophthalmitis Endophthalmitis - microbiology Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision Eye Infections, Bacterial Eye Infections, Bacterial - microbiology Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Life Sciences Male Medical sciences Ophthalmology Phacoemulsification Polymerase Chain Reaction Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods Postoperative Complications Prospective Studies RNA, Ribosomal, 16S RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics Sequence Analysis, DNA Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs Vitreous Body Vitreous Body - microbiology |
title | Eubacterial PCR for Bacterial Detection and Identification in 100 Acute Postcataract Surgery Endophthalmitis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T19%3A39%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Eubacterial%20PCR%20for%20Bacterial%20Detection%20and%20Identification%20in%20100%20Acute%20Postcataract%20Surgery%20Endophthalmitis&rft.jtitle=Investigative%20ophthalmology%20&%20visual%20science&rft.au=Chiquet,%20Christophe&rft.aucorp=French%20Institutional%20Endophthalmitis%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2008-05-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1971&rft.epage=1978&rft.pages=1971-1978&rft.issn=0146-0404&rft.eissn=1552-5783&rft.coden=IOVSDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1167/iovs.07-1377&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E69136849%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69136849&rft_id=info:pmid/18436828&rfr_iscdi=true |