Relationship between reversed sexual dimorphism, breeding investment and foraging ecology in a pelagic seabird, the masked booby
Reversed sexual dimorphism (RSD) may be related to different roles in breeding investment and/or foraging, but little information is available on foraging ecology. We studied the foraging behaviour and parental investment by male and female masked boobies, a species with RSD, by combining studies of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Oecologia 2009-09, Vol.161 (3), p.637-649 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 649 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 637 |
container_title | Oecologia |
container_volume | 161 |
creator | Weimerskirch, Henri Le Corre, Matthieu Gadenne, Hélène Pinaud, David Kato, Akiko Ropert-Coudert, Yan Bost, Charles-André |
description | Reversed sexual dimorphism (RSD) may be related to different roles in breeding investment and/or foraging, but little information is available on foraging ecology. We studied the foraging behaviour and parental investment by male and female masked boobies, a species with RSD, by combining studies of foraging ecology using miniaturised activity and GPS data loggers of nest attendance, with an experimental study where flight costs were increased. Males attended the chick more often than females, but females provided more food to the chick than males. Males and females foraged during similar periods of the day, had similar prey types and sizes, diving depths, durations of foraging trips, foraging zones and ranges. Females spent a smaller proportion of the foraging trip sitting on the water and had higher diving rate than males, suggesting higher foraging effort by females. In females, trip duration correlated with mass at departure, suggesting a flexible investment through control by body mass. The experimental study showed that handicapped females and female partners of handicapped males lost mass compared to control birds, whereas there was no difference for males. These results indicate that the larger female is the main provisioner of the chick in the pair, and regulates breeding effort in relation to its own body mass, whereas males have a fixed investment. The different breeding investment between the sexes is associated with contrasting foraging strategies, but no clear niche differentiation was observed. The larger size of the females may be advantageous for provisioning the chick with large quantities of energy and for flexible breeding effort, while the smaller male invests in territory defence and nest guarding, a crucial task when breeding at high densities. In masked boobies, division of labour appears to be maximal during chick rearing—the most energy-demanding period—and may be related to evolution of RSD. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00442-009-1397-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00401586v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40310170</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40310170</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-91b888e759903c85368af1d0dcaced710bfa7095be1237c0a95aa87e78fc36f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUGP0zAQhSMEYkvhB3AALKQFIW1gHDuxfVytgEWqhATsOXKcSeqSxF07LfS2Px1HqQrisCdL8755fjOTJM8pvKcA4kMA4DxLAVRKmRKpeJAsKGdZShVTD5MFQKZSmXN1ljwJYQNAOc3zx8kZVTnnINgiufuGnR6tG8LabkmF4y_EgXjcow9Yk4C_d7ojte2d365t6C9I5RFrO7TEDnsMY4_DSPRQk8Z53U51NK5z7SHqRJNttG-tiUa6sr6-IOMaSa_Dz2heOVcdniaPGt0FfHZ8l8nNp48_rq7T1dfPX64uV6nJhRhTRSspJYpcKWBG5qyQuqE11EYbrAWFqtECVF4hzZgwoFWutRQoZGNY0TC2TN7NvmvdlVtve-0PpdO2vL5clVMt7hJoLos9jezbmd16d7uLQ5a9DQa7Tg_odqEUjKlCKjqRb-4lM1BcKSkj-Po_cON2fogTl1QpxmPoLEJ0hox3IXhsTkEplNPFy_niMasqp4vHJMvk5dF4V_VY_-04njgC50dAB6O7xuvB2HDiMioZ53waJZu5EKWhRf9Pwnt-fzE3bcLo_MmUA6NABUT91aw32pW69fHjm-8ZUAa0KFRcOPsD9mTV9g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199342372</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relationship between reversed sexual dimorphism, breeding investment and foraging ecology in a pelagic seabird, the masked booby</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Weimerskirch, Henri ; Le Corre, Matthieu ; Gadenne, Hélène ; Pinaud, David ; Kato, Akiko ; Ropert-Coudert, Yan ; Bost, Charles-André</creator><creatorcontrib>Weimerskirch, Henri ; Le Corre, Matthieu ; Gadenne, Hélène ; Pinaud, David ; Kato, Akiko ; Ropert-Coudert, Yan ; Bost, Charles-André</creatorcontrib><description>Reversed sexual dimorphism (RSD) may be related to different roles in breeding investment and/or foraging, but little information is available on foraging ecology. We studied the foraging behaviour and parental investment by male and female masked boobies, a species with RSD, by combining studies of foraging ecology using miniaturised activity and GPS data loggers of nest attendance, with an experimental study where flight costs were increased. Males attended the chick more often than females, but females provided more food to the chick than males. Males and females foraged during similar periods of the day, had similar prey types and sizes, diving depths, durations of foraging trips, foraging zones and ranges. Females spent a smaller proportion of the foraging trip sitting on the water and had higher diving rate than males, suggesting higher foraging effort by females. In females, trip duration correlated with mass at departure, suggesting a flexible investment through control by body mass. The