Comparison between a model-based and a conventional pyramid sensor reconstructor
A model of a non-modulated pyramid wavefront sensor (P-WFS) based on Fourier optics has been presented. Linearizations of the model represented as Jacobian matrices are used to improve the P-WFS phase estimates. It has been shown in simulations that a linear approximation of the P-WFS is sufficient...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Applied Optics 2007-08, Vol.46 (24), p.6176-6184 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 6184 |
---|---|
container_issue | 24 |
container_start_page | 6176 |
container_title | Applied Optics |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Korkiakoski, Visa Vérinaud, Christophe Le Louarn, Miska Conan, Rodolphe |
description | A model of a non-modulated pyramid wavefront sensor (P-WFS) based on Fourier optics has been presented. Linearizations of the model represented as Jacobian matrices are used to improve the P-WFS phase estimates. It has been shown in simulations that a linear approximation of the P-WFS is sufficient in closed-loop adaptive optics. Also a method to compute model-based synthetic P-WFS command matrices is shown, and its performance is compared to the conventional calibration. It was observed that in poor visibility the new calibration is better than the conventional. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1364/AO.46.006176 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00398538v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68185598</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-f1eb92c359af9d1bb8d08670d2df1a09cc93ecf21492bc324e49d663c57dde8e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM9LwzAUx4Mobk5vnqUnQbAzP9o0OZahThjMg4K3kCavWGmbmrST_fd2dOghvPDe533hfRC6JnhJGE8e8u0y4UuMOcn4CZqTlMk4SSk9PfxTGRMqPmboIoQvjFmayOwczUiWEcoEm6PXlWs67avg2qiA_gegjXTUOAt1XOgANtLt-CLj2h20feVaXUfd3uumslGANjgfeRinofeD6Z2_RGelrgNcHesCvT89vq3W8Wb7_LLKN7FhlPVxSaCQ1LBU6lJaUhTCYsEzbKkticbSGMnAlJQkkhbjSgKJtJwzk2bWggC2QHdT7qeuVeerRvu9crpS63yjDr3xWilSJnZkZG8ntvPue4DQq6YKBupat-CGoLggYlQlRvB-Ao13IXgo_5IJVgfbKt-qhKvJ9ojfHHOHogH7Dx_1sl__OHq7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68185598</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between a model-based and a conventional pyramid sensor reconstructor</title><source>OSA_美国光学学会数据库1</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Korkiakoski, Visa ; Vérinaud, Christophe ; Le Louarn, Miska ; Conan, Rodolphe</creator><creatorcontrib>Korkiakoski, Visa ; Vérinaud, Christophe ; Le Louarn, Miska ; Conan, Rodolphe</creatorcontrib><description>A model of a non-modulated pyramid wavefront sensor (P-WFS) based on Fourier optics has been presented. Linearizations of the model represented as Jacobian matrices are used to improve the P-WFS phase estimates. It has been shown in simulations that a linear approximation of the P-WFS is sufficient in closed-loop adaptive optics. Also a method to compute model-based synthetic P-WFS command matrices is shown, and its performance is compared to the conventional calibration. It was observed that in poor visibility the new calibration is better than the conventional.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1559-128X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0003-6935</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-4522</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2155-3165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1364/AO.46.006176</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17712383</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Optical Society of America</publisher><ispartof>Applied Optics, 2007-08, Vol.46 (24), p.6176-6184</ispartof><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-f1eb92c359af9d1bb8d08670d2df1a09cc93ecf21492bc324e49d663c57dde8e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17712383$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-00398538$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Korkiakoski, Visa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vérinaud, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Louarn, Miska</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conan, Rodolphe</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between a model-based and a conventional pyramid sensor reconstructor</title><title>Applied Optics</title><addtitle>Appl Opt</addtitle><description>A model of a non-modulated pyramid wavefront sensor (P-WFS) based on Fourier optics has been presented. Linearizations of the model represented as Jacobian matrices are used to improve the P-WFS phase estimates. It has been shown in simulations that a linear approximation of the P-WFS is sufficient in closed-loop adaptive optics. Also a method to compute model-based synthetic P-WFS command matrices is shown, and its performance is compared to the conventional calibration. It was observed that in poor visibility the new calibration is better than the conventional.