experimental study showed that handicapped females and female partners of handicapped males lost mass compared to control birds, whereas there was no difference for males. These results indicate that the larger female is the main provisioner of the chick in the pair, and regulates breeding effort in relation to its own body mass, whereas males have a fixed investment. The different breeding investment between the sexes is associated with contrasting foraging strategies, but no clear niche differentiation was observed. The larger size of the females may be advantageous for provisioning the chick with large quantities of energy and for flexible breeding effort, while the smaller male invests in territory defence and nest guarding, a crucial task when breeding at high densities. In masked boobies, division of labour appears to be maximal during chick rearing—the most energy-demanding period—and may be related to evolution of RSD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-8549</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00442-009-1397-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19544073</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OECOBX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Aerial locomotion ; Analysis of Variance ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal breeding ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Appetitive Behavior - physiology ; Aquatic birds ; Aves ; Behavioral Ecology - Original Paper ; Behavioral Ecology - Original Papers ; Biodiversity ; Biodiversity and Ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Bird nesting ; Birds - physiology ; Body Weight ; Breeding ; Chickens ; Chicks ; Diet ; Diving ; Division of labor ; Ecology ; Environmental Sciences ; Feeding Behavior - physiology ; Female ; Female animals ; Foraging ; Foraging behavior ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gastrointestinal Contents ; General aspects ; Global positioning systems ; GPS ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Life Sciences ; Male ; Male animals ; Marine ; Maternal Behavior - physiology ; Mating behavior ; Pacific Islands ; Paternal Behavior ; Plant Sciences ; Populations and Evolution ; Sea birds ; Sex Characteristics ; Sexual Behavior, Animal - physiology ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Telemetry ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><ispartof>Oecologia, 2009-09, Vol.161 (3), p.637-649</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heildelberg</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2009</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-91b888e759903c85368af1d0dcaced710bfa7095be1237c0a95aa87e78fc36f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-91b888e759903c85368af1d0dcaced710bfa7095be1237c0a95aa87e78fc36f33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1194-351X ; 0000-0002-0457-586X ; 0000-0002-5259-9073 ; 0000-0002-8372-9440 ; 0000-0001-6494-5300</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40310170$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40310170$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,799,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21834441$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19544073$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-00401586$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weimerskirch, Henri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Corre, Matthieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gadenne, Hélène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinaud, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Akiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ropert-Coudert, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bost, Charles-André</creatorcontrib><title>Relationship between reversed sexual dimorphism, breeding investment and foraging ecology in a pelagic seabird, the masked booby</title><title>Oecologia</title><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><description>Reversed sexual dimorphism (RSD) may be related to different roles in breeding investment and/or foraging, but little information is available on foraging ecology. We studied the foraging behaviour and parental investment by male and female masked boobies, a species with RSD, by combining studies of foraging ecology using miniaturised activity and GPS data loggers of nest attendance, with an experimental study where flight costs were increased. Males attended the chick more often than females, but females provided more food to the chick than males. Males and females foraged during similar periods of the day, had similar prey types and sizes, diving depths, durations of foraging trips, foraging zones and ranges. Females spent a smaller proportion of the foraging trip sitting on the water and had higher diving rate than males, suggesting higher foraging effort by females. In females, trip duration correlated with mass at departure, suggesting a flexible investment through control by body mass. The experimental study showed that handicapped females and female partners of handicapped males lost mass compared to control birds, whereas there was no difference for males. These results indicate that the larger female is the main provisioner of the chick in the pair, and regulates breeding effort in relation to its own body mass, whereas males have a fixed investment. The different breeding investment between the sexes is associated with contrasting foraging strategies, but no clear niche differentiation was observed. The larger size of the females may be advantageous for provisioning the chick with large quantities of energy and for flexible breeding effort, while the smaller male invests in territory defence and nest guarding, a crucial task when breeding at high densities. In masked boobies, division of labour appears to be maximal during chick rearing—the most energy-demanding period—and may be related to evolution of RSD.</description><subject>Aerial locomotion</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal breeding</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Appetitive Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Aquatic birds</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Behavioral Ecology - Original Paper</subject><subject>Behavioral Ecology - Original Papers</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biodiversity and Ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Birds - physiology</subject><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Chicks</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Diving</subject><subject>Division of labor</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Contents</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Global positioning systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Male animals</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Maternal Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Mating behavior</subject><subject>Pacific Islands</subject><subject>Paternal Behavior</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Populations and Evolution</subject><subject>Sea birds</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior, Animal - physiology</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Telemetry</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><issn>0029-8549</issn><issn>1432-1939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUGP0zAQhSMEYkvhB3AALKQFIW1gHDuxfVytgEWqhATsOXKcSeqSxF07LfS2Px1HqQrisCdL8755fjOTJM8pvKcA4kMA4DxLAVRKmRKpeJAsKGdZShVTD5MFQKZSmXN1ljwJYQNAOc3zx8kZVTnnINgiufuGnR6tG8LabkmF4y_EgXjcow9Yk4C_d7ojte2d365t6C9I5RFrO7TEDnsMY4_DSPRQk8Z53U51NK5z7SHqRJNttG-tiUa6sr6-IOMaSa_Dz2heOVcdniaPGt0FfHZ8l8nNp48_rq7T1dfPX64uV6nJhRhTRSspJYpcKWBG5qyQuqE11EYbrAWFqtECVF4hzZgwoFWutRQoZGNY0TC2TN7NvmvdlVtve-0PpdO2vL5clVMt7hJoLos9jezbmd16d7uLQ5a9DQa7Tg_odqEUjKlCKjqRb-4lM1BcKSkj-Po_cON2fogTl1QpxmPoLEJ0hox3IXhsTkEplNPFy_niMasqp4vHJMvk5dF4V_VY_-04njgC50dAB6O7xuvB2HDiMioZ53waJZu5EKWhRf9Pwnt-fzE3bcLo_MmUA6NABUT91aw32pW69fHjm-8ZUAa0KFRcOPsD9mTV9g</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>Weimerskirch, Henri</creator><creator>Le Corre, Matthieu</creator><creator>Gadenne, Hélène</creator><creator>Pinaud, David</creator><creator>Kato, Akiko</creator><creator>Ropert-Coudert, Yan</creator><creator>Bost, Charles-André</creator><general>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1194-351X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0457-586X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5259-9073</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8372-9440</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6494-5300</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>Relationship between reversed sexual dimorphism, breeding investment and foraging ecology in a pelagic seabird, the masked booby</title><author>Weimerskirch, Henri ; Le Corre, Matthieu ; Gadenne, Hélène ; Pinaud, David ; Kato, Akiko ; Ropert-Coudert, Yan ; Bost, Charles-André</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-91b888e759903c85368af1d0dcaced710bfa7095be1237c0a95aa87e78fc36f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aerial locomotion</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal breeding</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Appetitive Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Aquatic birds</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Behavioral Ecology - Original Paper</topic><topic>Behavioral Ecology - Original Papers</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biodiversity and Ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Birds - physiology</topic><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Chicks</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Diving</topic><topic>Division of labor</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Contents</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Global positioning systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Male animals</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Maternal Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Mating behavior</topic><topic>Pacific Islands</topic><topic>Paternal Behavior</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Populations and Evolution</topic><topic>Sea birds</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior, Animal - physiology</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Telemetry</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weimerskirch, Henri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Corre, Matthieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gadenne, Hélène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinaud, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Akiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ropert-Coudert, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bost, Charles-André</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weimerskirch, Henri</au><au>Le