</description><issn>1559-128X</issn><issn>0003-6935</issn><issn>1539-4522</issn><issn>2155-3165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkM9LwzAUx4Mobk5vnqUnQbAzP9o0OZahThjMg4K3kCavWGmbmrST_fd2dOghvPDe533hfRC6JnhJGE8e8u0y4UuMOcn4CZqTlMk4SSk9PfxTGRMqPmboIoQvjFmayOwczUiWEcoEm6PXlWs67avg2qiA_gegjXTUOAt1XOgANtLt-CLj2h20feVaXUfd3uumslGANjgfeRinofeD6Z2_RGelrgNcHesCvT89vq3W8Wb7_LLKN7FhlPVxSaCQ1LBU6lJaUhTCYsEzbKkticbSGMnAlJQkkhbjSgKJtJwzk2bWggC2QHdT7qeuVeerRvu9crpS63yjDr3xWilSJnZkZG8ntvPue4DQq6YKBupat-CGoLggYlQlRvB-Ao13IXgo_5IJVgfbKt-qhKvJ9ojfHHOHogH7Dx_1sl__OHq7</recordid><startdate>20070820</startdate><enddate>20070820</enddate><creator>Korkiakoski, Visa</creator><creator>Vérinaud, Christophe</creator><creator>Le Louarn, Miska</creator><creator>Conan, Rodolphe</creator><general>Optical Society of America</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070820</creationdate><title>Comparison between a model-based and a conventional pyramid sensor reconstructor</title><author>Korkiakoski, Visa ; Vérinaud, Christophe ; Le Louarn, Miska ; Conan, Rodolphe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-f1eb92c359af9d1bb8d08670d2df1a09cc93ecf21492bc324e49d663c57dde8e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Korkiakoski, Visa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vérinaud, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Louarn, Miska</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conan, Rodolphe</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Applied Optics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Korkiakoski, Visa</au><au>Vérinaud, Christophe</au><au>Le Louarn, Miska</au><au>Conan, Rodolphe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between a model-based and a conventional pyramid sensor reconstructor</atitle><jtitle>Applied Optics</jtitle><addtitle>Appl Opt</addtitle><date>2007-08-20</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>6176</spage><epage>6184</epage><pages>6176-6184</pages><issn>1559-128X</issn><issn>0003-6935</issn><eissn>1539-4522</eissn><eissn>2155-3165</eissn><abstract>A model of a non-modulated pyramid wavefront sensor (P-WFS) based on Fourier optics has been presented. Linearizations of the model represented as Jacobian matrices are used to improve the P-WFS phase estimates. It has been shown in simulations that a linear approximation of the P-WFS is sufficient in closed-loop adaptive optics. Also a method to compute model-based synthetic P-WFS command matrices is shown, and its performance is compared to the conventional calibration. It was observed that in poor visibility the new calibration is better than the conventional.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Optical Society of America</pub><pmid>17712383</pmid><doi>10.1364/AO.46.006176</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1559-128X |
ispartof | Applied Optics, 2007-08, Vol.46 (24), p.6176-6184 |
issn | 1559-128X 0003-6935 1539-4522 2155-3165 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00398538v1 |
source | OSA_美国光学学会数据库1; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Comparison between a model-based and a conventional pyramid sensor reconstructor |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T18%3A25%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20a%20model-based%20and%20a%20conventional%20pyramid%20sensor%20reconstructor&rft.jtitle=Applied%20Optics&rft.au=Korkiakoski,%20Visa&rft.date=2007-08-20&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=6176&rft.epage=6184&rft.pages=6176-6184&rft.issn=1559-128X&rft.eissn=1539-4522&rft_id=info:doi/10.1364/AO.46.006176&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E68185598%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68185598&rft_id=info:pmid/17712383&rfr_iscdi=true |