Corre, Matthieu</au><au>Gadenne, Hélène</au><au>Pinaud, David</au><au>Kato, Akiko</au><au>Ropert-Coudert, Yan</au><au>Bost, Charles-André</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relationship between reversed sexual dimorphism, breeding investment and foraging ecology in a pelagic seabird, the masked booby</atitle><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle><stitle>Oecologia</stitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>161</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>637</spage><epage>649</epage><pages>637-649</pages><issn>0029-8549</issn><eissn>1432-1939</eissn><coden>OECOBX</coden><abstract>Reversed sexual dimorphism (RSD) may be related to different roles in breeding investment and/or foraging, but little information is available on foraging ecology. We studied the foraging behaviour and parental investment by male and female masked boobies, a species with RSD, by combining studies of foraging ecology using miniaturised activity and GPS data loggers of nest attendance, with an experimental study where flight costs were increased. Males attended the chick more often than females, but females provided more food to the chick than males. Males and females foraged during similar periods of the day, had similar prey types and sizes, diving depths, durations of foraging trips, foraging zones and ranges. Females spent a smaller proportion of the foraging trip sitting on the water and had higher diving rate than males, suggesting higher foraging effort by females. In females, trip duration correlated with mass at departure, suggesting a flexible investment through control by body mass. The experimental study showed that handicapped females and female partners of handicapped males lost mass compared to control birds, whereas there was no difference for males. These results indicate that the larger female is the main provisioner of the chick in the pair, and regulates breeding effort in relation to its own body mass, whereas males have a fixed investment. The different breeding investment between the sexes is associated with contrasting foraging strategies, but no clear niche differentiation was observed. The larger size of the females may be advantageous for provisioning the chick with large quantities of energy and for flexible breeding effort, while the smaller male invests in territory defence and nest guarding, a crucial task when breeding at high densities. In masked boobies, division of labour appears to be maximal during chick rearing—the most energy-demanding period—and may be related to evolution of RSD.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>19544073</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00442-009-1397-7</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1194-351X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0457-586X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5259-9073</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8372-9440</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6494-5300</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0029-8549 |
ispartof | Oecologia, 2009-09, Vol.161 (3), p.637-649 |
issn | 0029-8549 1432-1939 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00401586v1 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Aerial locomotion Analysis of Variance Animal and plant ecology Animal breeding Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Appetitive Behavior - physiology Aquatic birds Aves Behavioral Ecology - Original Paper Behavioral Ecology - Original Papers Biodiversity Biodiversity and Ecology Biological and medical sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Bird nesting Birds - physiology Body Weight Breeding Chickens Chicks Diet Diving Division of labor Ecology Environmental Sciences Feeding Behavior - physiology Female Female animals Foraging Foraging behavior Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Gastrointestinal Contents General aspects Global positioning systems GPS Hydrology/Water Resources Life Sciences Male Male animals Marine Maternal Behavior - physiology Mating behavior Pacific Islands Paternal Behavior Plant Sciences Populations and Evolution Sea birds Sex Characteristics Sexual Behavior, Animal - physiology Statistics, Nonparametric Telemetry Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution |
title | Relationship between reversed sexual dimorphism, breeding investment and foraging ecology in a pelagic seabird, the masked booby |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T12%3A19%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relationship%20between%20reversed%20sexual%20dimorphism,%20breeding%20investment%20and%20foraging%20ecology%20in%20a%20pelagic%20seabird,%20the%20masked%20booby&rft.jtitle=Oecologia&rft.au=Weimerskirch,%20Henri&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=161&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=637&rft.epage=649&rft.pages=637-649&rft.issn=0029-8549&rft.eissn=1432-1939&rft.coden=OECOBX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00442-009-1397-7&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_hal_p%3E40310170%3C/jstor_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199342372&rft_id=info:pmid/19544073&rft_jstor_id=40310170&rfr_iscdi=true |